What are your guys' thoughts?
They are like Jon Snow from Game of Thrones - they know still almost nothing really.
Example how Russians do militarized memetics - watch carefully but not believe those half-truths because is Russian propaganda: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o01nS_M3PQY masterpiece. https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-31715389 Those video above is about half truths,view from one side mobilizing in fact also those who not liked results of transformation to market economy (which indeed had its disadvantages for some hard working people too)... It became viral a bit but fortunately that not got fully to target group and not demanded action. It don't needed believers,it already has them before...
Or this : you don't even need to know russian to understand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZkHx30ctVU . Or those discrediting direct open sending army in ukraine (and claiming russians not are in Ukraine): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_Weqg7JpaA
Does it pass to their theory ? That is how it could be done well... Military memetics. By Russians.Light years before american one.
This presentation is tip of iceberg really,it is teaching kid to be mechanical using only hammer and screwdriver. Presentation full of text,poor in ideas. Low memetic potential,boring. It is failure really. 150 pages ? being 90% of unnecessary text. What to say else...
At influencing culture (it isn't so quick and easy !) and mentioning "to fight enemy intelligence operations" they are right a bit,but they don't have more clues than those usual ones how to do it... Some "metrics" ? Oh,good,nice to see it but still only clues what to measure (if he isn't wrong what to measure)...
Some quotes from manuals about psychological operations ? Man they shall know it... Repeated bullshit myth of "wiping old ideas" before "programming" person (not too much Mk-ultra CIA morons ?).Yawn...
They asked amateur or intelligence not shared its toys,or they are really such stupid ? Or it is civilian presentation. Memetics is job and part of intelligence and counter-intelligence in fact,and if deep state not understand its use - it is good. Maybe it is truth looking at those shit ? I don't know. Those summit looks legit...
Beginning - theory - is even not so bad,but the rest... I am engineer but I know a bit - maybe at the level of marketing first year student and simply I see - this moron Dr Finkelstein not researched it enough and made it too long.
However because I am less and less sure about Q I don't know if explaining more about meme war would be good or not. Deep state watch us...
This things in those presentation are of course bit right.But are only tip of iceberg. They are right about getting believers,about recruiting them for the idea... But it is like droping moab or "little boy" on the city.Not mentioning way to disarm it or secure against it a bit... It is right that Q can be operation of military (or marketing). It is right that even Trump used good marketing being simillar to that in 2016. Even better one was those video in 2020 with BLM violence,but it was not made popular and strong enough to become powerful-enough "propaganda".
You begun bullshit after my answer to your question, so my response was those corrida.You are perfectly right to have other opinion,but that was almost bull-ying.
Play stupid games - win stupid prizes. And you played stupid game so...
Dont ask me about difference about those words,rather check how many meteorites from asteroid belt we have.
It is rare,but I wouldn't say "artificial". Glassification or quasi-crystallization shall happen in space sometimes.I cannot say about probability and how common it is simply because I don't have a data about chemical composition of asteroids in solar system,probability of asteroid crashing with asteroid,their velocities...
If it were organized complex nanostructure we would have the right to suspect alien nature... But it isn't really such. It is all about proper chemical composition and rapid cooling and a bit of quasicrystals in meteorite as the result.
Threee faces godess ? I am from Poland,and it is VERY interesting because despite we don't know much about ancient slavs religion (it was wiped out !) we know that there was ancient deity with THREE heads, later changed into deity having four heads. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triglav_(mythology)
Unlike Viking mythology,Celtic one and so on majority of Slavic mythology key parts were almost completely erased. Of course there are claims that something could be "reconstructed",but what was forgotten would be real astonishing thing.There is also very possible connection between proto-slavic people and ancient iranians and brahmins (rulling caste).
I don't think it is about only Slavs,but in fact about all Indoeuropeans roots and beliefs. It is just the example,things could be just part of ever bigger picture.
Slavic haglogroup of DNA R1a1 (father chromosome) is dated to 15k years b.c. alone, so it were not so popular probably 10k years b.c. ...
If there was "atlantis" advanced civilization being civilization of white people it would perfectly make sense.
100% of people in India have access to toilets.
Then why such films made by Bollywood for Indians to promote it ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toilet:_Ek_Prem_Katha
"Racist" - well it isn't about race,it is about country being complete slum you claim to be "superpower" able to dominate USA. Sorry but it is not such one.
Ganga river is sewage, India is garbage can with leprosy,exotic diseases,extreme corruption and place where women are raped even on the street. Place where absolute poor people try to barely survive to next day living in conductions being mix of stone age and post-apocalypse. Maybe big part of guilt about that is about British exploiting India for centuries - but fact is fact. Superpower ? Even Russians and Ukrainians live much better and statistically longer, India should be in Africa...
100% of people in India have access to toilets.
Then why such films made by Bollywood for Indians to promote it ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toilet:_Ek_Prem_Katha
It isn't common on earth of course.The question is rather - is it common/probable in space. In space even fire behave other way than usual.
So what ? He is right in most cases. Jewish criminals used holocaust so many times it is now "hollycost" like "nazis" call it. Enough is enough,they used and use it like monopoly exit card so less and less people will care.
Probably not all jews are bad,but there are bad jews obviously and those ones stand behind many of our important problems today. Bad thing that if they are still good jews (probably I'm naive but hope so...) they do not enough against them.
If jews don't want problems with REAL antisemitism and fascism in near future they shall do something with their own criminals instead of protecting them. But it is probably so probable like muslims denouncing their terrorists... tribal loyalty... (here on it I spit)
You can dream pajeet,but the truth is Indians still have designated shitting streets.
So yes,world superpower at 2030 ;)
PS:
https://img-comment-fun.9cache.com/media/avgLA6n/adx7wj1j_700w_0.jpg
If I would know what "alien" means it would mean I know anything about aliens being real and it would be then more,much more interesting that some quasicrystals in meteorites... Unfortunately I don't know nothing sure about aliens or even if they exist so...
True,but at the end conclusion real science usually have doubts instead of being 100% sure. Moreover this webpage not supports physical equations needed to show even known conditions needed to creation of quasicrystal in scientifical way - both from solid state physics and thermodynamics side, not mentioning that rock crushing rock with such speeds there are in space would mean also pressure - not only temperature,so probably you shall not ask me but materials science professors to give you it mathematical.
Ok,I think linking research will work - if it will not work for you I wouldn't response anyway: https://wwwphy.princeton.edu/~steinh/naturalquasicrystals.html Especially:
https://wwwphy.princeton.edu/~steinh/ncomms5040.pdf
https://wwwphy.princeton.edu/~steinh/PNAS-2016-Asimow-1600321113.pdf