2
Graphenium 2 points ago +3 / -1

Hypernormalization is great. Made by a documentarian named Adam Curtis

I also recommend his

Bitter Lake - about the last 100 or so years of Western meddling in the Middle East and the lies we’ve been told/told ourselves along the way

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1pn2z7zp1V0

All Watched Over By Machines of Loving Grace - about the way computers and technology and our reliance on them has been sold to us as making us more “free”, while in reality it has imprisoned us in many ways

https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDCEA4A968815D711

The Living Dead - about how collective memory is manipulated and conformed to the narratives chosen by the powerful, even things like the facts of a man’s life

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=luI-ecZ0AQM

The Power of Nightmares - about the early days of advertising and all the psychological manipulations and propagandizing which that field entails, focusing on Bernays/Freud and other highly influential people/movements

It looks like this channel has a lot of his stuff, including the power of nightmares:

https://m.youtube.com/@adamcurtisdocumentaries

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +2 / -1

The stars we see in space are millions of light years away.

That means, unless you’re retarded, the light you’re seeing is millions of years old.

That means the universe is millions of years old.

Period. End of topic. Until you revolutionize particle physics that’s how it’s gunna stay

Lmfao

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don’t think you get to invoke BBT inflation when that’s something which explicitly occurs during the first few microseconds of existence, LONG before any stars form. And if the stretching out occurred after the stars formed, that would be observed as redshift (it isn’t, at least, not the type you describe, of a one-time stretching event)

And you don’t need to tell me about this stuff. I was posting about “fundamental constants” not necessarily being all that constant years ago. You would give those posts shit because you don’t like Rupert Sheldrake lmao. But you writing some sentence of bullshit on the internet doesn’t account for tens of thousands of professionals and experts who operate in these domains every day who would say your views are next to unfounded.

Anyway, my point is not to get into a debate about any given one of these subjects. My point is you need to deal with “the consensus” with a little more respect than the flippancy of the we wuzzers. Take some lessons from sheldrake:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sF03FN37i5w

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Your world view requires, for all intents and purposes, God to be a Liar. Why would God make it look like stars are clearly many millions of light years away? Why would God make it look like c was invariant? And make the CMB look like it’s 13.4 billion light years away? Why would God make the rock layers look like they got deposited slowly over millions of years of slow geologic processes, infrequently punctuated by catastrophic (and relatively rapid) layering events?

Your ideology reeks far too much of “Satan buried dinosaur bones to test our faith!”-esque cope. Especially so to so flippantly dismiss “the establishment perspective”. Grand claims require grand evidence. You’ve yet to overturn the consensus much less propose a coherent alternative. Imo atleast. To balance out your opinion above.

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +2 / -1

And “we” also “know” that many sedimentary and metamorphic rock formation processes take fucking eons.

Until you can explain:

The speed of light

Radio-isotope decay

Asteroids/meteors/moon rocks consistently being dated to 4.6 billion years old

Cosmic microwave background radiation

And literally a dozen other dating mechanism

You’re gunna need to do a little better than “theyz lyin! We wuz 6,000 year ol kangz n shieeet!”

0
Graphenium 0 points ago +2 / -2

Cosmology and astronomy provide strong evidence for an older universe, not to mention geology here on Earth

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Apparently “influenza” comes from the Italian “influenza della stelle”

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Documentary on how the government actually went about seeding mis- and dis-info into the “ufo community”:

Mirage Men

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=awsv66J31S8

Skip to two minutes in, there’s a weird/annoying intro for some reason

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ctrl+F “draco”

1 result


We shall deal with these next two posts together:

>"He is reptilian. That's the race of the bloodlines. They control just about everything behind the scenes. And remember there's no such thing as a bad race, just select individuals or groups who stand out more than others."

>"Ok, so i have another question for hidden_hand. Reptilians are described as being very aggressive, arrogant and perceive humans to be nothing more than cattle. So what's with the split personalities? You're saying you are loving and spiritual, and yet everyone says reptilians are fearsome beings?"

That amuses us. We are most certainly NOT Reptilian, and there is nothing remotely reptilian about the True Power Bloodlines. The only 'Reptilian' influences that are in anyway remotely involved with this planet at this time, are those of the Zeta Reticuli and Alpha Draconis systems. They are of no particular threat to you.

For those to whom it may be of some interest, we are of Venusian heritage, originally. What is another name that Venus is called by? Connect the dots.

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

For sure.

I think it raises some important points (ones which anyone who has ever played Civilization will be able to tell you - e.g. “fuck, I have no horses/iron/oil resources”), but at the same time I agree with much of the criticism, that it vastly over simplifies things in an attempt to tell a “Just So” story from the marxist perspective of human ethnic differences (i.e. that they don’t exist, obvious non-sense)

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s a series of forum posts from 2008

It shares lots of overlap with the information presented in The Law of One (aka Ra Material):

https://www.lawofone.info/

Idk what the “first whistleblower” had to say on the subject

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

> "You say that you come from 13 original blood lines. Yet the DNA mapping project clearly proved that all humanity desends from only 3. Does this mean you aren't human?"

An excellent question, thank you. Yes, that is correct, in a manner of speaking. If you were to meet me walking down the street, I would appear just as human as you do. We've been incarnating here with you for generations, yet our bloodlines do not originate from this planet.

Its what Blue Beam was created to cover up

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

My point is that what determines the smartest ethnic groups are just circumstantial luck which allows the populace to take over neighboring countries, trade routes, and to acquire knowledge and advancements.

You’d probably like the book Guns, Germs, and Steel:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guns,_Germs,_and_Steel

Diamond argues that the gaps in power and technology between human societies originate primarily in environmental differences, which are amplified by various positive feedback loops. When cultural or genetic differences have favoured Eurasians (for example, written language or the development among Eurasians of resistance to endemic diseases), he asserts that these advantages occurred because of the influence of geography on societies and cultures (for example, by facilitating commerce and trade between different cultures) and were not inherent in the Eurasian genomes.

The book proposes that the environmental and geographical conditions of Eurasia and North Africa provided significant advantages, such as access to a greater variety of domesticable plants and animals, as well as an east–west continental axis that allowed for easier transfer of crops, livestock, and technologies. These conditions accelerated the development of agriculture, population growth, and political complexity, which in turn led to technological advancement and the spread of epidemic diseases to which Eurasian populations gradually developed resistance. By contrast, regions such as sub-Saharan Africa, the Americas, and Oceania faced geographic isolation and ecological barriers that slowed similar developments. Diamond argues that such environmental constraints, rather than any differences in intelligence or culture, determined the pace and direction of societal evolution.


The anthropologist Jason Antrosio described Guns, Germs, and Steel as a form of "academic porn", writing, "Diamond's account makes all the factors of European domination a product of a distant and accidental history" and "has almost no role for human agency—the ability people have to make decisions and influence outcomes. Europeans become inadvertent, accidental conquerors. Natives succumb passively to their fate." He added, "Jared Diamond has done a huge disservice to the telling of human history. He has tremendously distorted the role of domestication and agriculture in that history. Unfortunately his story-telling abilities are so compelling that he has seduced a generation of college-educated readers."

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +3 / -1

Just for my own curiosity, what’s the exact setting called? Is it just having selected “politics” as one of the community topics?

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +3 / -1

Oh! Excellent! Was it a button on your end or did the admins get around to it finally?

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yes, it was /Trending we were manually hidden from

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Holo (whole) gram (to draw or write)

Two-dimensional data (GATTACA) given Three-dimensional form via the interplay of Light and Shadow - all that’s needed is Soul, or the breathe of life, from the Whole (holo) to the One (gram)


A) Two particles created in the same event are “entangled”, facilitating Spukhafte Fernwirkung or “spooky action at a distance”

B) All particles in the universe ultimately derive from a single event (a so-called “big bang”)

Thus:

Other words for consciousness...hivemind; gestalt intelligence; egregore; collective consciousness; mind coalescence; swarm intelligence; universal mind; group think…

I think we can recognize God therein

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, super interesting stuff, this intersection of physics and consciousness and everything that gets labeled “supernatural” (only by those unaware of the totality of “nature”, of course).

These videos are based on a book (plus some of the scientific developments after the book was published). I posted a summary of the book in another comment, you might find that interesting too.

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Here’s a summary of the book that this video is based on. I recommend the book to anyone whose interest is piqued by the video. Also highly worth checking out part two of the video (linked in another comment)


📘 The Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot — What It’s About

The Holographic Universe explores a radical idea: that reality isn’t the solid, separate world we think it is, but more like a hologram — a unified, interconnected projection of information. Talbot weaves together science, psychology, mysticism, and paranormal phenomena to support this view.

1️⃣ The Holographic Model of Reality Talbot opens by introducing two key scientific influences:

  • David Bohm’s quantum physics ideas, which suggest the universe has a deeper “implicate order” where everything is interconnected;
  • Karl Pribram’s neurophysiology, proposing that the brain stores information holistically, like a hologram. From this he argues that both the cosmos and the human mind may operate holographically — meaning every part contains information about the whole.

2️⃣ Mind, Consciousness & Perception A big theme is that consciousness isn’t just a by-product of the brain, but central to reality itself. Talbot suggests:

  • Our perception actively shapes what we experience;
  • The mind extends beyond the physical brain (explaining things like dreams, intuition, telepathy, and psychic phenomena);
  • Consciousness is a nonlocal field — not confined by space or time.

3️⃣ Parapsychology & Extraordinary Experiences Talbot brings in lots of case studies and real examples:

  • Telepathy, precognition, and psychokinesis;
  • Near-death experiences (NDEs) and out-of-body experiences (OBEs);
  • Miracles, “aura” vision, and other seemingly paranormal events. Within the holographic framework, these aren’t just oddities — they make sense as phenomena where information isn’t limited by ordinary physical boundaries.

4️⃣ Implications for Science & Spirituality The book doesn’t just talk physics — it bridges science with spiritual and mystical traditions. Talbot points out parallels between the holographic view and ancient wisdom about unity and interconnectedness. He invites readers to question assumptions about matter, time, space, and what it means to be “real”.


🔍 In short: Talbot’s The Holographic Universe argues that reality might be a hologram, that mind and matter are deeply interconnected, and that many mysterious human experiences could be windows into a deeper truth about the nature of existence.

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

I recommend part 2 as well, which gets into the neuroscience side of things (i.e. our perception of the “hologram” known as “reality”):

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VB1Kwjbz4nU

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

I do see what you mean, and agree to an extent, though that doesn’t change the fact that this system is still the most wholistic and coherent of all the systems I’ve come across

Anyway, the one God is the source of them all, so you'll get to see him in everything soon enough.“But at the same time as I say that, I will also say there’s only one real version of the story” - literally you


newfun

Deleted thread, and nothing you quoted or mentioned is from the LoO/Hidden Hand stuff. The other link is literally this conversation, yes, lol

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

It makes sense that the 6th density is unity because unity can’t come before awareness (of self and other), love, and the wisdom to temper that love.

I get you really want it all to not make sense. And you’re fully convinced it makes no more sense than monkeys on a typewriter. But that’s because you haven’t read it, and what little snippets you have skimmed you’ve only done so to provide fuel for “debunkings”

Just approach it with an open mind. You don’t need to respond. I don’t care about Moses de leon.


New Fun is posting on densities and I answered more there.

?

view more: Next ›