Clearly you aren't following the thread of conversation.

A US state. How is that the standard? But I have at least one, West Virginia seceded from Virginia.

But of course the standard is secession everywhere, not just in the USA where it only happened once against the federal government. You can look at any number of Soviet Satellite states that seceded. That's a lot of secession right there.

Any empire that declines (ahem, USA) will see states or nations secede.

Uh, how does that answer my question?

The question is whether or not it is valid to think secession "forces" war. Based on history, no.

Many people. People in his own country. People in his own party. People in other countries (for example Poland). And the list goes on.

You'll hate me regardless, so I might as well be honest

I didn't deny gravity exists.

If you think following a Darwinian murderer is Christian, you might want to pray about that.

Completely incorrect you left wing retard. Most secession throughout history did not provoke a war.

I've seen no source showing she admitted she "made it all up". I imagine that would be getting posted a lot if that were the case.

Ok, I look for myself too. A sunset disproves Flat Earth, and there is no saving the theory from that.

Yes I have to say I don't think flat earth can possibly be true based on observation. Perhaps a geocentric model, if someone can overcome the issues with orbital patterns that originally led to heliocentrism making more sense (see the epicycle model). But I also have no problem with heliocentrism if it works.

I'm truly convinced relativity is punishment for a moral relativist society.

Just listen to this nonsense. Go on, watch the video.

These guys can't even agree on their explanations. This guy claims time dilation itself causes gravitational force. Other explanations claimed gravity is due to everything already accelerating upward (for some reason). Other relativists say it is because space is "bending" around the planet. What a great theory, three explanations that all make no sense for one phenomenon.

But we also have to ask is this even still Einstein's original theory, or have people just been riffing on it for years making up new ad hoc explanations?

Amen

That's pure projection on your part. Lefties always try to claim Jesus, while only cherry picking scripture.

Yes what Jews really want are two parent households, no fornication, no abortion and no LGBT for the goy. Yet they push for the exact opposite in their media. Nice try though.

Christianity was always an obstacle for them, which is why they had to subvert it.

Oh right. Let's completely move away from Christian morality, which is totally not what the Jews want, fellow white :)

They channel it. Many musicians including Dylan himself admit as much.

But since no one cares what lefty Jews think here, you'll have no luck on that.

I work with small teams of people where everyone is expected to get things done.

Hah. I guess I finally agreed with you.

All seems like an excuse to implement UBI. Layoffs were already underway due to fiscal tightening by the fed bursting the market's bubble.

Not necessarily. Because at this point their body is full of toxins stored in the fat. Processing all that crap won't be fun or easy.

Eyes on either side of his nose.

Upper lip sits north of bottom lip.

Nose in center of his face.

Neck sitting below the chin.

Yep, that's a Jew alright.

I've asked the question on Special Relativity's time dilation and the answers seem to conflict with this relativist's video I presented. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/18rg12h/how_does_general_relativity_fix_special_relativity/

For satellites in orbit the two frames are not symmetric. The satellites are going in circles, which means their local reference frame is accelerating.

This video explicitly stated that gravity provides no acceleration. So now when it suits the relativists there IS an acceleration on an object in orbit, unlike what is stated in the video.

But, even if we accept that acceleration magically "breaks" the symmetry there is no explanation for how. The Lorentz transform doesn't deal in acceleration, it deals in velocity, so what precept states that as soon as a frame is moving rotationally wrt another that the effects become one sided?