As ridiculous as FE seems, prima facie, until it's proven false, I keep my mind open to plausible explanations for why:
A) the moon landings were all fake and we've never "been back"
B) there are no actual photos of the entire earth from space (unless you believe the sizes of the continents are changing by 30-60% every decade or so)
C) the only people on earth that we give billions of dollars to, to go to space, are faking any, let alone much (or all) of the footage, using green screens, parabolic "zero gravity" flights, actual hair spray to make their hair stand up, underwater studios (unless you believe in air bubbles in space)
You might say "but these items have better explanations than FE". Well let's hear those theories also. Let's not shoot down those who are proposing an outlandish, yet mostly comprehensive, theory, one that explains these anomalies as well as a plethora of others, like how did they use radio frequencies that don't even purportedly bounce off the ionosphere to communicate hundreds of miles during WWII, how can the horizon be seen above an item whose entirety should be hidden behind it, why is Antarctica, aside from a tiny portion, entirely off limits to most civilians, how was Felix Baumgartner able to slowly float up to nearly 30 miles without drifting a thousand or more miles because of the earth's rotation, etc.
Suggestions that these things are not even worthy of discussion, on a forum dedicated to conspiracy theories, have to be disingenuous.
Original Research
Let's not also forget that FE researchers are literally the only conspiracy theorists doing original research. These people will buy lasers that cost thousands of dollars, cameras, etc., and go to some large body of water (large lakes, bays, etc.) where they can test their hypothesis with an actual experiment. Everything else I see on here is pure speculation, or videos of interviews involving various professionals with dubious backstories (Malone, etc.).
Does it Matter
Pertaining the "would it even matter" argument, you honestly don't need a lukewarm IQ to imagine how much it would matter, if FE was real.
Principles
Most of us are here because we couldn't speak freely elsewhere, because "hate has no place on our platform" type communist bullshit. Now we're going to make the same kind of rules, especially banning arbitrary content that is desired by a clear majority, on a platform with already-existing mechanisms for getting rid of low quality postd (downvoting, hiding)? If FE posts are banned, this place is no better than TGA, and don't even pretend to be pro constitution when you can't even stand up for free speech about a conspiracy theory in a conspiracy theory forum.
I'm out of here, for good, if FE is banned. Aside from spam, illegal, doxxing, banning has no place on our platform.
FE posts could be interesting only in one aspect - how pushing false narratives works.
We will perfectly see following:
And so on.
Exactly same things and behaviour we literally see every single day done by governments and MSM pushing their agendas on public.
I find a lot of different interesting and controversial conspiracy things on that forum, and no poster behave like FEr. Most are pretty open for discussion, able to accept counterarguments and think out their own explanations and develop or adjust their theory to explain things that does not fit.
Always remember, if FE pushers were running things, we would definitely be banned.
I have no doubts, it is just exactly same pattern. First they infiltrate, then began to flood place with their agenda evading any honest discussion, then use that as a proof of consensus, then demand power and finally ban everybody who don't support their narrative. Observed exactly that thing in every single narrative.
Funny, that those who think all that shit out, somehow can't think further than one step. They think out different narratives, but never bothered to think out different methods of pushing them, not even talking about new methods of dealing with consequences, side effects and so on. Even if goals of pushing different narratives is different, they use single scheme and hope that nobody will notice.
There is no need to confront FE, endlessly trying to prove something to those who inherently will never agree with you. Their behaviour is more that enough to uncover their real intentions.