Haha. Ukraine has lost a few more Ukrainians, somehow, probably?
But okay, for the sake of it?
The press is claiming Ukraine can now advance completely unhindered on all fronts into the Crimea, it has fallen. Completely fallen, destroyed. The Bridge of Kerch has sunk. Ukraine has advanced into the sea of Azov. Cutting off the Crimea. Russia has lost 100s of miles. Completely overrrun. Retreat. Surrender. Ukraine are advancing, surrounding, the Crimea.
He was senile? India made better CGI.
The end game cannot be attrition? If it is supposedly a reset? I mean come on. Into? Or? What?
I mean. No.
Although, it certainly tolls. Escalation! However it has an another agenda where nobody cares. Attrition! Causality doesn't care! Nobody cares. it erupts into? Continuing conflict. Even if it's another agenda forcing demand. Resources. There are sides.
What? If it hasn't, it's because it won't. Nukes are a, what, nothing happens.. Because it won't. Ukraine, however, might go and retake the Crimea. They just need some F16s, if, their pilots, can fly them.
The Creator was A.I? Seriously gifted. He, Matt Goening is?
What are you suggesting?
The Simpson's, good show, has almost nothing else to do with the Ukraine. It's a Cartoon.... Not a WAR!
What? Try again. And slowly! Deep breathes!
Thanks. But you're wrong.
I am trying to understand why the press whenever Ukraine gains ground claims Russia have lost and are retreating. Is it because the Russia has been losing?
I am just trying to make sense of it. It seems like Ukraine has retaken another town pressing positions into it. The town is called Rabotino, Rabotyne? It was part of the defensive Russian line. So there have been claims on its significance. Are Russians retreating, like the press is claiming? Too, the extents of collapse and recession, because warfare is hitting their homeland and its infrastructure, and hundreds of Russians are dying daily?
My.. My.. Is there any need for such language and grammar?
It really is turning into Reddit in here. Hostile accusations. Like I am.
I asked why the press is claiming. You seemed to admit it, contrarily. I suggested it is another, but nvm. It had been already. Although Ukraine still have quite a large reserve. However you've admitted the Russian retreat and their significant losses?
Only if it has significant returns, and if it doesn't have Civil litigation on each independently owned development. Aren't the Government currently investigating the dead, months, even a year, or more if forensics call for it. Significant, dead, causing extended investigations, and a death toll climbing. Forensics are investigating.
Maui had the fire engines, coming form where? Where were the fire departments located? Where,? Did they make a line, pushing back sides of the fire? At which points? Did they use boats? When did the airplanes, arrive?
Who is proposing redevelopment and how are any current landowners affected by it?
I know nobody can develop it, while investigations are still carrying out their forensics. Then there is litigation into all further proposals, as further services and access become available.
Suggesting a redeveloper jumped through all the hurdles and is now absolutely in charge of all later planning, distribution, services, and infrastructure is absurd? Perhaps conspiratorial. Where there are some kind of structures into it. I don't know how that works? Do you? Except not, with active investigations.