Has the Ukraine found another hole, or will the Russians retreat?
Have Ukrainians found another meathgrinder? I.E Bakhmut? Billions more funding, and bodies?
Are the Russians clearly retreating, and losing? The press has been claiming the Ukraines are blowing up Russian strategic bombers in Moscow. They pushed Russia back to the sea of Azov, and are blowing up the bridge of Kerch and Russians are clearly losing. They lack munition, troops, equipment, and the firepower. It said the Ukrainians counter offensive is winning.
Which one are conspiracies?
You're trying to make sense of a Balkan war, when there is no sense to be made.
The battle lines will shift until the proper amount of troops and equipment have been lost by both sides and then it will end.
They are chewing their population down to an amount that matches their lazy farmers' grain output.
Thanks. But you're wrong.
I am trying to understand why the press whenever Ukraine gains ground claims Russia have lost and are retreating. Is it because the Russia has been losing?
I am just trying to make sense of it. It seems like Ukraine has retaken another town pressing positions into it. The town is called Rabotino, Rabotyne? It was part of the defensive Russian line. So there have been claims on its significance. Are Russians retreating, like the press is claiming? Too, the extents of collapse and recession, because warfare is hitting their homeland and its infrastructure, and hundreds of Russians are dying daily?
Best I can describe is you are watching episodes of Simpsons and worrying too much about Homer and Bart and not enough about Matt Groening.
The Creator was A.I? Seriously gifted. He, Matt Goening is?
What are you suggesting?
The Simpson's, good show, has almost nothing else to do with the Ukraine. It's a Cartoon.... Not a WAR!
What? Try again. And slowly! Deep breathes!
I'm exactly saying that this war is a cartoon. The casualties are real, but the story arc was written ahead of time. The only goal is to keep both sides willing to send more men to die.
Who wins what battle in which city, none of this is important, because the end had been determined before the beginning.
When you watch a sports movie and the underdog starts to win, you cheer the underdog--but the only reason they come back and win is because that's how the script was written. The goal of the movie was to take your money, the underdog story is only useful in getting you into the theater.
The wartime updates on the state of the battles is only to keep the men hopefully volunteering to march to their deaths, to keep donating to the fake charities.
The end game cannot be attrition? If it is supposedly a reset? I mean come on. Into? Or? What?
I mean. No.
Although, it certainly tolls. Escalation! However it has an another agenda where nobody cares. Attrition! Causality doesn't care! Nobody cares. it erupts into? Continuing conflict. Even if it's another agenda forcing demand. Resources. There are sides.
What? If it hasn't, it's because it won't. Nukes are a, what, nothing happens.. Because it won't. Ukraine, however, might go and retake the Crimea. They just need some F16s, if, their pilots, can fly them.
If there's enough food for only 140 million russians, then they will fight until there are only 140 million russians.
Haha. Ukraine has lost a few more Ukrainians, somehow, probably?
But okay, for the sake of it?
The press is claiming Ukraine can now advance completely unhindered on all fronts into the Crimea, it has fallen. Completely fallen, destroyed. The Bridge of Kerch has sunk. Ukraine has advanced into the sea of Azov. Cutting off the Crimea. Russia has lost 100s of miles. Completely overrrun. Retreat. Surrender. Ukraine are advancing, surrounding, the Crimea.
Maybe read more and you can get a better sense, instead of posting rhetorical questions you clearly can't comprehend. you sound oddly disjointed like you are drunk or on drugs. I can sort of gather you are hinting at seemingly conflicting narratives. I wouldn't say Ukraine is winning per say nor is russia exactly losing the whole situation is pretty fucked up. Ukraine has decided to not follow Nato doctrine as it got too many of their troops killed. So they have to work with what they have, and are going outside the box so to speak. So far it is working but it's too little too late as the rainy mud season is coming. So best they can do is hold the line and pummel the shit out of airbases and moscow as well as supply lines. Don't try and oversimplify the situation, things are always much more complex.
My.. My.. Is there any need for such language and grammar?
It really is turning into Reddit in here. Hostile accusations. Like I am.
I asked why the press is claiming. You seemed to admit it, contrarily. I suggested it is another, but nvm. It had been already. Although Ukraine still have quite a large reserve. However you've admitted the Russian retreat and their significant losses?
Why watch anything from main stream media? Just go to the movies, it is the same level of fiction.
So are you the new bot sent out to fight disinfo, and you have a funny way of doing it? Or just a bot to assess sentiment in fringe conspiracy sites?