Then they should have nothing to worry about right?
Do you live in China? Or are you confusing people left of the republican party with communists?
Now you're a nazi for reporting crimes to the police? What happened to law and order?
He's being depicted as a fervent Trump supporter because of all the video and photo evidence of his fervent support for Trump?
He's a huge QANON guy
Now they are saying that "herd immunity doesn't work". I will remind you that the basis of vaccination is the principle of herd immunity. We "defeated smallpox" on the planet through vaccination. No one who is NOT vaccinated with smallpox has to worry about smallpox
This is just made up though.
Nobody is saying that "herd immunity doesn't work", people have just been trying to avoid conflating herd immunity as achieved through mass infection with herd immunity as achieved through mass immunization.
People who are vaccinated STILL have to worry about smallpox, so do people who aren't. That's because the vaccine doesn't always work, its effective rate is below 100% so in order to completely irradicate smallpox a very high percentage of the population needs to get the vaccine. That way, even though it can hypothetically still infect some both vaccinated and especially unvaccinated, the population that could be potentially infected isn't large enough to maintain an outbreak, and it slowly dies out (until recently when people stopped getting vaccinated lmao).
Remember when they said "we don't want your unvaccinated kid to go to our school.." Why? Why would they worry if their own kids are vaccinated?
Because, the vaccine isn't 100% effective. Again, if enough unvaccinated people and people whose vaccine didn't take congregate there can be an outbreak, and again even THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN VACCINATED, would be susceptible
Now the WHO and CDC are saying herd immunity won't be achieved through vaccinations.
Again, they've never argued that. What are you quoting?
Liberals point this out all the time, the police will keep footage of the crimes they're prosecuting and keep it from the press for as long as possible.
This is why you only get snippets of bodycam footage when police murder someone. Whatever does come out is only a result of persistent legal action.
What was the scam there? I thought the "suitcases" turned out to be just the same ballot boxes they were using all night, and the people who were leaving were those opening the ballots that had finished for the night?
What? You would prefer someone reading the text and then editorializing a review of it for you, rather then reading it yourself?
By disagreeing with the narrative presented by the President?
Isn't that the opposite of propaganda lmao?
These are the disjointed ramblings of a scorned ex girlfriend, in this post you insist
-Its a conspiracy sub of course the ideas are on the fringe but how dare you call Italygate baseless!
-Protest to being labelled pro Trump and insisit its simply for "allowing" pro Trump content and "questioning russiagate", meanwhile you just finished telling us how you think "italygate" is real and pinned it lmao
-Protest to being called anti Semitic simply for being critical of Iseral, but later elaborate on how you think holocaust denial " deserves its time in the sun to be simply discussed"
-You said you felt that it wasn't "my place to simply "decide" as a /r/conspiracy moderator that it didn't deserve its time in the sun to be simply discussed" as if you are concerned with keeping the sub a free speech haven, but at the exact same time you were banning people for simply questioning your conspiracies
This is easily one of the funniest, most delusional reactions to the bans that has come out lol. I don't know how you've tricked yourself into thinking you're some impartial actor, you're a reactionary contrarian who questions everything, except for when the worlds most notorious and prolific liar says it lmao.
What data? Both the recounts and even hand recount should they were within the margin of error completely.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/19/us/elections/georgia-recount.html
The data shows it was an average year,
That would be uncovered in a recount. The GOP there would be able to easily find the discrepancies in the voter rolls, that type of fraud wouldn't even require signature verification. They didn't "wait until everyone would leave" either. The scanners stopped briefly until they were informed they couldn't go home at the prearranged time as there were way more ballots then anticipated, (it had been literally 14 hours since they started), and the people opening the mail went home as their work was done.
They did a signature audit, 15,000 votes, and it turned up no fraud.
There just isn't any evidence, that's why all the court cases get thrown out except for the one case were ballots were already being suspended pending a judges ruling; Because everything Trump has objected too was agreed up before the election, and all the allegations of fraud, dozens of people saying they for sure saw it happened, and nobody can find the discrepancies, even in DEEP GOP regions.