Makes sense. Be sort of like forging a medical document at that point.

Just as an FYI: Many cards aren't going to be handwritten, but will have stickers printed off and stuck to them showing the vaccine lot number. Might be tricky to pull this off

There he goes again!

It's just funny to me how you think it means anything or matters at all. It's like a cute little act of aggression like when a toddler starts punching the ground. It's not like it bothers anyone, but it's funny to watch, in a cute kinda way. Thanks for being continued entertainment!

I know! Pretty funny how much you care enough to do that. Must mean I really hurt you ?

I love that you pooped your pants and felt the need to downvote my comments by the way. Gave me a good laugh.

Hope you’re well, little crybaby!

Wow, bud. No need to get triggered over me telling you to have a nice day lol

All right, no worries!

I think you need to do a better job of understanding what clickbait actually means. Have a good one!

Well I've already explained why it isn't.

Article title of "We've never left earth's atmosphere" --> Clickbait

Article title of "Earth's atmosphere extends further than we thought" --> not clickbait

I agree that it's all in the presentation, hence the difference between these two headlines. I'm not sure why you equated them as the same in previous comment, but they are telling the reader two very different things when read at a surface level

Please explain why the second article title is clickbait, because I completely agree when you said the first one is.

Because yesterday it wasn't known to have existed. Now that we have discovered it, we assign a definition to what it is. In this case, an extension of our atmosphere.

It's not as though we have always known this was here and now we suddenly decide it's part of the atmosphere, but now we're able to detect and measure it, as we already have been able to our previously known atmosphere.

This isn't scope creeping though. The geocorona is being considered as an extension of earth's atmosphere.

Correct, That is the headline, which is true, and not as clickbaity

The faux headline of "We'Ve NeVeR LeFt tHe AtmOsPheRe" (same as the one that OP wrote) is more misleading, and I'll explain why.

A headline saying "we've never left earth's atmosphere" is terrible clickbait, because for most people's understanding, the atmosphere does not go past the moon, so now a moron or a child walks away from the title of an article thinking that we've never gone to space or landed on the moon.

However, the headline "earth's atmosphere goes past the moon" is still true, but the atmosphere that reaches further is so thin it's barely even perceived. Technically, the moon and surrounding space are still in the earth's atmosphere, so from this fact, we can technically say that we've never left earth's atmosphere, but the required explanation of why that sentence is true needs to come first. The clickbaity "We've never left earth's atmosphere" line is literally the last line of the article, after all of the explanation about what the scientists have found.

The "tail" comes from solar wind just like cometary tails. There's even a picture showing this plan-view style in the article. Tidal effects are no doubt there but the overall impact is tiny compared to tidal warping of earth and water.

Yes, absolutely. Agreed.

By letting midwit-at-best journalists, producers, editors, etc filter out the "big words" and "hard stuff", science just becomes masturbatory fluff for getting clicks and likes on social media. And that's really what I'd call this headline, nothing but clickbait "OMG WAO WE'VE NEVER LEFT ERFS ATMOSPHERS WAU".

This was written by OP. The article goes into a bit more explanation as to what it means that the earth's atmosphere extends further than we expected. I do agree that OP's title is clickbaity nonsense, but that's on him, not the writer of the article.

Not necessarily! Gravitational pull also comes from the pull of the sun as well (hence that oblong shape) and the other planets (much weaker).

It can be challenging teaching this to a child (or a moron), but that shouldn't stop people from sharing facts and discovering more. If we let that stop us from progressing we wouldn't get anywhere. We shouldn't have to cater to the slowest buffalo, but rather progress in spite of their lack of understanding, and help them down the road.

Well essentaily the word means the area surrounding the planet that contains particles contained in its gravitational pull. Up to a point, we can measure the portions of the atmosphere that can be observed by the presence of moisture/air particles/gravitational pull, but as devices get more sophisticated we can see even fainter measures of the presence of hydrogen (in this instance). We essentially compare that to the composition of dead space, where you're not going to find any such particles presence.

Well it's not like any accomplishments have changed. It just means that they've realized the atmosphere reaches further than they had thought. In the article, it mentions the presence of hydrogen in this part of the atmosphere is so thin so it's very difficult to measure.

Science is always about discovery. Science is almost always going to change as new things get discovered. At one point, it was the belief that the earth was the center of the universe. When they discovered they were wrong, that doesn't mean that science should be abandoned, it just means that advancements in technology allowed for more to be discovered

And what if nothing happens?

Did you have any response?

Then why do you keep talking about them?

It’s like a bad breakup. Move forward! You’re on .win now.

Sure!

At what mall and at what time did you see santa? Because ill need that information in order to prove my side. Otherwise it’s just conjecture.

If you are unable to produce that, that’s okay! Not only is a general accepted reality that Santa is a made up thing, but in your area there exists many companies who will hire out men who will pose as Santa Claus for malls and events, so it’s pretty easy to figure out.

However, if we want to stick to the topic at hand, we have televised and recorded events of people claiming to be the Richard family. Is your belief that the city of Boston is propping up this fake family? Or are these actors fooling the whole city?

Because if what you’re saying is true, then logically you, like me, would want to get to the bottom of what these people are doing. Frankly, it seems odd to me that you have no interest in seeking out these answers.

Why would he take that chance?

If it’s possible that he doesn’t end up back at the White House, as we saw him leave yesterday, why wouldn’t he just declass when he had the chance?

I get the analogy you’re attempting to make here but the difference is the Richard family photos I’m pulling out are of the same people each time. The Santa you see at the mall is a documented employee playing a part, and the Santa you’re seeing at the mall is not the same Santa I saw at my mall.

So, who is this Richard family? If they aren’t real, as you claim, then who are these people that are continuing to play the part, and why is everyone else playing along? Is the whole city involved?

So would this imply that since there is a family that continues to be the Richard family despite your claims otherwise, that the rest of your theory also can’t be possible?

I’m not following what your statement and that picture has to do with my comment, or with each other.

Well that's not a very good analogy, since you haven't found any documented footage of either of the Claus', let alone elves or Rudolph.

On the contrary, we have documented evidence of people being identified as the Richard Family over the course of several years. Jane, the daughter, has made several public appearances since the event. The father, Bill, has also made public appearances. If they are supposedly fake people, then sureley there should be details about the lives they've been leading. You haven't at all found that suspicious or interesting? Why have several coworkers, peers, and townsfolk of Boston all agreed that this is the Richard family, when your evidence is showing that they are fake?

As for the other comment, I'll reply here:

I don't care where work is done or if it is seen by others, because I am not interested in what others think. I'm interested in what YOU think. If we'd like to take this conversation to your 3rd post, I'm happy to continue it there. I like to keep things concise so that we don't lose track of the facts.

I was aware of the can of worms I was opening. Like I said, I'm happy to continue further! There are just too many loose ends to what you're claiming here.