it wasn't meant for the conspiracy theorists. 9/11 was an op within an op within an op. Read the current pinned thread "the three levels of 9/11" for context.
Farrell continues:
So my "op within an op within an op" scenario is basically that someone, with probably access to hidden space technologies, and with all but certain access to weaponized versions of "scalar-torsion technologies," brought the Twin Towers down.
That "someone" is some sort of rogue extra-territorial organization, with deep and historical connections to the radical Islamic underworld. The message was sent: "we know your game...we can literally turn your centers and instrumentalities of power to dust before your very eyes. We are deeply penetrated into your own covert agencies and plans, and the game is now afoot."
Consider also the Masonic symbolism of what was struck in that way: the Twin Towers, the twin Masonic pillars of Jachin and Boaz, sitting in the heart of the Anglo-American elite's financial district...The Muslims do not have access to such technologies, whereas the Nazis were investigating them with a vengeance since at least 1933!
This Fascist International had deep post-war ties with rogue elements of the similarly fascist mindset in the American financial and intelligence Deep State, a group initially represented by Allen and John Foster Dulles, John McCloy, and others of the "Sullivan and Cromwell crowd."
Although many 9/11 researchers tend to dismiss or at least avoid these possibilities and discussions, others have no hesitation in describing Tony Blair's "global network" as a Fascist network, centered in London and New York.
It is therefore not a great leap of the imagination to state that this network also has centers in Frankfurt, and that some of its historical and technological roots lie in Nazism. This third layer exposes itself in a variety of clues, not the least of which are those clues which suggest exotic modalities of the Twin Towers' destruction, be that "nano-thermite," "mini-nukes," or exotic "energy weapons."
Viewed in this way, such an approach to 9/11 is an attempt to view the event from the perspective of Richard Dolan's idea of a "breakaway civilization" that secretly emerged over the decades since WWII, a civilization that emerged because of its decades' long access to secret funds, a great deal of which came from the exploitation of Axis loot, and that emerged because of its use of that vast war chest to fund the secret development of various exotic technologies.
Such an approach is not meant to delegitimize the efforts of those 9/11 researchers who stick to "nuts and bolts" and who do not consciously attempt to integrate their speculations about the architecture of the conspiracy into such a wide historical and interpretive context.
It is perhaps time to reconsider these clues within a much larger technological and historical context, for that context leads us to UFOs, to the black projects world, to the national security structure and Mr. Dolan's breakaway civilization hypothesis, and to that post-war extra-territorial Nazi organization, with its own deep ties to the criminal underworld, drug trafficking, and, of course, to Islamic radicalism and terrorism.
Like all Mafias, it has its factions, and like all Mafias, its alliances are always and only of convenience. It can does go to war with itself.
Farrell and others have consistently argued that the goals of this post-war Fascist International was to destabilize Anglo-American petroleum interests in the Middle East, and that the war on terror might be a convenient front for a war against this Fascist International, "connected as it was and is to Islamic terrorist groups."
It's time for the interpretive net to be cast much wider, as the Fascist devil is in the details.
As for the high financial weirdness surrounding 9/11, PROMIS, and the mechanism of the murder weapon itself, stay tuned...
Sources:
Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks and Secret Sorcery - Joseph P. Farrell
9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in the USA - Webster Griffin Tarpley
9/11: The Big Lie - Thierry Meyssan
Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil - Michael C. Ruppert
JFK-9/11: 50 Years of Deep State - Laurent Guyénot
The Most Dangerous Book in the World: 9/11 as Mass Ritual - S.K. Bain
Collateral Damage: US Covert Operations and the Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 - E.P. Heidner
Welcome to Terrorland: Mohamed Atta and the 9/11 Cover-Up in Florida - Daniel Hopsicker
CONTINUED
For Tarpley, 9/11 was a coup d'état with Global Guardian as its effective instrument of cover, a surrender of the Bush White House to the coup planners that:
...owed much to the fear that the coup faction were extremists capable of unleashing nuclear war. Here is a portal through which the rogue network could have launched nuclear missiles without the help of Bush. The targets for such missiles could have been Arab or Islamic capitals, if Bush had refused to initiate the war of civilizations in conventional form by attacking Afghanistan. The target could also have been China or Russia.
We must never lose sight of the Bush-Putin telephone call on 9/11, which was the central diplomatic and strategic event of the day, even though most 9/11 books do not even mention it. In that telephone call, Bush in effect delivered an ultimatum that the US was determined to seize Afghanistan...plus bases in former Soviet central Asia.
Tarpley thinks Putin agreed, partly because he knew the US would fail in Afghanistan, and that such a large effort would ultimately sap America's strength.
Bush's own statements, as well as statements from his staff, further suggested a coup attempt by level three against level two on 9/11.
On September 12 and 13, Bush's press secretary, Ari Fleischer, indicated that the Secret Service had received credible threats on 9/11 from the attackers, and indicated that the White House and Air Force One were also targets.
The New York Times reported them as credible because they had been accompanied by the use of transmission and identification codes unique to the presidency itself. According to researcher Thierry Meyssan:
The attackers also had the codes of the DEA, the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), Air Force Intelligence (AFI), Army Intelligence (AI), Naval Intelligence (NI), the Marine Corps Intelligence (MCI) and the intelligence services of the State Department and the Department of Energy.
Each of those codes is known by only a very small group of officials. No one is authorized to possess several of them. Also, to accept that the attackers were in possession of them supposes either that there exists a method of cracking the codes, or that moles have infiltrated each of these intelligence bodies.
Technically, it appears to be possible to reconstitute the codes of the American agencies by means of the software, PROMIS, that served to create them.
Farrell expands on this narrative:
It is crucial to note (and to remember) that some of the codes the attackers allegedly knew were those of the super-secret National Reconnaissance Office, the center coordinating all of America's spy satellites, and the center coordinating their reconnaissance data.
To Meyssan, the use of the codes to establish the attacker's credibility and capability meant that the American state, and more importantly, the highest and deepest levels of its national security and military establishment, was penetrated by traitors and moles.
By calling the White House they were blackmailing the US government, and access to those codes could help them usurp the authority of the POTUS, and conceivably flip the Global Guardian drill to live status.
The only means allowing Bush to retain control of the military was to physically hold the HQ of the US Strategic Command, at Offut, and to personally issue orders and counter-orders from there.
After reading My Pet Goat in Sarasota, Florida, Bush made this statement: "This is a difficult moment for America. I, unfortunately, will be going back to Washington after my remarks...two airplanes have crashed into the WTC in an apparent terrorist attack on our country."
Tarpley observes that the crucial remark is the reference to an "apparent" terrorist attack. Also of note is that Bush explicitly stated he would be returning to Washington after his remarks. At some point after this statement, the threat became clearer and he was diverted to Barksdale and then Offut. The Secret Service learned of a threat against Air Force One after leaving the school, suggesting the use of classified presidential codes to convey this threat.
Then, at around 9:42 AM, ABC broadcast "live images of a fire that had broken out in the White House annex, the Old Executive Office Building, home to a number of key offices of the executive, including that of the VP."
According to Meyssan, "no information has ever leaked out concerning the origin of the blaze, or its exact scale" as ABC had merely showed "a fixed shot of plumes of black smoke escaping the building."
Approximately 15 minutes later, Cheney was taken by the Secret Service and escorted to the White House situation room, while sharpshooters "armed with rocket launchers" were deployed around the now evacuated White House complex.
According to Meyssan, these troops were "capable of repelling an assault by airborne troops. In short, they were facing a threat of a very different nature to that later described by Vice President Cheney."
Farrell extrapolates further: "At that moment, the threat was not terrorism; it was something else entirely."
When Air Force One landed at Barksdale, Bush made another statement before proceeding to Offut. In addition to attempting to reassure the American people, Bush notably stated:
We have taken the necessary security precautions to continue the functions of your government...The resolve of our great nation is being tested. But make no mistake: we will show the world that we will pass this test. God bless.
Meyssan, Tarpley and Farrell all agree that it's very notable that "there is not a single mention of terrorism in this speech, but only of a "test," and Bush's words could therefore just as easily refer to an internal revolt, coup, or military conflict, as to terrorism. Similarly, a terror threat, no matter how big or dire, is unlikely to provoke the statement that indicates Continuity of Government operations were begun."
Meyssan continues:
In such a context, one can interpret in two different ways the activation of the Continuity of Government (CoG) procedure. The simplest explanation is to consider the need to protect the President and other political leaders from the actions of traitors capable of starting a fire in the Old Executive Building and stealing the secret codes of both the Presidency and the intelligence agencies. One might also consider whether, on the contrary, the CoG plan was put into effect not to protect political leaders from traitors, but was initiated by the traitors themselves to isolate those leaders.
The account given by Vice President Dick Cheney is truly strange. He claims that men from the Secret Service seized him in his office and bundled him into the White House bunker without receiving his consent. He appeared to suggest that the same was true for the principal members of the government and Congress. And what else is an operation where the secret services take elected officials and put them in bunkers "for their own security", if not a coup d'état, or at least a palace coup?
Farrell speculates that the government in Washington had been seized by the coup, placing its key members under "protection," leaving the President to attempt to reassert control over the strategic command structure of the military by his personal presence at its headquarters, forestalling a potential nuclear conflict, by surrendering to the demands of the attacks.
In the scenario where Bush and Cheney and other elements of the government knew about 9/11, and even helped plan aspects of it, the third level now starts to reveal itself, for "Bush and the federal government are then reacting to an operation they know has gone wrong, and that has been penetrated or coopted by someone else."
A few months later, Bush possibly alluded to these others "players" in his famous "axis of evil" State of the Union address. The fascist connotations of that phrase should not be overlooked.
Another example of this rhetoric, noted by researcher Daniel Hopsicker, was when British PM Tony Blair referred to Al Qaeda as a "terrorist organization with ties to a global network."
That made sense. The idea that Mohamed Atta and his henchmen needed help from an international organization while they were in the US was easy to understand. But what kind of global network. Blair didn't say. Blair's "global network" remained elusive, unnamed, shadowy, and undefined. Several weeks later the FBI denied that this global network existed, and proposed instead a "lone Cadre Theory" which became the operative assumption in their investigation.
Farrell, who has extensively researched the "Fascist International" and the assimilation of the post-war Nazi and Fascist ideologies into the Western intelligence apparatus, and who also believes that some form of exotic energy was used to destroy the towers, wrote the following in a 2008 letter to researcher Richard Hoagland:
So we are left with some version of the Nazi International extra-territorial state with an all but proven track record of the postwar investigation of precisely the technologies to bring down the Towers. This rationalizes the rather odd signs of "panic" that "our" elite has shown since 9/11, for consider the almost frenzied rush into Afghanistan and Iraq (whose ultimate purpose involved much more than oil).
Realizing that they were faced with an extra-territorial state with possession of extraordinarily sophisticated "scalar-torsion" technology that had been successfully weaponized, they launched a 'war on terror' with radical Islam as the fall guy, when in fact, the real target is something completely different and much more frightening.
The behavior of the financial elite during the bailout crisis is another signal that someone has the gun to their heads; they acted like people being blackmailed by some hidden "protection racket" by insisting on "no oversight" back in 2008. The only people in the historical record that wielded such financial and technological clout that I can think of were the postwar Nazis.
Farrell highlights the strange similarities between this perceived reality and the James Bond film "You Only Live Twice," which shouldn't be dismissed entirely as fiction as it's a fairly prevalent theory that Ian Fleming was "leaking" information under the guise of fiction.
In that film, we find:
-
An international conspiracy that is extra-territorial, called SPECTRE
-
A network with a secret space program which it uses to interfere with Russian and American space launches and to bring the two nations to the brink of war
-
A society with a heavy presence of Japanese criminal underground
-
The society is headed by an obviously German fellow (played by an actor who Farrell notes is "almost Martin Bormann-esque in appearance")
Other than what is commonly speculated, I don't. Hopefully someone can chime in.
but the amount of energy required would be insane.
Have you looked into Hurricane Erin? It approaching New York on 9/11. It's been hypothesized energy was "drawn" from the storm system.
The towers were brought down with high technology, likely Directed Energy Weaponry.
Judy Wood has been debunked by 9/11 Engineers for truth.
Dude. Richard Gage is a fraud.
facepalm
This is the precise infighting they want.
I'm saying bombs WERE used. Thermite probably WAS used.
why would the towers be any different?
They literally vanished in front of your eyes.
The "bathtub" would've been destroyed and NY flooded.
Please do an ounce of research or just fuck off.
Extremely disrespectful and nauseating to see you pushing this on the 20th anniversary of 9/11, but I suppose I shouldn't be surprised.
I had a soft spot for you, but now I can see you're truly scum.
yet it’s a “red herring”
Dr. Steven Jones is a literal fraud who sabotaged Pons and Fleischmann's legitimate cold fusion research. Pons and Fleischmann have since been vindicated, and "Jones" was exposed as a literal disinfo agent. Watch the film "Heavy Watergate".
Jones was ALSO caught altering images to push his "thermite" theory to make them seem "hotter" than they were. Absolute drivel and trash.
and no evidence for DEW
Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Energy Technology on 9/11
There's reams of evidence. Probably more evidence for the DEW theory on 9/11 than any conspiracy theory I've ever studied, and I'm literally one of the most studied conspiracy theorists on the web :P
I spent 10 years arguing with people on conspiracy forums that "swine flu" was a massive hoax, and predictive programming for a future "more serious" staged pandemic.
cough
weird, you have a lot of history freaking out about the theory and calling people names who discuss it.
fucking glowie.
yes, probably more.
The only way to cause mass civil disobedience is to literally push people to the brink.
This is an act of desperation from the "biden" regime NOT a consolidation of power.
This is the last trick in their "controversial distractions" bag.
If they had come out with anything less, it would allow the fence-sitters more leeway.
Now even the fence-sitters can't ignore the line in the sand.
The pushback against tyranny that will naturally result from this psychosis will be as strong, if not STRONGER, than this blatant coup.
The echoes of our success will reverberate across the world and reach countries that were unable/unwilling to stand up for themselves.
This is the beginning of the end for them.
That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
Much love, friend.
blatantly stupid, such as the purported link between small pox vaccines and AIDS.
Bruh, using an experimental smallpox vaccine on millions of Africans caused MASSIVE immune system deficiencies for DECADES. wtf are you smoking?
Please PLEASE read "dissolving illusions" by Suzanne Humphries.
I respect you, which is why I can't sit back and watch you "debunk" the truth and propagate an antiquated and severely warped medical paradigm.
This is speculation friend. Keep casting aspersions on those who explore ideas that you disagree with.
Was the smallpox vaccination program a success? Definitely so.
The smallpox vaccination program was the greatest medical blunder in human history. Please read my research here.
The smallpox "vaccine" was poison and did nothing to stop the spread and in fact CONTRIBUTED to the smallpox epidemics of the 19th century.
Smallpox wasn't "eradicated" by the vaccine.
You have 200 years of junk science to catch up on friend if you actually believe the smallpox vaccine wasn't outrageously stupid and lethal.
We all should be hoping "the good guys" are winning.
who are the good guys?
Anyone who opposes the current subjugation of the planet over a phantom and is championing human freedom.
I think the "lab leak" is a red herring for more fuel for the "rona" fire.
I love how pretty much any pathogen or poison falls under the second definition. I mean, they stimulate the body's immune system!
I hear you. I worry for our brother and sisters over there.
This analysis applies to all vaccines, including the new RNA COVID injections, which are actually genetic treatments.
In today’s episode of Mainstream Vaccine Quackery, Medical Morons, and How to Make a Fortune Selling Injected Snake Oil, we ask the burning question: How can the body adequately respond to a rehearsal (vaccination) unless it’s ALREADY prepared for the REAL THING?
Vaccinations are said to be rehearsals. Whatever is injected stimulates the immune system to respond to a harmless version of a germ-invader. As a result, this military exercise prepares the body for the real thing, should it appear in the future.
But why does the body need a rehearsal?
If a vaccination does stimulate the immune system to respond, doesn’t this constitute proof that the body is already prepared to defend against real attacks?
Why does the immune system swing into gear and mount a defense against whatever is in the vaccine? Answer: Because it’s already ready for a) that military exercise and b) the real thing.
The “prompt” provided by the vaccine was unnecessary.
The public, however, has a standard reaction to the notion of rehearsals. “It’s a good idea. Soldiers drill to prepare for actual battle. Stage actors rehearse over and over, before the opening night of a play. Makes sense.”
However, the human body is different. Many functions are automatic. Do babies need stimulants to teach their blood to flow? Must little children engage in breathing exercises in school, so their bodies don’t forget to take in air and expel it?
Immune defense (however you want describe the process) is one of those automatic functions. If it weren’t, the production of antibodies, which is said to take place after vaccination, wouldn’t occur—and doctors would say, “You need a vaccination to get you ready for vaccination.”
The typical response to this and all criticisms of vaccines is: Well, through vaccination, we wiped out millions of cases of many diseases.
But is that claim true?
I’ve tackled the subject several times. Here is an example:
“Richard Moskowitz, MD and homeopath, on vaccination,” May 5, 2020.
In this piece, I want to take a look at a few fundamentals about vaccination. In particular, the claim that vaccines have done a fantastic job of reducing case numbers of diseases, and therefore all criticisms of these injections are irrelevant.
From his bio: “Richard Moskowitz was born in 1938, and educated at Harvard (B.A.) and New York University (M.D.). After medical school he did 3 years of graduate study in Philosophy at the University of Colorado in Boulder on a U. S. Steel Fellowship.”
“He took his internship at St. Anthony’s Hospital, Denver, and has been practicing family medicine since 1967, as well as attending about 800 home births. With a background in Oriental medicine and other forms of natural healing, Dr. Moskowitz studied homeopathy with George Vithoulkas in Greece and Rajan Sankaran and others in India.”
In 1987, while writing my first book, AIDS INC., I had a long conversation with Richard about vaccination. It was my first trip exploring vaccines as a form of immune-system suppression.
I came away from the conversation with an idea about how vaccines could be touted and trumpeted as the reason for vastly reducing cases of diseases, when in fact the reduction of visible symptoms was occurring—a very different thing.
If vaccines were lowering immune-system response, then the acute, vigorous, and all-out inflammatory reaction to germs would be eliminated. And it IS that acute reaction which creates the visible symptoms (rashes, spots, etc.).
After vaccination, “Voila, no measles,” the experts say. But really, as a result of vaccination, it’s just the visible rash that is missing, while something more dangerous, out of view, is going on in the body.
I’m printing here an excerpt from Richard’s article (written years ago), The Case Against Immunizations. The article is based on a classical view of germs and the action of the human immune system. The pros and cons of germ theory itself are a different matter, about which I’ve spoken and written in other places:
It is dangerously misleading, and indeed the exact opposite of the truth, to claim that a vaccine renders us ‘immune’ to or protects us against an acute disease, if in fact it only drives the disease deeper into the interior and causes us to harbor it chronically instead, with the result that our responses to it become progressively weaker, but show less and less of a tendency to heal or resolve themselves spontaneously.
What I propose, then, is to investigate as thoroughly and objectively as I can how the vaccines actually work inside the human body, and to begin by simply paying attention to the implications of what we already know. Consider the process of falling ill with and recovering from a typical acute disease, such as the measles, in contrast with what we can observe following administration of the measles vaccine.
Once inhaled by a susceptible individual, the [measles] virus undergoes a prolonged period of silent multiplication, first in the tonsils, adenoids, and accessory lymphoid aggregations of the nasopharynx; later in the regional lymph nodes of the head and neck; and eventually, several days later, it passes into the blood and enters the spleen, the liver, the thymus, and the bone marrow, the ‘visceral’ organs of the immune system. Throughout this ‘incubation’ period, which lasts from 10 to 14 days, the patient typically feels quite well, and experiences few or no symptoms of any kind.
By the time that the first symptoms of measles appear, circulating antibodies are already detectable in the blood, and the height of the symptomatology coincides with the peak of the antibody response. In other words, the ‘illness’ that we call the measles is simply the definitive effort of the immune system to clear this virus from the blood. Notice also that this expulsion is accomplished by sneezing and coughing, i. e., via the same route through which it entered in the first place.
It is abundantly clear from the above that the process of mounting and recovering from an acute illness like the measles involves a general mobilization of the immune system as a whole, including inflammation of the previously sensitized tissues at the portal(s) of entry, activation of leukocytes, macrophages, and the serum complement system, and a host of other mechanisms, of which the production of circulating antibodies is only one, and by no means the most important.”
Such splendid outpourings indeed represent the decisive experiences in the normal physiological maturation of the immune system in the life of a healthy child. For recovery from the measles not only protects children from being susceptible to it again, no matter how many more times they may be exposed to it, but also prepares them to respond promptly and effectively to any other infections they may encounter in the future.
The ability to mount a vigorous acute response to infection must therefore be reckoned among the most fundamental requirements of health and well-being that we all share.”
By contrast, the live but artificially attenuated measles-virus vaccine is injected directly into the blood, by-passing the normal port of entry, and sets up at most a brief inflammatory reaction at the injection site, or perhaps in the regional lymph nodes, with no local sensitization at the normal portal of entry, no ‘incubation period,’ no generalized inflammatory response, and no generalized outpouring.
By ‘tricking’ the body in this fashion, we have accomplished precisely what the entire immune system seems to have evolved to prevent: we have placed the virus directly into the blood, and given it free and immediate access to the major immune organs and tissues, without any obvious mechanism or route for getting rid of it.”
The result is the production of circulating antibodies against the virus, which can in fact be measured in the blood; but this antibody response occurs as an isolated technical feat, without any overt illness to recover from, or any noticeable improvement in the general health of the recipient.
Indeed I submit that exactly the opposite is true, that the price we have to pay for these antibodies is the persistence of viral elements in the blood for long periods of time, perhaps permanently, which in turn carries with it a systematic weakening of our capacity to mount an acute response, not only to the measles, but to other infections as well.”
Far from producing a genuine immunity, then, my suspicion and my fear is that vaccines act by interfering with and even suppressing the immune response as a whole, in much the same way that radiation, chemotherapy, corticosteroids, and other anti-inflammatory drugs do. Artificial immunization focuses on antibody production, a single aspect of the immune process, disarticulates it, and allows it to stand for the whole, in much the same way as chemical suppression of an elevated blood pressure is accepted as a valid substitute for genuine healing or cure of the patient whose blood pressure has risen. It is the frosting on the cake, without the cake.
The worst part of this counterfeiting is that it becomes more difficult, if not impossible, for vaccinated children to mount a normally acute and vigorous response to infection, by substituting for it a much weaker, essentially chronic response, with little or no tendency to heal itself spontaneously.
This is a classical explanation of vaccination which chops down the claim that vaccines are wonderful because they eliminate cases of disease.
Instead, vaccines engage the body in chronic low-level warfare. The ability to mount a full-force inflammatory response is squelched. As a result, the visible “symptoms” of the illness—which are really the signs of that inflammatory response—disappear. And this is taken to mean “the disease doesn’t occur anymore.”
Consider this scenario as a rough analogy: a commanding general is surrounded by his troops on top of a hill. He’s viewing his forward forces who are down below in a large field. Those forces are engaging in close combat with the enemy. After a long time, the battle moves off the field into a thick forest. The general on the hill can’t see what’s going on anymore. But he says:
“We’ve won, boys. The field is empty. No more fighting down there. It’s all over. We’ve wiped out the opposition. Let’s go home and celebrate…”
I don't know. I believe it's joint owned by a small handful of guys from the donald subreddit.
One guy came out publicly after the election and distanced himself from the project. I'm assuming the remaining folks want to stay anonymous. I'm sorry if that's not comforting, but it's all I've got.