So I see you're not going to present any objective, peer-reviewed data. Sounds good, it really shouldn't be surprising why this argument keeps getting laughed out of court then.
We seem to categorically reject name-sake evidence here, that's kind of the point of a conspiracy. Thought should be driven by our own conclusions from data, not the conclusions of others. Every time the election fraud movement is called on to produce objective, peer-reviewed data, they can't — because it didn't happen.
Democracies indeed allow their elections to be challenged. Hence, we've had recounts or audits in Wisconsin, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Michigan, among other states. We've granted full appellate review to a plethora of baseless lawsuits in court. We've had academics research and publish results that indicate there was no significant election fraud. What the MAGA movement has turned to is not democracy, but rather the usage of political games to install a President that lost both the electorate and popular vote in a valid election. Cope.
Valid ballots have not been destroyed, feel free to present anything to substantiate your claims. Federal law does not require ballots to be "turned over," just retained. Additionally, you seem to have skipped over when I said "publish" by academics. Feel free to present any academia-published analysis from Shiva or Pulitzer, i.e., the peer-reviewed, objective data that I asked for in the beginning.
So I see you're not going to present any objective, peer-reviewed data. Sounds good, it really shouldn't be surprising why this argument keeps getting laughed out of court then.
We seem to categorically reject name-sake evidence here, that's kind of the point of a conspiracy. Thought should be driven by our own conclusions from data, not the conclusions of others. Every time the election fraud movement is called on to produce objective, peer-reviewed data, they can't — because it didn't happen.
Democracies indeed allow their elections to be challenged. Hence, we've had recounts or audits in Wisconsin, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Michigan, among other states. We've granted full appellate review to a plethora of baseless lawsuits in court. We've had academics research and publish results that indicate there was no significant election fraud. What the MAGA movement has turned to is not democracy, but rather the usage of political games to install a President that lost both the electorate and popular vote in a valid election. Cope.
Valid ballots have not been destroyed, feel free to present anything to substantiate your claims. Federal law does not require ballots to be "turned over," just retained. Additionally, you seem to have skipped over when I said "publish" by academics. Feel free to present any academia-published analysis from Shiva or Pulitzer, i.e., the peer-reviewed, objective data that I asked for in the beginning.