I can say you're speaking e.g. of Frankism but not of Hasidism (among many isms)
No, I'm speaking of the Jews. But things are actually much more complicated than that. Actually I'm talking about EVIL, and the Jews are a construct and tool of the evil empire. In other words, they're really the middle managers, to the ones who helped and continue to help manage the empire. Evil needs middle managers. And for the past few years, the Jews have served this purpose well. You may call them Sabbateans, Frankists, Deep State, Cabal, international bankers, whatever... to me they're the shadows and they make all the money. And it's really the Jews that get all the blame.
The British Empire for example, it controlled the whole world. But, it went bankrupt because of evil, it used the Bank of England as a Ponzi scheme. It needed people to buy into into the empire for it to continue to be successful. The grand strategy of the British empire was to create as much chaos and conflict possible in Europe and elsewhere. You always want your enemies to fight each other. So, this is the evil the core strategy for the British empire, pretty simple to understand.
The remaining question is then whether the Monad participates in evil by allowing free will
Now you speak as if the Monad is Yahweh which is God. Is not, Monad is the supreme/absolute consciousness, complete fullness (Pleroma) and total absence of evil. And this is not an insignificant theological detail. Once we understand the difference, it completely transforms our understanding of Christianity, the very nature of prayer, and our own connection to the divine. Jesus never prayed to God. He prayed to the Monad, the primordial source that exists beyond the creator, the absolute consciousness that precedes and transcends the divinity that shaped our material universe. None of the the manuscripts say that he prayed to God. They specifically mention that he prayed to the Father. For Gnostics, who represented the original Christian understanding before its appropriation and distortion by the Evil Empire (Rome), the father is not the creator God. The creator god is the Demiurge, or Yawheh, the architect of the material world, an entity believed to be the one and only God, but which in reality is merely a distant emanation of the true source. When Jesus uttered the words, "I and the father are one," he was not claiming to be Yahweh. He was describing his consciousness in complete fusion with the Monad with the ultimate source beyond all creation. This distinction changes everything we thought we knew about Christian spirituality. Observe carefully how Jesus prayed. He did not plead. He did not beg. He did not ask for permission. He spoke as one who already possessed access to the infinite power: "Father, I thank you for having heard me. I knew that you always hear me.". Always. Not sometimes. This is because he was not communicating with a deity subject to moods and preferences, but with the immutable source, the Monad. Who does not judge, who does not decide who deserves to be heard. The Monad is pure consciousness.
Bringing it back one topic, the physical is not evil in itself but is being redeemed
With this I agree. Remember Frankists believe that they were and are saving the world. But, they believed they had to destroy the world in order to save it. The Talmud says that Moshiach will come when the world is in a state of chaos and the foundations of society are crumbling. And all these made perfect revolutionaries. On the other hand Christians believe that they must use Jews as a pawn in order to force the return of Jesus.
Frankists were/are also very materialistic, they believed that the body was more important than the spirit. So, both the Frankists (Frankist Jews) and the British (also Americans) they wanted to obtain power through chaos, instability and regime change and both were very focused on the pursuit of wealth and power. So these were natural allies. Another example of an evil alliance is of course the Rothschild banking dynasty. This is the Rothschilds who own/control the Bank of England and Federal Reserve, with the British Monarchy. And this alliance goes back hundreds of years.
British (American) philosophy at this time is (and was) controlled by the Freemasons. But that's another deep rabbit hole, and we'll discuss in more detail another time. For now I just want to say the British/American philosophy at this time was/is controlled by Freemasons. And the main purpose is to really deny God and truth.
There are many answers to why evil exists
OK, why is the world so evil? here is my opinion, but first let's take a look at evil happening in our world today.
Rather than talking about Phoenicians and their children sacrifices, or Romans and their human sacrifices (although they called it triumph), and many others in history, let's look at Gaza where Israel was bombing and still killing people today. Almost half of the population of Gaza is made up by children. What's happening in Gaza is genocide an extreme form of evil. What I would argue though is that the truth is far more disturbing. What is really happening in Gaza is not only genocide but a ritual sacrifice.
Ritual sacrifice happened often in human history. For example the Aztecs. We've dug up temples of the Aztecs and inside the temples are thousands and thousands of human skulls. So before they went to war, they practiced human sacrifice. They would commit mass murder of their enemies in public. I already mentioned the Phoenicians who were famous for a particular type of ritual sacrifice which is child sacrifice. And the Romans that after every major war, they would capture all the major leaders, all their enemies, and they would parade their enemies through the streets of Rome. This is something called the triumph. At the end of the triumph, they would gather enemies at the temple of their god Jupiter, and then they would strangle to death their enemies.
Why do the Phoenicians, Romans, Aztecs do it? And why is it today the Israelis do it in Gaza? Why? Because 47% almost half of the population of Gaza is under 18 years old. And we can all see it for ourselves, it's almost as though the Israelis want us to see it and want us to hate them. Why allow horrific videos to be uploaded to the Internet? there are actually much more effective ways of doing that, poisoning the water, vaccines which cause fast cancer. Why bomb the Palestinians on national & global TV? when they could do this secretly and no one would talk about it. IMO, they want the world to hate them because by doing this they create the ultimate taboo. So the entire world will unite against Israel, which is exactly what their religion wants. They believe that at the end of the time, Israel will fight the entire world and God will help Israel triumph in the end. The entire idea of this ritual sacrifice is to unite the Israeli population (and jews all over the world). And they do this, because it works.
What's the worst thing, the most evil thing you can do in a modern society? killing children right? that's evil to everyone, but not to them. They tell each other stories And then these stories become a common myth, a founding myth of why they're here. And they come to believe that God has chosen them to save the world and that's why they're here. Then they will create a new religion and start to develop rituals to reinforce this religion. These rituals include sex, to create intimacy and bonding among them and there'll be a lot of religious rituals as well. But this is not evil to them, only a natural progression... just ask Ghislaine Maxwell (since you can't ask Jeffery Epstein any longer). They've got the capacity to work together. They have a hive mind. They're really energized. They're really inspired. They're really driven. They have a new religion all to themselves. And best of all, it's not EVIL.
look at us humans. I rest my case... There are many answers to why evil exists
I said that more or less as a joke. And I wasn't necessarily referring to evil, but, now that you mention... I was thinking more to an imperfect world from a human perspective. For instance humans live to be about 120 years old. However, Most animals’ bodies do not gradually degenerate as they get older the way our bodies do. But for humans once they reach about age of 30 their chance of dying doubles roughly every eight years. That's not true for animals.
Math Universe Hypothesis
The theory of everything, this is a deep rabbit hole. Meantime take a look at "Are We Living in a Brahma's Simulation? The Hindu Maya Theory Explained".
namely Yahweh, Yaldabaoth, Demiurge, or Creator
Take all the time you need, and definitely read the Apocryphon of John.
Yahweh and Yaldabaoth/the Demiurge are the same entity. Samael is another name of Yaldabaoth that means “god of the blind” to gnostics. However, I know Samael can have a different meaning depending on tradition.
And Yahweh/the Demiurge is the grand architect of the imperfect world we live in. He also created Adam, the first man, but could not grant him a soul due to the absence of his connection with the Pleroma. That's when Sophia stepped in, having already repented, and provided the divine spark. IMO, all by design. But, many would argue Yahweh is the creator of an evil and imperfect world. And they may not be entirely wrong... all you have to do is look around, look at us humans. I rest my case.
IMO, Yahweh created the world this way in order for humans (us) to be able to exist, and it had to be that way. The FALL didn’t occur with Adam & Eve, it happened before the world’s creation with Sophia. But Sophia repented, and the Father agreed to bring her back to the Pleroma once what had become lacking in her (us) was restored to its natural fullness. This is a process which is long, over many lifetimes, but time is of no consequence. Time is infinite, this lifetime is one experiment. If you fail, you'll get another chance. Eventually, you'll figure it out.
The world Yahweh created is specifically designed to make this possible. It operates on a fundamental concept of duality, it is structured by deterministic laws that yield regularity and predictability. In the same time this duality gives rise to the uncertainty that alters our perception of reality and our place within it. It’s like a dream/simulation. Many people believe we live in a simulation, and that includes Elon Musk. Have you ever had that feeling? Hindus believe we live in Brahma's Simulation/Dream. Ancient Hindu wisdom predicted simulation theory thousands of years before The Matrix and Hollywood. And they’re not entirely wrong…
Jesus says "find your own divine spark and each one of us must discover it" as if that's different; but it sounds the same to me
No, totally different. Gnostics believe the God of the Old Testament, Yahweh is the Demiurge. Same as in the Apocryphon of John "And she called his name Yaltabaoth.". Yahweh occurs more than 6,800 times in the Old Testament, and for good reason, he is the creator of our material world. And he is our creator. Yahweh, the Demiurge, is also a ruler, a jealous god who seeks control. Sofia his mother, and a partial aspect of the divine Pleroma, desired to create something apart from the divine and did this without consent from the Father. Demiurge (Yahweh) having stolen a portion of power from his mother, sets about a work of creation in unconscious imitation of the superior realm. Thus Sophia’s power becomes enclosed within the material forms of humanity, themselves entrapped within the material universe. Sophia (wisdom in Greek) resides in all humans as this divine spark.
Sophia when she realized her mistake she decided to cast her child, the Demiurge, out of the Pleroma. The Demiurge, now alone, believed that he was the only being who had ever existed, and created the material world out of his ignorance, trapping sparks of divinity within Adam and Eve along the way. The Demiurge traps souls within the physical realm, making them forget their divine origin. This makes sense, and there are many examples of this in the Bible. Jesus mission is that of spiritual liberation, and his goal is the awakening of this divine spark of wisdom (Sophia), enabling the enlightened soul to return to the superior, non-material realities which were its primal source.
So far so good. Now, where I disagree with some/many of the gnostics, they conceive the relation of the Demiurge to the Supreme God as one of actual antagonism. The Demiurge thus became the personification of the power of evil (he's not), the Satan of Gnosticism, with whom the faithful had to wage war (they don't) to the end that they might be pleasing to the Good God (it's not). However, it is true John says "has three names: The first name is Yaldabaoth, the second is Saklas, and the third is Samael. He is blind. His power is great. He falsely claimed, 'I am God, and there is no other God beside me.' But he did not know that there exists the true Source above him." - The Apocryphon of John
IMO, the Demiurge, the God of the OT, Yahweh is not evil, far from that. I'll go more in depth about this later, I don't have time now.
Finally, you seem to imply you have an answer as to those who don't desire the burden of responsibility
I don't have the answer, I just raised the question.
differences between those Jews who rejected Jesus and those (Jews) who accepted Jesus
I'm not sure what that means. I know what the Church teaches, with which and I don't agree. Christianity demands something different from every other religion, it doesn't matter how good you are, if you don't believe in Jesus, you will burn in hell forever. Might as well say: accept the Empire narrative and obey, or else.
And here is why I disagree:
- Jesus's message: Find the spark within yourself and connect. Inner transformation matters.
- Church's message: Worship (accept) Jesus and obey us or be condemned to hell. Belief is everything.
differences between what Jesus did and what Jesus was
Jesus was student under John the Baptist, but he was also a teacher. He was a prophet who never claimed to be God (any God). Now, what he did... he brought a message of spiritual liberation. This message was first of all extremely dangerous to Rome because it told people that imperial power was ultimately meaningless. A dangerous message to the Jews, risking to destroy everything they had work so hard achieve. That is to enslave people. Not only financially, but also from a religious perspective. But a message of liberation to the people:
- Find the Divine Spark: He taught that each person has a divine spark connecting them to the ultimate source of love and truth.
- How to activate it once you found it: He showed people how... through love, forgiveness, compassion, and inner obedience.
- True Freedom: The poor and oppressed are spiritually free. The rich and powerful are trapped in spiritual death.
differences between attributes of Monad and attributes of Dodecad
For the attributes of the Monad I'll direct you once again to the Apocryphon of John: "He is the invisible Spirit... he is more than a god, since there is nothing above him, for no one lords it over him. For he does not exist in something inferior to him, since everything exists in him. For it is he who establishes himself. He is eternal, since he does not need anything. For he is total perfection... he is always completely perfect in light... He is illimitable... He is unsearchable... He is eternal... He is ineffable... He is unnamable... He is immeasurable light.".
a new reply to OP with the ping of the other's name (like u/SwampRangers) added
I understand create a new message under OP, copy & paste, but what do you mean by "ping to others". You mean insert u/SwampRangers in the body of the new message?
I haven't heard that DMs are prohibited to newcomers
It's CAPTCHA that's required when I click Save. CloudFlare returns an error message "Direct Messaging not allowed for newcomers".
What is this? you have nothing else to do but monitor this platform? you replied to my message just a few minutes later. I haven't read your message in entirety, so I can't yet reply... but, I just can't understand what you're doing. And why? so please be honest, I don't care what you think, believe, or follow.
Also keep in mind, I don't know how many messages we can exchange. There must be a limit. And since I'm new on this platform I'm not allowed to DM, so time and space is short.
If the historical Jesus were not God in the flesh, I'd be wrong, and I'd want to know I was wrong
And if I agree with you, we'd both be wrong. There is a divine spark within all of us. The jews claim this divine spark or spark of the Moshiach, as they call it, gives them alone the power to be united to God. That's why they rejected Jesus, because his God and their God was not one and the same. That's where they're wrong, they're worshiping to wrong God. But, it feels good for them since this is the creator of everything material, including MONEY.
Jesus isn't saying "follow me" or "worship me." He's saying find your own divine spark and each one of us must discover it. That's what we should focus on, not the religious icon called Jesus.
Jesus who merged his consciousness with the consciousness of the universe over a certain period of time; please go on
We must do the same thing as Jesus did. He showed us the way, we must follow. But, no one can do this work for you. You must do it yourself.
"I found all of them intoxicated. I found none of them thirsty. For empty they came into the world, and empty too they seek to leave the world."
People are drunk on wealth, power, status, and pleasure. They came with nothing and will leave with nothing, yet they chase illusions. Eventually they'll sober up and realize what's truly important.
All told, in one sense Jesus never claimed to be God on his own
That's right Jesus never claimed to be God. Because he knew very well the people in Judea were worshiping a lesser God. You probably know this, according to the gnostics this God is the Demiurge, or Yaldabaoth, who is identified as the creator of the physical universe, asserting that he single-handedly established the world. This Demiurge is the creator of this evil world, the God of the jews; "for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, inflicting the punishment of the fathers on the children, on the third and the fourth generations of those who hate Me". The Demiurge is also responsible for the flood of Noah, or the great flood present in every civilization.
When Jesus declared, “I and the Father are one,” he was not claiming to be Yahweh, he was talking about the consciousness of the universe, for gnostics this is the Monad.
But, before you label me a gnostic, I will tell you I believe the gnostics don't go all the way either. They also stop short with their revelations. Jesus taught that a divine spark exists within each person, a responsibility to let it grow, bringing happiness and connection with the divine. But this freedom comes with a burden: individual responsibility, mistakes, and suffering. What about those who lack the courage to follow this path? What about millions who simply want to live normal lives without the weight of freedom?
By his logic a lot of historical figures don't exist
And you're correct here. History is not something we can observe. That's why historical science deals with past events that were not directly observed, and observational science is true science and can be trusted, whereas historical science is, at best, weak and highly unreliable.
Historians use observation and analysis of historical data to make logical conclusions based on the clues left behind by past events. They also use comparison with realistic experiences and they use repeatable uncontrolled experiments. Historiography is the study of historical writing. It involves critically examining sources, selecting specific details from authentic materials, and synthesizing them into a narrative that withstands critical analysis.
But God exists
I don't deny this, someone had to create us. And we didn't come from monkeys. Darwin believed that the fossil record is incomplete due to the lack of discovery of intermediate forms, which he considered necessary for his theory of evolution. He maintained that if evolution were true, countless intermediary fossils demonstrating gradual transitions between species should be found. We found NONE.
And Jesus did exist, historians are reasonably confident of that. Two billion people believe Jesus is God, not a prophet, not a teacher, but literally God in human form. However, the Jesus that billions worship today is not the Jesus who actually lived and taught in 1st century Palestine. But he never claimed to be God. Today's Jesus is a religious icon that only proves the power of the empire. How the Elites can manipulate the narrative in order to brainwash people. And the made up character of Paul/Saul of Taurus is just another proof of that.
I asked you what you believe about Jesus and your answer amounts to "not that"
I tried to avoid discussing Jesus because I'm convinced we have two different views on this. Very well, I'll share this with you, but I'm not sure how helpful it will be.
Let's first talk about the historical Jesus, because indeed we have evidence that this man existed.
Two billion people believe Jesus is God (you included), not a prophet, not a teacher, but literally God in human form. But, IMO, the Jesus that billions worship today is not the Jesus who actually lived and taught in1st century Palestine. That gap between the historical Jesus and the religious icon reveals something profound about how power works and how empires shape narratives. It was exactly the same 2,000 years ago as it is today.
Scholars are also reasonably certain Jesus studied under John the Baptist, an apocalyptic preacher who taught that God was coming to destroy evil and establish his kingdom. Jesus was one of his disciples but at some point in time broke away and started his own following. And here I think is where the extraordinary happened. To me the baptism of Jesus, the ritual purification of Jesus with water by John the Baptist allowed Jesus to awaken the inner self. Similar in many ways to Buddha’s enlightenment, but not the same. All the Buddha recognized was the nature of his being. Same with Jesus, but more, at that moment he was able to merge his consciousness with the consciousness of the Universe. In that moment Jesus knew what John the Baptist didn't.
I don't count myself a Zionist
I don't care what you call or count yourself as, a Messianic Gentile, an Evangelical Christian or something else... I say you are a Christian Zionist.
The state of Israel can be praised or criticized; it's in a nadir
Did you know the word nadir has Arabic roots? the source of nadir is na?hir, meaning "opposite", that is the opposite of the zenith. (The word zenith itself is a modification of another Arabic word that means "the way over one's head.")
Interesting choice of words for the artificial nation mostly owned by a satanist family, the Rothschilds, committing genocide of Arab Palestinians. Right in front of our eyes.
Bob Dylan said you gotta serve somebody.
Why would I care what another satanist jew, his real name is Robert Allen Zimmerman, has to say?
Ann Coulter says of Christianity, if you can find a better offer, take it
Also I don't care what Ann Coulter has to say. Ann Coulter is a rabid Zionist, and neocon heroine. She is just another "useful idiot", according to Netanyahu. "I don't believe the Jewish state and modern Zionism would have been possible without Christian Zionists." - Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu
Having said all that, what is your answer to my question?
Thanks. We're on the same page here.
So I trust you accept James, since he's in Josephus
I want to ask you a question. But, first let me answer your question; No I don't trust anyone. They have given James the title "the just" for a reason. He may or may not be the brother of Jesus, but that's irrelevant to me.
And it's Titus Flavius Josephus, but his real name is Joseph ben Matityahu. And yes he's a jew who changed his name, like so many others. They do it today as well. And that brings me to the question.
I know you're a Christian Zionist and here is your website. To me Christian Zionists, especially the ones in America, along with the jews, are responsible for the creation of the state of Israel. Jacob Rothschild bragged that was his family who created Israel, and that may be true from a finance pov, but that's all. The fact is, the state of Israel wouldn't exist today without the support from Christian Zionists. What makes you a supporter? Even Ben Netanyahu doesn't think much of Christian Zionists.
He's the owner of c/Satanism c/Porno and c/Yahweh
He is also associated with Scott Lively, another evangelical Christian Zionist. As far as I am concerned the Christian Zionists, along with the jews, are responsible for most of the evil and the problems in the world today. Without them there wouldn't be a Rothschild state of Israel in Middle East. https://www.scottlively.net/swamp-rangers/swamp-rangers-recruiting-office/
he's playing both sides
I disagree with you here. IMO, Christian Zionists are the most brainwashed people of Earth. But, they don't play anything... they just obey. They're puppets on a string. According to Bibi they're "useful idiots".
This is why that link is stupid
I don't care what you think. Enjoy the 💩 show.
NASA in Hebrew means "To deceive"
I know this and I know about Wernher von Braun and Psalms 19:1
But, I don't believe you're correct. They play both sides according to the Hegelian dialectic game. "Some call it Marxism (Communism). I call it Judaism." - Rabbi Isaac Mayer Wise
This is why that link is stupid
No. I think it's because you believe in a globe earth. Either way I don't care what you think. Enjoy the shitshow: https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1718314797144428544/pu/vid/avc1/426x426/_4fa04rtetaA9Mp4.mp4?tag=12
The Jew who destroyed civilization
I agree with that. He was a Roman citizen and tasked by the Sanhedrin with the destruction of the early movement. But, are you sure Paul aka Saul of Taurus real name was Philo? I know of a Philo who was a jewish philosopher from Alexandria, Egypt.
Personally I doubt St. Paul ever existed. It was just something they made up. He isn't mentioned by any ancient Roman historian, just as Titus Flavius Josephus (real name Joseph ben Matityahu), Pliny, Suetonius or Tacitus.
Or maybe it's not a hoax
And maybe pigs can fly.
It was all filmed in Hollywood studios
Stanley Kubrick was the director and allegedly he even confessed on his deathbed.
White American men
What's the Moonlanding hoax have to do with whites in America?
You can find a log URL
Thanks. The link that I provided was an image of a table showing the two creation stories side-by-side. Nothing special, here is another link showing exactly the same thing. Let's see if they censor this as well: https://i.pinimg.com/474x/7d/af/15/7daf15dd7d129189e4ef019c2fa295cf.jpg?nii=t
no readers of Genesis had any problem with creation being told from two perspectives
I don't have a problem with inconsistencies in the Bible, it's something I would expect. And anything can be explained to a brainwashed audience. I have an issue with what's not being there (i.e. included in the Bible), for instance 1Enoch, The Book of Jubilees, The Gospel of Thomas, Apocryphon of John, etc. Same jews were censoring then, as their descendants are doing today.
And the Gospel of Thomas is not even a gnostic text and according to many scholars it was written before the Synoptics.
He won't acknowledge the obvious lie
So what? many people lie on this platform, or any other social media platform. Unless the OP lives rent free in your head, and that's not a good thing for you.
Have you ever met anyone who has never lied in his or her life? I mean meet, be in the presence, conversate with, not read somewhere, or be told that it is so.
the origin of man is deliberately being covered up from us
They are covering a lot more than you think about the original man. There are two creation stories of humans in the Bible. They are found in the first two chapters of Genesis. Here are some of the differences between the two stories:
- Order of creation. In the first story, God creates plants, then animals, and then simultaneously creates man and woman. In the second story, God creates a human, plants, then animals, and later he divides the human into female and male.
- Names for the deity. The first account uses the Hebrew word Elohim, meaning “God,” whereas the second uses the tetragrammaton, YHWH (often represented by “Lord.”)
- Literary style. The first account appears neatly organized into three days of preparation followed by three days of actual formation. Each day concludes with the formulaic expression “and there was X.” The second story is much less formulaic; rather, it is a dramatic narrative in a series of seven scenes.
Here is the same message again. Now I understand, you must have have a bone to pick with OP.
However, I don't understand your links. It's a well known fact jews owned slaves in America. Just because they change their names it doesn't mean they can hide. Jesus most likely came many times before, again it's not some unique view here. And do you have anything against whites?
This is not so hard any longer. All you have to do is look at Gaza where Israel was/is bombing and still killing people today. Almost half of the population of Gaza (47%) is made up by children. What's happening in Gaza is genocide an extreme form of evil. What I would argue though is that the truth is far more disturbing. What is really happening in Gaza is not only genocide but a ritual sacrifice. The most extreme form of evil.