You know, I'm not really a linguistic expert, but I'm pretty sure your comment is a collection of random non-related sentences.
The news media is the civilian government's intelligence & propaganda bureau.
It's called indoctrination. It's the same thing communists do everywhere. When that generation matures things should get interesting.
This, along with thousands of other examples, is just an isolated incident. The kid was probably doing something he shouldn't have been doing like, idk, breathing maybe?
There are ways out of the ala carte services.
That's not Roberts.
There's been no peer reviews of this study or any long term studies on its efficacy. I'm not sure I understand why the CDC isn't all over this mandating its use.
If you look closely The Eye of Providence is almost always within geometric shapes and never on a person's forehead, whereas The Third Eye is almost always displayed on a person's forehead without geometry.
The starburst or radiance that you see in both images of either eye has different meaning. In The Eye of Providence it is the glory of divinity. In representations of The Third Eye it represents awakening of awareness.
Both The Eye of Providence and The Third Eye come from two very different and distinct cultures in different parts of the world. Their meanings are quite disparate.
Rogan is a proponent of psychedelics. It makes a hell of a lot more sense that he would correctly use in his logo The Third Eye on his forehead rather than incorrectly use the Eye of Providence on his forehead.
Is Rogan using the "All Seeing Eye" or the "Third Eye"?
It was a simple question. Your answer is to attack me. You can't even explain why they're controlled opposition other than to reference someone else's statement that they are controlled opposition. I hate to break it to you. That's not critical thought. That's parroting.
So your argument stops at the buzz phrase. ok.
Can you go beyond the the buzz phrase of "controlled opposition" and tell me why I should ignore some of the loudest voices in opposition to the vax?
This is a topic best discussed in a book, but here's the short of it:
Trump never had solid political backing in the 4 years of his presidency and even less when he turned on his supporters on Jan 6th. Any hope there was of turning over the election through evidence of fraud evaporated when our leadership turned their backs on the American people with promises from Biden for trillions of dollars in pork spending.
To be clear, I believe the election was fraudulent. With no political will to prosecute the offenders and dishevel the US government into a crisis on par with 1860 and life still being more or less good for a populace not wanting to throw away their careers, their life, their families, their children's families by forming an open rebellion, there's little reason to worry too much about it. In other words, shit's gonna hafta get a lot worse before it gets better.
This is the dumbest shit I've ever heard of. But, it's going to be hilarious if all those vax Karens get carted off as property.
In real world application there's two ways to look at this: 1) you'll ensure your work gets zero distribution within the biggest software distribution networks because they're all woke or 2) as non-woke societies rise (i.e. 3rd world countries develop), the woke policies of censorship begin to work against itself. The irony here is that woke censorship is presented under the auspice of inclusion, but should +nigger licensing take off then woke development will find itself excluded from a greater development country.
I'm confident in my assumption.
Not sure I really care about Portugal's internal policies.
Bruno Maçães is a Portuguese politician, consultant and author. He is a nonresident senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. He is a former Secretary of State for European Affairs in Portugal.
I'm not sure why he would have difficult imaging medical doctors or any legitimate sciences studies. It's more believable that he would have a harder time imaging a PhD in Critical Race Theory, like at UCLA, on the other hand.
He quite clearly fingers leftists, "with education in degrees I could never imagine". Women's studies anyone?
The conspiracy here is the almost complete lack of attention to a life long establishment man on his way out pointing out the elephant in the room.
Duped? He's part of the club.
Interesting. They still demand you waive your right to privacy. And divulge your vax status. I think that would be a strong "NOooooooooo" on my part with a threat to sue them.
It's simple. If they had a right to the information they would go to your provider. They can't and so don't have right to the information.
You already have the answer. The data shows the effects of the vaccine. The DoD is editing the data to normalize the reported numbers between 2020 and 2021 so that the differences aren't so dramatic when compared to other years. And the MSM is ignoring it. That tells you the data illustrates the effects of the vaccine.
If it showed the effects of covid then it would be a justification for vaccination. There would be no need to edit the data and it would be paraded around every MSM talk show for the next few weeks discussed ad nauseum.