Here is the glitch in the delusion you cling to about encryption -- the keys do not equate to the value. They equate to accessing stored value defined on a server. Your BTC address is not the storage of value. When you mine - the value is stored and must be distributed. Under your theory of isolation then you shd have a new wallet key every time you change the amount -- but that is not what happens. The wallet is a static DB owned by some one else. Your offline wallet can not exchange value peer to peer without internet connectivity eventually.
there is no server in BTC, and there is no any value storage at all.
Your BTC address is not the storage of value.
Nothing is a storage of the value in BTC.
BTC is a distributed storage of transactions between addresses , not some single-server storage of account values like you used to with banks.
There is no place in whole BTC system for storing value that is on your address. No such thing at all, so your
assumption is just senseless.
If one want to know how many coins is currently available on some address he have to calculate a sum of all transactions to that address and subtract sum of all transactions from that address. No way around. And everyone who spread and sign block with yourr transaction will do that to check if you have enough at your address to make transaction you issued valid.
Only way to change sum some address currently can operate without creating additional transaction to(from valid address that have incoming transactions) or from (impossible without your private key) it, is to rebuild (and so re-mine) the whole blockchain since block with transaction you want to change.
There is no computer power on whole Earth to replace one transaction in blockchain in a reasonable time. Also, since transaction have two addresses, you can't do that without affecting the other address and so all following transactions connected with that address too. So you will have to change transactions of that second address too and who knows how long chains of transactions connected with that second address. It is just impossible at current level of our computer tech. Also you will have to somehow convince all other participants of BTC network to abandon current blockchain and accept your modified version of blockchain. I don't see how that could be done.
The address is the storage of value as it is a promissory key to equate a value defined in storage. You can not claim a thing has no value by giving it credibility of value to access. Either the BTC address IS the note of value (which it is not) or the key is access to the address where the storage of value is represented. You can not exclude the system when you can see inside the wallet when you insert a key unassigned by you.
There is no "storage of value" in BTC. Address is an endpoint for transaction. Number of endpoints in transaction is 10000 for input adresses and 65535 for output addresses.
BTC address is not a note of value, nor a key for access to a value. It is endpoint. BTC address private key allow you to issue a network-accepted request for transaction where this address is used as input. Nobody (you included) need any access to your address for anything else, including creating transactions where your address is output.
There is nothing except transactions in Bitcoin. No value storages, no accounts as in banks, nothing like that. Even miner block reward is transaction.
This same sort of line of logic where there is not a compilation so as to equate value is the same dogma that thinks encryption thru ISP is untouchable. There is a trail. There is a db of transactions. There are numerous companies that store your wallets, mining, etc -- hell one cunt mining company that stole my Doge ayh mined as an experiment bcz ayh did not collect it in time -- so how could they do this if the address was strictly mine? How do intelligence agencies recover crypto? The claims of no ledger is a lie. Data passes thru agencies you don't see -- the data is stored -- crypto is stored value -- made up value -- the address is a marker on a highway -- not the highway.
Here is the glitch in the delusion you cling to about encryption -- the keys do not equate to the value. They equate to accessing stored value defined on a server. Your BTC address is not the storage of value. When you mine - the value is stored and must be distributed. Under your theory of isolation then you shd have a new wallet key every time you change the amount -- but that is not what happens. The wallet is a static DB owned by some one else. Your offline wallet can not exchange value peer to peer without internet connectivity eventually.
there is no server in BTC, and there is no any value storage at all.
Nothing is a storage of the value in BTC.
BTC is a distributed storage of transactions between addresses , not some single-server storage of account values like you used to with banks.
There is no place in whole BTC system for storing value that is on your address. No such thing at all, so your assumption is just senseless.
If one want to know how many coins is currently available on some address he have to calculate a sum of all transactions to that address and subtract sum of all transactions from that address. No way around. And everyone who spread and sign block with yourr transaction will do that to check if you have enough at your address to make transaction you issued valid.
Only way to change sum some address currently can operate without creating additional transaction to(from valid address that have incoming transactions) or from (impossible without your private key) it, is to rebuild (and so re-mine) the whole blockchain since block with transaction you want to change.
There is no computer power on whole Earth to replace one transaction in blockchain in a reasonable time. Also, since transaction have two addresses, you can't do that without affecting the other address and so all following transactions connected with that address too. So you will have to change transactions of that second address too and who knows how long chains of transactions connected with that second address. It is just impossible at current level of our computer tech. Also you will have to somehow convince all other participants of BTC network to abandon current blockchain and accept your modified version of blockchain. I don't see how that could be done.
The address is the storage of value as it is a promissory key to equate a value defined in storage. You can not claim a thing has no value by giving it credibility of value to access. Either the BTC address IS the note of value (which it is not) or the key is access to the address where the storage of value is represented. You can not exclude the system when you can see inside the wallet when you insert a key unassigned by you.
There is no "storage of value" in BTC. Address is an endpoint for transaction. Number of endpoints in transaction is 10000 for input adresses and 65535 for output addresses.
BTC address is not a note of value, nor a key for access to a value. It is endpoint. BTC address private key allow you to issue a network-accepted request for transaction where this address is used as input. Nobody (you included) need any access to your address for anything else, including creating transactions where your address is output.
There is nothing except transactions in Bitcoin. No value storages, no accounts as in banks, nothing like that. Even miner block reward is transaction.
This same sort of line of logic where there is not a compilation so as to equate value is the same dogma that thinks encryption thru ISP is untouchable. There is a trail. There is a db of transactions. There are numerous companies that store your wallets, mining, etc -- hell one cunt mining company that stole my Doge ayh mined as an experiment bcz ayh did not collect it in time -- so how could they do this if the address was strictly mine? How do intelligence agencies recover crypto? The claims of no ledger is a lie. Data passes thru agencies you don't see -- the data is stored -- crypto is stored value -- made up value -- the address is a marker on a highway -- not the highway.