2
dukey 2 points ago +2 / -0

I posted the ACTUAL data, and ACTUAL emails from the study author who I believe went onto to work for GlaxoSmithKline lol. Who do you want a quote from? God?

Here is an article about it if you are really interested

When he crunched the numbers, Verstraeten found large statistically significant correlations between high doses of mercury and outcomes like autism, ADHD, tics, and speech disorders. He redid the numbers the next month and found an even higher correlation for autism. In fact, autism was more than 11 times as common in the high early exposure group than the non-exposure group.

https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/yes-vaccines-cause-autism

3
dukey 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are you retarded? Serious question. The data and all the internal communications about the study were leaked. It showed a) the data showed vaccines caused autism. b) They knew this and couldn't make the link go away.

They sat on and massaged the data for YEARS before releasing it which in itself is highly unusual. What they eventually published was a study comparing kids that got shots, to kids that got shots, and guess what? There was no difference. That is a scientific disgrace.

2
dukey 2 points ago +2 / -0

The data showed it cause autism. The published study did not because they they compared kids that had shots to kids that had shots, and found no difference. Read the emails and the links regarding the study, it was all leaked.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14595043/

4
dukey 4 points ago +4 / -0

Holy shit just learn to read, the info is linked.

6
dukey 6 points ago +6 / -0

Disinfo? lol this was the raw data and it showed the more mercury and aluminum you inject the more likely you are to get autism. They were strongly correlated. If you dig further (you won't because your mind is tighter than a ducks anus) the emails from the author were leaked in which he complained the link wouldn't go away. Well they did make it go away eventually, what they did was the equivalent of comparing kids that smoked 49 cigarettes a day, to kids that smoked 50, finding no difference and then declaring that cigarettes don't cause cancer. That is essentially what they eventually published. I believe the final data was published in 2004 in the journal of pediatrics.

Edit: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/It-just-wont-go-away-Verstraeten-Thomas-to-Davis-and-Destefano.pdf

3
dukey 3 points ago +3 / -0

The vaccine never even worked lol. Unless you define worked as myocarditis.

by DrLeaks
6
dukey 6 points ago +6 / -0

Sam Smith, another genderless faggot

6
dukey 6 points ago +6 / -0

This seems like an enormous failure of government, the food industry, the education system and of course the individual.

3
dukey 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fluoride doesn't weaken the enamel except if they are still developing. Dentin has like a crystalline structure. Fluoride destroys this.

2
dukey 2 points ago +2 / -0

One thing they do it to not publish studies which show their drug or whatever has no benefit. They usually bury those and only publish the ones that show benefit. So this greatly warps the science in favor of the drug.

2
dukey 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bird flu is fake and gay

2
dukey 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought it was climate change with a sprinkle of racism.

1
dukey 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol what. It was just pure comedy, in no way a serious prediction for the future.

1
dukey 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imagine commenting on a 1yo post lol

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›