“Trumps speech on Jan 6 and tweets leading up inspired me to buy GameStonk, absolutely that’s true mr romney”

Ok, but doesn’t changing in any manner whatsoever imply a being that is not outside of time?

Here is the idea briefly:

1. The true god, ALL that is, “wakes up”, this is known in the religion of Science as the “Big Bang”

2. a friend gave this example: imagine that all of existence is white light, and you are white light. Would you ever or even COULD you ever KNOW that you exist in this scenario? No, without differentiation, ALL would be NO-THING(s). Think of the the waking up of the true god as the passage of that white light through a prism, to produce the rainbow of potentials.

3. at this stage, physical reality barely exists. There’s no planets there’s no life yet there’s nothing but energy.

4. the lower emanations of the true god, each comprising aspects of the true god, yet not the whole, as these emanations CHOSE to be born, so that the ALL could experience itself

5. these emanations, as they are not the true god, are therefore not perfect, they can make mistakes, potentially including the creation of yahweh, an entity which, as the masons and many others have deduced, IS the “Grand Architect”. But architect of what? Our physical reality, which is many, many steps removed from the reality of the true god, but only one step away from the god of the wandering desert semites, the angry wrathful god who sent plagues and used bear maulings to teach rude children lessons.

Have you ever read the gospel of Thomas? If you call yourself a follower or Christ I think it’s incumbent upon us to seek out any of his words, especially those the pedo faggots at the vatican seek to keep hidden

No, it’s one of the 10 names of god according to the jews whom you draw your line from

When do you think anatomically modern humans first appeared on earth? And if you agree with the mainstream belief of 250,000-300,000 years ago, why did god allow humans to sit around jerking off for so long before anything started happening ~6000 years ago?

Also questionable rationalization there with “god hasn’t changed, he just changed a little that’s all” but whatever I guess you’ve come to that conclusion after a lot of thought so I won’t try and push you on it, but suffice to say, I think my version makes more sense, but I guess everyone says that lol

Edit: also, I read your definition of jealous, to whom does our attention go when it inspires gods jealousy? And you can’t say satan because a)god is all knowing and b)you claim this god is also the creator of satan

You haven’t exposed nor clarified SHIT champ

Elucidate things for us rabbi

Just watch the video geniusette

Did you watch the video? Doesn’t sound like it. And btw I wasn’t talking about God I was talking about the abrahamic god of war, yahweh, don’t conflate the two

So all knowing implies he exists outside of temporality, time. How could an entity that exists outside of time, change over time?

Would the god who comes from love be a jealous, angry, spiteful, wrathful, god? Do any of those words describe an entity one could imagine as “ALL KNOWING”? Or do they imply an ignorance? A disconnect?

It is absolutely a negative thing, because when you comprehend the gnostic texts, you see he was jealous of OUR divine spark, like Christ’s, gifted by Sophia, an emanation of God and higher than Yahweh, but still not herself the all encompassing majesty of God.

In your opinion is the old testament god all knowing?

Fair point, however given the topic and it’s tendency to provoke Talmudic reasoning, I tried to state as little as possible, and name the texts, players, and plots relavent to our story.

If I were to retool this what context would you want to see? The video nicely encapsulates the proof of “G-d”s origin as the lord of armies. As for the Gnostic cosmogeny, that’s harder to describe but does this video explain where I’m coming from or is it still too mysterious:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QskgCfwYO0g

Hmm interesting take... so it doesn’t strike you as utterly implausible for an omnipotent being to act like a jealous, angry bitch circa 6000 years ago, and then all of a sudden chill out after he has a kid? An ALL KNOWING being...that has temper tantrums?

Everything you say may be the case, but you’re better off understanding the origins than not.

The god of the Old Testament is exactly what I stated above, the god of war of a small, wandering tribe of semites. That god was responsible for the construction of the physical, but it is not the “true god”.

Ask yourself why 95% of the sayings of Christ never made it into the canon of the cannibals.

??? I feel like we’re talking past each other. Did you watch the video that demonstrates the marsian origin of “G-d” and have you read the oldest version of your scriptures?

Feel free to search up any terms you don’t recognize

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kZY2eeozdo8

I await your response

Figuring out as a group the forgotten knowledge

https://conspiracies.win/p/11RhYGNOR6/the-root-of-all-conspiracy-is-hu/c/

https://conspiracies.win/p/11S0bhAMwC/why-has-the-smithsonian-covered-/c/

Et al

Finally an explanation of the “nukes aren’t real” meme that makes sense, how long has this theory been a thing because I remember seeing this on those iceberg memes from a while ago lol, but never found an explanation until now.

Other than “coping mechanism #2” I disagree almost completely with what you’ve written. It’s a nihilistic black pill seemingly meant to poison the minds of the impressionable.

You state so unequivocally that there is no free will, no point to resistance, what are you a fucking borg sent here to assimilate us?

He, in this instance, is you, and I was talking to the 5 idiots who downvoted your valid contribution to the conversation!

He’s got a point, at some stage (around the age of 12) it becomes incumbent upon the individual to not fester in the poison like a pig in shit

I’ve heard 3 different “deep dives / exposés / whatever you’d call em” on “the Q phenomenon” from MSM.

Not one of them attempts to identify the person(s) behind the posts other than general terms like anons.

Not one of them (these were all after the 6th) addressed the fact that Q made multiple posts since both the “failed insurrection” and the “nothingberger inauguration”, they all imply that Q fans all of a sudden headless chickens without direction.

Basically they talk about Q while spending as little time as possible talking about Q...

I am indeed trying to figure up how subsuharran africans fit into the picture, among other aspects of your argumentation style

Why does this post feel like 1 person with 4 accounts arguing with themselves?