What does it prove though? The biggest Democrat party donor at the time had many well known top democrats direct phone numbers in his personal phone book. Back then Trump was also Democrat by the way.
With everything we know about Epstein, why would you possibly assume the best about anyone in his social circle? That's what you're doing here. There's 1971 names in there. That's 3*10-5 percent of the world. Kinda narrows things down a bit. If you're in there, SHOW that it's a coincidence.
What does it prove though? The biggest Democrat party donor at the time had many well known top democrats direct phone numbers in his personal phone book. Back then Trump was also Democrat by the way.
HAHA COPE HARDER
This comment (reddit-esque) confirms to me this is bs
You make true/false judgements about real events from the tone of anonymous internet comments?
Truly lost.
this doesn't seem like an argument to me
With everything we know about Epstein, why would you possibly assume the best about anyone in his social circle? That's what you're doing here. There's 1971 names in there. That's 3*10-5 percent of the world. Kinda narrows things down a bit. If you're in there, SHOW that it's a coincidence.
I don't assume anything, good or bad.