3
jamesfinmadison2 3 points ago +3 / -0

He's justifying the suppression of speech of the POTUS/exPOTUS in his statement by arguing that he had no facts to back up election steal (false) and that such assertions made when elites like him don't agree is "corrosive".

The people who support such suppression understand the game of a permissive justification argument phrased as a speculation. No one is fooled. He should have said it was outrageous to censor the POTUS, period.

by pkvi
2
jamesfinmadison2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Every city and town has a budget for snow removal. The comparison is less between states here then townships. The states are responsible for the highway snow removal only, typically.

Meme's like this are retarded because they hurt federalism, state's rights, by using a straw man argument for central planning government models.

1
jamesfinmadison2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Women still, despite feminism, as a whole, look for men to be their primary supporter naturally. Even if both work, they want and crave a strong provider due to millions of years of evolution creating sex based roles.

Feminizing men creates men who want government to be that protective provider, instinctively. Like women, they won't recognize this instinct, need, as based in their core biology.

There is more to leftism and male feminization we see, and how it makes men what we see them becoming, then being jealous and petty (feminine trait btw!) or simply college professors or a desire to live of other peoples money via social welfare programs at the lowest economic rung.

2
jamesfinmadison2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Parler also has made some huge security privacy mistakes that fuvked their users. I wouldn't go back to them. They are the neocon RINO version of Twitter. The UniParty R side to control and monitor us the same as the left side is with Twitter.

0
jamesfinmadison2 0 points ago +1 / -1

My argument is sound, based in common sense. Also as someone in the industry who knows.

He had an appeal for the users to migrate over years, and a general marketing appeal most same people understand could work no other way for any social media company offering a service without all the user analytics harvesting revenue. Parler being shut down on AWS was also an unnatural tyrannical event no one saw coming.

Until you build your own platform, understand the cost of paid transit per mbs, colocation, systems upgrades, server and storage costs, you might want to stfu and be grateful.

The emotional statement of "When we needed it most." is pure faggotry that ignores reality.

Then again, maybe you are a Parler investor?

0
jamesfinmadison2 0 points ago +1 / -1

That"s the argument of a child. It takes real dollars to run a host and run a server farm that can handle Twitter users at the rate everyone moved over. You don't build that and let it sit because you hope some external event will drive everyone literally overnight (which it did).

They invested and got the site running well in a week. For a free fucking service. Don't be a faggot.

1
jamesfinmadison2 1 point ago +2 / -1

Can't blame Gab. They run their own physical server farms and ramped up as fast as they could. This is a bs conflating attack of Gab or super ignorant of the facts.

4
jamesfinmadison2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is that you Crenshaw?

Anyone that seriously thinks this is NOT a critical thinker. Trumps national populist policies have opposed both the UniParty Donohue/CoC objectives of the R party (junior partner) and the globalist ChiCom friendly D party. Both wings are full of NWO intel agency plant candidates.

The R party fractured itself by selling us out. They just did it less obviously (right up until this election year at least).