Removed because I don't approve google drives
I could say that about people active now probably too, the problem becomes proving shills vs people you don't like or get along with and it's a slippy slope before we're all turned against eachother, I think.
As you mentioned earlier about mistrust, I also tend to lean toward the suspicious side of things and am trying to be better about it, otherwise I'll end up locked in a room, probably.
If you believed you were about to be reunited to your source of life, in living flesh, right in front of you, would you be excited?
I love Christ now and I'll love Him when I see Him, here or there.
Conflict can be good. Were you expecting me to just agree with whatever anyone said? That's not who I am. I don't forget much so I doubt it.
It's a discussion, not a trap. Why shouldn't I defend my position? I have thoughts too.
But I am a user here.. The fact that I am a frequent user and know the community is why Admin made me the mod.
The post is here because it was voted highest in the submission thread.
I've been deeply involved for years before I was ever made mod, it's how I do things and I care for these people and, more often than not, see us as frens, if I changed my name people would still see me.
Clem himself said he was derelict in his duties and it had resulted in people leaving, namely DrLeaks. I think most people on the site as a whole are lurkers and I also think there are many lurkers in this forum specifically. It seems we have a reputation here of being somewhat intimidating (with thinkings) and I see it as a moderator's duty to care for both types of people around, meaning those that don't want to be personally attacked (versus their arguments) and those that see the need for a moderate amount of personal attack, hence the 'free for all' compromise. I know of one user specifically that has asked that all their posts be considered 'free for all', but mostly it is being underutilized.
The default of this community is not a 'free for all' but rather free thinking with an understanding of honoring a very simple 3 rule set standard.
I will continue to think on this idea of using my alts more but some things, like my live invite posts, rely on people being able to gauge my reputation and changing that would be counter-productive.
I very much appreciate your wisdom in this and many other things and am grateful you replied to this post, thanks dude.
Not only are we paying pedos in high places now we're also funding our very own prison planet..
Who do you think pays them?
I have no problem bantering without calling people names.
I'd also like to be reminding about the original compromise that there can be free for all posts where rule 1 is suspended.
It's stifling to not call people names or attack their person and not their argument?
Rule 1 is a good rule. Engagement being down because we don't attack people is what seems immature, to me, and I'm not convinced it's the reason things are down (engagement is down site wide, not just here). How does attacking people and not their arguments gain anything?
Chapters:
0:00 Introduction – The Digital World at Risk
2:24 What Makes Mythos a Game Changer?
3:45 Is Mythos Just Hype?
8:04 Who Gets Access? The Problem with Patching Only 20 Companies
10:54 Demystifying Zero Days and Bug Bounties
12:44 The Cat and Mouse Timeline: How Long Does the US Have?
16:07 AI-Written Code and the Opacity Problem
24:10 Claude Mythos System Card: What the AI Actually Did
28:29 International Coordination Opportunities
36:57 Policy Solutions
42:24 What Can Individuals Do? Practical Advice
A generation ago, the world's critical infrastructure was physical. Today, it’s largely digital. Your bank vault is a database, your filing cabinet is a server, your car is a robot on wheels. And in a world where these systems are mostly secure, life is more convenient and efficient. But all that comes into question when an AI system can break through the security that runs the world.
That’s what’s happened with Claude Mythos, Anthropic’s most powerful AI model yet. In a very short time, Claude found thousands of flaws and vulnerabilities in the software that runs the world, in every major operating system and web browser — systems that human security researchers had thought were secure for years.
How do we live in a world where a private company suddenly has a skeleton key that can unlock the entire digital world with little oversight or accountability? And what does Mythos mean for all of us who rely on digital security to go about our lives?
In this episode, we speak with two cybersecurity experts to answer these questions.
Josephine Wolff is a professor of cybersecurity policy at Tufts University, where she focuses on the economic impact of cyberattacks.
Fred Heiding is a research fellow at the Defense, Emerging Technology, and Strategy Program at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government.
I could explain the why of the stickies, and for any good faith users who want to know, I will, but I see no need to explain it to you.
What a odd thing to say. Did you forget this isn't high school?
You've been warned about this previously.
If you are here to subvert, you will be banned. I was reluctant to long term ban you because you have some moments of clarity and share decent information but it is up to you.
Oh good, I was being dense because I am..
Ok and I'll disagree and say Jesus is King of kings and life is worth the living because of Him. It'll be fun!
Removed for rule 1.
Vlad's comment:
No one comes to this conspiracies forum anymore.
I was answering someone else's question about Christ. What is the problem?