2
pkvi_stannum 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ayh have literally been immersed in the environment -- it is 100% of failed gifting lies delivering nothing but bread and circus on the front end. Ayh used the Forbes report are affirmation of there being a discrepancy between product's promotion and global investments.

2
pkvi_stannum 2 points ago +2 / -0

The thing you have to look past is the characters on the stage -- they are stringless puppets being led by advisors and a blur of egos -- they likely only have a inkling of how they are contributing to the nightmare -- and some just surrender to it eventually (for reasons, eh Zion Don and Zion Musk?) Remember, the final red flag comes when DID is assigned to Starlink network.

0
pkvi_stannum 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ayh have to oppose you on all of this perspective this time -- there is no bubble and the bread and circus was always the front end "AI" theatrics just like crypto and nft, to gaslight/condition peasants to embrace a product that banks and gov manufactured and always intended to deploy.

The bubble dialog is superficial hyperbole from stringless puppets who argue from platforms within their lanes -- economist simply stating a mathematical reality -- but when has any thing in the last few decades prescribed to mathematical reality?

The red flag is plainly there -- we went from deploying a seemingly unviable unreliable gimmicky consumer product to global government investment in less than a year -- and persistently since with no obvious successes for consumers but OBVIOUS successes for surveillance and war.

2
pkvi_stannum 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is a reference to a film plot

2
pkvi_stannum 2 points ago +2 / -0

The tok and tubers who do that hand flailing italian feed the chicken hand motion. Open tok and you can not not see it from the soap boxers who are still toeing peasant lines

2
pkvi_stannum 2 points ago +2 / -0

We are two years out from any actionable retaliation but up until then while they* mask progress you must insist on nationalists that every thing is a bread and circus lie.

That we lost.

Not one thing the Zion Don show puts on equates to the damage done long term. Those unwilling to fight when the time comes can serve in other capacities like creating lists of users, locations, data. They must know they have a duty to contribute (bcz their lack of willingness is what got us here)

-2
pkvi_stannum -2 points ago +1 / -3

Thank you for proving you are the 100 IQ guy.

2
pkvi_stannum 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ayh would argue it is the same conspiracy -- always has been. It is a centuries old grift. The only difference today is the depth of the subversion to convince others to do some thing against their own interests.

1
pkvi_stannum 1 point ago +1 / -0

We could slaughter a million grifters tomorrow but obese black women will still buy chicken sandwiches bcz the sticker on the window and white middle aged women will stick buy SSRIs bcz a doctor thinks he shd.

1
pkvi_stannum 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no "autism" The conditions of adapting this quickly to societal conditions has been unstable and it allowed psychologists to claim any thing as a form of retardation.

Normalizing literacy is only truly less than 100 years but now the idea is if you can not read well, autism.

Autism flexed on actual mutative retardation and went from there at the behest the pharmaceutical industry.

2
pkvi_stannum 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ayh have spent 15 years advocating for review of particle theory for its algebraic necessity to embrace absolute nothingness as a dominate characteristic in nature -- and just even positing instability of particle theory is a "how dare you" to the conditioned brainwashed generations of students and professors whose indoctrination they wear on their sleeves like badges of honor. Ayh agree that it has become so corrupted in the last 120 years to profiteer from celebrity and tenure and publication. Einstein (who ayh disagree a lot with) became the benchmark of aspiration for theoretical physicists going forward, focusing more on the consumable theatrics than practical mechanical understanding.

3
pkvi_stannum 3 points ago +3 / -0

Going back to a weekly review -- this one was a generalization -- future ones will focus greater on the events of the week.

1
pkvi_stannum 1 point ago +1 / -0

The velocity of a government promoting a new product that consumers have no real interest or trust in (the acknowledgment of errors is robust), shd be enough of a red flag that one thing is not about another -- but -- the consume next product indoctrination has become so prevalent and cultural that arguably we have lost and the only solution going forward ayh have communicated many times now.

2
pkvi_stannum 2 points ago +2 / -0

examining

If the infrastructure was not inherent in the design of digital coin then it would not be up for discussion (for years)

1
pkvi_stannum 1 point ago +1 / -0

This same sort of line of logic where there is not a compilation so as to equate value is the same dogma that thinks encryption thru ISP is untouchable. There is a trail. There is a db of transactions. There are numerous companies that store your wallets, mining, etc -- hell one cunt mining company that stole my Doge ayh mined as an experiment bcz ayh did not collect it in time -- so how could they do this if the address was strictly mine? How do intelligence agencies recover crypto? The claims of no ledger is a lie. Data passes thru agencies you don't see -- the data is stored -- crypto is stored value -- made up value -- the address is a marker on a highway -- not the highway.

1
pkvi_stannum 1 point ago +1 / -0

The address is the storage of value as it is a promissory key to equate a value defined in storage. You can not claim a thing has no value by giving it credibility of value to access. Either the BTC address IS the note of value (which it is not) or the key is access to the address where the storage of value is represented. You can not exclude the system when you can see inside the wallet when you insert a key unassigned by you.

3
pkvi_stannum 3 points ago +3 / -0

Every legislative hysterics in the last 10 years has been circling around digital identity -- CoHoax, pornography, immigration, crime, "AI", ... nothing has felt authentic.

1
pkvi_stannum 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here is the glitch in the delusion you cling to about encryption -- the keys do not equate to the value. They equate to accessing stored value defined on a server. Your BTC address is not the storage of value. When you mine - the value is stored and must be distributed. Under your theory of isolation then you shd have a new wallet key every time you change the amount -- but that is not what happens. The wallet is a static DB owned by some one else. Your offline wallet can not exchange value peer to peer without internet connectivity eventually.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›