I've long said, based on stuff just like this, that Theoretical Physics and Archaeology are two of the most corrupt "industries" out there. You won't even get peer reviewed if you don't toe the narrative line, and you won't get funding either.
Ayh have spent 15 years advocating for review of particle theory for its algebraic necessity to embrace absolute nothingness as a dominate characteristic in nature -- and just even positing instability of particle theory is a "how dare you" to the conditioned brainwashed generations of students and professors whose indoctrination they wear on their sleeves like badges of honor. Ayh agree that it has become so corrupted in the last 120 years to profiteer from celebrity and tenure and publication. Einstein (who ayh disagree a lot with) became the benchmark of aspiration for theoretical physicists going forward, focusing more on the consumable theatrics than practical mechanical understanding.
For relativity aka for conditioning and brainwashing those who nature set apart from one another, into artificially relating to one another within a scientific consensus.
Meanwhile...Einstein aka EIN (one) ST (saint/sancire/to separate) EIN (one) aka the separation of oneness (whole) into each one (partial) within.
Ayh have spent 15 years advocating for review of particle theory...
It's as cheap as using free will of choice to discern oneself as particle within all of nature. No theory; just praxis aka practicing free will of choice by resisting the temptation to bind self to another.
Ayh agree
If a particle agrees, then it relates to other particles, which inverts the particular nature into artificial commonality.
A jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentiles to agree or disagree, thereby establishing a relation among both sides within a conflict called reason (agree vs disagree).
As in..."The theory of relativity, developed by Albert Einstein, includes two main parts"...suggestion and consent aka special relativity (ones consent to the suggested) and general relativity (consensus formed by each ones consent).
I've long said, based on stuff just like this, that Theoretical Physics and Archaeology are two of the most corrupt "industries" out there. You won't even get peer reviewed if you don't toe the narrative line, and you won't get funding either.
Ayh have spent 15 years advocating for review of particle theory for its algebraic necessity to embrace absolute nothingness as a dominate characteristic in nature -- and just even positing instability of particle theory is a "how dare you" to the conditioned brainwashed generations of students and professors whose indoctrination they wear on their sleeves like badges of honor. Ayh agree that it has become so corrupted in the last 120 years to profiteer from celebrity and tenure and publication. Einstein (who ayh disagree a lot with) became the benchmark of aspiration for theoretical physicists going forward, focusing more on the consumable theatrics than practical mechanical understanding.
For relativity aka for conditioning and brainwashing those who nature set apart from one another, into artificially relating to one another within a scientific consensus.
Meanwhile...Einstein aka EIN (one) ST (saint/sancire/to separate) EIN (one) aka the separation of oneness (whole) into each one (partial) within.
It's as cheap as using free will of choice to discern oneself as particle within all of nature. No theory; just praxis aka practicing free will of choice by resisting the temptation to bind self to another.
If a particle agrees, then it relates to other particles, which inverts the particular nature into artificial commonality.
A jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentiles to agree or disagree, thereby establishing a relation among both sides within a conflict called reason (agree vs disagree).
As in..."The theory of relativity, developed by Albert Einstein, includes two main parts"...suggestion and consent aka special relativity (ones consent to the suggested) and general relativity (consensus formed by each ones consent).