Ever since the USS Fitzgerald incident where a US warship collided with a cargo ship off the Coast of Japan, or the collision of the USS John McCain near Singapore - again with a cargo ship - I've been suspicious of these incidents.
Not that collisions of civilian and military ships don't happen: the RMS Olympic, sister ship of the Titanic, had a collision with a British warship early in her career (leading to some interesting theories, too).
But then we had the Suez Canal incident where a ship literally beached itself on the sides of the canal, blocking traffic through the crucial waterway for a week. Just a few days ago, a crack in the I-40 bridge over the Mississippi River at Memphis Tennessee brought barge traffic on the waterway to a halt.
And yes, having seen a picture of the crack on the bridge, I'm suspicious, especially as it occurred in the same relative time frame as the Colonial Pipeline hack and shut down.
Well, E.G. spotted these two stories, and yes, I'm at least "suspicious" once again:
Ship Carrying Auto Parts Sinks Off Japan Coast
Paralyzed Crude Tanker Blocked Strategic Strait In Turkey
In the first instance, we know only this:
A search is ongoing for three crew members reported missing from a roll-on/roll-off (ro/ro) vessel that sank off the coast of Japan early Friday morning. The MV Byakko sank at about 2:40 a.m. local time after colliding with the chemical tanker Ulsan Pioneer just before midnight in the Seto Inland Sea, Reuters reported. The Byakko reportedly sank about 2.5 miles off the coast of Imabari.
The 557-foot-long Byakko is operated by Kobe, Japan-based Prince Kaiun Co. According to Kyodo News, the Byakko was carrying auto parts and left Kobe at 4:30 p.m. Thursday bound for Kanda, Japan. The Ulsan Pioneer reportedly departed a port in China on Tuesday and was scheduled to arrive in Osaka, Japan, on Friday afternoon.
A cause of the collision has not been reported. According to FreightWaves meteorologist Nick Austin, there were no indications of unusual weather at the time of the accident.
"Not unusual" weather, and presumably the Japanese are not building ships without the latest technologies and competent crews. So are we looking at design flaws? Incompetence on the part of the crews of either ship? We don't know, but what we do know is that a lot of insurers are going to have to pay out a lot of money after they conclude their investigations, which may well be worth watching.
In the second instance, we have this, and again, note the absence of any genuinely informative details:
Technical problems onboard a massive crude tanker Friday led to the shutdown of Turkey's Bosphorus Strait.
The vessel veered off course in the Bosphorus Strait, a narrow waterway that divides the city of Istanbul and connects the Black Sea and the Mediterranean Sea.
At its narrowest point, the waterway is 700 meters wide. The temporary suspension of traffic in the Strait conjured up fears of the Suez Canal blockage in late March. Bosphorus is a strategic chokepoint and represents a substantial geopolitical risk if extended closure were to happen because its critical to global trade between Asia and Europe.
While we may never know what "technical problems" the vessel experienced or what exactly caused it, one thing is sure is that the Strait has become an essential route for Russian naval traffic.
There's probably a lot more to this story that is not being disclosed...
I couldn't agree with Zero Hedge's conclusion more: "technical details" seems to cover a lot of room. Did the rudder somehow get stuck? Was the helm unresponsive? Were the computer systems not performing optimally? Were they hacked?
When you stop and think about it, all of this considered together is more than passably strange. Two US warships colliding with cargo ships within months of each other, the Suez canal blocked and later the Bosporus, barge traffic on the Mississippi brought to a standstill because of a crack in a support member in a major bridge on a major highway artery, a crack which, incidentally, looks suspiciously "uncrack-like."
And in most of these cases, an almost baffling lack of any real details as to the cause. In the case of the Japanese cargo ship sinking, the insurers of the ship and cargo are going to be out a pretty penny, and one can rest assured they will be conducting their own corporate investigations.
But I have to wonder if someone is running "practice" or "drills" in efforts to learn how to shut down shipping. Are we looking at hacking and cyber war? Or incompetence or, worse, remote mind manipulation interference with the ships' crews?
In the case of the Suez and Bosporus, there would be pilot crews on board that know the waterways. So explaining these "mishaps" by mere "technical difficulties" seems to be the "story of first resort", a literal appeal to a glitch ex machina, while the real story may be covered up just long enough so that people will forget, and reports never published.
Are we to expect more "technical difficulties" on ships at other choke points, the Straits of Hormuz or the Strait of Gibraltar, for example?
Time will tell, but for now, you can continue to put me in the "suspicious" column...
See you on the flip side...
I like "China Fray Donut" :D
Some people have mentioned that I regularly and repeatedly sounded the alarm about the pro-vaccine conditioning and propaganda on reddit.
Well, it had nothing to do with any predicative ability on my part, and everything to do with the bot/NPC activity surrounding the vaccine topic.
I noticed about 10 years ago that vaccine threads attracted the most bots/NPCs compared to any other subject...even calling out Monsanto (which was a major shill-magnet back in the day, remember that?) or Israel didn't bring out the numbers that vaccines did.
At that point I realize I needed to make vaccine study my singular issue and I spent years putting together my "skeptic's guide to vaccines" to warn people about what was coming.
In January, 2020 I publicly called COVID the great hoax of our time, and I warned everyone I could.
It had nothing to do with predicting the future as much as observing the past/present.
It's also why I (and others) was silenced. When the truth is revealed, they can't let the conspiracy theorists take the win.
Same for election fraud.
They are still correcting the record about me on /r/conspiracy.
Threads that discuss the sorry state of the sub are swarmed with bots/NPCs saying how "axo was an asshole" and how the sub is "better without axo".
It's weird how obsessed they still are, and I haven't been on reddit for 5 months.
Rent free.
Nothing you've posted has been worth addressing as of late, but this is just too much lol.
The entire COVID hoax is crumbling around our feet, accelerating in the last 24 hours, and magapede69 is still furiously masturbating over Trump LOL you people.
They're hoping people go back to the "fear" zone when they hear "lab-released bioweapon". It's basically the only way they can prop up this hoax any longer.
Sheeple are too dumb to realize that an artificial "virus" is inherently unstable and LONG AGO was mutated beyond recognition by Mother Nature.
This means there hasn't been a "deadly" virus for at least a year (if ever).
This destroys the entire COVID narrative/hoax.
A naturally evolved virus would be endemic and with us forever.
A fake virus is quickly dispatched by Nature.
Hopefully people wake tf up now before they pull more of this insanity.
something is serious cooking behind the scenes.
I think this vaccine is largely a placebo...but a placebo with toxins that is still making people sick. I don't full understand the spike protein yet, but still learning.
I appreciate you sharing your experience.
If COVID is real, then it was a artificially produced, and therefore was QUICKLY mutated by Mother Nature to be weak af.
When did you get it?
"COVID" hasn't been dangerous since the end of 2019. Since then it's mutated to practically nothing.
I know you're full negative nancy at this point, but dude the false flag is literally collapsing as we speak.
At some point you need to maintain a shred of optimism or you're starting to appear like a concern troll, which is a bad look.
Not my theory, but the more I think about it, the more it seems to check out.
I think I needed to see it myself with people I know irl...they literally have been cowering in their homes for a year, and since they've gotten vaxxed they're out and about, smiling, hugging people, maskless.
I know at least a dozen people like this, maybe more.
Is the placebo vaccine going to cause health problems down the line? Undoubtedly.
But...is the placebo vaccine eliminating the fear thrust upon the population in a significant portion of people? YES. I've seen it with my own eyes.
FEAR is the essential ingredient in the COVID hoax. They can't keep people in fear if they've received the vaccine and they feel safer. The vaccine wasn't supposed to be ready for AT LEAST a year...that's why the "scientists" and MSM FREAKED out at Trump when he said the vaccine would be ready by December (it was).
The timeline of this viral hoax is all wrong. That's why I think it's failing. They are doubling down in their failure, yes, but ultimately its hastening the death of this hoax, thank god.
At least, this is one optimistic way to look at things. I hope I'm right.
This rather intriguing article applies directly to some topics that I have both blogged about on this site, and that members of this website and I have often discussed in our "members' vidchats", namely, that peculiar area where "paleoancient" (my somewhat redundant term) pre-history, archaeology, and genetics intersect. It was spotted by S.D., to whom a thank you for passing it along:
Alice Roberts: Archaeogenetics will help us solve mysteries of past
The article's authoress, Ms. Alice Roberts, begins by also noting this curious area where archaeology and genetics overlap, but note carefully what she goes on to say:
TWO seemingly disparate scientific disciplines have been drawn into each other’s orbits, set on a collision course. On one side is archaeology with its grimy earthiness, heavy with history and tradition; on the other is genetics, with its clinical brightness, brave and brash in its newness. Fusion can be difficult, but it can also create astonishing energy when it happens.
At the forefront of this merging is a new sequencing project called 1000 Ancient Genomes. Led by Pontus Skoglund at the Francis Crick Institute in London, it is the most ambitious ancient genomics project to date. The DNA it looks at will be completely sequenced, leaving no stone unturned, no stretch unread.
It is two decades since the human genome was first sequenced, and the pace of change in genetic technology in the intervening years has been breathtaking. Sequencing is now faster by several orders of magnitude – a human genome can now be deciphered in a day. And with DNA extracted from ancient bones, we are able to uncover the genetic secrets of our ancestors. (Boldface emphases added)
Now, fascinating as the rest of the article is - for example, Ms. Roberts mentions that the 10,000 year old "cheddar man" skeleton, given its genetic composition, may have been very dark complected with blue eyes, "a combination that is rare today" - what intrigues me here are the implications of the "1000 Ancient genomes" project.
Over the course of several books I have pondered the claims of some ancient texts - the Old Testament's nephilim, or the Babylonian or Egyptian kings' lists of Berossus and Manetho respectively, or Mesopotamia's "annunaki" - of an ancient intermingling of humans and the "sons of God" or the gods.
Some researchers, myself included, have speculated that this may represent some sort of "genetic project", a speculation that presupposes a rather advanced civilization to do it. In Genes, Giants, Monsters, and Men I even speculated on the suggestive parallels between genetic haplogroup studies, and some of those ancient texts as interpreted by some of those researchers speculating on just such a "paleoancient" genetic program. But texts and parallels are a long way from proof or disproof.
But a project such as this 1000 Ancient Genomes might be a clue, perhaps, that a long term project might now be underway to test and prove or disprove such speculations. And governments can read those texts and understand their implications just as easily as you or I, and it stands to reason that they would try to seek some proof or disproof of them, even if only covertly. So here I am speculating once again in our tradition of "daily high octane speculation."
It is interesting to note that the project has apparently begun at the "more recent" end of the archaeogenetic spectrum, a sensible step, since by the nature of the case there are bound to be more "younger" human remains than "older" ones, and also because the farther back one moves in history, the more theoretical the assumed evolutionary connections between modern humans and other members of the genus "homo" become.
So how might such a project look for such a possibility, i.e., of deliberate genetic manipulation not only of the species, but perhaps of the entire genus? I suspect it would have to concentrate on two areas, or to look for two specific things: (1) a sudden emergence within the genetic record of persistent traits not previously there, and (2) evidence that these traits could not have been introduced by nature.
The latter is important because the first - since the theoretical proposals of biologist Stephen Gould for evolutionary changes of "punctuated equilibrium" rather than "gradual Darwinian change through micromutations" - would not be sufficient in and of itself to indicate such tinkering.
Time will tell, of course, whether anything like such a grand project is actually the goal, but at least for now, you can put me in the suspicious column that it is, at least, a possible hidden goal of the quest.
—The disease switcheroo; they don’t teach this in medical school.
I’ve mentioned this shell game hundreds of times in articles and lectures over the years. Here I want to boil it down to a protocol that has earned the medical cartel trillions of dollars.
We begin the story with an “outbreak.” Somewhere on Earth, we are told there is a cluster of unusual cases of illness.
The key word is “unusual.” Otherwise, who would care? People would instead say, “Forty people in Wuhan have lung congestion.” And that would spark no interest.
In Wuhan, it was “unusual pneumonia.” How so? No convincing answer. Some people have cited a “ground glass” appearance in pictures of patients’ lungs. Meaning gray areas, or opacity. Another claim: patients had extreme shortness of breath.
But opacity and shortness of breath were mentioned and described in medical literature long before COVID.
Something else must be offered, to justify the term “unusual cases.” And we get it almost immediately, while we’re still trying to figure out what makes these patients’ illness new and different:
It’s a virus. A never-before-seen virus.
Already a switcheroo is in progress. There is actually nothing unusual in the Wuhan cluster of cases. And just as we’re about to realize that, we’re hit with “new virus.” And then we forget there was no reason to look for a new virus in the first place.
Deadly air pollution has been hanging over Wuhan for a long time. It explains all sorts of lung infections, including pneumonia, the cardinal COVID symptom. And by the way, roughly 300,000 people in China die every year from pneumonia. [5] [5a] [5b] [5c] [5d]
The “new virus” is trumpeted. But of course, as I’ve demonstrated many times, it hasn’t actually been found. No one isolated it. The so-called genetic sequencing of it was a fictional castle in the air based on supposition. How could it be otherwise? No one has an isolated and purified specimen of the virus that can be analyzed.
Accepting “new virus” as fact produces this situation: a list of very familiar clinical symptoms can now be called unique, because the cause is unique.
Suddenly, cough, chills, fever, fatigue, congestion, shortness of breath—which have been called flu, or just infection, or other names—are COVID. That’s the big switcheroo.
Next step: provide a diagnostic test for “the virus” that would automatically spit out false-positives like water from a firehouse. That’s the PCR. I’ve taken the PCR apart six ways from Sunday and exposed it as a fraud.
With the PCR in hand, the switcheroo is deepened. That list of familiar illness symptoms—taken together with the test—paints the picture of millions of cases of a “new plague.”
All this fabrication is on the order of—“Hey, Jim, sales of our widget number 6 are in the toilet. What can we do? Unless…let’s call it widget number 7, put it in a new box…”
People say, “But there ARE mysterious COVID cases that can’t be explained away as repackaged lung infections…”
Of course there are. When you make the net big enough, it will sweep in groups of cases that seem to defy explanation. But when you move in close enough, you discover a variety of factors that cause illness and death. New poisonous vaccination campaigns, toxic pesticides, lagoons of feces in giant pig factory-farms, opioid drugs; even various electromagnetic technologies.
I first caught on to the switcheroo in 1987, when I was doing research for my first book, AIDS INC. Scientists in Africa were investigating a “new” outbreak among people who, “incidentally,” were suffering from protein-calorie malnutrition, hunger, and starvation.
The scientists, cheap con artists that they were, called this “wasting syndrome,” then “Slim disease,” and finally “AIDS.” They announced the cause was HIV—a virus no one had isolated.
And lurking in the background, if you needed another cause of illness and death, there was the infamous World Health Organization mass smallpox-vaccination campaign in Africa, one of the most dangerous mass medical experiments ever carried out on a population. That campaign had wrapped up injecting millions of people several years before “the discovery of AIDS.”
The campaign was so dangerous that, at a secret WHO meeting in Geneva, a decision was made never to use that vaccine again, because it had caused smallpox (or something that looked like it).
In 1987, I combed through volumes of medical journals at the UCLA bio-med library, and discovered that the single most prevalent cause of T-cell depletion (“AIDS”) in the world is MALNUTRITION.
In Africa, malnutrition, hunger, starvation, contaminated water supplies, lack of basic sanitation, toxic vaccines, grinding poverty, war, fertile farm land stolen from the people by major agricultural corporations, toxic medical drugs…were all repackaged as a new disease caused by a new virus, HIV.
I then went on to study every so-called high-risk group for AIDS. I found that in each group, all the “AIDS symptoms” could be explained by non-viral causes.
At that point, I realized I was looking at a classic intelligence-agency-type covert operation, applied within the medical universe. The virus was the cover story. It was being use to hide ongoing government and corporate crimes. For example—forced starvation.
A con is a con.
Only the disease-names are changed, to protect the guilty.
With COVID, you must also consider the following: an extraordinarily high percentage of cases and deaths are occurring in people over the age of 65. The elderly. Many of these people are living in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities.
IB Times, 7/27/20: “New research from the Kaiser Family Foundation has indicated that while adults 65 and older only account for 16% of the U.S. population, they make up 80% of COVID-19 deaths.” [6]
CDC, May 14, 2021: “8 out 10 COVID-19 deaths reported in the US have been in adults 65 years old and older.” [7]
Why are these older people dying?
Because they have long-standing serious health problems. And for years, even decades, they’ve been treated with an array of toxic medical drugs.
Then, in 2020, they’re terrified they might be diagnosed with COVID. And then they ARE diagnosed. Which ramps up their terror.
On top of all of this, they’re neglected by nursing home staffs, even handled brutally in some cases. They’re isolated “because of COVID,” imprisoned, cut off from family and friends. They’re alone.
So they give up and fold up and die.
No virus required as an explanation.
In a large study of New York state hospitals, it was discovered that people over the age of 65 who were diagnosed with COVID, and put on breathing ventilators, died at the rate of 97.2 percent. [8] [8a] [8b] [8c] [8d]
No matter what the prior condition of the patient, any treatment that has a death rate of 97.2 percent must be discontinued at once. But it wasn’t discontinued. It still goes on. This amounts to murder.
“People are dying, it must be the virus.” No. Wrong.
There is no “it.” People dying from various causes are fictionally brought under one umbrella, called COVID-19.
This is titanic fraud, tragedy, mass murder—murder compounded many times by the destructive vaccine, aka genetic treatment.
It didn’t originate in a lab in Wuhan.
But the story that it did originate there cements the premise, in many minds, that we are dealing with a virus.
Quite convenient.
The Wuhan lab, intentionally or unintentionally, becomes a cover story that obscures the truth.
For further reading, see “The China lockdown, Sun Tzu, and the Art of War” [9] and “Meet the Medical CIA” [10]
SOURCES:
[1] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/05/20/the-pandemic-virus-that-doesnt-exist/
[4] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/11/06/smoking-gun-fauci-states-covid-test-has-fatal-flaw/
[4a] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/02/22/fauci-states-covid-pcr-test-has-fatal-flaw-confession/
[4b] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/04/20/fauci-smoking-gun-evidence-pandemic-fraud/
[5a] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/03/03/more-on-china-pollution-and-the-coronavirus-cover-story/
[5c] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/01/27/what-are-the-chinese-hiding-in-wuhan/
[5d] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/01/29/covid-if-there-is-no-virus-why-are-people-dying/
[8a] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/06/12/military-nurse-at-covid-epicenter-hospital-its-murder/
[9] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/12/07/the-china-lockdown-sun-tzu-and-the-art-of-war/
[10] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/04/22/meet-the-medical-cia/
What I’m about to lay out might seem “too staggering to believe.”
Fortunately, what people do or don’t believe isn’t the issue.
And with that, here we go. Buckle up.
For the past year, I’ve been presenting evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist. It’s never been proven to exist. [1]
Those who claim it does exist have two legs to try to stand on. One: the virus has been isolated (discovered). [2] And two: its genetic sequence has been found. [3] [3a]
However, the mainstream scientific definition of “isolated” turns out to mean: “We have the virus in a soup in a dish in a lab. The soup contains all sorts of material. We never extracted the virus from the soup.” In other words, “isolated” means its opposite.
In the soup, in addition to the purported virus, there are human and monkey cells, toxic drugs, chemicals, and other genetic material. When the cells begin to die, researchers assert (with no proof) that the cause of cell-death must be the virus.
Therefore, the virus IS in the soup, and it is deadly.
However, the drugs and chemicals could be killing the cells, and the cells are being starved of nutrients, so that could certainly account for their death.
Bottom line: There is no proof of isolation. It isn’t even close. There is no evidence that the purported virus is in the soup.
I’ve published a typical account of virus-isolation from a study, and Dr. Andrew Kaufman did a step-by step analysis of this process and tore it to pieces. I published his analysis. Dr. Kaufman showed there was no merit to the claim that SARS-CoV-2 had been isolated. [2]
What about the genetic sequencing of the virus? You can’t sequence something you haven’t isolated (discovered). To claim you have sequenced it would be like saying, “We have a generic fragment of iron dust, and we know it comes from a 1932 Ford Moon Rover fender.” There was never a 1932 Ford Moon Rover.
Researchers presume, assume, guess, pretend that “SARS-CoV-2” WOULD HAVE certain pieces of genetic material, and referring to libraries which contain data about such material, they use a computer program to cobble together pieces of data and present a genetic portrait of “SARS-CoV-2.” [3] [3a]
If we were discussing a science fiction novel about a virus, we might say, “That’s an interesting genetic sequence. An interesting castle in the air.”
Now—to bridge over from this part of the article to the Wuhan lab, gain of function research, tweaking a coronavirus to produce a dangerous entity, we need to know one thing:
Mainstream researchers—virologists, molecular biologists—BELIEVE they are working with a real virus. Most of them certainly believe this. They are married to their fallacious and fantastical processes of proving a given virus exists.
And because they believe, so do politicians and public health officials and military leaders.
Therefore, we could certainly say, if the evidence is convincing, that there has been an effort to ramp up the function of a coronavirus in Wuhan.
But EFFORT and TRYING have nothing to do with the truth.
Based on unproven and untenable beliefs, people have TRIED TO DO all sorts of things. And some of those people have CLAIMED that they SUCCEEDED.
Therefore, it’s really quite easy to see how a) the virus has never been proven to exist and b) some researchers have been trying to ramp up the function of a fantasy they call a virus.
“But…but if the virus doesn’t exist, what are these researchers in their lab in Wuhan doing? What are they working with? What’s going on?”
Yes, I like that question. But you see, in the Church of the Virus, the inner sanctum, the holy of holies—THE HIGH-SECURITY LAB—is not open to you or me or anyone from the outside.
We (and dissenting scientists) can’t look over researchers’ shoulders. We can’t film every step they take. We can’t stop them at any point and make them explain what they’re actually doing. We can’t say, “You just fabricated a conclusion out of thin air, so justify it.” We can’t challenge their ironclad beliefs about the truth and validity of their procedures as they’re actually carrying out those procedural steps.
“What? You call that isolation? You didn’t isolate anything. You just stirred the soup in the dish. Explain yourself. And the gene you say you just tweaked? What gene? Let’s go back over that again. You just fiddled with DATA about a gene in a so-called virus. Makes no sense. Let’s review that move. Let’s break it down.”
No, we can’t do any of this.
Instead, we’re supposed to have faith in what these researchers have faith in.
If this amounts to science, Kool-Aid is the nectar of the gods.
“Excuse me, Doctor Towering-Arrogant, but you just plugged your latest ‘finding’ into a computer program, which is supposed to spit out the genetic sequence of the ‘new tweaked virus you just created’.”
“Yes? So?”
“First of all, you’re working with DATA here, not actual physical material. But we’ll put that aside for the moment. I want to know exactly what’s in this computer program. These five people standing with me here in the lab? They’re software pros. They have no allegiance to any government or funding entity. I want them to take the computer program apart and analyze it.”
“I’m not responsible for the program.”
“Who is?”
“Colleagues. I don’t know them personally.”
“Well, get them in here now. All research stops until we have them here in the lab. They’ll open the whole computer program to the light of day, explain it, and then I’ll have my people go through it with a fine-tooth comb.”
“That’s outrageous. Why?”
“To see if the program is credible, or just another fantasy constructed to give the false appearance that you’re actually sequencing something.”
We’re not permitted to do that, either.
We’re in Church. We must accept all the prescribed articles of faith.
For those people who not only claim SARS-CoV-2 was tweaked or invented in a Wuhan lab, but was made deadly there…they should consider the extraordinary lengths to which public health officials have gone to FALSELY pump up COVID case and death numbers.
None of that pumping would be necessary if an actual PANDEMIC virus existed and were loose in the world.
During the past year, I’ve covered all the criminal schemes to inflate case numbers. To cite just one scheme: Running the PCR test at an unconscionably high sensitivity has automatically created millions and millions of “positive COVID cases.” In concert with this fraud, the CDC has changed its definition of “a case,” so people who test positive but remain healthy with no symptoms can be counted as “COVID cases.” [4] [4a] [4b]
Now, I’m going to present a Part Two to this article. It isn’t necessary, but some people are thinking: “If it isn’t the virus, why are so many people dying?” I’ve written perhaps a dozen pieces that answer this question. Here is a shortened version:
aww isn't that too bad!
Remember when "Reddit conspiracies" were mentioned on the Senate floor as being directly responsible for the Jan 6 false flag?
Remember when the head moderator of /r/conspiracy was banned and memory-holed mere hours after "reddit conspiracies" were complained about IN CONGRESS?
Remember when multiple MSM hit pieces were written about said moderator, linking him to the Jan 6 false flag?
I dunno...I was KINDA hoping for a commission. Was looking forward to going full "come at me bro!" with these abject imbeciles.
Ah well :D
Be Trump. Know that a coup is underway to remove you with a fake virus.
Do you:
-
Tell the world all viruses are hoaxes
-
Tell the world THIS virus is a hoax, tell people to use non-vaccine therapeutics, and then release a placebo "vaccine" years ahead of schedule to fuck up the planned timeline of the covid script
If Trump had tried option 1 he would've been crucified even more than he was.
The vaccine was never meant to be released by 2020. They flipped out at Trump for even suggesting it...that's because the COVID bullshit was supposed to go on for years.
The schizophrenic nature of the "restrictions" around the world, even after the vaccine, are strong indicators that the COVID hoax has fallen flat, and the ramifications of this are still playing out.
Not trying to defend Trump here...honestly he should've just gone with option 1.
People are soooo stupid, however, that perhaps they needed to see just how bad things really are for themselves.
Last year “an autonomous weaponized drone hunted down a human target last year” and attacked them without being specifically ordered to, according to a report from the UN Security Council’s Panel of Experts on Libya, published in March 2021 that was published in the New Scientist magazine and the Star.
The March 2020 attack was in Libya and perpetrated by a Kargu-2 quadcopter drone produced by Turkish military tech company STM “during a conflict between Libyan government forces and a breakaway military faction led by Khalifa Haftar, commander of the Libyan National Army,” the Star reports, adding: “The Kargu-2 is fitted with an explosive charge and the drone can be directed at a target in a kamikaze attack, detonating on impact.”
The drones were operating in a “highly effective” autonomous mode that required no human controller and the report notes:
“The lethal autonomous weapons systems were programmed to attack targets without requiring data connectivity between the operator and the munition: in effect, a true ‘fire, forget and find’ capability” – suggesting the drones attacked on their own.
Zak Kallenborn, at the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism in Maryland, said this could be the first time that drones have autonomously attacked humans and raised the alarm.
lol, imagine being retarded enough to believe this is the first time this has happened.
Not an "I told you so" but rather an observation of vindication:
For many years I roused the ire of many Aussies on /r/conspiracy by saying their country was a testing ground for the New World Order.
I frequently stressed that the disarming of essentially the ENTIRE country after ONE VERY POORLY EXECUTED false flag (Port Arthur) was a major sign that the country would be the first to fall when the NWO reared its ugly head.
For years I warned everyone to GET OUT OF AUSTRALIA.
I remember this pissed off a lot of Aussies. I wasn't even 100% confident WHY I was telling them to get out either...but I KNEW I needed to warn them.
I wonder how those skeptics are doing now?
I remember one particular argument with an Aussie who was very well versed on Operation Gladio and false flags around the world.
When I brought up Port Arthur he went FULL reeeeee and snapped, calling me names and saying how absurd it was I doubted the official story of that stupidly obvious false flag.
At that point I knew Australia was fucked...here was someone who actually was aware of the fuckery in the world...but he couldn't even see that it had come home to roost, right under his nose!
public opinion polling shows Australians mostly support the restrictions, since they have apparently helped the country keep its COVID-19 cases and deaths at levels well below their peers in Europe and North America.
This is how you cuck an entire country.
When you control the testing, you can present the "cases and deaths" however you want in order to sway public testament.
The greatest reckoning in human history is coming once people realize they've been conned.
I tried my best to do everything I could, when I could. At least my conscience is clear.
Thanks for this thread, I needed it and it means a lot to me.
Love you guys.
I literally just told you I'm over saving humanity and instead I'm working on my community. What are you even going on about?
and you should applaud my honesty ha..
No, I'll excoriate you for dooming. So again, fuck off.
unsolicited opinion
keep it to yourself doomer and fuck off back to all
Well, Dr.Skidmore, who is familiar to readers here as the economics professor from Michigan State who verified the missing money claims of Catherine Austin Fitts, and who has been tracking missing federal money ever since, has now stated that the amounts of missing money are nearing the astronomical, according to this article spotted by S.D.:
Financial System Fake La La Land – Dr. Mark Skidmore
According to Dr. Skidmore, between 2017-2019 the US Department of Defense is missing about $94 trillion dollars, that's $94,000,000,000,000:
Now, even more unofficial and unaccounted for cash has been revealed from the DOD. It’s an eye popping $94 trillion from the years 2017 to 2019. So, add in the $30 trillion in official debt, and that means there is at least $145 trillion in overt and covert money floating around in the federal government, not counting Social Security and Medicare commitments.
This story sounds like a fantasy or a cartoon, but it’s totally backed up with facts you will never hear on the legacy media. Dr. Skidmore, who is an expert in public budgets, explains, “In my mind, it does not follow the principles laid out in our Constitution in accounting for revenues coming in and expenditures going out. It’s fraudulent in my mind.”
Why, just think, if we added two more zeroes to that figure, we'd be at 14 and a half quadrillion dollars, which is the amount of bad derivatives sloshing around in the system according to some estimates. Think of that: $14,500,000,000,000,000. That's more money than the entire gross domestic product of the planet by several multiples. Skidmore's comment is as follows:
Skidmore says, “The risks are really kind of unknowable. The derivatives market is so enormous and so complexed (sic.), and who knows if some of the money that we are not able to account for in the government books is pushing into a quadrillion dollar derivatives market? We don’t know that. It could be.
It would be small potatoes in quadrillions (in the derivative market). It’s incomprehensible. . . . My gut tells me this ends awfully with a very abrupt disruption of some sort that could include a transition to some sort of new financial system, and potentially a much more draconian system.”
In short, says Skidmore, "we are in la la land."
Indeed we are. But need it necessarily end in "a much more draconian system?" In my opinion, only if we let it. The idea of a much more draconian system is only of benefit to the people who created this mess in the first place: the central banksters, the politicians, the too-big-to-fail, too-big-to-jail cartels.
And we know what that "much more draconian system" looks like already, because they've told us: a "cashless" "digital 'currency'" society coupled to a social credit system, with lots of robots doing jobs humans used to do, and lots of "useless eaters" to be "taken care of" in the sense that the Emperor Palpatine said Darth Vader would "take care of" some of his former allies.
Rather, what we have, I suspect, is a two-tiered economy; at one level, the finance-crapitalists who make money by creating more of it. So long as they can create derivatives and other "financial instruments" and run the presses faster than the rate of inflation, they're happy, because inflation is always a mechanism for clawing wealth away from the middle class into the hands of the super-rich.
They don't have to produce anything, just run the presses and come up with new ways to financialize everything; think of weather derivatives or (here's one already in use) "pandemic bonds".
Remember that people made money, boatloads of it, during the inter-war period of hyper-inflation in Germany, precisely by speculating in German currency until Hjalmar Schacht put an end to it. (Remember him? Of "Where's the Reichsbank's gold" fame? Remember how he let off the New York Fed with a nod and a wink when it couldn't find Germany's gold?
And remember how Schacht put an end to it, and reigned in the inflation, literally in almost a weekend by suspending the currency speculation and trading and allowing the Reichsmark to stabilize? In short, he turned against his own finance crapitalist class. And maybe it was his "nod and wink" to the NY Fed over that missing gold episode that got him such a light sentence at Nuremberg after WW2. But anyway, I digress... )
Then there's the real economy, the truck driver, the railroad, the manufacturer, and so on. I strongly suspect it's the disparity between the two - and the fact that my own hypothesized "hidden system of finance" has grown so enormous that is has swallowed the federal government and normal budgetary processes - that is behind the move of some states to create state bullion depositories and legislation recognizing bullion as legal tender.
Hyper-inflation and hidden processes do no one any good: why trade a real automobile for blips on a computer screen that are losing value faster then the transaction can be completed? Answer, you don't. The customer leaves without a car, the car stays on the lot, the manufacturer doesn't move as many cars, and pretty soon the whole supply chain shuts down. Until more stable money comes along.
All because of Mr. Central Bankster and the philosophy of "making money by making money."
What I suspect, therefore, is that we will see the emergence of more and more such regional measures, and that, for a while, the moves toward centralization and de-centralization will co-exist, uneasily, for a period of time until people wake up and realize they no longer need Mr. Central Bankster and Mr. Globaloney. Why? Because trusting Mr. Central Bankster to create stable media of exchange is not in their job description.
dood ya been at this for a decade
longer
give it up
No? Leaving reddit was the best thing I've done in a while, but I'm going to continue exposing corruption as I see it until I'm dead.
I've let go of my hope to save humanity from itself though, stupid fuckers. I will, however, save my friends and family.
I did and feels good man
Why are you on a conspiracy forum telling people to stop reporting on conspiracies if you "gave it up".
Sounds like you're actively discouraging people from seeking the truth. Sounds like the opposite of "giving up", but what do I know :P
Greetings from “New Normal” Germany!
On April 1, 1933, shortly after Hitler was appointed chancellor, the Nazis staged a boycott of Jewish businesses in Germany. Members of the Storm Troopers (“die Sturmabteilung,” or the “Storm Department,” as I like to think of them) stood around outside of Jewish-owned stores with Gothic-lettered placards reading “Germans! Defend yourselves! Do not buy from Jews!” The boycott itself was a total disaster — most Germans ignored it and just went on with their lives — but it was the beginning of the official persecution of the Jews and totalitarianism in Nazi Germany.
Last week, here in “New Normal” Germany, the government (which, it goes without saying, bears no resemblance to the Nazi regime, or any other totalitarian regime) implemented a social-segregation system that bans anyone who refuses to publicly conform to the official “New Normal” ideology from participating in German society. From now on, only those who have an official “vaccination pass” or proof of a negative PCR test are allowed to sit down and eat at restaurants, shop at “non-essential” stores, or go to bars, or the cinema, or wherever.
Here’s a notice from the website of Prater, a popular beer garden in Berlin
Of course, there is absolutely no valid comparison to be made between these two events, or between Nazi Germany and “New Normal” Germany, nor would I ever imply that there was. That would be illegal in “New Normal” Germany, as it would be considered “relativizing the Holocaust,” not to mention being “anti-democratic and/or delegitimizing the state in a way that endangers security,” or whatever. Plus, it’s not like there are SA goons standing outside shops and restaurants with signs reading “Germans! Defend yourselves! Don’t sell to the Unvaccinated and Untested!” It’s just that it’s now illegal to do that, i.e., sell anything to those of us whom the media and the government have systematically stigmatized as “Covid deniers” because we haven’t converted to the new official ideology and submitted to being “vaccinated” or “tested.”
Protesting the new official ideology is also illegal in “New Normal” Germany. OK, I think I should probably rephrase that. I certainly don’t want to misinform anyone. Protesting the “New Normal” isn’t outlawed per se. You’re totally allowed to apply for a permit to protest against the “Covid restrictions” on the condition that everyone taking part in your protest wears a medical-looking N95 mask and maintains a distance of 1.5 meters from every other medical-masked protester … which is kind of like permitting anti-racism protests as long as the protesters all wear Ku Klux Klan robes and perform a choreographed karaoke of Lynyrd Skynyrd’s Sweet Home Alabama.
Who says the Germans don’t have a sense of humor?
I don’t mean to single out the Germans. There is nothing inherently totalitarian, or fascist, or robotically authoritarian and hyper-conformist about the Germans, as a people. The fact that the vast majority of Germans clicked their heels and started mindlessly following orders, like they did in Nazi Germany, the moment the “New Normal” was introduced last year doesn’t mean that all Germans are fascists by nature. Most Americans did the same thing. So did the British, the Australians, the Spanish, the French, the Canadians, and a long list of others. It’s just that, well, I happen to live here, so I’ve watched as Germany has been transformed into “New Normal Germany” up close and personal, and it has definitely made an impression on me.
The ease with which the German authorities implemented the new official ideology, and how fanatically it has been embraced by the majority of Germans, came as something of a shock. I had naively believed that, in light of their history, the Germans would be among the first to recognize a nascent totalitarian movement predicated on textbook Goebbelsian Big Lies (i.e., manipulated Covid “case” and “death” statistics), and would resist it en masse, or at least take a moment to question the lies their leaders were hysterically barking at them.
I couldn’t have been more wrong.
Here we are, over a year later, and waiters and shop clerks are “checking papers” to enforce compliance with the new official ideology. (And, yes, the “New Normal” is an official ideology. When you strip away the illusion of an apocalyptic plague, there isn’t any other description for it). Perfectly healthy, medical-masked people are lining up in the streets to be experimentally “vaccinated.” Lockdown-bankrupted shops and restaurants have been converted into walk-in “PCR-test stations.” The government is debating mandatory “vaccination” of children in kindergarten. Goon squads are arresting octogenarians for picnicking on the sidewalk without permission. And so on. At this point, I’m just sitting here waiting for the news that mass “disinfection camps” are being set up to solve the “Unvaccinated Question.”
Whoops … there I go again, “relativizing the Holocaust.” I really need to stop doing that. The Germans take this stuff very seriously, especially with Israel under relentless attack by the desperately impoverished people it has locked inside an enormous walled ghetto, and is self-defensively ethnically cleansing.
But, seriously, there is no similarity whatsoever between Nazi Germany and “New Normal” Germany. Sure, both systems suspended the constitution, declared a national “state of emergency” enabling the government to rule by decree, inundated the masses with insane propaganda and manipulated “scientific facts,” outlawed protests, criminalized dissent, implemented a variety of public rituals, and symbols, and a social segregation system, to enforce compliance with their official ideologies, and demonized anyone who refused to comply … but, other than that, there’s no similarity, and anyone who suggests there is is a dangerous social-deviant extremist who probably needs to be quarantined somewhere, or perhaps dealt with in some other “special” way.
Plus, the two ideologies are completely different. One was a fanatical totalitarian ideology based on imaginary racial superiority and the other is a fanatical totalitarian ideology based on an imaginary “apocalyptic plague” … so what the hell am I even talking about? On top of which, no swastikas, right? No swastikas, no totalitarianism! And nobody’s mass murdering the Jews, that I know of, and that’s the critical thing, after all!
So, never mind. Just ignore all that crazy stuff I just told you about “New Normal” Germany. Don’t worry about “New Normal” America, either. Or “New Normal” Great Britain. Or “New Normal” wherever. Get experimentally “vaccinated.” Experimentally “vaccinate” your kids. Prove your loyalty to the Reich … sorry, I meant to global capitalism. Ignore those reports of people dying and suffering horrible adverse effects. Wear your mask. Wear it forever. God knows what other viruses are out there, just waiting to defile your bodily fluids and cause you to experience a flu-like illness, or cut you down in the prime of your seventies or eighties … and, Jesus, I almost forgot “long Covid.” That in itself is certainly enough to justify radically restructuring society so that it resembles an upscale hospital theme park staffed by paranoid, smiley-faced fascists in fanciful designer Hazmat suits.
Oh, and keep your “vaccination papers” in order. You never know when you’re going to have to show them to some official at the airport, or a shop, or restaurant, or to your boss, or your landlord, or the police, or your bank, or your ISP, or your Tinder date … or some other “New Normal” authority figure. I mean, you don’t want to be mistaken for a “Covid denier,” or an “anti-vaxxer,” or a “conspiracy theorist,” or some other type of ideological deviant, and be banished from society, do you?
taken from the Pfizer clinical trial, based on which the FDA authorized the vaccine for public use.
A key quote is buried on page 42: “Among 3410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group [who received a saltwater shot].”
Those shocking numbers have never seen the light of day in news media.
The comparative numbers reveal that the vaccine was not effective at preventing COVID-19. It was certainly not 50% more effective than no vaccine at all—the standard for FDA Emergency Use Authorization.
To make all this clear, I need to back up and explain the theory of the vaccine clinical trial.
The researchers assumed the SARS-CoV-2 virus was spreading everywhere in the world, and during the clinical trial, it would descend on some volunteers.
The billion-dollar question was: how many people receiving the vaccine would become infected, vs. how many people in the placebo group?
If it turned out that FAR FEWER people getting the vaccine became infected with SARS-CoV-2, the vaccine would be hailed as a success. It protected people against the virus.
But as you can see from the numbers above, that wasn’t the case at all.
So now we come to the vital weasel-phrase in the FDA document I just quoted: “suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 [cases].”
“Well, you see, we can’t say these were ACTUAL COVID-19 cases. Maybe they were, maybe they weren’t. They’re in limbo. We want to keep them in limbo. Otherwise, our clinical trial is dead in the water, and we’ll never get approval for the vaccine.”
What does “suspected cases” mean? It can only mean these people all displayed symptoms consistent with the definition of COVID-19, but they’re unconfirmed cases because…their PCR tests were negative, not positive.
However, if their tests were negative, why would they be called “suspected cases” instead of “NOT CASES”?
Something is wrong here. The FDA is hedging its bets, muddying the waters, obscuring facts.
By FDA/CDC rules, a case of COVID-19 means: a person has tested positive, period.
That’s the way cases are counted.
These several thousand volunteers in the Pfizer clinical trial were either COVID-19 cases or they weren’t. Which is it?
The official response to that question is obvious: the FDA decided to throw the data from all those suspected cases in the garbage and ignore them. Poof. Gone.
Why do I say that?
Because if the FDA had paid serious attention to the several thousand “suspected cases,” they never would have authorized the vaccine for public use. They would have stopped the clinical trial and undertaken a very deep and extensive investigation.
Which they didn’t.
This is called a crime.
“But…but it’s not that simple. This is a complex situation. It’s a gray area.”
“No. It isn’t. If you were running a clinical trial of a new drug, and a few thousand people in the trial, who were given the drug, nevertheless came down with the disease symptoms the drug was supposed to cure, wouldn’t you cancel the trial and go back to the drawing board?”
“You mean if we were being honest? That’s a joke, right? We’re not honest. Don’t you get it?”
Yes. I get it. You’re criminals. Killers.
But wait. There’s more. The FDA document also states: “Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were 409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group.”
That’s explosive. Right after vaccination, 409 people who received the shots became “suspected COVID cases.” This alone should have been enough to stop the clinical trial altogether. But it wasn’t.
In fact, the FDA document tries to excuse those 409 cases with a slippery comment: “It is possible that the imbalance in suspected COVID-19 cases occurring in the 7 days post vaccination represents vaccine reactogenicity with symptoms that overlap with those of COVID-19.”
Translation: You see, a number of clinical symptoms of COVID-19 and adverse effects from the vaccine are the same. Therefore, we have no idea whether the vaccinated people developed COVID or were just reacting to the vaccine. So we’re going to ignore this whole mess and pretend it’s of no importance.
Back in April of 2020, I predicted the vaccine manufacturers would use this strategy to explain away COVID cases occurring in the vaccine groups of their clinical trials.
It’s called cooking the data. It’s a way of writing off and ignoring COVID symptoms in the vaccine group—and instead saying, “The vaccine is safe and effective.”
And the FDA document, as I stated above, just puts an impenetrable cloud over all the volunteers in the Pfizer clinical trial by inventing a category called “suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 cases,” and throwing those crucial data away, never to be spoken of again.
I’m speaking about them now. Any sensible person, looking at them, would conclude that the vaccine should never have been authorized.
Unless fraud, deception, profits, and destruction of human life via the vaccine were and are the true goals.
Finally: When you have “suspected cases,” and their ultimate status depends on doing a test, you do the test. You do it as many times as you need to, until it registers positive or negative. Then each “suspected case” becomes an actual case or no case at all.
Perhaps these “suspected cases” in the clinical trial were tested, and many of them came up positive, revealing they were actual COVID cases—but the researchers lied and covered up the fact that they were tested.
Or if you really don’t want to know whether “suspected cases” are actual cases, you don’t test them. You leave them in a convenient limbo and park them, never to be seen again.
Either way, the situation is patently absurd. By official standards, the PCR test decides whether a person is a case or not a case. Just do the test. Saying “we don’t know” is nothing more than a con and a hustle.
I’d love to hear the researchers try to talk their way out of this one. Here is how the conversation might go:
“So you’re saying these several thousand suspected COVID cases couldn’t be adjudicated one way or another?”
“That’s right. Their PCR tests were ‘indeterminate’.”
“That says something devastating about the test itself.”
“Well, sometimes you just can’t tell whether it’s positive or negative.”
“I see. And this ‘indeterminate’ result occurred in SEVERAL THOUSAND suspected cases.”
“I guess so, yes.”
“You know, you could have done something else with these suspected cases. A different test. You could have taken tissue samples and looked for the virus itself in a more direct way.”
“No. That wouldn’t work.”
“Why not?”
“Because…the actual virus…”
“Because no one has been able to come up with a specimen of the actual SARS-CoV-2 virus.”
“Right.”
“So tell me—what does that indicate? I’ll tell you what it indicates. You can’t prove the SARS-CoV-2 virus exists.
“I have to go. I’m late for a meeting.”
“You’re late for more than just a meeting. Is it true a person becomes a virologist by cutting out a coupon from the back of a comic book and mailing it to a PO Box in Maryland?’
“Absolutely not. That’s outrageous.”
“What then?”
“The PO Box is in Virginia.”
SOURCES:
You are unhealthily obsessed with this man. For your own mental health, try to just move on.
Even if you're being paid to do this (god I hope so), you're exhibiting some very disturbing behavior as of late, even for you.
Seek help friend.