A blooper tells you nothing other than that the footage is fake. The rest is your own wild and baseless assumption.
What ever you need to tell yourself. I don't find anything you've said here to be a remotely compelling argument against the existence of a bigfoot, yeti, sasquatch type animal. For example - The trail cameras, drones and satellite have a tiny % of the wilderness under extremely intermittent surveillance. Satellite: useless because of trees, and high resolution satellites are not trained for long stretches on remote areas where the animals might be found. Drones and trail cameras are not in truly remote areas at all, they are within reach of humans, in locations where humans go, for the very reason that humans go there, and have to go there to retrieve them.
Anyway, despite those arguments, there have been a rare few compelling video captures on fixed cameras in remote locations. But they are poor resolution, like most fixed CCTV cameras and the majority of cameras on drones and trail cameras. It's easy to overestimate how much of the world is under close scrutiny to a high resolution. It's really a very very tiny percentage, and it's also a relatively, very recent phenomenon. Just a few decades ago there was even less, and before that zero.
The real conspiracy with regards Challenger is that NASA were well aware of the likely catastrophic failure of the rocket launch, due to cold weather, yet went ahead anyway; despite their contractor's fierce and impassioned pleas not too. Those astronauts were murdered by NASA just like the Astronauts in the Pre-launch test for Apollo 1, and Thomas Baron, his wife and young daughter.
So your filing system need refining, since there is quite a bit of compelling photographic, film and video evidence for Bigfoot, from different places on the planet, along with historical records and witness testimony going back centuries - but nothing remotely like that for the other two. The bird thing was an elaborate prank made up by a guy who despises conspiracy theorists.
Maybe. They are probably quite inbred.
I don't assume anything, good or bad.
This guy looks like a gargoyle.
this doesn't seem like an argument to me
What does it prove though? The biggest Democrat party donor at the time had many well known top democrats direct phone numbers in his personal phone book. Back then Trump was also Democrat by the way.
They may say it, but they are wrong. There is legitimacy to UFO and Bigfoot discussion. Not flat earth.
Interesting day of the year for such a fiery happening.... Summer Solstice... St. John's Eve (in a couple days)
Trump obviously meant RFK Jr
Someone made the exact same mistake on here the other day, it's easy to do.
I'll do you one better than a FE mega thread. How about an ENTIRE COMMUNITY dedicated to it!
No need to thank me.
Sorry, but flat earth is uniquely retarded. It's almost like it's designed to discredit conspiracy theorizing. Like purposefully putting a rotten apple in a bucket full of good apples.
There are at least 2 dedicated communities on this website for FE
https://scored.co/c/flatearthresearch
That's one, I can't remember the name of the other. You can go there for the "ultimate conspiracy" content you seek, and I encourage all FE posts to be made there instead of here. Just so they are easily accessible when one decides it's time to get "down and dirty" into some heavy FE research.
i thought you were too, at first....for being so balls to wall against FE
No, I'm just against it because it's retarded and taints this forum more than any slur ever could.
Q posts don't seem to me to be clues to help reveal a truth. They seem intended to create doubt and confusion more than anything.
There are lots of accusations of other users being glowies here. But we only have about 100 regular users (actually it seems to have gone down recently), hardly seems worth an agent's time to me. The term "glowie" is not synonymous with "asshole", which is how people seem to be using it.
If glowies are assigned to this website, they would make far better use of their time by being on TheDonald or GAW or, dare I say it, moderating TheDonald or GAW.
the science behind the way nuclear bombs function doesn't add up. Read "Death Object: Exploding The Nuclear Weapons Hoax" by Akio Nakatani. It's a shortish book and it's available as a free pdf on Libgen and Internet Archive. It details why Nuclear bombs are ridiculous. NOT nuclear energy, that's very real.
Then there's another book "Hiroshima Revisited: The evidence that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by fire bombing and mustard gas" where the argument is made that the evidence for post nuclear detonation didn't exist in those places. The after effects, on the land and on the injured and dead people, are more realistically attributable to fire bombing (napalm) and mustard gas.
Then there are various videos on the internet exploring the various nuclear detonations propaganda films we are familiar with. They are propaganda films, yet we accept them as genuine without skepticism for some reason. Cast a skeptical eye on them and many flaws become apparent. The most ridiculous is the hilarious South African one. It's so obviously fake. They never had Nukes, but officially we are told they did - no nuclear power denied their claim.
Never seen him say one way or the other, but I doubt it.
I'd be very surprised if he said that. They are probably referring, with a bad memory, to the incident of a party being held at house, right at the first vaxx rollout, when the invitation asked that guests be vaxxed. He had no hand in the arrangements for the party, his naieve liberal wife organized the whole thing. He made clear soon after that he personally did not and would not ask for people to be vaxxed. But the MSM took the opportunity to call him a hypocrite about vaccines.
It's relevant because probably half the users who use the site don't see a sidebar. I have no complaints or issues with the changes you've made. I will copy the txt into the manage rules section for mobile users.
The site uses the "web app" function. You go to the domain on mobile device web browser, and an option pops up to "install website as app" or "install webapp" - something like that. Then "scored" or "win" shows up as an app on the device. The admin seemed to put a lot of their focus for a while into developing that mobile UI, I think they must have quite a lot of mobile users. It seems to be their intention to eventually get an actual app into app stores. I have used that mobile UI to moderate when I've been away.
Context: How paedophiles infiltrated the left and hijacked the fight for civil rights