You claim Romans 11 is only about “Hebrews” and not applicable now. That is false. Paul the Apostle wrote Romans after Yeshua, to Gentile believers, warning them in real time.
No, I'm saying 'some of the branches' are Hebrews. Not the European ashkeNAZI people that arrived on a boat. And the Root is Jesus, is it not?
So your claim collapses immediately. Then you twist it into “so nobody can criticize Jews ever.”
That's what you implied, yeah. Thanks for expanding your position.
cannot deal with what the text actually says.
What about when it says the jews are "contrary to all men" ?
The warning is about arrogance
Speaking of arrogance, most modern jews are very arrogant, such as thinking they can outsmart God.
arrogance
Matthew 3:9
and replacement, not banning criticism.
Ok.
And here is the part you keep avoiding. Romans 11:1 (Amplified Bible) “For I too am an Israelite”
Israelite. So the Temple was around?
Paul believed Yeshua is the Messiah and still identifies as Israelite. IMAGINE THAT.
Yes, he BELIEVED IN YESHUA. Not the talMUD, not secular.
So your whole framework of “Hebrews back then vs fake Jews now” does not come from the text.
It comes from seeing their actions today and John 8:39. Also Paul was being a true Jew (Hebrew) by belief in God's Son. Which modern jEWs do the exact opposite of.
It comes from you forcing the text to fit your narrative. Which means you're a
Projection, there is nothing about the ashkeNAZIs in the verses you mentioned.
No. The talMUD did not exist yet.
So that means Paul was not a Modern Jew.
It (chicken abuse) has nothing to do with Paul
Precisely.
prosecuted for coin clipping were Christians
Nope. "Judeo"-christians, mabye.
Paul explicitly condemned idolatry.
Precisely. He also wasn't greedy, hostile, cracking down on as much criticism as he could, or always angry.
while following Yeshua
Which people like Netanyahu clearly do not.
His people?
God's people are anyone who follows Christ, aren't they?
descendant of Abraham
There is no temple so there are no records. Good luck tracing the kippahmen's lineage.
member of Israel
Not a member of 1948 isntreal which was created by THE GLOBALIST SATANIST ELITE U.N.
It is insane how people will rail on the U.N. all day but yet support IsFake.
modern issues
Like how 1948 U.N.real is modern. 1948 Isreal is Unreal!
Did he push miscegenation? No. Paul spoke about unity of Jews and Gentiles in the Messiah, not modern racial categories.
Precisely.
Was he pro-usury? No. Paul taught believers to live honestly and not exploit others.
True.
A DIRECT WARNING TO GENTILES WHO START RAILING AGAINST JEWS.
So no one anywhere can ever criticize the ((()))'s, because you extrapolate a passage about Abram to these modern day fakes with no established lineage?
Romans 11:17–18 (Amplified Bible) “But if some of the branches were broken off, and you, a wild olive [shoot], were grafted in among them… do not boast against the branches… it is not you who supports the root, but the root that supports you.” The Greek word sir for root is ῥίζα (rhiza), meaning the source or origin. LOOK IT UP!!
That's only talking about Hebrews. About OT believers in God. Not these new impostors seeking cover under a claim to the OT faith.
Enjoy your day.
You too!
completely different centuries
Almost as if truth stays the same. Huh.
you claim Jews after 70 AD are impostors and not connected to the ancient Hebrews. Yet the apostle Paul the Apostle was already dealing with Jewish communities before 70 AD in places like Rome, Corinth, and Ephesus.
Before 70 AD. So you're just reinforcing my point.
are the very communities the New Testament is talking about.
How so?
And the idea that Jews secretly worship Baal or Molech today is pure assertion.
A baal statjEW was burnt and ((they)) screechkvetched over it! They basically blew their kippahs off XD Kek!
Judaism has condemned those idols for thousands of years.
The type in the Bible. Since when has chab*d or AIPAC ever spoken out against those?
That accusation only works if you ignore what Jewish texts and practices actually say.
Okay, what do they say? Hint: NOT talking about the Old Testament.
Your coin clipping example also collapses the moment you look at the records. Medieval courts prosecuted large numbers of Christians for that crime.
https://media.scored.co/scale/i74zza7J7fFfnrH5.jpeg
Yet entire Jewish communities were blamed collectively because they were convenient scapegoats.
No, that is a strawman argument. It is jEWs who struggle with nuance and seperation, not the g0yim.
That is exactly how stereotypes get created.
So why would they blame Juce and not someone else?
Then you jump from medieval accusations to modern politics
Oh but medieval accusations against muslims and modern politics are relateable. What's good for the goose...
and try to weld it all together into one narrative. That is not evidence. It is just connecting unrelated grievances across centuries.
That's like saying islamic jihad isn't related to muslims.
The irony is that the New Testament itself warns Gentiles not to go down this road.
According to the Bible we should expose evil. Why do I not see any of the usual pro-jEW guys point out anything negative jEWs do?
Romans 11:17–18 (Amplified Bible) “But if some of the branches were broken off, and you, a wild olive [shoot], were grafted in among them… do not boast against the branches… it is not you who supports the root, but the root that supports you.”
I touched on this one too. Also boasting implies pride. Who is doing boasting, and how? What about when Netanyahu boasted about Genghis being better than Jesus?
The West and Whites have dumped infinity help on the New jEWs, yet their countries are flooded with so much evil. Gay, trans, mass migration, a garbage economy, worse health, etc. Almost as if giving them MATERIALISTIC possessions is the wrong way to view those verses.
So calling centuries of disconnected accusations “facts” does not make them historical or biblical. It just shows you are stitching together grievances instead of dealing with what the texts actually say.
"So calling decades of accusations against communists "facts" does not make them historical or biblical. It just shows you are stitching together grievances against them instead. "
It's been over 15 days, keeps it fresh.