This one sure is. Standing around with your tits out in order to sell something is the definition of whoredom.
Yeah, but we don't use that meaning when referring to you
nonconsensual mutilation of a person
Mortal Kombat has entered the chat. So has Call of Duty, GTA, Baldurs's Gate, pretty much any game where enemies are violently defeated. But they make a lot of money, so...
"How is this supposed to help us sell jeans?"
"Jeans?"
It becomes clear as day when a shift is happening because all the smaller "alt-right" channels start disappearing while guys like Brand and Fuentes show up out of nowhere and blow up overnight.
aims to create a curriculum that will lead to good jobs and solid careers in US manufacturing
That is some grade-A gobbledygook. It takes about a week to train a factory worker, that's the point of the assembly line. What could their curriculum possibly do to facilitate that?
Without pissing off the sub-80s by making students actually show up and follow instructions, which they'll never do.
I honestly wonder about Trump.
Sure, he's playing a character but I think it's more like two factions within the machine fighting for power. TPTB overestimated the effectiveness of the propaganda in the late 2010s and I really don't think they expected Trump to win. He showed them that there was a strong anti-woke sentiment that could be tapped, which he did before someone else did it honestly.
The whole Russia-gate/Biden presidency was the froth of in-fighting between Trump and Soros. Trump came out on top so they faked an assassination attempt or two to make him seem legitimate, put him in the White House and now he's the lead in the show.
"Average" includes stillbirths and kids dying of not being able to keep up with their family fleeing from war. If you made it out of childhood, you could live quite a while.
Neil DeGrass Tyson is, supposedly, an astronomer that doesn't know what perihelion is. We definitely shouldn't be listening to anything else he has to say.
Name five companies you would never under any circumstances trust with your data.
But at least they won't be able to access porn on facebook, right?
And sanitation. Europe stopped getting plagues when they moved their latrines away from their wells.
But at least some of the porn I don't like is banned, right? It's not as though these same governments will be pushing pedophilia and globohomo and using these very laws to shut down dissent, right?
We're winning, aren't we?
You know you done fucked up when redditors are dunking on you.
Even the word "censorship" is vague.
They aren't proposing to shut down porn sites, or demonetise them, or even make sure that they aren't hosting CP.
They're going to require online ID to view porn. That's it, that's what we're cheering for; the further normalisation and institutionalisation of porn.
So what is a porn site? Pornhub, no doubt, but this will actually help them by shutting down smaller competitors who can't afford to implement an ID system. We can post pictures to this site, which could be porn, so every site with user-generated content is now a potential porn site and thus requires ID.
That's what this is about. We're not preventing another 9/11, we're not stopping kids being left behind, we're not even protecting them from porn (see Youtube Kids); we're getting rid of the anonymous internet.
And I know "nobody's really anonymous" but from a criminal law standpoint, we are. They can make a really educated guess at who we are, which is enough to rile up a mob or even for a civil action, but for a criminal matter, where they put your in jail for "hate speech", they still need to prove who you are. Digital ID does that.
Don't be useful idiots. If this were actually making the world a better place, the government wouldn't be doing it.
Lazy argument. I never use itch and I didn't know Steam even had porn games but I still oppose this for two reasons: it's going to be used to shut down noticing and it's not going to stop porn.
As for you question for OP, that really goes to the heart of it: what is porn? Where is the line? Because I have pictures of my 6mo in the bath, or my 5yo in a swimsuit at the beach, am I going to jail for that? I guarantee you there are coombrains out there who will blast rope to almost anything, certainly to that.
Sure, you can say that certain things a definitely porn, and I'll agree. But if you can't draw a clear line that everyone can point to and agree on, then the decision is up to the people enforcing it, and they hate us. They will find something, anything, that you have posted that could in any way be construed as CP, and then arrest you for it. Nobody is going to ask what it actually is because it's CP. The news said so.
Back to the question, you aren't asking anything. It's like asking "Are you a Nazi?" I can only respond with, "WTF do you think a Nazi is?" Anyone committing a sexual act on or near a child should be lit on fire, starting with their genitals, and photographic evidence helps to out them. I don't think there's a problem with nudity in general, even if it's a kid, other than we've been oversexualized by Jewish media to assume "nudity=sex", and I don't have a problem with baby bath pictures.
I think most people can make that distinction for themselves. The only people who can't, or won't, are the very people trying to set themselves up as the enforcers of these laws, which they will use against you no matter how much you say you hate porn (cause they don't).
The only reason that everyone doesn't hate Jews is because they suppress information, including the Talmud.
The average joe thinks porn isn't that bad because they think it's just naked women. If they saw how deep the hole goes, nobody would tolerate their kids browsing porn sites or Youtube pushing it in the algorythm.
Information (good or bad, so long as it's true) is sunlight and sunlight kills Jews.
And there's the other shoe...
"You can't use any site without..."
You think this is about porn?
It's literally a "Save the children" bill that will allow the government to identify online noticers and/or keep them off mainstream platforms. It's a cohencidence that it's being pushed in Europe where they are arresting people, physically, for online posts. Do you want to dox yourself on this site right now? Because that's what's being proposed.
Second, this will reduce online porn by about the amount similar laws reduced "piracy" in the 2000s. Coomers will host sites outside of the EU, distribute through private chats, or use encrypted P2P. And, since it's more hidden, there sill be zero incentive for major porn distributors to block CP, snuff, bestiality etc. Pornhub got called out (correctly) for hosting CP because they were huge and notorious but if they were operating via private encrypted networks, no one would have even know about it. Not saying this is an effective way to deal with porn, but these laws won't do anything about the really bad stuff and might make it harder to expose.
Finally, you don't find porn online unless you go looking for it. All the major sites already have age gates, mostly based around either credit card or phone numbers, which will block any kid of a parent who gives any sort of crap. Beyond that, adults need to opt in. I didn't even know Steam hosted porn games (not surprised, though) because I never allowed NSFW content on my account. It's not a problem to any non-degenerate, but the laws to fight it create problems for people trying to speak truth to power, including the truth about porn.
Blocking porn will not change the minds, or even habits, of coomers. It will not protect children. What it will do is legitimise the corporate porn producers who are probably the ones pushing for it in the first place. The only game in town will be OnlyFans and Pornhub, which will be considered "safe" porn, because they follow the rules but despite the fact that they're both notorious for hosting CP and providing a platform for actual women to exploit themselves. What is the point of requiring IDs for individuals when Youtube literally pushes sexualized cartoon charaters on their "kids" platform?
Don't be a useful idiot.
So right now, Steam and Itch are conducting full audits of their entire libraries to make sure they're in compliance with totally arbitrary and sudden changes in policy from their main payment processors (both of them).
How much more effort would it be to lauch their own crypto coin, get it listed on a few exchanges, and have users pay them that way? Fees would probably be less as well.
Not normal women
You got that right, check the Early Life sections...
I already revoked my donor card during Covid; glad I did.
Can't take organs out of a cadaver, obviously. How did people think this worked?
Just a reminder that this isn't targetted at men, it's an attempt to make White women act like this by making them think it's popular.
Stuff like this is why the pink tax exists. Women are so insecure and desperate for validation that they're drop $1000 on a denim onesie instead of a sensible pair of jeans and a shirt.
Just say no.