0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

It’s just troop movements and strategic locations to attack.

Right, and Russia failed to accomplish those troop movements and strategic attacks . . .

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

Your Globohomo bullshit nato forces cannot pump enough weapons into Ukraine to have any impact at all on Russia over all.

See, stuff like this makes it really hard not to think that you’re just a Corpis/DavidCole bot alt-account, lol.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nah, I never said you’re paid by Putin. I think you’re probably just a bot alt-account made by one of the few users here that likes to primarily push pro-Russian narratives.

Why would you think I’d waste my time trying to push a narrative on some washed up Reddit offshoot site? I just find it funny to watch you all squirm around facts in my downtime.

1
newuserfromreddit 1 point ago +2 / -1

Oh look, another handshake account that misuses English grammar, comments predominantly pro-Russian content largely on posts from suspected Russian shill accounts, and goes long periods without activity only to become active when anti-Russian content starts to rise.

Weird.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

I think you're kind of ignoring the fact that Belarus is actively involved in the invasion of Ukraine, and this map (released at the start of March) pretty much parallels exactly what the troop movements came to be throughout March, until Russia started retreating. In keeping with your Trudeau-Biden analogy, it's more like Trudeau and Biden authorizing the same tyranny for all of North America, then Trudeau saying the plan for authorization.

It would be a little weird for two nations in a joint-invasion of a country to have different invasion maps, especially where the public one matches what happened in the invasion.

-3
newuserfromreddit -3 points ago +1 / -4

Meanwhile, Russia has lost about a quarter of its combat effectiveness, most of its elite troops, and just shy of 25,000 Russian lives.

F.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

The only way we’d know for sure if it’s a failed invasion is if we have the Russian plans before us, look at what’s been done and what was planned and what happens and then we could know for sure.

You mean like these plans?

-4
newuserfromreddit -4 points ago +1 / -5

Russia maintains comms in independent regions of Ukraine.

I hate to break it to you, but a region is by definition not independent if another nation is using it for its communications, lol.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

So now we’re trusting CNN too? Quite the conspiracy theorist you are, lol.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

I’ll circle back to you once Russia invades Moldova.

1
newuserfromreddit 1 point ago +2 / -1

Probably not. They’re just not independent, as you’re trying to suggest.

1
newuserfromreddit 1 point ago +2 / -1

Agreed. To that end, no lawyer would include a crayon-written affidavit in a credible lawsuit.

-5
newuserfromreddit -5 points ago +1 / -6

This actually has a legal basis. The election lawsuits were largely nonsense.

I remember seeing some lawsuits that had affidavits written in fucking crayon.

by pkvi
0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

The negative impact of your approval rate is significantly decreased when your opponent also sucks.

-3
newuserfromreddit -3 points ago +1 / -4

A successful place of global trade and diplomatic resolution?

Yeah, I agree.

-4
newuserfromreddit -4 points ago +1 / -5

Still waiting for that mountain of evidence and the Kraken to come along and reinstate Trump into office.

-14
newuserfromreddit -14 points ago +2 / -16

An election isn’t rigged just because you lose.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

I didn’t realize typos include publishing a government report that 13,000 troops are dead in a foreign country.

They must be using a pretty big keyboard.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›