2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not a dum question, all good. I forget that the side bar doesn't show up on mobile mode but it will populate on desktop mode. Are you using the mobile mode version? (Edit: If on desktop, side bar can be found on the community page by clicking the magnifying glass on the top right corner of the screen.)

Thinking I'll have to sticky this to the board but for you I uploaded to this link:
https://img.gvid.tv/i/3MkGwpbT.jpg

3
Thisisnotanexit [M] 3 points ago +3 / -0

It has been well noted from the community that I am being too lenient in my moderation and I serve at their behest, so I will be doing better starting today. Thanks for everyone's patience with me: https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2022/03/2/1642545293-foto-no-exif-2.jpg

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

This user has been perma ban'd for constant disruption and inability to follow rules, tho I appreciate your appeal process, this is being denied.

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lovely to see this side of your face when things don't go your way.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

This isn't c/Christianity, maybe you should read my reply again?

I shared my paranoia with you all because this is where I can do that.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

How do I explain discernment to others that won't accept it? We need a stable meeting place to what the discernment is measured against, in this case the rules, in c/Christianity it's God's commands.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your proposal sounds like just banning whoever you say I should, should I take everyone's requests or how do we set up who can request and who can't, age of account, comment/post score on board, oh how bout we take polls and vote on who should be banned, what could go wrong?

(Heavy sarcasm)

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't think you're hearing me. How does this community keep it's integrity if I just ban at my will or who people tell me to ban? (Besides the gore posting pedo)
I don't follow that logic.
That's why we have rules, people can follow them or leave but rule 1 seems to be too difficult a task for some so now there's free for all threads.

4
Thisisnotanexit 4 points ago +4 / -0

How does one enforce rules for some but not others? Just call them a shill and ban cause I said so? I wonder if we've seen what that looks like.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, I can't explain to you how perfectly timed this was when you posted it, but this is hilarious.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Based on ratio, SwampRangers won, so would be nice if you noticed.

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

A lot of new people started dropping by after the initial requests began and then went to meta, if I remember the chain of events correctly, u/Neo1 started threads in c/Conspiracies and then u/SwampRangers took that to mean genuine interest and took it to c/Meta and then an even greater influx was seen here, which I don't hold him accountable for creating.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is not a free for all thread and your mocking reply is a violation of rule 1, will be approved upon edit.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Using rule 1, shill would be considered a violation due to common vernacular use. I'm also advising the reply to this comment is a rule 1 violation.

I would rather not remove this whole comment because it is critical of me and should be addressed, which I have here: https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARwwpoCZf/mods-were-demanded-because-of-ne/c/4eZDpN1h9KW

And also adding: If I modded in retaliation and not from rules I'd be no better than the bad actors who do that.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

We reached the thread limit so I started here because it's relevant.

VeilOfReality:

Certainly expressing an opinion is also valid in a thread like this, yeah?

Me:
Sure, what I'm saying tho is that it's mostly infighting and not outfighting, make sense?

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

These were deleted by the user, perhaps another, new leafer turning? They were rightly removed and no retro free for all thread to be enacted.

Edit: I was incorrect in this comment, see update: https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARws4ap4K/files-mentioning-elon-musk-and-i/c/4eZDpRkbXCq

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Without rule 1 this community would be conpro esque, no offense to them but it's not how I prefer to argue, we all still need to adhere to site wide rules.

And yea, I think the global surveillance state is becoming a prison planet, have I switched timelines again or I have I just been screaming into the void here for years?

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

The whole internet is public and we should act accordingly, free will also exists. For some reason rule 1 is too difficult a task for some people so I'm not sure what else I should do.

Maybe I am a crazy paranoid conspiracy theorist or maybe I'm a time traveler, the world may never know..

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't admit that but if people wanna act foolish that's on them, I won't have the whole board be covered in shit and pigs.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›