▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m aware of atleast two selves. My self, and the self that contributes nothing. The nothing self does nothing but attempt to knock down what others have built. My self attempts to understand what others have built, and if my self selfishly sees another self being selfish, my self won’t hesitate to point it out, selfishly.

Where do you derive your life’s meaning?

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only a sith deals in absolutes, shill.

What have you contributed? Anything? Ever?

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Likewise! and if I’m not mixing you up with another user, stay positive! As the axiom of polarity intimates, any thing negative, from a great event to a fleeting thought, implies by its very existence, the equal in magnitude and opposite in alignment, positive reality. I think the key to discernment is never forgetting that. But we’re all grasping to make sense of things, so what do I know lol

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tough question, thanks... I agree with the idea they are not innately evil, and they do seem like tools for filtering the seeming chaos of reality to its essential mechanisms (basically what we today call “Science” but in the form of pure words without getting bogged down in numbers and thus numerology numerological reasoning).

I don’t think everything labeled occult is negative - there clearly are some strands, like satanism, but this gets into the problem of labels and brands, one mans satanist is another mans archbishop- and I think it’s been a useful blanket word for those who have wanted to control thought throughout history (heretic/blasphemer/occultist/witch/{holocaust denier}/{Science denier})).

So to boil this down before I cease making cents, I think the key is the discernment and comprehension of the individual. Think of the world and all of its ideological temptations like 4chan in the early 2000s. 99% an overflowing sea of shit, but to he who has eyes and he who has ears will much be revealed.

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep! Was tired of the pdf I had been using so I got myself a copy a few christmases back. Some useful insights to understand the historical obsession with al khemit.

What inspires you to ask?

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Golly gee sure doesn’t look weird for a confirmed shill to stand up for an accused one.

The path to enlightenment is one of discernment and comprehension, and to suffer fools is one burden, to suffer shills is beyond any regular man’s ability

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah I think this needs to be one of the next roundtables, then the shills can’t try to bury it with downvotes and spam posts

▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey shill why did you delete all your obvious shill posts when I called you out yesterday?

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, I think the shills noticed your post on the front page. I’ve documented a couple topics {they} don’t want discussed which mysteriously attract silent downvotes only if and when they hit the front. Look at the bottom of your post, one of them commented an hour ago lol

▲ 4 ▼
Graphenium 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wow, first of all blown away that’s a real song/album title lol.

2nd of all what the fuck is going on in this music video:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vBHild0PiTE

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Matrices within matricies.

As the architect told us, there have been 6 attempts before ours. The 7th is when it clicks.

But no, I’ve never really absorbed much first-hand Watts (other than maybe a short video here and there over the years), but I can tell he’s had a tremendous influence on people regarding their views of existence, I’ll check that book out thanks

▲ 4 ▼
Graphenium 4 points ago +4 / -0

Interestingly, I would lean towards a combination of your two interpretations, namely that as “individuated” persons, we (and all consciousness falls under this “we”) are all threads in the divine tapestry. This divine tapestry could be called God or the Pleuroma, but what’s important to understand is that this isn’t the petty war god of some desert tribe, but “THE ALL” itself in its all encompassing glory. The issue arises in the obvious paradox. THE ALL cannot comprehend it’s own glory until IT experiences every strand from start to finish.

In other words, we are god coming to know ourselves (and in doing so dissolve our ego). So instead of picturing our lives as little green army men reincarnating in a sandbox, having different “adventures”, I imagine an amnesiac or someone waking up from a coma slowly remembering who they are... or something like that lol

▲ 4 ▼
Graphenium 4 points ago +4 / -0

But everyone including themselves, calls them Jews. That is their name now. The Synagogue of Satan is just a bit of a mouthful.

Imo this is the point of the deception, to create a caste of “redshields” to be ritualistically sacrificed

▲ 4 ▼
Graphenium 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fucking amazing post my guy, I’m still working through it and must say I’ve had many of the same intuitions as you regarding how what seems like parts of a disjointed narrative (in other words “conspiracies”) relate and how truly interconnected it all is.

I would just poke two parts of your analysis to hopefully open up further discussion:

do you think that the entities you’re describing, El/Enki/(the Demiurge (in my reading)) and Shekhina/holy spirit/(sophia pistis (again my reading)) are physically incarnate (I.e. “aliens”), or are “immaterial” and working through some other layer of reality?

What is the root of evil? The consequence in physical reality of the existence of good? A corruption from an “evil” entity (I.e. satan/saturn). I agree with your determination of the phonecians and their lineage as the promulgators/promoters of evil, what what do you think is it’s absolute root in our reality?

Thanks again for the post, I think it is bound to inspire some great discussion

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

What a shock, judeans write a book that tells its reader to bless judea. Do you take the book administered by pedophiles and edited/stolen by userers at face value?

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Looking for a fact check(lol) on a memory I have from late 2015: wasn’t there overlap between the mods of TuMOR and the_donald back on reddit? Struggling to remember the TD mod’s name, either NJFreakshow or his alt account was one of the first mods of TD. This is why I never participated in any TD forums for precisely this reason, they seem to have been useful idiots of the zionists. I remember early 2016 people posting on r/con about being banned from TD for referencing the true power players in world politics. Ironic I’m here now, but whatever can’t post on reddit these days so what options are left?

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah lmfao, it’s the Karen’s talking about crystal healing, they’re the true string pullers, what a fucking genius insight from the forums resident shill for israel

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Rofl? You really out here saying Gaia fucking tv, a YouTube channel, is proof the gnostics are around today, as a functional group of oppressors as opposed to LARPer “pagans”.

The g in freemasonry stands for grand architect, aka god you plug

Also I don’t intend to browse two random links to make your arguements for you, why not just copy and paste the best evidence you think that site has linking gnostics to the group who exterminated them 2,000 years ago for “heresy”

Edit: Just read your response to jollyjoker, great comment and I agree with a good chunk, but specifically regarding the gnostics, I’d love to see you elaborate, because my understanding is they were wiped out and anyone alive today who says they’re a gnostic is basically LARPing off the wiki page. And while there is some overlap between gnostic and freemason beliefs, the masons take literally the exact opposite stance as the gnostics, believing that their Grand Architect is God and not the Demiurge

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

zionists love to conflate their victims with their oppressors

Edit: awww struck a nerve?

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

So who was he actually pandering to? Dead joggers or rich schnozzers?

▲ 4 ▼
Graphenium 4 points ago +4 / -0

Buddy, the pandering he did to “joggers” wasn’t in the same universe as his pandering to “the chosen people”, seems like your impotent rage is being directed at the wrong targets

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

What a weird nostalgia for a time that never existed. The peasants of the middle ages were never regarded as kin by their rulers.

And I think his question was supposed to be from trumps perspective, one of the few who’s sacrifice could have inspired many

Edit: the user seems to have deleted their account after it was lightly insinuated they were a zionist shill...yikes guess you could say the nose knows when it’s time to goes

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›