Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

11
Possible Flat Earth explanation for stars, if there is indeed water above the firmament (dome) as the Bible suggests (Genesis 1:7) Let the Reeeee's ensue... (youtu.be)
posted 3 years ago by YuuugeAsshoe 3 years ago by YuuugeAsshoe +11 / -0
26 comments share
26 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– YuuugeAsshoe [S] 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

"And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so." Genesis 1:7 KJV

Also note that Wernher Von Braun, father of Nasa and modern rocket science only put one thing on his tombstone. Psalm 19:1, "the heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament showeth his handiwork."

Also look into military operations 'Dominic' and 'fishbowl' where the US military nuked the firmament. Together those operations mean 'Fishbowl of the Lord'.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– MrPancake 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Bible vs. NASA is like Red vs. Blue. Both are wrong.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– YuuugeAsshoe [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

You don't have to go by the Bible, all our ancestors from various cultures and religions seem to know we were on a non moving flat earth, and many describe a firmament. It wasn't until the fake moonlanding that the entire world was deceived. Flat earth was still being taught in the early 1900s. Big bang, evolution, and relativity are meant to make humans feel insignificant atheist, and put faith in human institutions and creations.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– YuuugeAsshoe [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

This is to point you in the right direction, that is a large question.

https://communities.win/c/flatearthresearch/p/15K6lZryo2/

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– freedomlogic 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Well I dont really know one way or the other, but just some thoughts here.

Your thinking of operation starfish and fishbowl. Dominic seemed to be different.

Most of these shots were conducted with free-fall bombs dropped from B-52 bomber aircraft. Twenty of these shots were to test new weapons designs; six to test weapons effects; and several shots to confirm the reliability of existing weapons. The Thor missile was also used to lift warheads into near-space to conduct high-altitude nuclear explosion tests; these shots were collectively called Operation Fishbowl.[2]

Sounds like one of the experimental weapon designs was the thor missile which is what they used for operation fishbowl.

Starfish Prime was a high-altitude nuclear test conducted by the United States, a joint effort of the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and the Defense Atomic Support Agency. It was launched from Johnston Atoll on July 9, 1962, and was the largest nuclear test conducted in outer space, and one of five conducted by the US in space.

A Thor rocket carrying a W49 thermonuclear warhead (designed at Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory) and a Mk. 2 reentry vehicle was launched from Johnston Atoll in the Pacific Ocean, about 900 miles (1,450 km) west-southwest of Hawaii. The explosion took place at an altitude of 250 miles (400 km), above a point 19 miles (31 km) southwest of Johnston Atoll. It had a yield of 1.4 Mt (5.9 PJ). The explosion was about 10° above the horizon as seen from Hawaii, at 11 pm Hawaii time.[1]: 

The Operation Fishbowl nuclear tests were originally planned to be completed during the first half of 1962 with three tests named Bluegill, Starfish and Urraca.[2]

I understand how you guys think, that were in gods fishbowl or something.

But to me, it was more like trying to get out of the fishbowl. You can claim they hit the firmanent.

I think they were trying to blast open the van allen radiation belts so they could fly through and start exploring. But instead of blowing a hole, the radiation was just absorbed by the magnetic fields. I cant prove anything, but I think the timing was funny.

The first evidence for the radiation belts was reported in 1958 by James Van Allen using data from a cosmic ray detector on the very first NASA mission: Explorer 1 spacecraft. Explorer 1 launched into Earth's orbit on a Jupiter C missile from Cape Canaveral, Florida, on January 31, 1958

4 years later they are blowing nuclear bombs up there with the sole purpose to see what it did to the magnetic fields. Crazy fuckers. Then the moon landing happened supposedly 7 years later.

Yeah turns out if we just fly through the weak part really really quick well be fine guys.

Yeah ok ^^.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– YuuugeAsshoe [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

What I read was operation fishbowl was within operation Dominic. And to be honest I'm not even sure nuclear bombs exist. All I've seen is the footage and accounts of very large bombs going off very high up. To me they look like they are hitting an actual hard surface. From everything I've seen the dome seems to have a layer with liquid-like properties, and a layer that is solid. If you search for videos of 'rocket hits firmament' or 'missile hits dome' you will see it go through the liquid-like layer, and then skip off or explode on the solid layer.

Example: https://www.bitchute.com/video/fsfNDkf2ekFI/

This just does not look like space and the van Allen radiation belt to me.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No subversion.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
  • Perun
  • Thisisnotanexit
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy