No... 12 gorillian jews died...
All the deaths on one side count for double. All the deaths on the other are fake and gay.
And can you tell me why they would shoot germans in buildings with wooden doors?! WOODEN FUCKING DOORS!
How stupid do you think we are to actually believe you can shoot someone when you're in a place with a wooden door? SMH....
There are ALTERNATIVES which actually care for your health and not profit.
Well unfortunately they don't care about basing their treatments on science, and so no matter how much you think they care about you personally, you will get ineffective treatments.
And you will never find a single witch doctor, native american healer, or crystal power person that will treat you without bilking you for absurd amounts of money.
You're a total fool if you think the crystal lady who's charging you $50 per hour to expose you to healing pyramid energy isn't as bad as a hospital charging you $5,000 to sit in an MRI machine.
At least the MRI machine has real costs associated with it, and a proven use.
Nah. There were no firebombs. Cities aren't even flammable.
This is all just a fake and gay psyop by the germans so you don't realize they're the ones running your country.
Just go down the list of senators, presidents, mayors, governors, and you'll find COUNTLESS germans trying to hide their german ancestry and acting like they're american.
It's fake. Never happened. They all died from typhus and bombings from their own side.
Muhh 12 gorillion... Gimmie a break. It's not even possible to shoot that many people. The gun would break well before it reached that number.
Didn't happen. Which is too bad... Because it should have, and would've been a good thing. But it didn't.
I just wanted to say thanks for confirming that you're full of shit, presenting unscientific nonsense that has absolutely no relevancy to the claims you are making, and can't defend any of your ideas when they are actually challenged.
Was the patient in charge during covid?
Ive got a big bottle of ivermectin with my name on it, from the height of the pandemic, when it was being called "horse dewormer" and the medical establishment you are complaining about was doing everything in their power to make sure people did not get it. But I got it anyways, and someone with a PhD helped me get it.
So you tell me, was I in charge when I decided to get a bottle of ivermectin and found a doctor that would provide it? if the doctor refused and told me that I needed seven jabs instead, would I have to just bend over and let him jab me?
No dude. Take some responsibility for your own health care. You're responsible for hiring your doctor. You're also responsible for firing them.
Too many people refuse to fire bad doctors.
Great, so were paying to bomb them and were also paying to feed them. Just great. Soon we will also be paying for their counter attacks, and if were lucky we will also get to pay for the post-war reconstruction on both sides.
doctors prescribe medications not pharmaceutical companies. And the patient decides if they take the medication or tell the doctor to prescribe an alternative one. The patient is always in charge.
and please answer the question. Even if it's 99.9% of doctors departing from science-based medicine, why would you seek treatment from alternative medicine when they disregard science 100%?
why do you not seek out the 1% or 0.1% or however small you think the number is, of doctors that actually follow real medicine?
Edited reply:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/11/Koch%27s_Postulates.svg
That 2nd mouse is not a control because the experiment is not performed on it, and therefore it doesn't provide any results to measure against the other group.
It's just a graphic showing that he ASSUMES there is no virus present in a healthy animal, which is he himself realized wasn't true, causing him to abandon postulate #1, and also invalidating #3 in the process as well.
The hypothesis is that the suspected pathogen can be cultured and then inoculated on a healthy animal which will lead to the same pathology which according to him proves causation.
So let me get this straight.... Koch's postulates are not intended to prove or disprove the existence of viruses?
You're telling me they are actually testing whether or not said virus can reproduce and re-infect people in highly specific artificial conditions, after being removed from all living cells?
So then.... Why are you trying to use it as evidence for a completely different claim that it's not even testing?
And lastly, What do you have to say about the fact that Koch himself abandoned postulate #1 and postulate #3 in his own lifetime, as new information became available to him?
I highly doubt the number is 95%, but just for the sake of argument, lets go with that.
95% of the medical establishment discarded and ignored MANY of the tenants of science based medicine.
Why would the solution to that be to receive medical care from people who discard and ignore ALL of the tenants of science based medicine?
Why isn't the solution to seek out and find the 5% who still adhere to science based medicine?
we would need to see more footage of the green sky from other angles in order to know it's not just an issue with the camera or post-processing in the video.
either make the argument for why kochs postulates are a legitimate scientific experiment or go the fuck away.
identify the hypothesis and the control group. explain to me how the experiment validates the hypothesis.
put up or shut up.
You dont "trust" anyone with your medical decisions.
You stay informed and make your own decisions, while the doctors provide advice.
If your doctor advises you to inject an untested substance into your body, you need to get a new doctor. Blindly trusting them should never be part of the equation.
And no not every doctor was promoting this garbage. Only in the fake reality projected by your screens did that have universal support from the medical community.
if these postulates are real science where is the control group?
Where is the hypothesis?!
It's nothing but a series of absurd demands. It's not even a real experiment.
XxxRDTPRNxxX's Postulates: if you cannot satisfy these then fish are not real.
postulate 1: a fish must be removed from a pond, skinned alive, tuned inside out, and placed in a bucket.
postulate 2: the fish must reproduce inside the bucket.
postulate 3: the new fish must then be dumped into an empty pond.
postulate 4: you must then recapture the same kind of fish from the previously empty pond.
Since no one has satisfied those postulates I just proved fish are fake and gay...Right?
This is an immensely stupid take because if what it says is true, then the value of crypto will continue to skyrocket, which means it's not "wasted ammunition" it's actually a great investment. Furthermore it's calling fiat money "ammunition", which is also stupid because central banks already control that as well.
So it's like "Don't invest in this other thing, that's definitely going to skyrocket in value, instead keep your money in the central bank's fiat currency to help fight the central bank"
And also I guarantee this person doesn't have the slightest clue how bitcoin works on a technological level and how ridiculously impossible it would be to take over.
They just hear "digital money" and have a knee jerk reaction probably getting flashbacks from 3rd grade Sunday school when they were traumatized by being made to watch "Left Behind", and now they're sure the anti-Christ wants them to put a bitcoin wallet in their forehead, even though they don't really know what a bitcoin wallet is.
Science based western medicine isn't supposed to involve mass injecting new a radically new technology into everybody by force, with zero long term safety studies.
Just because Bob's wife is a dirty cheating whore, doesn't mean that's what marriage is all about.
Just because California is the worlds largest homeless camp, doesn't mean that's what capitalism is all about.
Each of those are instances where people go against the systems and institutions that would prevent those problems.
Except you demand someone satisfy "KoChS PoStuLateS" as if that's a real scientific requirement, demonstrating that you don't know the scientific method or even understand what "postulate" means.
You know people have common sense, and can observe a sickness spreading from one person to another right?
Or is contagiousness fake and gay too?
My grandma was literally dying from covid, already started agonal breathing and fading fast. The emergency room saved her life, and helped her survive long enough to beat the virus.
I've talked to you many times before.
Either inject yourself with HIV infected blood to prove viruses are fake, or just admit you're full of shit.
Is there ANY aliment you'd rather have treated by alternative medicine instead of someone with an actual medical degree?
Bet you'd still go there if you broke your leg, and the easily accessible chicken nuggets wouldn't dissuade you.
Where is the conspiracy?
That's a good analogy actually... angry aggressive bugs being agitated intentionally by incompentent fools instead just gassing their asses once and for all.