"Trump did this bad thing"
"That claim is disputed"
"No it's not. He really did it"
"There's no evidence of it"
"Here, look at this video"
"I'm not watching that. It's already been debunked"
"Debunked? There's a published report on it"
"I saw that report. There's a spelling mistake on Pg 4. It's worthless."
"But Trump is on video saying he did it!"
"That's manipulated media. It's taken out of context"
"Look, there are witnesses testimonies"
"They're lying. They're also radical far-left anarcho-communists. One of them is a felon."
You get the idea.The left lies and believes they are the sole arbiters of truth. But we don't have to play along. Just dismiss their claims as baseless and move along. It's what they do. So it's fair and square. .
Oh, you mean like the election fraud narrative that has been categorically shot down in court? Oh wait, no because now the courts — even those with Trump-appointed judges — are biased. It's also been shot down in academia but, oh wait, that's also biased. Most news networks and political commentators have also refuted it, but — boom — they're obviously biased also. Sure, the "evidence" is entirely circumstantial and, in some cases, outright fabricated — but yee-yee God Emperor Trump says Chyna-man bad so the election surely must be a fraud.
What about the fact that right-dominated forums — e.g., TD.W, r/conservative — openly revert to censorship to make sure their views aren't criticized? Nah, let's just label those people shills and disregard anything they say.
How about the fact that the top post on conspiracy.win — not thedonald.win — is literally just a photo of Trump, with a title that categorically rejects any discussion?
The criticism is that a significant part of the information from the right is cope-fueled nonsense. On sites like this, there has to be a concerted effort to maintain the visibility of opposing views. As TD.W demonstrates, right-aligned forums will gladly hop on any opportunity to censor contrary speech, including — as my original comment stated — discounting people from a group identity based on non-uniform opinions.
Wrong
What the fuck is this? The same people pushing the idea that "air conditioning is patriarchy" don't like trump. Big woop
You mean political activists disguised as "journalists". Carlos maza can shove it up his privileged lying ass. When you censor anyone who disagrees with your bullshit narrative claiming "most people" goes right out the window. In fact, popularity is antithetical to what is true. If that were so then the world was actually flat in 1752 and everything the KKK did was justified because "it's popular!".
Biden flew his crackhead son on air force 2 to china to get paid. Exactly what you people have been screaming about, without any evidence, for the last 4 years. Now twitter bans the white house press secretary and the oldest newspaper in the nation because they have the truth about biden smocking crack on a laptop.
Funny how much of a "resistance" you are when you're protected by the same media conglomerates that protected jeffrey epstein and called that situation "anti-semitic conspiracy theory"
Everything you say is objectively false. You're wrong.
Look at that, you did exactly what I said you would. To each point you, with the exception of that about legal arguments (to which you evidently are woefully uniformed), imply the source is biased and untrustworthy. You finish off by implying I'm a democrat and not a part of the "resistance" (whatever that means).
Thanks for proving my point.
He's won two lawsuits.
You literally just said "most people say" blah blah I don't care. I don't care if people say trump rustles their jimmies anymore than I care most people 100 years ago said to hang the blacks, it doesn't make you correct. In fact, the truth often contradicts out lic opinion.
Who else screams about trump?
I stopped reading because there was nothing except bullshit you were spouting. This is no exception. This is not legitimate criticism, you're just screaming "fuck those people!"
What exactly is "cope fueled nonsense"? Like twitter banning the white house press secretary and the oldest newspaper in the nation because they published a TRUE STORY of joe bidens crack smoking son receiving millions of dollars from the CCP?
THAT is criticism.
Crying "you're a big doo doo head" is not