-8
newuserfromreddit -8 points ago +2 / -10

Should we really expect 80+ million Americans to just go along with that?

Whether they should or shouldn't is irrelevant, they will go along with a Biden presidency.

-8
newuserfromreddit -8 points ago +4 / -12

Election fraud deniers are usually also holocaust denials, thanks for the info!

-12
newuserfromreddit -12 points ago +3 / -15

That people on here do in fact doubt the holocaust.

-10
newuserfromreddit -10 points ago +4 / -14

Thanks for proving underlying assumption lmfao

-12
newuserfromreddit -12 points ago +4 / -16

Imagine being more convinced the holocaust is fake than that the election was valid.

-18
newuserfromreddit -18 points ago +7 / -25

Nothing. Votes are counted in Biden's favor. Biden is inaugurated. Trump continues to angry tweet. TDW continues to "trust the plan." Lots of cope.

-3
newuserfromreddit -3 points ago +1 / -4

You do realize you just defined shill, right? Like. You literally defined shill as defining shill, which, by your logic, would make you a shill...

Just wanna make sure you're following along.

-10
newuserfromreddit -10 points ago +2 / -12

It's hard to talk with an average sized dick in your mouth, but I guess you wouldn't know that from Trump.

-6
newuserfromreddit -6 points ago +1 / -7

Valid ballots have not been destroyed, feel free to present anything to substantiate your claims. Federal law does not require ballots to be "turned over," just retained. Additionally, you seem to have skipped over when I said "publish" by academics. Feel free to present any academia-published analysis from Shiva or Pulitzer, i.e., the peer-reviewed, objective data that I asked for in the beginning.

-8
newuserfromreddit -8 points ago +1 / -9

Lol, feel free to present some evidence to support your statement.

As I've said in other comments, the fact that you honestly think this site is important enough for someone to be paid to shill on is downright laughable.

-6
newuserfromreddit -6 points ago +1 / -7

premier experts

We seem to categorically reject name-sake evidence here, that's kind of the point of a conspiracy. Thought should be driven by our own conclusions from data, not the conclusions of others. Every time the election fraud movement is called on to produce objective, peer-reviewed data, they can't — because it didn't happen.

Democracies indeed allow their elections to be challenged. Hence, we've had recounts or audits in Wisconsin, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Michigan, among other states. We've granted full appellate review to a plethora of baseless lawsuits in court. We've had academics research and publish results that indicate there was no significant election fraud. What the MAGA movement has turned to is not democracy, but rather the usage of political games to install a President that lost both the electorate and popular vote in a valid election. Cope.

-17
newuserfromreddit -17 points ago +4 / -21

4D chess. If the computers switched the votes, we'll have them down for the count when we do the recount.

Oh wait.

by Doeseat
-8
newuserfromreddit -8 points ago +1 / -9

I think blocking, when it works correctly, only stops the blocker from seeing the blockee, not vice-a-versa.

That's still honestly preferable. I feel bad triggering the TDW-shills so often.

-5
newuserfromreddit -5 points ago +1 / -6

So I see you're not going to present any objective, peer-reviewed data. Sounds good, it really shouldn't be surprising why this argument keeps getting laughed out of court then.

-5
newuserfromreddit -5 points ago +2 / -7

Pennsylvania's constitution and election laws

Pennsylvania's constitution has already been construed by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to not require invalidating votes in these circumstances. TDW-shills only pick and choose what judicial decisions to follow.

-4
newuserfromreddit -4 points ago +1 / -5

I mean, this isn't really surprising. They made this for the military back in '05.

-10
newuserfromreddit -10 points ago +3 / -13

Hey! No anti-Trump thoughts here, we're trying to overthrow an election!

-5
newuserfromreddit -5 points ago +1 / -6

Low information voters are the backbone of the Democrat party.

Lol.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›