3
YuuugeAsshoe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Here this will be the future when you are finally able to visit space.

https://youtu.be/A314bM9xca8

2
YuuugeAsshoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

What I read was operation fishbowl was within operation Dominic. And to be honest I'm not even sure nuclear bombs exist. All I've seen is the footage and accounts of very large bombs going off very high up. To me they look like they are hitting an actual hard surface. From everything I've seen the dome seems to have a layer with liquid-like properties, and a layer that is solid. If you search for videos of 'rocket hits firmament' or 'missile hits dome' you will see it go through the liquid-like layer, and then skip off or explode on the solid layer.

Example: https://www.bitchute.com/video/fsfNDkf2ekFI/

This just does not look like space and the van Allen radiation belt to me.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

You don't have to go by the Bible, all our ancestors from various cultures and religions seem to know we were on a non moving flat earth, and many describe a firmament. It wasn't until the fake moonlanding that the entire world was deceived. Flat earth was still being taught in the early 1900s. Big bang, evolution, and relativity are meant to make humans feel insignificant atheist, and put faith in human institutions and creations.

4
YuuugeAsshoe 4 points ago +4 / -0

"And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so." Genesis 1:7 KJV

Also note that Wernher Von Braun, father of Nasa and modern rocket science only put one thing on his tombstone. Psalm 19:1, "the heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament showeth his handiwork."

Also look into military operations 'Dominic' and 'fishbowl' where the US military nuked the firmament. Together those operations mean 'Fishbowl of the Lord'.

5
YuuugeAsshoe 5 points ago +6 / -1

I get why everyone thinks FE is a psy op. You are right to be suspicious. But the truth is FE is too censored and made fun of for there not to be any significance to it. Obama made fun of flat earth every few months referencing the 'flat earth society'. Incidently the flat earth society is a government psy op with a ridiculous model that no true Flat Earther believes of a floating disk in space amoung spherical planets. They often will not outright delete flat earth channels to avoid the Streisand effect, but they suppress the shit out of them and promote idiotic debunking channels that don't even represent legitimate FE models correctly (straw man). I never even cared about FE enough to make fun of it cause I didn't think it was worthy of attention, why do prominent figures alway attack it like black science man niel degrassi tyson?

I investigated FE for 2 reasons. First it was flat earthers that convinced me the moonlandings were fake and there points were so strong I felt obligated to look into FE. 2nd I made observations many times over oceans that should be impossible on a sphere of earth's circumference even with refraction.

If the moonlandings are fake, then you have to reconsider the public understanding of space, and to what extent we can be lied to. Also the ISS and all Orbiting Satellites are fake.

6
YuuugeAsshoe 6 points ago +7 / -1

What bias or motive to lie could academia, MSM, and Hollyeood have to lie about WW2. It's not like those institutions are run by Jews...

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ya, moving forward, I will only trust people for guidance if they have an actual interest in me doing well, other than a pay check. Look to people you have relationships with, and are wiser than you.

6
YuuugeAsshoe 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes. My father's friend had a very bizarre experience, but that generation has been hypnotized so long they don't get the significance of what happened. Let's call him John, John is a business man so successful he flies around on private jets and is mostly retired. He is very high iq, and like many men of his status he has a somewhat neurotic/OCD mind, to use the enemies terminology. He's been going to therapy a few years for this reason even though there is nothing wrong with him other than being a brainwashed normy boomer. He suddenly started ignoring his wife and stopped sleeping in the same room. After months she eventually broke down and asked if he was trying to leave/divorce her. John said yes. His wife is a very devout Christian woman who believes there are spiritual explanations for many things people would chalk up to mental or physical health problems. She prayed and fasted over this for two weeks until God told her to go release her husband from the 'spell' he was under, for lack of a better word. When he woke up the next day he denied any memory of wanting a divorce or avoiding his wife for months. My father even questioned him on a road trip and the guy said he can't remember it happening.

It turns out he was seeing the same therapist my parents had consulted about me, when I was a young adult. I had what some would call ADD/Nuerotic/undisciplined mindset (to use their terminology). This therapist suggested I be institutionalized and in my mother's words "she wanted to kidnap you". So my mother in her wisdom never spoke to her again. We told John about this experience and suggested he never go to therapy again.

It is my speculation that therapists/psychiatrists to varying degrees do practice a sort of satanic mind control. It is meant to numb you to the spiritual and look to a fake form of science for answers. I think the therapist we had confronted was overtly practicing satanic mind control techniques (mk ultra). Through all of human history the only therapy we had was to look to elders, parents, grandparents, local spiritual leaders or teachers. People who have a genuine interest in your well being. Therapists and psychiatrists are better off if your mind has problems, they can keep charging you.

0
YuuugeAsshoe 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hey do me a favor and go to a search engine and type 'biblical cosmology' and tell me what images show up. Is it a sphere earth, or a fixed plane earth with a firmament over it?

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not sure how familiar you are with the flat earth model, but if you search 'Gleason 1893 map' this is the generally agreed upon approximation. We don't believe there is any satellites used for communication in orbit. All communication is through various land and sea cables, and radio/cell towers. Its easy to look up,but nasa also releases 1000s of helium balloon satellites that can stay aloft for 1-2 years. These have various purposes but they can also function as repeaters for communication. Any land in the southern hemisphere is going to be towards the extremities of flat earth, and I would expect any communication delays to be represented in this. Look up that map I told you, but I hope that provides some insite to your observations.

Edit: I can't find a FE representation right now, but if you look at the layout of sea cables between continents, they make far more sense on a flat earth map. The sea cable distances between South America, South Africa, and Australia are far to great to be practical on a flat earth layout. This is why they are all focused in the northern hemisphere.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Alright, I appreciate you addressing it seriously. And I get what you are saying that as gravity shifts as you go around the curve it makes this 'drop' unapparent for lack of a better word. I just don't agree that gravity could hide any hint of flying an arc that dramatic (due to the speed).

Incase you were interested in addressing another FE proof for shits and giggles. Here is a video explaining how their gyroscopes work, and how they cannot possibly function on a rotating/Orbiting sphere. Essentially if you flew from USA to Australia your gyro which is meant to orient you to a level runway, would show that you are upside down. Airplane Gyros hold their rigidity in space regardless of gravity, inertia, rotation or any other motion. This issue has turned countless pilots into FE's and many have been fired or grounded over the issue. https://www.bitchute.com/video/hRBuIFBed0tq/

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +2 / -1

I mean all you basically said is gravity makes it work like magic. I am describing the geometric path the plane has to follow if earth is a sphere as we are told. I'm saying it's impossible because if you were following a trajectory that dips 837 feet per second, there is no way you could perceive it as a straight and level path. If you can set aside globe programming we have had from birth, no one perceives this earth curvature when flying at any speed, and how could you not if it's as dramatic as I outlined?

2
YuuugeAsshoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why have a hoax rather than a real shooting? Why not, it's no more complicated than a Hollywood production. I know they do real ones too. Go be an angry little midwit though, idgaf.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ML0CXjJWi1Tu/

2
YuuugeAsshoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Alright, what's your proof that real people died? Otherwise in was a completely fake event. I could be wrong but the proof I saw years ago indicated it was all fake, including crisis actors as parents.

2
YuuugeAsshoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

First of all the plane has 'lift' so it is not falling due to gravity, and it's in atmosphere so it's not like we are talking about a satellite in orbit. So I don't see how that applies at all.

Second the plane traveling 2200mph, has to drop 595.7 miles in one hour to follow earth's curve. This is far beyond any terminal velocity even of a very aerodynamic object. But again, it's not falling due to lift. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills, does no one see how ridiculous it is for a plane to drop 9.9 miles per minute? By all appearances it's flying straight and level, not following some dramatic earth curve trajectory.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok and just to reiterate (and given there are several variables involved I think are insignificant to the example) a spy plane moving 2200 mph has to 'drop' 9.9 miles per minute, and 873.7 feet per second in order to maintain a level altitude over the curve of the earth. Your statement makes this insane trajectory plausible?

I know this suggestion doesn't sound very scientific but just watch some videos of spy planes flying at these immense speeds. Are they really dropping 873.7 feet per second to keep up with earth's curvature. Or are they simply flying over a fixed and flat earth? I mean really try to imagine how insane that trajectory is.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +3 / -2

Didn't realize it until recently but he is a sort of end of the line gate keeper. He won't speak out about the J's, and now this trial is going to convince everyone sandyhook was real and you will be punished heavily foe questioning it.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +2 / -1

Oh sweet, you know what's up. I got my brother in on it too, and he freaked out on me a bit when I first brought it up.

I remember the first time I really accepted FE as the truth after researching, I was staring out the window on a plane, and I started laughing like the Joaquin Phoenix Joker. Everyone looked at me weird.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›