-9
newuserfromreddit -9 points ago +2 / -11

Biden is shit, but Trump is worse. We got stuck with a choice between two piles of shit, we picked the one that didn't make us vomit immediately.

-4
newuserfromreddit -4 points ago +2 / -6

Isn't this the same chick that sounded straight up drunk at the public hearing? Show the proof already, this shit is stupid.

-7
newuserfromreddit -7 points ago +1 / -8

This isn't TD.W, I don't have to suck Trump's dick 24/7.

Biden won. Election fraud itself is a conspiracy.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +3 / -3

This world is already a catalyst, my local gun shop has been literally bone dry for almost a month now.

-3
newuserfromreddit -3 points ago +1 / -4

What makes Reddit shitty is censorship. TD.win is trash for any sort of open discussion, if you're not clearly sucking POTUS' dick on there you're out.

The same will happen here if you draw the line at mainstream narratives. There's times where conspiracies are just objectively wrong, that should be pointed out and not shoved away.

-1
newuserfromreddit -1 points ago +3 / -4

Second one is too subjective, no speech restrictions here.

-5
newuserfromreddit -5 points ago +1 / -6

You really don't have to go through much before the "evidence" starts becoming needlessly cumulative. I think you honestly have to be partisan to believe there was fraud here, hence why you're seeing outcry almost entirely from conservatives and not independents.

-4
newuserfromreddit -4 points ago +1 / -5

Something more than what already exists. To say what's currently been presented is biased and circumstantial, at best, is an understatement. Even the bogus impeachment had more direct evidence than this.

-8
newuserfromreddit -8 points ago +1 / -9

Yeah, I've looked at all of the evidence and I'm not convinced, let alone do I think most of that stuff would cut it in court under the federal rules of evidence.

I think it benefits the upper class, as does all political infighting.

-1
newuserfromreddit -1 points ago +1 / -2

Generally speaking, that's not how delegation of authority works. Legislative delegation occurs by legislative act, recall can only be accomplished, likewise, by legislative act. State and federal government has been pretty protective of delegation for some time now; the last time the Supreme Court invalidated an act based on non-delegation doctrine was in 1935. Regardless, assuming that (1) the state legislature recalled the delegation of authority, and (2) the state legislature then certified in a manner that contradicts the already-existing certification by the SOS, I don't see the Supreme Court upholding the state legislature's certification. Doing so would require effectively applying a state law retrospectively to a constitutionally compliant certification. I don't even think the originalists would get on board with that.

-10
newuserfromreddit -10 points ago +1 / -11

I still don't buy that this election was stolen. If anything, I think that the fraud lawsuits are actually part of a conspiracy to sow civil unrest to fuel internal warfare within the middle class.

1
newuserfromreddit 1 point ago +4 / -3

It's almost as if all private, for-profit media companies are biased.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

Only if both Houses disapprove the initial results are they changed.

Good luck with that lol. Additionally, none of those states have contested electorates in the sense of the "dueling electorates" problem, if that's what you're referring to.

-9
newuserfromreddit -9 points ago +2 / -11

Idk man, the benefit of this place compared to TD.W is that you don't have to buy into the mindless group think. The guy who tweeted this is legit a convicted felon with no formal legal education.

-13
newuserfromreddit -13 points ago +1 / -14

Jesus this is so stupid. None of this matters.

It would matter if any of these GOP electors had been selected by the legislature or the state executive. That's the dueling electorates issue. However, that did not happen in any of these states.

This is literally the equivalent of you getting your neighbors together and voting for a rock.

3
newuserfromreddit 3 points ago +4 / -1

This is insanely interesting, efficient, and horrifying all at the same time.

-2
newuserfromreddit -2 points ago +2 / -4

Short of a literal coup — which I'm not suggesting should, or even (for lack of political capital) could, happen — there isn't one.

-9
newuserfromreddit -9 points ago +2 / -11

I'm very well-versed in constitutional law lol, you just don't have to see the leaf fall from the tree to know winter is coming.

-1
newuserfromreddit -1 points ago +1 / -2

This is only relevant for states that do not delegate authority to the state executive to issue electors. Nevada delegates such to the Secretary of State, thus the dueling electorate problem isn't possible.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›