1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except im obviously being sarcastic, while you’re obviously willfully misinterpreting the text. Which is fucking hilarious coming from the YEC who quotes from the flat earth espousing Bible.

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’ll have to ask the mods who interpreted it that way for 4+ years, since evidentially you’re unable to hear what the users are telling you about how the rule was used

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s so obviously a joke that to deny such a readily apparent fact one would literally have to be a disingenuous cock-sucker

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Any luck finding evidence to support your claim that “namecalling” resulted in blanket removals before you became the mod?

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

So he didn’t remove people namecalling eachother? Glad we agree that your new rule is out of left field then.

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well I never denied that “kill yourself” was removed as harassment. We’re talking about shit like calling people faggots and kikes and hollow earthers.

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, Clem consistently approved comments with name calling. Infact, that was his last act/comment on the site, to TallestSkil. Oh, and don’t be disingenuous and conflate name calling with wishing death.

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

6,000,000 words and none of them were “you’re right, my bad, I shouldn’t be such a disingenuous faggot.”

Oh well, maybe sometime in the next 5 years hey?

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because he only earned the label “disingenuous faggot” when he started arguing like one, by willfully misinterpreting the text so he could slur me multiple times

Mod logs are public.

Yes, and you’re the one claiming they show something

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you “actually” “studied” it, then the evidence for your claim should be at your fingertips. You realize it’s not possible to “prove” a negative right? You’re the one suggesting “that’s how it’s always been”, you’re the only one between the two of us who could find evidence to support your claim

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

The rule that you made up with no requests from the community*

Remove his post while you’re at it, for calling me a “hollow earther” as a slur

Or, just be a fucking grown up.

Can I add suggestions for reading too?

Go ahead, but no cutting in line

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you see no conflict between “treat others as you’d like to be treated” and “kill all their babies”.

Kk lol

Just trust the plan goy!!

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

I told him exactly how I would respond if he posted bullshit, and I followed through on that promise. Leave it up til he replies to it then do whatever you want. Not like anyone else is reading this thread lmao

Tangentially: Any luck finding the two hours needed to read anything I’ve posted yet?

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Stop” evil?

I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things.

How does killing babies “stop” “evil” lol?

I guess he was just “stopping” “evil” when he killed 99.999% of humanity with a flood too, huh?

If only he had some kind of plan to “conquer death” which he could have rolled out thousands of years earlier…

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Feels like you’re avoiding my question so I’ll ask it again more pointedly:

Do you see any conflict between the following statements

  1. “to love others as ourself.”

  2. “Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants”

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

What’s the title of the thread again?

And wow I just checked, you are one disingenuous faggot, here’s the quote you’re pissing yourself over:

"Is the Earth Hollow?"

Hold on, let me just check. Yes, definitely.

So obviously a joke. What are you retarded?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›