7
graucho 7 points ago +8 / -1

Kushner seems dodgy as fuck. Maybe they threatened to put him in jail and make Trump's grandchildren fatherless. Though, in that case, the kids would probably better off.

6
graucho 6 points ago +6 / -0

First Amendment violation? Never mind, that assumes a functioning judiciary.

3
graucho 3 points ago +4 / -1

No, the Moscow Times (Soros funded) lies about everything. No one in Russia takes it seriously as a news source. It's the kind of rag you find in dentists offices catering to English speaking tourists.

13
graucho 13 points ago +13 / -0

"I'm hesitant to get the second dose, now." HOW STUPID ARE THESE PEOPLE.

Also, the fact checks that amount to: "Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?"

2
graucho 2 points ago +2 / -0

Would it surprise anyone if Carrey does turn out to be a serial killer? If he is, this Redditor may just have saved Keanu's life. I mean, he can't murder Reeves now, right?

https://nitter.cc/force_karma/status/1359598666613362689

2
graucho 2 points ago +2 / -0

The bots have discovered us! I'm flattered.

4
graucho 4 points ago +4 / -0

Modern medicine had nothing to do with ending scarlet fever or any of the other baby killers of previous centuries. Clean water did. This has been proven over and over again min third-world shitholes with high infant mortality rates. When provided with clean water, childhood mortality plummets. Then people like Bill Gates go in there, vaccinate all the children and mortality skyrockets again. Source: any public health textbook.

2
graucho 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hard to tell with all that hair. Vivian Kubrick should have something to say. She's been denying "Stanley Kubrick shot the moon landings" for years.

4
graucho 4 points ago +4 / -0

Speaking of ethics, who are they testing childhood vaccines on? Poor children in India and Africa (Bill Gates) and foster children here in the US (often over the objections of both foster AND biological parents). Even if vaccines were safe and effective, I would reject them on that basis alone.

10
graucho 10 points ago +10 / -0

I'm definitely anti-vax because the founding premise is wrong. That is: that the human body is incapable of healing itself. If terrain theory is correct, then what people call "disease" is the body trying to detoxify itself. Interfere with that at your peril.

There's a reason that 54% of children now have a chronic illness.

1
graucho 1 point ago +2 / -1

The theory is that Madelyn Dunham (Obama's grandmother) was the daughter of Eva Braun: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EAptgkyW4AEPE3W.png

2
graucho 2 points ago +2 / -0

In order to be more black, Elba needs to pull his pants down so we can see his butt.

2
graucho 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dave proves that John Wilkes Booth didn't kill Lincoln.

Give it a go when you've got the time. McGowan's a really good writer.

3
graucho 3 points ago +3 / -0

This translation of the AFP article does Attali no favors, though. We've all seen what "euthanasia" means in practice.

"The only similarities with the Facebook post found are two short extracts: But as soon as one passes 60/65 years, man lives longer than he produces and it costs society dearly , he says. He also explains: Indeed from the point of view of society, it is much preferable that the human machine stops abruptly rather than that it does not deteriorate gradually.

Jacques Attali is then in the process of advancing his point of view on the way, according to him, in which society approaches the question of the place of seniors and the extension of life expectancy.

He explains in particular: Hence I believe that in the very logic of industrial society, the objective will no longer be to extend life expectancy, but to ensure that within a fixed lifespan, man lives as well as possible but in such a way that health expenses will be as low as possible in terms of costs for the community.

As always I am reproached here for wishing for what I am only predicting and denouncing. The new version is just a delusional extension of the false quotation that I had condemned for defamation in 1983 , commented Jacques Attali in his response to AFP.

In the book, he concludes: Euthanasia will be one of the essential instruments of our future societies in all cases. In a socialist logic, to begin with, the problem arises as follows: socialist logic is freedom and fundamental freedom is suicide; consequently, the right to direct or indirect suicide is therefore an absolute value in this type of society. life when it is too unbearable or economically too costly, will emerge and will be common practice. I therefore think that euthanasia, whether it be a value of freedom or a commodity, will be one of the rules of future society ."

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›