Interesting that there is real problem with industry pollution with really harmful substances. However, they forcefully shift everything to normal and even useful CO2 pollution, when we have CO2 levels from 2 to 5 times lower than normal. Nobody now talk about real poisons, like cyanides, fluorides, soluble metal compounds and halogen-organic things (from that 'green' things production too), everything is about that meaningless 'carbon footprint'. Total attention shift from real thing about industry to harmless CO2.
I would be not surprised if they introduce 'breathing tax' soon. Do you know, that on every breath every human breath out nearly half a liter of air with 40000ppm CO2? That's a threat! Carbon footprint!
The global warming scam
It seems that global warming could be real, so it is not a scam itself. Scam is in labeling global warming as a problem, when it is really a solution for nearly every problem rised in front of humanity. From drinking water to energy losses on heating/cooling. Even depopulation agenda, so beloved by tptb become completely obsolete.
science is fundamentally not about consensus
Exactly. That anti-science 'consensus' thing began to poison even physics.
And in general the earth's climate is too complex a phenomenon for our models to really say much about the predicted outcome
Currently, meteorologinsts could not predict damned weather for more than 3 days. With some strain for 7 days maximum. So there are definitely no any working model available to predict climate even in a year span. All that 'models' they show us about climat change is an absolute scam. One could easily create a 'model' to show anything about anything, but that will have nothing with reality. The only real scientific data we have about possible outcome of rising CO2 levels to 1000-2000ppm from our current 300-400ppm - is paleontologic data about eocene, that definitely shows that there will be climate paradise on Earth if we reach that levels.
Good point! :)
But what it could be, and why is it so undesirable for "them"?
This is all about short-term cycles in unnatural and unstable climate of ice age prone to high sensitivity to small changes in insolation and other stuff. Greenhouse effect will smooth all that effects.
Current climate is completely unnatural for our planet. That is the main thing they don't tell us.
Current climate is a consequence of some catastrophic event or events happened nearly 2.5 millions years ago, that started quaternary glaciation after approx. 60 millions years of normal climate.
Take a look in scale of millions of years. There no any regular cycles in ice ages. Nobody knows the real cause of ice ages, there are only theories about volkanos, asteroids, celestial events etc. In earth history ice ages was relatively short in comparison to greenhouse periods. And Earth climate always returned to warm greenhouse climate for next tens of millions years.
I see a massive propaganda against sugar in last few years.
The reason is very simple: Sugar or sucrose is disaccharide, made from two monosaccharides - fructose and glucose. Sugar is energetically cheap and plain source of glucose for our bodies. Glucose is main energy source for our brain. Fructose is not.
No she wouldn't leave her family though...
If you are the target, it is much safer for family to stay away from you and have no idea where are you. They can't even use her family as hostages because they have no way to inform runaway about hostages privately. They can do it only via MSM or social media, but this will uncover all the shit immidiately. In theory.
The Tiffany Dover Story is the most interesting thing happening on the internet right now.
Shure. Hope she is alive.
As far as I remember, the proposed change was to repel 230 from the services who heavily censor user content, and that is not about spam.
Whatever.
Really that could be a step forward for internet. There are a lot of interesting and perfectly working solutions. Distributed, federative, etc. The only drawback is that there are no many users of that solutions. Everybody use that proprietary centralised crap from big corporations - Facebook, Twitter, Google, etc. When someone welcome friends to the alternative solution, everybody tell "we don't want to, we have whatsapp/facebook/etc.". If this 230 repeal will be real, it will force users to drop that corporate crap in favor of open and distributed solutions.
In Russia we got that censorship with 'real ID' registration a little earlier. Do you think that this changed something? No. But now everybody in Russia know what VPN is, how to bypass censorship and how to use advaced communication technologies. The result of government laws was completely opposite to what they mean. They finally lost a possibility to censor internet or track users. Yes, there will always be some poor bastards who forgot about security and encryption and was catched by police. But overall, things become less fortune for government.
While we have internet connectivity (possibility to establish a connection from one IP to any other), there is no way to set up full censorship and tracking.