The defining difference between poison and venom is that venom can be eaten safely.
Putting venom in the water simply wouldn't work.
i'm open to the idea, the laser measurements on lakes, or why wouldn't hot air balloons start to accelerate to 1000 mph as they ascend and the earth supposedly rotates below.
If you are interested in exploring the idea, asking questions, sharing criticisms, etc. - please join us on flatearthresearch to do so!
I still don't believe flat Earth
Nor should you! Only a fool believes what they ought to know.
If you believe the world is flat, spherical, or any other shape - you have faith NOT fact.
I know the Deep State wants to see how many they can fool with such a dumb psyop
Lol, no - that isn't the purpose of the heavily advertised (i.e. funded) psyop. It is overtly offensively stupid to drive people (such as yourself) away from the valuable/rewarding subject (so you'll never earnestly research or discuss it)!
It does!
But I think it is a stage light.
Compelling (i.e. popular) is almost never true/correct.
The mere fact that it is popular and heavily (i.e. expensively) advertised should tell you a lot.
I generally don’t disagree with your speculations, or sources.
However - it is important to remember that ufo’s and aliens are entirely separate. They are falsely conflated by a psyop (since the late 40’s) to discredit and suppress discussion/study/reporting on the former (ufo’s NOT aliens) - don’t fall for it!
Ufo’s are very old, but our ufo’s - known as flying saucers - first began appearing around the 40’s.
Aliens never existed, and are entirely modern fiction. They are a fictional character that hails from a fictional scene location (“outer space”) which itself was first created around the 1700’s.
As i said, the modern grey that we all know and love was first created in the 90’s. Aliens are entirely fictional, and very modern. Ufo’s are another matter entirely!
Sun hitting it from BELOW?
Yes. Although if the sunlight were directly below the moon - we would expect the entire face to be illuminated right? The presumptive view is that the sunlight is hitting the side of the moon, and it looks like the bottom to us due to our orientation to it. As I said, there are other possibilities.
I don't think it looks like a spaceship nearly as much as it looks unnatural. Perhaps i should have said that instead of "spaceship."
Fair enough. I think it is a bit odd, especially if you think it is a giant rock that floats above our heads and never falls. That would make it extraordinarily unnatural!
as ive seen no proof either way.
I think the reasonable position for such things is skepticism. If it hasn't been adequately demonstrated to be real, then there is no reason to assume it is.
As for aliens, I have done extensive study on the subject and found that they are entirely fictional and modern. The grey that we know and love wasn't created until the early 90's!
Why does the moon look like a spaceship?
Probably because you believe it does. Why do you think it looks like a spaceship / what is spaceship-like about it?
If there were no such thing as spaceships, what do you imagine it might look like instead? Some say/have said a wheel of cheese.
Why is it lit from below?
The presumptive answer is that that is the direction the light from the sun is hitting it. There are certainly other possibilities, however.
“Drugs as a weapon against us” supports the view that she herself was one of the children trafficked.
Sadly the abused does often become the abuser, and is certainly accustomed to serving said abuser :(
I suppose all the pilots could be 'IN' on the 'conspiracy' of a flat earth?
Sure, but there is no flat earth conspiracy. There are also no pilots that do (or ever could) go “perfectly straight” for the distance required to reach the origin point. Going perfectly straight is very hard, even on the order of a single mile.
If you are interested in exploring these ideas further, please join us on flatearthresearch! I assure you it will be worth your while and rewarding, assuming you are earnest. Flat earth research isn’t what you have been heavily advertised to believe it is!
Not sure I believe that.
You shouldn’t, and in this specific case you don’t have to!
Just wait until it switches to the camera inside the pod itself - the horizon is perfectly flat again. Or look at the footage shot on/near the ground which displays the curvature added by the fisheye lens used for the external shots.
I'm actually open minded to flat earth
Then please join us on flatearthresearch to discuss, explore, and exchange views on the subject!
You can’t solve a mystery with another mystery.
You especially can’t solve it with a fantasy (aliens).
Aliens only exist in fiction. You’ve been watching too much television.
We have significantly more evidence supporting the existence of giants (which could have more easily moved such mammoth blocks) than aliens (which ONLY exist in fiction, and have their origin unambiguously in it)
If you want to understand or explore this further, so it (at least) makes sense - please join us on flatearthresearch.
I would be happy to explain it, assuming you are interested in understanding!
it gets paid when we reply
It seems this may be the case, which is even more sad than the alternative (young and dumb).
This is a government-invented word like "racism" that's only use is to shut down a conversation when the glowing ones can't stand on their own arguments.
Lol. You are literally the definition of a troll.
You contribute nothing to any conversation, and harass people online “recreationally” as a substitute for a real human life :(
Racism is a buzzword. Troll is merely what you are. If you want to stop being a troll, then do it.
Oh gosh yes, those “valuable” clicks and “internet points”.
I just made a suggestion to post the question on a sub that specializes in the subject and has some users interested in that subject (as opposed to malignant trolls like yourself, which waste everyone’s time - most especially their own :()
It is, but it sure doesn’t stop you.
internet points
Lol.
Sadly i don’t have such a map.
Hopefully someone will respond here with what you are looking for. You may try asking over at flatearthresearch as well (the topic is more popular/often better received over there)
I hear ya not trusting FREEMASONIC controlled science
One of science’s greatest strengths is that it requires no, and is directly hindered by, trust. Trust/belief is known by another name in science; bias. It is to be avoided, excised, and suppressed whenever possible.
Personally, i am a fan of real science. But discerning between it and pseudoscience/mythology/religion masquerading as it is impossible for most people. They simply don’t know what science is, and the common colloquial definitions most learn are plainly incorrect.
I do buy the globehead model.. Mainly thru observation
Fair enough! Making your own informed decisions, and doing your own thorough/rigorous validation on encountered claims (of which facts are merely one type) before you accept them are the most important things.
I used to, as we are intended, “buy” the globe model as well - but i have found through my research that it does not withstand scrutiny. It was merely assumed to be true over 2000 years ago and disingenuously/erroneously taught as validated fact to virtually every student since then.
So flat Earth now uses refractory optical shift to explain Sunrises and boats appearing over horizons?
No. Flat earth is not a thing. It is a heavily advertised/funded psyop.
I am an independent flat earth researcher (we study the subject, phenomenon, and psyop to discredit/suppress it) and my views are my own.
What about the stars?
The same thing applies to all distant objects. Stars appear to rise and set for the same reasons.
Why do the stars move in the same direction the Sun rises and sets?
We’ve ventured into speculation, but i personally suspect for the same reason. Their motion is caused by (or perhaps is the cause of) the swirling motion we observe above us.
Are the stars all moving around the FlAT Earth as we see with the animations of flat Earth?
I don’t care much for cartoons, personally. In any case, the world is whatever shape it is and the motion of the celestial lights is what it is. The bias that they must be linked is merely that; encouraged through astronomy. Looking up at the sky, the literal opposite direction of the world whose surface shape you wish to study, to determine the shape of the world is unscientific and powerful dumb.
You'd think A refraction index with that kind of power would show a SUN or Moonrise shifting into view from the 'convex curve optical illusion' point (whereever that may be on the flat horizon)
I’m not sure i am following you. We do see the moon/sun/boat/distant object appearing to rise out (“shifting into view”) of the horizon line as it approaches us (and vice versa).
you can watch them appear/disappear over the horizon even with a telescopic lens
True. Zooming in on the optical illusion doesn’t change it. Why do you think it would?
In your view , it's the density gradient that shifts them out of view right at the 3 mile horizon point 6ft above see level.
More or less, yes - exactly. Well, more correctly in the case of the sun, moon, stars, planes, etc (anything not on the surface of the water) - it appears that that is the case! The horizon line is distinct/separate from the density gradient that causes the light from the distant objects to curve convexly towards the surface. The light from the boat curves enough to appear to sink, at that 3-7 (approx) mile limit.
Please let me know if you have any other questions and/or criticisms!
This is why many conclude that space is “fake and gay”.
It’s nothing but distraction from reality, and the real (and serially unaddressed) problems we face.
This is a very common question (and misunderstanding).
The horizon is an optical illusion, and not the edge of anything except our vision. This fact is not dependent on the shape of the world, and is true regardless.
The disappearing and reappearing of objects interacting with that optical illusion, is - you guessed it - also an optical illusion.
It is primarily caused by the refraction caused by the density gradient in our air which tends to cause light traveling through it to curve convexly towards the surface.
There is already a thread or two on the community i created about it if you want more detail.
To any with an interest in this topic (and/or larger subject), please join us on flatearthresearch to further explore, discuss, and exchange views on it!
A wrong (and/or contrived/mythological) explanation for stars is worse than none at all. All the cultures and mythologies for the stars they had that came before you are good examples. They all had "explanations" too...