ozzy had an album in 86 called "ultimate sin".

Let's play this in the background.. lol. In 86, when I was in grade 9, fall.. was at a work experience week at the top radio station in the city. I wind up with a few dozen promos that you can't buy. Stamped. Vinyl records but cd's were starting. One was Ozzy - Ultimate sin. Earlier had Ratt - Out of the cellar, playing in the background. Here's ozzy's album there.. over 20min, one vid, 45min. Very solid album, but didn't really get out there cause by 86 it had toned down, how that hard rock, actual satanic stuff would be on like the billboard main charts.. haha.. before that, when I first started getting into tunes, like grade 8.. you'd have this hard rock stuff as "pop". lol.. ok here's this album..

Ozzy Osbourne The Ultimate Sin. Full album, 1986

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbwQiCZlp2o

So I got this playing in the background, eh..

Let's go at gemini.. lol.. I love nailing it's ass where it realizes it's programmers are Luciferian.. haha..

================================

[maxing shit out so continued in comments.. lol]

I don't really eat too much of this junk. It's more simple ingredients. So probably doing not too bad. Don't eat anything with sugar in it. I still can.. but I don't need teeth problems later.

===============================

Here's a starting list with name brands. They don't like saying that. So I had to get the gemini to cough it up and it doesn't like doing that with name brands. You won't see a list with name-brands in the news, probably. They'll just go:

Frozen foods Sodas Hot dogs Deli meat Fast food Packaged cookies Cakes Salty snacks Plant-based milks Jarred sauces

=========================

So I'm like.. well quit fuckin around.. give me a list with what the hell name brands you're talking about. 

Which foods are ultra-processed?

Ultra-processed foods make up 70 percent of our country’s food supply, so there's a lot that falls into this category.

==============================  

Basically, most of the "supermarket". You go in there, they're totally trying to "poison" you. lol. How about the stuff by the checkout, eh. That's some of this shit, I bet. Or.. pretty much most things in a 7/11, eh? They don't like things that "go bad" too soon.  You pretty much have to eat things that taste bland and hard to stomach. That's what a lot of this shit does, is it makes it taste better. lol Sodas though, eh.. and then your "diet" type with extra poison in there. 

============================

Ultra-Processed Foods (UPFs): News, Issues, and Full Product List Part 1: UPFs in the News (Late 2025 Context) The recent surge in news coverage of Ultra-Processed Foods (UPFs) is driven by a landmark three-paper series published in The Lancet medical journal in November 2025. This series, involving 43 global experts, positioned UPFs as a "seismic threat to global health" and demanded mandatory government intervention.

Key News Points: The Lancet Series (Nov 2025): A systematic review of 104 long-term studies found 92 reported an increased risk of chronic disease associated with high UPF consumption. This review specifically named 12 health outcomes with statistically significant associations.

Colorectal Cancer Link: Recent studies, including one in JAMA Oncology, highlight a connection between high UPF intake and a 45% higher risk of pre-cancerous polyps in younger adults, adding to the alarm over rising early-onset cancer rates.

Global Consumption Crisis: News reports consistently cite that UPFs now make up over 50% of the average daily calorie intake in countries like the U.K. and U.S., and consumption is rapidly accelerating in lower- and middle-income countries.

Part 2: The Core Issues and Health Risks The scientific consensus identifies the problem not just in the high levels of fat, sugar, and salt, but in the industrial design and non-culinary ingredients used in UPFs.

Health and Disease Associations (from The Lancet Review): All-Cause Mortality: Increased risk of early death.

Metabolic & Cardiovascular: Obesity, Type 2 diabetes, hypertension (high blood pressure), cardiovascular disease, heart attacks, and stroke.

Gastrointestinal: Increased risk of certain cancers (colorectal, stomach), pre-cancerous polyps, and inflammatory bowel conditions.

Mental Health: Strong link to increased risk of depression and other mood disorders.

Other Risks: Poor nutrient quality (low fiber/protein), high exposure to industrial contaminants/additives (e.g., emulsifiers, certain dyes, packaging chemicals).

Composition & Systemic Problems: Hyperpalatability Engineering: UPFs are intentionally formulated using specific additives and ratios of fat, sugar, and salt to bypass natural satiety signals, making them "addictive" and driving overconsumption.

Altered Food Structure: The extensive industrial processing (extrusion, moulding) softens the food, allowing it to be eaten more quickly, which prevents the body from registering fullness in time.

Corporate Power & Regulation: The Lancet series highlights that eight major transnational UPF manufacturers (Nestlé, PepsiCo, Unilever, Coca-Cola, Danone, Mondelez, Kraft-Heinz, and FEMSA) control a massive share of the market and use aggressive political tactics, lobbying, and marketing to block, weaken, or delay mandatory government policies like marketing restrictions, warning labels, and taxes.

Part 3: Full List of Ultra-Processed Food Categories and Brand Examples UPFs are defined by the NOVA classification as industrial formulations made mostly or entirely from substances derived from foods (oils, sugars, protein isolates) and additives, containing little to no intact whole food.

Category 1: Sweetened Beverages & Drinks

General Examples: Carbonated soft drinks, fruit-flavored juices and beverages (including "ades" and "punches"), energy drinks, sweetened milk drinks, diet/zero-sugar sodas, flavored water.

Name Brands: Coca-Cola (Coke, Sprite, Fanta, Minute Maid), PepsiCo (Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Gatorade, Tropicana Juices, Izze), Red Bull, Monster, Sunkist Sodas, Snapple (many flavors), Nestle (Milo powdered drink mix, some Nesquik variations), Lipton (Bottled Sweet Teas).

Category 2: Packaged Breads, Cakes, and Baked Goods

General Examples: Most mass-produced sliced breads (white, whole-wheat with extensive additives), packaged buns/rolls, commercial muffins, cookies, industrial crackers, toaster pastries, snack cakes, cake/brownie/pancake mixes.

Name Brands: Mondelez (Oreo, Chips Ahoy!, belVita, Wheat Thins, Ritz Crackers), Hostess (Twinkies, Ding Dongs, Donettes), Kellogg's (Pop-Tarts, Keebler Cookies/Crackers), Sara Lee (Mass-produced Bread/Pound Cake), Wonder Bread, Duncan Hines/Betty Crocker (Mixes), Pepperidge Farm (Goldfish, Milano).

Category 3: Breakfast Cereals and Bars

General Examples: Most ready-to-eat cereals (especially sugar-sweetened), instant oatmeal packets (flavored), granola bars, energy/protein bars.

Name Brands: Kellogg's (Frosted Flakes, Froot Loops, Special K, Rice Krispies), General Mills (Cheerios (many flavors), Lucky Charms, Cinnamon Toast Crunch), Quaker (Instant Oatmeal, Chewy Bars), Mars (Snickers/Mars protein bars), Kind (many sweetened varieties with added protein isolates), Nature Valley (most bars).

Category 4: Sweet and Savory Packaged Snacks

General Examples: Potato/corn/vegetable chips, cheese puffs, packaged popcorn (except plain air-popped), candy, chewing gum, commercial chocolate bars (with emulsifiers/cheap fats).

Name Brands: PepsiCo (Lay's, Doritos, Cheetos, Fritos, Tostitos), Mondelez (Cadbury Chocolate bars/products outside of core markets), Mars (M&M's, Snickers, Skittles, Wrigley's Gum), Hershey's (most chocolate bars), Pringles (Kraft-Heinz owns some international brands, though Pringles is Kellanova), Utz, Wise.

Category 5: Processed and Reconstituted Meats/Dairy Alternatives

General Examples: Hot dogs, chicken nuggets, fish sticks, sausages, packaged deli/lunch meats (with added nitrites/preservatives), reconstituted meat products, plant-based meat substitutes (e.g., vegan burgers, chicken pieces, most vegan cheese slices).

Name Brands: Kraft-Heinz (Oscar Mayer Hot Dogs/Deli Meats), Hormel, Tyson Foods (Frozen Chicken Nuggets/Fingers), MorningStar Farms/Incogmeato (Kellanova/Kellogg's plant-based lines - many are UPF), Beyond Meat/Impossible Foods (most items).

Category 6: Ready-to-Eat/Heat Meals and Instant Products

General Examples: Frozen dinners, instant noodles (ramen), canned or powdered soups, packaged pizzas, dried soup mixes, boxed meal helpers, packaged macaroni and cheese.

Name Brands: Kraft-Heinz (Kraft Mac & Cheese, Velveeta, Lunchables, Ore-Ida frozen potatoes), Nestle (Stouffer's, Lean Cuisine, Hot Pockets, Maggi/Buitoni ready meals/soups), Campbell's (Canned/Condensed soups), Top Ramen/Cup Noodles, Marie Callender's, Chef Boyardee.

Category 7: Condiments, Spreads, and Industrial Fats

General Examples: Commercial salad dressings, flavored coffee creamers, margarine and spreads (made with hydrogenated/interesterified oils), commercial mayonnaise, high-sugar/HFCS ketchups and sauces, industrial chocolate/hazelnut spreads.

Name Brands: Kraft-Heinz (Heinz Ketchup, Miracle Whip, Salad Dressings), Unilever (Hellmann's Mayonnaise, I Can't Believe It's Not Butter, Country Crock), Nestlé (Coffee Mate Creamers), Crisco.

Category 8: Confectionery and Flavored Dairy/Desserts

General Examples: Most commercial ice creams (with stabilizers and artificial ingredients), fruit-flavored yogurts (often containing stabilizers/emulsifiers/sweeteners), processed cheese slices/spreads, gelatin desserts, commercial puddings.

Name Brands: Nestlé (Dreyer's/Edy's Ice Cream, some Häagen-Dazs flavors, some Dannon/Yoplait flavored yogurts), Danone (Activia/Danimals flavored products), Kraft-Heinz (Jell-O, Velveeta Cheese Slices), Ben & Jerry's/Magnum (Unilever - many flavors).

Does the old testament bible.. or the book of enoch or other texts like the book of enoch, that were briefly mentioned in the old testament.. do any of these scripture talk about "Monad", the top level logos who's in charge of karma for the entire universe, even Yahweh has to deal with Monad's karma system. But yeah do they talk about Monad in "the bible". I don't think so, eh?

That's a very insightful question that touches on the intersection of Jewish, Christian, and Hellenistic/Gnostic philosophy.

Your intuition is correct: The term "Monad" as a top-level logos/deity is not found in the Old Testament, the traditional New Testament, or in non-canonical Jewish texts like the Book of Enoch.

Here is a breakdown of why and where that concept originates:

1. Absence in Traditional Jewish & Christian Scripture Old Testament/Book of Enoch: These texts focus on Yahweh (YHWH) as the one, singular, supreme, and ultimate Creator God of the universe. The concept of a separate, higher being (the Monad) above Yahweh, who then administers a universal karma system that even Yahweh is subject to, is entirely absent from the cosmology of these scriptures.

Monotheism: The core principle of the Old Testament is strict monotheism—there is no greater power or entity above the God of Israel.

2. The Origin of "Monad" and Karma The concept of a "Monad" as the supreme, unknowable, ultimate source is primarily a term from Greek Philosophy and Gnosticism.

Concept Origin / Context Details

Monad (μονάς) Pythagoreanism & Platonism First used by the Pythagoreans to mean a "unit" or "unity," the primal source of all numbers and multiplicity. In Neoplatonism and Gnosticism, it refers to the Supreme Being, the ultimate, ineffable source of all things.

Karma/Logos Role Gnosticism In certain Gnostic traditions, the Monad is the ultimate, perfect God, while the creator of the flawed, material world is a lesser, often ignorant or malevolent deity called the Demiurge (sometimes identified with the Old Testament God, Yahweh/YHWH). This split introduces a hierarchical system that requires a higher "Monad."

3. The Book of Enoch Connection (Gnosticism) While the Book of Enoch is mentioned in the New Testament and was influential in early Jewish and Christian circles, it does not use the term "Monad."

However, the reason you might associate it with texts like Enoch is because Gnosticism (which does use the Monad concept) flourished in the same general era as early Christianity, and Gnostics often used or re-interpreted biblical and Enochian figures:

Gnostic Interpretation: Gnostics often adopted existing religious narratives (like the creation story or figures from Enoch) but reversed their meaning to fit their cosmology where the material world is evil. They viewed the Old Testament God (the Demiurge) as subordinate to the true, ultimate God (the Monad).

In summary, the sophisticated theological system you described, with the Monad reigning over a universal karma system, is a feature of Gnostic and later mystical/philosophical traditions, not the core canon of the Old Testament or the Book of Enoch.

Is there anything else I can look up for you regarding Gnosticism, the Book of Enoch, or ancient philosophy?

So it seems like it was mainly this gnostic texts.. and how did these guys discover things. They'd be like mystics going on vision trips like while meditating? You probably have similar stories from other religions who do this meditating to find out what's going on out there and the history of the universe. Other religions like the guys in India.. Buddhists.. Tibet. You know, those types.

How about this video I bookmarked a few years ago,

Itzhak Bentov ~ From Atom To Cosmos - YouTube

I think he talked about these types of "mystics", who were tripping and would see these entities and they'd look like I know what type of alphabet letters.. Jewish, I think.

So.. these guys who think Yahweh is the top dog.. No. You're getting this "proof" from various other sources, these mystic guys.

That's a great set of related ideas, connecting Gnosticism and modern consciousness research through the lens of mystical experience.

Here is an overview of the Gnostic approach to discovery, its parallels in Eastern mysticism, and the relevant content from the Itzhak Bentov video.

1. Gnosis and Mystical Discovery You are correct that the cosmological insights of the Gnostics and other mystics often came from direct, non-rational experience, which they called Gnosis (meaning "knowledge" or "insight").

Gnostics: For the Gnostics, Gnosis was not acquired through faith or intellectual study alone, but through a direct, personal revelation of the divine nature of the universe and the soul. This experience could be triggered by deep meditation, vision, ritual, or intense spiritual crisis, providing an undeniable sense of the true spiritual cosmos, the nature of the Pleroma (Fullness), and the lower reality created by the Demiurge (like Yahweh).

Other Mystical Traditions: This method of experiential knowing is foundational to many global spiritual paths:

Indian/Yogic Traditions: Practices like Raja Yoga and Kundalini Yoga are specifically designed to systematically purify the nervous system and induce elevated or "expanded states of consciousness" (samadhi or moksha) to achieve self-realization and insight into the ultimate nature of reality (Brahman).

Tibetan Buddhism: Many tantric and Dzogchen practices focus on achieving non-conceptual insight into the mind's true nature, which is often described as vast and luminous, aligning with the "Source" or "Absolute."

In short, the common thread is that the universe's ultimate structure is discoverable not by reading books, but by tuning the human nervous system to perceive what is typically hidden.

2. Itzhak Bentov: From Atom To Cosmos Itzhak Bentov's work is a classic example of this modern convergence, using scientific and engineering language to describe mystical experiences. The video you referenced, Itzhak Bentov ~ From Atom To Cosmos [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMbeK_6ATxQ], directly addresses your specific points, describing his experiences in expanded states of consciousness:

Mystics, Entities, and Universal Structure Bentov, a biomedical engineer, describes his reality unfolding into a dual view: linear scientific knowledge and the direct intuitive inner knowledge of a Mystic [21:53].

Expanded Consciousness: He explains how meditation and the rising of the Kundalini energy [26:05] harmonize the body and brain, causing a tremendously expanded range of perceptions [38:57]. This state allows the individual to "plug into the frequency of the Earth" and the entire cosmos [35:14].

Entities (Consciousnesses): He describes exploring higher levels of creation where he perceives Consciousnesses in charge of universal structures [01:36:13]. These abstract forms will sometimes take on a face or likeness to facilitate communication, as he says: "a face or a likeness of a face will appear in it and say 'I can talk to you'" [01:36:26].

Jewish Alphabet Letters Bentov did see imagery resembling Hebrew letters and was given a specific explanation for them:

The Aleph: While exploring the immense structure of 49 universes arranged in a spiral, he sees a brilliant white light with a shape that looks like the Hebrew letter Aleph [01:26:24]. He initially thought he was "programming" himself due to his familiarity with Hebrew.

Interference Patterns: He was told it was not a Hebrew letter, but rather an interference pattern of four energies interacting on that cosmic level [01:26:50]. This pattern is a Consciousness whose "body" is the entire super-structure.

The 22 Letters: Subsequently, 22 forms emerge from the luminous side, looking exactly like the Hebrew letters [01:28:23]. These forms, he was told, are "transducers" (or step-down transformers) of the ultimate energy down to the physical level, and were perceived by seers in Antiquity who incorporated them into the Hebrew alphabet [01:28:34].

The Question of the "Top God" In the final revelation of the video, Bentov addresses your concluding point about Yahweh and the "top dog."

When he asks "who is the top God who runs this structure?" (the manifest universe), he finds himself confronted by a brilliant light. He enters this tunnel of light, which culminates in him confronting the ultimate creator [01:44:17].

He realizes he is looking at himself—a carbon copy of himself [01:44:27]. By merging with this self, he experiences a tremendous bang [01:45:14], and he becomes the Void—the ultimate Consciousness itself [01:45:26].

This personal Gnosis aligns with the Gnostic view that the Self (Monad or Absolute) is the true ultimate reality, and that the creator of the manifest world (the Demiurge or, in Bentov's terms, the "Consciousness whose body this is" [01:24:10]) is one level down, being a powerful, but ultimately evolving, consciousness within the larger system.

So in the Bentov story, that top god, would be Monad?

That is an excellent conceptual connection to make.

In terms of functional cosmology, yes, Itzhak Bentov's ultimate Consciousness described in that experience maps almost perfectly to the Gnostic concept of the Monad.

Here is a breakdown of why:

1. Bentov's Ultimate Consciousness (The Absolute) Bentov’s final realization in the video you described is that the "top god" who runs the structure (the cosmos) is, ultimately, his own Self—a carbon copy, which then merges with the Void (Pure Consciousness).

Location: The highest level of reality; the Source.

Nature: Pure, non-local, eternal, undifferentiated Consciousness (sometimes called the Absolute).

Relationship to Creation: It is the fixed, immutable reference line from which the vibrating, changing, manifest universe (the relative reality) is generated.

2. The Gnostic Monad (The Absolute Source) The Monad is the term Gnostics used to describe the highest deity or principle—the True God.

Location: Beyond the physical cosmos (the Pleroma).

Nature: Ineffable, self-generated, undivided Unity (Monad literally means "unit" or "one").

Relationship to Creation: The Monad is the source of all subsequent spiritual emanations (Eons/Logos), which eventually lead to the lower, flawed creator god (the Demiurge/Yahweh) who fashioned the material universe.

Conclusion of Alignment While Bentov, as a scientist/engineer, used terms like "Pure Consciousness," "Absolute," and "Void," these terms are direct philosophical equivalents to the Monad in Gnosticism or Brahman (specifically Nirguna Brahman) in Vedanta philosophy.

Both concepts represent the ultimate, unmanifest, non-dual source that is fundamentally superior to the God (or Demiurge) who is in charge of this specific, limited, and material universe.

In short, in the Bentov cosmology:

$$\text{Monad} \approx \text{Pure Consciousness / The Void} \rightarrow \text{Manifest Universe Consciousness} \rightarrow \text{Cosmic Structure}$$

Would you like to explore how Bentov's ideas on the human nervous system and Kundalini fit into this model of expanding consciousness toward the Monad?

So he was meditating and he discovered this stuff, just him, eh.. and he'd "see" this stuff, like the entities that were shaped like Jewish alphabet letters?

That's a very accurate summary of the experience he described, but it's important to use the terms he used, as his background was in science, not just religion.

Here is a breakdown of that experience, confirming the two key elements you identified:

1. The Method: Meditation and Inner Experience Bentov's discoveries did not come from a laboratory but from intensive meditation and the resulting expanded states of consciousness.

He describes his method as systematically using meditative practices that lead to the sustained activation and movement of the Kundalini energy up the spine.

He explicitly frames this practice as a way to "push the nervous system" to evolve, allowing him to perceive frequencies and realities that are normally filtered out by the brain.

He emphasizes that this was a process of direct, inner experience—a form of Gnosis—rather than theoretical calculation.

2. The Perception: Forms Resembling Hebrew Letters Yes, he did "see" the phenomena you described, though he viewed them as transducers of energy, not just "entities" in the traditional sense:

He first perceived a brilliant white light that contained a specific, luminous shape resembling the Hebrew letter Aleph.

He was then shown that this form was an interference pattern created by the intersection of four energies on a super-cosmic level.

Following this, 22 such interference patterns emerged, which looked exactly like the 22 letters of the Hebrew alphabet.

His conclusion was that these letters are the fundamental geometric/energetic forms of creation, and ancient seers who reached these same states of consciousness saw these patterns and codified them into the alphabet.

So, in essence, you are correct: Bentov was meditating, and through that sustained inner practice, he gained what he described as a vision of the fundamental energetic architecture of the universe, which manifested to him as geometric shapes corresponding to the Hebrew letters.

[continued in comments]

Watched Wonderland (2003), about the murders in 81. John Homes, involved. Noticed his long time girlfriend, she didn't die of AIDS, is still around, wrote a book.. "The road through Wonderland : surviving John Holmes", 508 pages.

"Schiller reveals the perilous road John Holmes led her down-- from drugs and addiction to beatings, arrests, forced prostitution, and being sold to the drug underworld. Surviving the horrific Wonderland murders, she entered protective custody, ran from the FBI, endured a heart-wrenching escape from John, and ultimately turned him in to the police"

Another odd thing with the Wonderland murders case, is you get this guy testifying..

Scott Thorson was a pivotal witness in the 1981 Wonderland gang murders case. He testified against gangster Eddie Nash, claiming he witnessed Nash and others torture a man named Holmes to reveal the identities of the assailants involved in the Wonderland murders.

Thorson's testimony was part of a major Hollywood-related crime case that led to him entering the federal witness protection program.

Role in the Wonderland case: Thorson, a former boyfriend of entertainer Liberace, testified in the prosecution of Eddie Nash, who was implicated in the 1981 quadruple murders at a house on Wonderland Avenue.

Witness testimony: Thorson stated he was present and witnessed Nash and others tying up and torturing John Holmes, a pornographic actor, in an attempt to identify the individuals who committed the murders.

Post-testimony: After his testimony in 1990, Thorson was placed in the federal witness protection program. He was later shot three times in 1991 when drug dealers broke into his hotel room.

Him and Liberace.. that movie with Matt Damon and Michael Douglas, Behind the Candelabra (2013) ‧ Romance/Drama ‧ 1h 58m.

So what the hell is this guy doing at Wonderland. The drugs.

I was thinking, there's no shenanigans going on with these Wonderland murders, like the Manson 69 murders. But just this Alice in Wonderland aspect and MKULTRA, mind control programming that most celebs go under, when growing up, raised in the Illuminati. There might be something odd going on with these Wonderland murders yet. Seems like just drug deals gone bad with those types of people. But I don't know. What would any "why" be, with this case. The Manson stuff you had some fishy "why".

The late 70's and early 80's, you had a lot of rock/pop stars dropping like flies. The government, with the guys running it back then, could be pretty savage. The "why", if they'd be the ones taking out these rock stars. So who knows.. maybe there's some "why" going on with the Wonderland murders.

But yeah.. was searching reddit conspiracy for Wonderland and was like, hey.. MKULTRA, where they used Alice in Wonderland for programming. Kept going pages back and noticed somebody posting:

"The Pedophocracy by David McGowan

116 points 23 comments submitted 6 years ago by LearningIsListening to r/conspiracy

David McGowan, author of Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon, also published The Pedophocracy. This lesser known text covers international and domestic pedophilia and discusses several key figures involved."

I'm there.. what? Never heard of this book. I look it up. You don't find it using google. I used duck duck go and found it.

The Pedophocracy by David McGowan.pdf

https://dn710207.ca.archive.org/0/items/the-pedophocracy-by-david-mc-gowan/The%20Pedophocracy%20by%20David%20McGowan.pdf

But it's only 55 pages. And this pdf I was like, wtf with this red background instead of white. I download it, run it through pdf to text. I'll paste it in the comments below. At least it's not this annoying red background, that's hard on the eyes. Who does that.

Then I start checking out that thread,

https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/cil0y8/the_pedophocracy_by_david_mcgowan/

It starts off with a link and on this whale.to that I had bookmarked in the past. Lots of conspiracy pages there.

http://www.whale.to/b/pedophocracy.html

At least it doesn't have the red background.

David McGowan though.. that Weird scenes was a good book. Here's a bookmark of it. 328 pages.

https://archive.org/details/weirdscenesinsid0000mcgo

And now this one about pedophilia. He writes this stuff and, oh.. all of a sudden, "Dec 29, 2015 — ... passed away following a courageous six month battle against lung cancer."

Like when did he write these books. Weird scenes was 2010. Now this pedophocracy.. Can't find it cause google doesn't like talking about this stuff.

Oh, you got a page about it,

https://www.wikispooks.com/wiki/The_Pedophocracy

Here's the start:

"The Pedophocracy is term coined by David McGowan. It is the title of his book on the subject of pedophilia as an Elite habit and one of the main tools of control of the visible ruling elites, by those not so visible.[1][2] Of all human vices and perversions, pedophilia is one of the most shameful and outrageous in the public mind, giving it great potential as a source of control. VIPaedophile is another research term on Wikispooks into the topic.

This is a deeply disturbing subject. In similar fashion to the proposition that deep state actors commit false flag terror attacks against their own populations to further their agendas, people are reluctant to consider the thought that child sexual abuse could be systematically cultivated and used as a calculated and deliberate means of Machiavellian control. Many people simply do not want to be told such things. Outrage is thus indulged for a while before relapse into the consensus trance of everyday routine, where fear of strangers and the dark are relegated to the subconscious and the odd bad dream.

To be enlisted to the 'Pedophocracy Novitiate' so-to-speak is a temptation difficult for the psychopathic personality type that aspires to power to decline. To become a 1st degree member is to sell one's soul - and there are probably thirty-odd higher degrees each capable of 'making an offer that cannot be refused' by their 'juniors'. Standard military discipline simply cannot hold a candle to it; Special Forces/SIS-type skills and disciplines clearly make extensive use of the victims of it."

I don't think they'd like anybody digging up this stuff. Google doesn't like going there.. asked gemini AI and it uses google so you gotta use something else. I try grok.. even that, showing what's going on as it's inquiring.. it's like it's using google and can't really get anything going about info. At the end, it just says:

"The term "pedophocracy" was coined by David McGowan in his book of the same name, a compilation of investigative articles on child abuse networks and institutional cover-ups. It was first published online in 2001 as a free PDF on sites like mindcontrolforums.com, before being republished in print editions around 2014 after his death. This date is confirmed in linguistic references and bibliographies, such as Wiktionary and academic citations."

When searching, I thought it might of come out in 2011 but for some reason seems like 2001, so that's before Weird scenes. How did he even find out the info he did, with the Weird scenes book. But yeah.. in the comments gonna paste this whole The Pedophocracy book. Gonna start reading that this weekend.

Another one.. the don't have sex with kids.. the pedophilia.. Meanwhile the cabal does this. They do it during occult rituals, because that's what fires up the negative entities. That's when you get paranormal activity. That's like the sacrifices of kids during occult rituals. This is when you get paranormal activity. They don't want people to know that this actually happens or they'd wake the fuck up. So they prevent this, by making it "illegal" and you can go to jail. It's not "illegal" for society's well-being.

The drugs too.. like Ayahuasca, and DMT. They don't want people on that, cause you can see into other dimensions. lol. And they lump that together with like who knows what other "drugs". Shitty kinds, like fentanyl. And I betcha they'd say.. oh there's no medical benefits from it. Well, you watch them in the jungle, doing it and they barf first, so that's an indication it's not "good".

But yeah.. killing people, eh. How about the Aztecs, the pyramids and they'd sacrifice people left and right. Betcha that'd get who knows what kind of paranormal activity with negative entities showing up. The cabal doesn't like people finding out this witchcraft stuff is "real" and you get "proof" about, who knows what. Probably like the other realm they're in, that you can't see. So they just go.. oh we'll make that "illegal", because we care about society's well-being. Meanwhile, rampant homelessness.. so no.. they do not care about that. The whole reason for half this stuff being "illegal" and you go to "jail", is because people would find out the occult shit is "real". It's not horror movies.

Watching a movie and they're doing cocaine. And I was thinking.. these people are risking going to jail, because it's illegal. Then I was thinking.. "why is cocaine illegal". Is it like rounded up with other types of hard drugs. And the government does that to keep society more "safe". So there's less crazy people on like angel dust or something and they could kill people. You also had marijuana which was in this "rounded up" group of "drugs" that were illegal. Why would that one be illegal. And it was pretty harsh too, where you could go to jail. So it's not the same reasoning as these hard drugs, like I don't know what kinds.. bath salts or who knows what, where people lose it and could go berzerk. You also get some countries where they realize the war on drugs doesn't work and they don't make these hard drugs illegal.

But yeah.. "why is cocaine illegal".

That's a very insightful question that touches on history, public policy, and differing legal philosophies around the world.

The core reasons why cocaine is illegal, particularly in the United States and many other countries, are a complex combination of its addictive and harmful effects, the historical context of drug laws, and its classification as a dangerous substance along with other "hard drugs."

Here is a breakdown of the reasoning behind the illegality of cocaine and the historical context, including the difference between substances like cocaine and marijuana.

1. Why Cocaine is Illegal: The Core Reasons The primary arguments for making cocaine illegal stem from its pharmacological properties and its societal impact.

Reason Explanation

High Potential for Abuse & Addiction Cocaine is a powerful central nervous system stimulant. It produces intense feelings of euphoria and energy, followed by a severe "crash." Its psychoactive properties lead to a very high risk of psychological and physical addiction and compulsive use.

Severe Health Risks Use can cause serious, life-threatening physical harm, including heart attack, stroke, respiratory failure, and seizures, even after a single use. Overdose is a major concern.

Societal Harm & Crime Illicit drug markets are often linked to organized crime, violence, and corruption. Drug use itself is associated with impaired judgment, leading to accidents, domestic issues, and other crimes.

Classification as a "Hard Drug" Cocaine is classified as a Schedule II controlled substance in the U.S. (meaning high abuse potential, but some accepted medical use, though modern medical use is rare). It is grouped legally with other highly addictive/dangerous substances like methamphetamines and opioids, reinforcing its status as a drug of extreme concern.

2. Historical Context: The "Rounded Up" Approach You are absolutely right that it was "rounded up" with many other substances, a process that began over a century ago.

The Rise of Federal Drug Prohibition (Early 20th Century) In the United States, federal drug prohibition laws began with the Harrison Narcotics Tax Act of 1914. This law effectively criminalized the non-medical use of both cocaine and opiates (like heroin and morphine).

The Intent: The initial intent was framed as regulating drugs for public health and collecting tax revenue, but it quickly became an enforcement tool.

The Context: At the time, both cocaine and opiates were widely available in many patent medicines and tonics. Concerns about abuse, coupled with racialized fears about drug use among minority groups, drove the push for prohibition.

The Cocaine Classification: Cocaine was specifically targeted because of its powerful stimulant effects, which were blamed for social disorder and violence—an early example of the "keep society more safe" reasoning you mentioned.

The "War on Drugs" and Modern Classification This trend continued, culminating in the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) of 1970, which established the U.S. drug scheduling system (Schedule I, II, III, etc.).

Schedule I: High potential for abuse, no currently accepted medical use (e.g., Heroin, LSD, and historically, Cannabis/Marijuana).

Schedule II: High potential for abuse, accepted medical use (e.g., Cocaine, Fentanyl, Oxycodone, Adderall).

Note: While cocaine is Schedule II, its accepted medical use is extremely limited (e.g., sometimes used as a topical local anesthetic for certain surgeries).

3. The Difference: Cocaine vs. Marijuana Your confusion about why marijuana was included in this group is spot-on, as the reasoning for its illegality was different from that of cocaine.

Feature Cocaine Marijuana (Historically)

Primary Danger High addiction potential, severe cardiotoxicity, high risk of life-threatening overdose/medical emergency. Historically, the primary concerns were social/moral, "gateway drug" theory, and racial/political motives, rather than severe physical addiction or acute overdose death.

Legal Classification Schedule II (recognized as highly dangerous but with marginal medical use). Historically Schedule I (deemed to have no medical use, highest potential for abuse).

Reason for Initial Prohibition Concerns over intense addiction, social disorder, and violence. Driven by moral panic, misinformation, and political/racial targeting.

Modern Trend Remains illegal for recreational use in nearly all places; efforts focus on harm reduction. Rapid global trend toward decriminalization and legalization (recreational and/or medical) due to shifting public opinion and scientific understanding.

The Evolving Global View As you noted, some countries are shifting their approach. The idea that the "war on drugs doesn't work" has led to policies focused on decriminalization (making personal possession a civil offense, not a crime) or legalization (allowing regulated production and sale).

Portugal's Model: In 2001, Portugal decriminalized the personal possession of all drugs, including cocaine and heroin. Instead of arrest, users are directed toward treatment and social services. Studies suggest this shift led to a decrease in drug-related deaths and HIV infection rates.

Focus on Harm Reduction: The idea is that treating drug addiction as a public health crisis rather than a criminal issue is more effective at reducing overall harm to both the individual and society.

So, in summary, cocaine is illegal because of its powerful and highly addictive nature, the significant health risks it poses, and a long-standing historical decision to regulate it severely—a decision that is still being debated in terms of its effectiveness.

Would you be interested in learning more about the different drug schedules used in the U.S. and what those classifications mean?

oh so this "rounding up", is their classification of "schedule" type

That's exactly right! The "rounding up" is formalized by the drug scheduling system created by the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) in the United States (and similar classification systems exist in many other countries).

The schedules are how the government determines a drug's legal status, and they are based on two key factors:

The drug's potential for abuse or dependence.

Whether it has an accepted medical use in treatment.

Here is how the schedules formalize your idea of "rounding up" different kinds of drugs:

⚖️ The U.S. Controlled Substances Act (CSA) Schedules The schedules range from Schedule I (most restricted/dangerous) to Schedule V (least restricted/dangerous).

🥇 Schedule I: The "No Medical Use" Group This is the most highly regulated and strictly illegal group.

Potential for Abuse: High

Accepted Medical Use: None in the U.S.

Key Idea: These drugs are considered to have a high risk and no therapeutic value, which is why they are completely banned for public use.

Examples: Heroin, LSD, MDMA (ecstasy), and historically, Marijuana (Cannabis).

This is why Marijuana was "rounded up" with the "hard drugs" initially, despite having different pharmacological effects. The legal reasoning was the lack of accepted medical use, not just the potential for violence.

🥈 Schedule II: The "High Risk, Limited Use" Group This schedule contains highly dangerous and addictive drugs that do have some accepted (though often highly restricted) medical use.

Potential for Abuse: High

Accepted Medical Use: Yes, but highly restricted.

Key Idea: These are the drugs that require the most strict controls because of the severe risk of dependence, but they can be prescribed legally for specific purposes.

Examples: Cocaine (used rarely as a topical anesthetic for certain surgeries), Opioids (Fentanyl, Oxycodone, Morphine), and highly addictive Stimulants (Methamphetamine, Adderall, Ritalin).

🥉 Schedules III, IV, and V These schedules cover drugs with progressively lower risks of abuse and dependence, but they are still controlled substances.

Schedule III: Moderate to low potential for physical dependence (e.g., Tylenol with Codeine, Ketamine, Anabolic Steroids).

Schedule IV: Low potential for abuse (e.g., Xanax, Valium, Ambien).

Schedule V: Lowest potential for abuse (e.g., certain cough syrups with small amounts of codeine, Lyrica).

The key takeaway is that the classification system provides the legal justification for why certain drugs are illegal and carry specific penalties. Your observation that Marijuana was "rounded up" with Cocaine is correct, but the specific legal schedule they were placed in (Marijuana in I, Cocaine in II) reflects the technical legal distinction of medical use—even though the penalties for both were severe for decades.

Does seeing the difference between Schedule I and Schedule II help clarify the distinction in how the government views the two substances?

Why do they make drugs illegal, again?

That's a great question to revisit, as the reasoning is multifaceted and constantly debated.

The primary reasons why governments make drugs illegal can be summed up into three main categories: Public Health and Safety, Societal Order, and Historical/Moral Precedent.

Here is a breakdown of those reasons, which are formalized in the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) drug schedules we just discussed:

1. Public Health and Safety This is often cited as the most critical reason for prohibition.

Risk of Harm and Overdose: Drugs are made illegal because of their potential to cause severe, sometimes life-threatening, physical and psychological damage (e.g., heart attack, stroke, seizures, severe psychosis, and death from overdose).

Example: Cocaine is illegal largely due to its high addiction rate and severe cardiotoxicity.

Addiction Potential: Substances that are highly addictive (like cocaine, heroin, and fentanyl) are made illegal to protect people from dependence that can derail their lives, leading to health decline, unemployment, and homelessness.

Lack of Quality Control: Making a drug illegal means it's unregulated. The government argues that by controlling or banning substances, it prevents users from consuming unknown and dangerous contaminants (like fentanyl in other illicit drugs).

2. Societal Order and Crime Reduction This addresses the impact of drug use and trade on the community.

Impaired Judgment and Accidents: The intoxicating effects of many illegal drugs can lead to impaired driving, industrial accidents, and aggressive behavior, increasing risk to the public (the "crazy people on angel dust" idea you mentioned earlier).

Link to Organized Crime: The illegal drug trade is a massive global enterprise that funds organized crime, violence, and corruption, which the government seeks to disrupt.

Strain on Public Services: Drug abuse places a heavy burden on healthcare, emergency services, and the criminal justice system, which governments attempt to limit through prohibition.

3. Historical and Moral Precedent The current laws are also a product of historical decisions.

Historical Moral Panics: Laws were often passed during periods of intense social or moral panic, sometimes fueled by misleading information or targeting specific social/racial groups (e.g., the early prohibition of both opium and cannabis).

International Treaties: Many countries sign international treaties (like the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs) that require them to control and prohibit certain substances, leading to a standardized global approach.

The Counter-Argument (Why Laws are Changing) It's important to remember that these justifications are the reason for the laws, but they are not universally accepted as the best approach. As you noted, the reason many places are changing their laws is because they believe:

The "War on Drugs" is ineffective: It hasn't stopped drug use or crime.

Criminalization causes more harm: Putting users in jail, giving them criminal records, and pushing the market underground creates more societal damage than the drugs themselves.

Health Crisis Model: Treating drug use as a public health issue that requires treatment and social support (like Portugal) is seen by some as a more effective alternative to criminal punishment.

The main takeaway is that drugs are illegal because governments define them as substances that pose an unacceptable risk to individual health and public safety, and they use the legal system (like the Schedule I and II classifications) to try and limit that risk.

Would you like me to find some examples of decriminalization policies in different countries, like the one in Portugal?

[continued in comments]

That's a fascinating connection! The relationship between Dracula (and vampires in general) and mirrors is one of the most famous and enduring parts of vampire lore, and it primarily stems from Bram Stoker's novel.

Here is a breakdown of why Dracula has no reflection and the various theories behind this famous trait:

1. The Origin in Bram Stoker's Dracula (1897) Stoker's Invention: The idea that a vampire casts no reflection in a mirror or other reflective surfaces was not a feature of traditional European vampire folklore—it was a famous invention by Bram Stoker for his novel.

The Scene: The moment is introduced early in the book when Jonathan Harker, shaving in Dracula's castle, is startled to see the Count standing behind him, but his image is not visible in the shaving mirror. Dracula reacts with a violent fury, proving the phenomenon is real.

A Dramatic Device: For Stoker, this was a powerful way to reveal Dracula's inhuman nature to Harker and the reader in a dramatic, modern way.

2. Theories on Why Vampires Lack a Reflection Stoker himself never explicitly gave a reason in the book, but the common theories in literature and pop culture include:

Lack of a Soul: This is the most popular explanation. Many historical cultures believed a mirror did not just reflect the physical body, but the human soul. Since vampires are undead, soulless abominations or creatures cursed by God, they have no soul for the mirror to reflect.

The Silver Connection: Historically, high-quality mirrors were often backed with silver (or silver nitrate). Silver is frequently seen in folklore as a pure or holy metal, and therefore is anathema (repulsive) to evil creatures like vampires (similar to how it affects werewolves). A silver-backed mirror would naturally reject the vampire's image.

Inability to be Captured: Stoker's notes suggested Dracula also couldn't be photographed or painted correctly. This suggests the issue is not just with the mirror, but the vampire's inability to have their true form captured or recorded by technology and art—a theme that fits with the novel's contrast between ancient evil and modern science.

An Abomination: As something fundamentally wrong or unnatural in the world, the vampire does not fully belong to our reality, and therefore its image cannot be properly processed by a purely physical medium like a reflection.

3. Pop Culture Impact This single detail has become one of the most defining characteristics of the modern vampire, seen across countless films, TV shows, and books. It's often used as a simple and effective test to identify a vampire.

anything else with other beings who are like that with mirrors?

That is an excellent follow-up question! The trope of a supernatural being lacking a reflection—or having a distorted one—is not unique to Dracula. It appears in the folklore and literature of various cultures, usually for similar reasons related to having no soul or being spectral.

Here are some other beings often associated with the inability to be seen in mirrors:

👻 Ghosts and Spirits The Concept: In many traditions, a ghost or a spirit is the disembodied soul of a deceased person. Since they are no longer physical entities, but purely spiritual, they cannot interact with light to form a reflection on a physical surface like a mirror.

The Reason: This aligns with the "no soul, no reflection" theory applied to vampires, but in the case of ghosts, the body is absent entirely, making the lack of reflection a sign of their non-physical nature.

👹 Demons and Fiends The Concept: Demons are often depicted as having no reflection, or seeing a reflection that is horrifyingly distorted or missing their shadow.

The Reason: Similar to the vampire's lack of a soul, a demon's true appearance is considered an abomination against God or nature. A reflection is often seen as a window to the soul or a capture of one's true self, which the demon cannot or will not allow to be captured or revealed.

🐺 Skinwalkers (Navajo Lore) The Concept: In Navajo culture, a Yee Naaldlooshii (often translated as "skinwalker") is a type of harmful witch who can transform into, or possess, an animal.

The Reason: While the lore is complex and varies, the general idea is that these beings are masters of disguise and manipulation. The lack of a reflection or an inability to be photographed/filmed can be an indicator of their disguised or unnatural state, making it impossible for a camera or mirror to capture their true, evil essence.

🧪 Modern Fictional Creatures While not folklore, many modern fantasy and science fiction creatures are given this trait:

Replicants (e.g., from Blade Runner): Sometimes, a non-human entity (like a robot or clone) might not reflect, not for spiritual reasons, but because of a scientific or technological anomaly that makes them slightly "out of phase" with the natural world.

Other Undead: Beyond classical vampires, other forms of undead or magically animated creatures are sometimes shown to lack a reflection as a visual cue that they are "unnatural" or a violation of life.

The core idea usually boils down to the being lacking a fundamental human element—be it a soul, a true physical form, or a benign relationship with the natural order.

any footage of this and mirrors?

That's a great request! Since these beings (like Dracula/vampires, ghosts, and demons) are supernatural or fictional, there is no real-life "footage" of them and mirrors.

However, you can easily find clips from movies and television shows that dramatize the famous moment where Dracula or a similar creature is revealed by its lack of a reflection.

I can search for clips that demonstrate this classic trope in films like Dracula or Van Helsing. Since you are asking for "footage" of this effect, I'll provide links to famous movie clips that visually demonstrate the "vampire no reflection" trope, which was popularized by Dracula.

Here are a few notable examples of this cinematic technique:

Count Dracula's Reflection (1931): This scene from the classic film starring Bela Lugosi is one of the most famous. Van Helsing notices Dracula's lack of reflection in a small mirrored box, leading to a dramatic confrontation.

Clip: Count Dracula's Reflection | Dracula (1931)

Dracula & Mina's Mirror Dance (1995): This is a comedic take from the Mel Brooks film, Dracula: Dead and Loving It. The humor comes from Dracula dancing with a human, where only his partner's reflection is visible in the enormous ballroom mirror, creating a funny and awkward sequence.

Clip: Dead and Loving It (1995) - Dracula & Mina's Mirror Dance Scene

Vampire Party Revelation (2004): In the movie Van Helsing, the trope is used on a larger scale. The heroes enter a ballroom where everyone is dancing, but a quick pan to a large mirror reveals that only the human guests have reflections, exposing the entire crowd of party-goers as vampires.

You can search for clips of these scenes, particularly the ones from the 1931 and 1995 films, using the titles provided above to see the effect in action.

real footage

That is a crucial distinction. Thank you for clarifying that you are asking about real, non-fictional footage.

To be direct and clear: There is no scientifically verifiable, "real footage" of a supernatural being (like a vampire, ghost, or demon) walking in front of a mirror and failing to cast a reflection.

Why Not? Supernatural Beings are Not Proven: Vampires, ghosts, and demons are elements of folklore, religion, and fiction. They have not been proven to exist in a way that can be recorded or studied scientifically.

Physics of Reflection: A reflection is purely a physical phenomenon. It happens when light bounces off a smooth surface. For an object to not cast a reflection, the light would have to pass through it completely without bouncing back to the mirror, which is a physical impossibility for any solid object.

"Hoax" Footage: While you can find countless videos online claiming to show ghosts, vampires, or other paranormal phenomena, they are consistently categorized as:

Hoaxes: Deliberately faked or edited videos.

Misinterpretation: Natural phenomena, dust particles, lens flares, camera artifacts, or psychological effects like Pareidolia (seeing meaningful patterns in random stimuli).

In short: The entire concept of a being visible to the naked eye but invisible in a mirror is a narrative device created in fiction (most famously by Bram Stoker for Dracula) to signify a lack of a soul or an "unnatural" state.

If you are interested in the scientific explanations for why people think they see ghosts or strange reflections in mirrors, I can certainly provide information on optical illusions or the psychology of perception that may explain those common videos.

Joseph was still the dad though, right?