So flat Earth now uses refractory optical shift to explain Sunrises and boats appearing over horizons?
No. Flat earth is not a thing. It is a heavily advertised/funded psyop.
I am an independent flat earth researcher (we study the subject, phenomenon, and psyop to discredit/suppress it) and my views are my own.
What about the stars?
The same thing applies to all distant objects. Stars appear to rise and set for the same reasons.
Why do the stars move in the same direction the Sun rises and sets?
We’ve ventured into speculation, but i personally suspect for the same reason. Their motion is caused by (or perhaps is the cause of) the swirling motion we observe above us.
Are the stars all moving around the FlAT Earth as we see with the animations of flat Earth?
I don’t care much for cartoons, personally. In any case, the world is whatever shape it is and the motion of the celestial lights is what it is. The bias that they must be linked is merely that; encouraged through astronomy. Looking up at the sky, the literal opposite direction of the world whose surface shape you wish to study, to determine the shape of the world is unscientific and powerful dumb.
I hear ya not trusting FREEMASONIC controlled science. I follow the latest exoplanet discoveries almost everyday. Who the hell should trust these universities/ESTABLISHMENT anymore after the way they've been acting the last several years. I do buy the globehead model.. Mainly thru observation.
I hear ya not trusting FREEMASONIC controlled science
One of science’s greatest strengths is that it requires no, and is directly hindered by, trust. Trust/belief is known by another name in science; bias. It is to be avoided, excised, and suppressed whenever possible.
Personally, i am a fan of real science. But discerning between it and pseudoscience/mythology/religion masquerading as it is impossible for most people. They simply don’t know what science is, and the common colloquial definitions most learn are plainly incorrect.
I do buy the globehead model.. Mainly thru observation
Fair enough! Making your own informed decisions, and doing your own thorough/rigorous validation on encountered claims (of which facts are merely one type) before you accept them are the most important things.
I used to, as we are intended, “buy” the globe model as well - but i have found through my research that it does not withstand scrutiny. It was merely assumed to be true over 2000 years ago and disingenuously/erroneously taught as validated fact to virtually every student since then.
No. Flat earth is not a thing. It is a heavily advertised/funded psyop.
I am an independent flat earth researcher (we study the subject, phenomenon, and psyop to discredit/suppress it) and my views are my own.
The same thing applies to all distant objects. Stars appear to rise and set for the same reasons.
We’ve ventured into speculation, but i personally suspect for the same reason. Their motion is caused by (or perhaps is the cause of) the swirling motion we observe above us.
I don’t care much for cartoons, personally. In any case, the world is whatever shape it is and the motion of the celestial lights is what it is. The bias that they must be linked is merely that; encouraged through astronomy. Looking up at the sky, the literal opposite direction of the world whose surface shape you wish to study, to determine the shape of the world is unscientific and powerful dumb.
I hear ya not trusting FREEMASONIC controlled science. I follow the latest exoplanet discoveries almost everyday. Who the hell should trust these universities/ESTABLISHMENT anymore after the way they've been acting the last several years. I do buy the globehead model.. Mainly thru observation.
One of science’s greatest strengths is that it requires no, and is directly hindered by, trust. Trust/belief is known by another name in science; bias. It is to be avoided, excised, and suppressed whenever possible.
Personally, i am a fan of real science. But discerning between it and pseudoscience/mythology/religion masquerading as it is impossible for most people. They simply don’t know what science is, and the common colloquial definitions most learn are plainly incorrect.
Fair enough! Making your own informed decisions, and doing your own thorough/rigorous validation on encountered claims (of which facts are merely one type) before you accept them are the most important things.
I used to, as we are intended, “buy” the globe model as well - but i have found through my research that it does not withstand scrutiny. It was merely assumed to be true over 2000 years ago and disingenuously/erroneously taught as validated fact to virtually every student since then.