-14
newuserfromreddit -14 points ago +2 / -16

You mean to tell me that similar writing exists between voters in a city that numbers over two million? Welp, that's an open-and-shut case folks, overturn the election.

-14
newuserfromreddit -14 points ago +4 / -18

Im a supporter of the Constitution.

You're advocating for the Vice President to categorically exclude valid election results and install a President against the will of the people. You don't support the Constitution.

-3
newuserfromreddit -3 points ago +1 / -4

Look at that, you did exactly what I said you would. To each point you, with the exception of that about legal arguments (to which you evidently are woefully uniformed), imply the source is biased and untrustworthy. You finish off by implying I'm a democrat and not a part of the "resistance" (whatever that means).

Thanks for proving my point.

-12
newuserfromreddit -12 points ago +1 / -13

[META] Submitting this image partly as a metric to gauge political alignment on this site. An identically titled post was submitted earlier.

Depending if this, but not the other post, gets taken down or not, it will also be an indicator of any bias in the mod team.

-3
newuserfromreddit -3 points ago +1 / -4

Is there any criticism?

Oh, you mean like the election fraud narrative that has been categorically shot down in court? Oh wait, no because now the courts — even those with Trump-appointed judges — are biased. It's also been shot down in academia but, oh wait, that's also biased. Most news networks and political commentators have also refuted it, but — boom — they're obviously biased also. Sure, the "evidence" is entirely circumstantial and, in some cases, outright fabricated — but yee-yee God Emperor Trump says Chyna-man bad so the election surely must be a fraud.

What about the fact that right-dominated forums — e.g., TD.W, r/conservative — openly revert to censorship to make sure their views aren't criticized? Nah, let's just label those people shills and disregard anything they say.

How about the fact that the top post on conspiracy.win — not thedonald.win — is literally just a photo of Trump, with a title that categorically rejects any discussion?

The criticism is that a significant part of the information from the right is cope-fueled nonsense. On sites like this, there has to be a concerted effort to maintain the visibility of opposing views. As TD.W demonstrates, right-aligned forums will gladly hop on any opportunity to censor contrary speech, including — as my original comment stated — discounting people from a group identity based on non-uniform opinions.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +3 / -3

To be fair, I don't think I've ever even seen a statute in Marx in my American life.

-3
newuserfromreddit -3 points ago +1 / -4

They ban people with contrary opinions.

Actually, not even contrary opinions. Anything not perfectly in lockstep with POTUS is labeled "shill" and booted off the platform, good luck having any open discussion there.

-7
newuserfromreddit -7 points ago +2 / -9

The fact that you've got 23 downvotes for stating a fact is prima facie evidence of the shilling coming from TD.W.

-2
newuserfromreddit -2 points ago +1 / -3

Yeah, exactly. Neither are good examples.

-2
newuserfromreddit -2 points ago +1 / -3

Merry Christmas, but fuck "holding the line." That mantra has been used simply to kill open discussion and freethinking, it has no place in this type of community.

23
newuserfromreddit 23 points ago +26 / -3

Strange that the RV itself was broadcasting the message on a 15-minte countdown, seems like they were trying to avoid damage to human life.

Maybe this was some part of an insurance scam for one of the buildings that were damaged?

-2
newuserfromreddit -2 points ago +1 / -3

If you can already find them on LinkedIn, just use LinkedIn. It's going to be filtered as the same spam either way lol

-3
newuserfromreddit -3 points ago +2 / -5

Unofficially, on behalf of the non-right-aligned part of conspiracies.win, we likewise wish your community a Merry Christmas!

We reserve the right, of course, to fundamentally disagree with all of the information circulating on TD.W.

-1
newuserfromreddit -1 points ago +3 / -4

Alex Jones gives conspiracy theorists writ-large a bad name.

-4
newuserfromreddit -4 points ago +3 / -7

Shill alert! You can't criticize the right and still be a conspiracy theorist!

/s

3
newuserfromreddit 3 points ago +6 / -3

January 20th really is gonna be quite a system shock for a lot of y'all...

-3
newuserfromreddit -3 points ago +1 / -4

curated to reflect a certain point of view.

Yeah, that sounds a lot like what Reddit did.

-30
newuserfromreddit -30 points ago +10 / -40

This shit is over; it's been over since early December. The shear amount of cope is both hilarious and horrifying.

-10
newuserfromreddit -10 points ago +1 / -11

Let me fix that for you:

Pence will declare a contested election and nothing will happen. Die-hard Trump supporters will return to coping — as they have been since Trump lost in November — and this will continue for a few weeks, until they go back to their nine-to-five jobs.

-29
newuserfromreddit -29 points ago +5 / -34

The biggest conspiracy is election fraud. It's all a Trump-built disinformation campaign meant to sow civil unrest.

Shit's really going to hit the fan when Trump gets indicted the minute Biden takes office on the 20th.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›