2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which one's that? I was implying marriage, where you lose nothing and gain legacy.

Are you referring to divorce?

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who grew your food? Who built your home? Who maintains the power/internet grid you use to express your mental illness?

Children that aren't yours, who grew up to be productive adults.

I bet you haven't raised a single useful person, have you?

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

The "moral high ground" is that I don't need the government to pay my rent. So, yeah, I'm pretty comfy up here.

FYI, I actually don't pay taxes. I've managed to work a setup where my need for money is so low that I don't have to make enough to trigger income tax. It's all legit and I actually get a few hundred back at the end of the year due to the "working" benefit.

It's incredible how inexpensively you can live if you don't need daily hormone injections.

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hmm, almost like posting to Meta is causing more spam? Now that I think about it, I can't remember the last time Imp posted in Conspiracies before the current drama started up...

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

And you win, do you? Are you the mayor of Tranny-town?

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Aww, are you all salty that your EBT shut down?

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

You lazy fucking kike, lol

You are literally complaining about not getting free money from the government. Not having the government wipe you ass is "harm" now...

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +3 / -1

Oh man, if only there were an institution where people could have sex, without worrying about birth control, because they've committed to each other in case of pregnancy...

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +4 / -1

Children that aren't yours are the only thing keeping your useless ass alive. You're welcome, parasite.

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.aninconvenientstudy.com/

Considering the above, yeah, I would. Even if they work, all the cost/benefit calculations are right out the window. The whole thing should be suspended until we figure out what exactly is happening.

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +5 / -1

Well, I'm not Catholic, if it's any consolation.

Have you considered that it's just the Jews? Including the corrupted Catholic Church?

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why don't you start, then everyone else can join in if they like?

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +4 / -2

No, what they're saying is that if trends cause people to doubt their families (like you're trying to do right now), society breaks down.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +3 / -1

"Everyone I don't like is Nazis!!"

Yes, yes we are, and mods don't care.

"Oh...well, everyone I don't like is also pedos!!"

Mods: get banned, faggot

0
WeedleTLiar 0 points ago +3 / -3

She isn't arguing in good faith. She just tries to discredit every conspiracy theory involving Jews (read: all of them) and tries to push theories with no Jews in them. Unfortunately for her, those do not exist; it's easier to find an insidious organization without a single man than it is to find one without a single Jew.

5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +6 / -1

You didn't mention the National Children's Board that Kering and Balenciaga (directly) partnered to create.

https://wwd.com/fashion-news/designer-luxury/balenciaga-kering-foundation-national-childrens-alliance-partnership-three-year-program-ad-scandal-1235511682/

Their first president was literally a subject of a lawsuit alleging she took children from their parents without due cause when working for child services.

Because you hate kids.

I also notice that there are men on the Kering board of directors; checkmate, chud.

Didn't find anything at all about the JKR/Watson connection. In fact, if you go to the Kering site:

https://www.kering.com/en/group/our-governance/board-of-directors/

...no Emma Watson...

But check out the nose on Serge Weinberg, there. 2% of the population, 8% of Kering Foundation board members...

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good, I hope they take a good look at it.

I read it a few weeks ago and it seemed to me like both a readable (in layman's terms) and incontrovertible study. Correlation is totally clear so it's a matter of finding cause, but regardless we need to seriously reconsider the entire vaccination schedule, immediately, because even if these shots work (and I think they generally do) it may not be worth it to prevent deaths in some children (99%+ children who contract measles, for example, are not even hospitalized, much less die) if the cost is childhood diabetes and learning disabilities for all children.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I read that, so basically it isn't even internally self-consistent.

Clearly, the people nearby should be befriended first and if there is a conflict the people nearby take priority. There is a hierarchy of who to care about.

So how do you square that with the idea of loving everyone equally? You still slaughter them and despoil their lands but, what, feel bad about it later?

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

I generally agree, and don't really play much these days anyway, but it's not just about video games, it's about culture.

Like it or not, video games are the prime vehicle for our culture and the most insidious. With movies or tv or books, you are observing and you can objectively say, while watching "I agree with this" or not. With video games, you're actually doing. Many times, moral actions (or facimilies thereof) are required to progress, and get that sweet dopamine hit. How many times have you put a game down because it required you to do something morally wrong?

That's not to say that shooting a kid in a video game is the same as doing so in real life, but it does compartmentalise the choice and reduces it's importance in relation to, say, getting some job done. Over time, I think people get to the point that most of them completely atrophy their moral compass in favour of the progression of their own status quo.

This is far broader than the current issue, but this is why I think video games (and the culture war generally) are important even if we don't participate. It's all well and good to chop wood (and I prefer it) but everyone not as self-possessed as you is currently falling into these traps.

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +1 / -0

looked up value of property

gained access to bank accounts

ordered a chest freezer for head storage

I guess this guy doesn't subscribe to "Africa time"...

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why is that a problem? That's kinda why I watch out for conspiracies; because of the horrible consequences that I want to avoid.

5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +5 / -0

She has a side profile identical to the kikess running Mexico right now.

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

But she also won't publish donor records, right?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›