In case you missed it... Boston Marathon Bombing Red Pill - Part 1 - FEMA Deputy Administrator Richard Serino https://conspiracies.win/p/11S0bg19Gv/boston-marathon-bombing-red-pill/c/
Part 2
"Bill Richard" supposedly works as a "community organizer", and yet nobody can seem to identify any legitimate source of income he uses to support his family or his lifestyle. "Denise Richard" supposedly works as a school librarian, at "Neighborhood House Charter School", the school that "Martin Richard" allegedly attended.
LOL These photoshopped party hats. note how the shadows of the hats are all wrong. https://i.redd.it/d4rbgftcvi601.png
According to Boston Globe columnist Kevin Cullen, "Bill Richard" had just completed the marathon and "Martin" went out to hug his father and returned to his mother and sister just as the first bomb exploded. https://i.redd.it/2marnngm3t601.png
The eight year old boy killed, his sister horribly injured just moments after their father crossed the finishing line https://i.redd.it/83kv11488ysy.png
Rep Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts spoke on the story on MSNBC's Morning Joe, which differs from the accounts that state Martin's father was running during the marathon https://i.redd.it/lbkbuc9qvusy.png
So, first the story was that Martin Richard had went out into the street to hug his dad, Bill Richard, who had just finished the Boston Marathon. But when it was discovered that Bill Richard never actually registered to run, and never finished the Boston Marathon, the story changed, to "Bill Richard" was standing on by the finish line, watching someone else finish... The person the Richard family was allegedly watching finish was never identified, presumably because that person does not actually exist. So, if Bill Richard never actually ran the Marathon, then obviously Martin never ran out into the street to give him a hug as he finished running, And obviously Martin Richard was not killed by a bomb, as Martin returned to the sidewalk after hugging his dad. You might "accidentally" mis-spell someone's name, but how do you "accidentally" fabricate an elaborately detailed story ?
Note: you can tell that these bullshit fake news stories are written by the same people because they always follow this same basic template: Crisis Actor Witness: I was just doing X, and thats when Y happened!
Judging by the blood splatter on "Bill Richard's" pants, which of these two photographs would you say was taken first? https://i.redd.it/tyxnvuqprcsy.png
Note the fireman with the BFD coat on. Would a real fireman, in a real situation, allow Bill Richard to carry his daughter out into the street, for a ridiculous photo op, when she just had her leg blown off, and would presumably be dead in a matter of minutes, from blood loss? wouldn't the fireman try first aid? to tourniquet her leg? to elevate her leg? anything to try and stop the bleeding? is the fireman guilty of gross negligence? incompetence ? or does the fireman know its just a planned mass casualty drill, and that she's not in any real danger. Apologists claim the reason she's not leaving a trail of blood behind her, is because she already bled out, and yet, if she had already bled out, she should be as limp as a rag doll, with her head flopped over, because she would be unable to hold her head up. http://i.imgur.com/qJaNnr5.jpg / https://archive.is/MlWJC http://i.imgur.com/Fq3Yvac.png / https://archive.is/BCByk The left pic shows damage to outside of his right leg. The right pic shows damage to outside of his left leg. How did one bomb do this kind of damage, and how is this man still standing? https://i.redd.it/7pfc0tqwbgsy.png
Two different sources identify the female next to the boy who died as "MOM". https://i.redd.it/2c7bypuiqgsy.png
Note female in TUFTS LACROSSE sweater on right side of pic. She was standing next to boy who allegedly died in bombing, yet somehow fled unharmed? This female (previously identified as "MOM") somehow has the foreknowledge to flee the scene before the bomb goes off, killing the boy? Hi Rez image of Boston Marathon Bombing suspect fleeing the scene, turning the corner, with white hat on. https://i.redd.it/697n0c89tgsy.jpg New York Times http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/blogs/thelede/posts/suspect-number-2.JPG https://archive.is/nYSzt has this photo been photoshopped? http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=a0f3bd8be9a367c5f73d79702c74afd62cc03d01.2703171
The female in the green circle was next to the boy who died, yet somehow she was able to flee before being injured by the bomb that killed the boy https://i.redd.it/x7c5bwl1ogsy.jpg
From background to foreground: female in green circles is enlarged in right pic, showing her TUFTS LACROSSE sweater, shorts, socks shoes, which match the female on the barricade who was next to the boy who allegedly died https://i.redd.it/279jppbv7hsy.png
After public uproar, the FBI reluctantly "fake arrested" the female suspect, because her involvement was so obvious and well documented. She was never identified, which is odd because she clearly was "arrested" https://i.redd.it/70mwt1f6zgsy.png
Crisis Actors at the Boston Marathon Bombing mass casualty drill: Both of his pants legs are shredded, but he is still walking. Both of her pants knees are torn, but her knees aren't bleeding. https://i.redd.it/50guye30a8ty.jpg
How many tourniquets can you count? Were any tourniquets necessary or effective? https://i.redd.it/7hwejt6ihgsy.jpg
Well that's not a very good analogy, since you haven't found any documented footage of either of the Claus', let alone elves or Rudolph.
On the contrary, we have documented evidence of people being identified as the Richard Family over the course of several years. Jane, the daughter, has made several public appearances since the event. The father, Bill, has also made public appearances. If they are supposedly fake people, then sureley there should be details about the lives they've been leading. You haven't at all found that suspicious or interesting? Why have several coworkers, peers, and townsfolk of Boston all agreed that this is the Richard family, when your evidence is showing that they are fake?
As for the other comment, I'll reply here:
I don't care where work is done or if it is seen by others, because I am not interested in what others think. I'm interested in what YOU think. If we'd like to take this conversation to your 3rd post, I'm happy to continue it there. I like to keep things concise so that we don't lose track of the facts.
I was aware of the can of worms I was opening. Like I said, I'm happy to continue further! There are just too many loose ends to what you're claiming here.
I personally saw Santa Claus at the shopping mall just last year.
I get the analogy you’re attempting to make here but the difference is the Richard family photos I’m pulling out are of the same people each time. The Santa you see at the mall is a documented employee playing a part, and the Santa you’re seeing at the mall is not the same Santa I saw at my mall.
So, who is this Richard family? If they aren’t real, as you claim, then who are these people that are continuing to play the part, and why is everyone else playing along? Is the whole city involved?
Prove it.
You keep clinging to this idea that even though Santa Claus is a proven fake, that somehow one of his elves is still real because you think you saw the elf on TV
Sure!
At what mall and at what time did you see santa? Because ill need that information in order to prove my side. Otherwise it’s just conjecture.
If you are unable to produce that, that’s okay! Not only is a general accepted reality that Santa is a made up thing, but in your area there exists many companies who will hire out men who will pose as Santa Claus for malls and events, so it’s pretty easy to figure out.
However, if we want to stick to the topic at hand, we have televised and recorded events of people claiming to be the Richard family. Is your belief that the city of Boston is propping up this fake family? Or are these actors fooling the whole city?
Because if what you’re saying is true, then logically you, like me, would want to get to the bottom of what these people are doing. Frankly, it seems odd to me that you have no interest in seeking out these answers.
Did you have any response?
Boolean logic
1+1+1+1+0=0
If one condition is false, the entire statement is false
https://i.redd.it/7pfc0tqwbgsy.png
I’m not following what your statement and that picture has to do with my comment, or with each other.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_logic
So would this imply that since there is a family that continues to be the Richard family despite your claims otherwise, that the rest of your theory also can’t be possible?