3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m not [the thing I axiomatically have to be since I denounce everything else]

Sure thing.

Yet Christianity was never about excluding any race

Cool, so you can’t read.

Those who were born into the covenant

The old one, which has been fulfilled and is no longer law. To clarify.

were cutting themselves off from the covenant

The new one. Which is explicitly Christian law, defining Christianity as distinct from all other beliefs. To clarify.

it's not literally supersession

“The thing that supersedes isn’t supersession!” ~ the mentally ill

it agrees there was only one covenant all along and the new covenant is the unfolding of the old.

new

old

Cool, so there were two covenants, just as the Bible itself says. Got it.

But the issue is that you've acted as if you have this idea that supersession means racism

Strawman. You won’t be able to redirect the conversation.

Christ kept the same covenant.

The one He explicitly held fulfilled and thereafter created a new one; got it, yeah.

a formerly-hidden provision

So hidden that it’s explicitly stated in the Bible as being new.

So the old contract (covenant of works between God and all men) was not done with

Except Jesus said otherwise, so you’re not even pretending to cover up your lies anymore.

There's no supplanting there.

Just removal and replacement with a new one; that’s a totally different concept!

Not the text.

Already posted the text.

Think about what "exposit” means

Think about what

I WILL MAKE A NEW COVENANT

and

NOT ACCORDING TO THE COVENANT MADE BY THEIR FATHERS

mean, heretic.

If you don't define and defend your position

“The Bible says so.” ~ my position

You have nothing.

it's easy to snipe everyone else and then never take criticism for a position because you can keep morphing it behind the scenes.

[muffled hand rubbing in the distance]

That's so 20th-century Usenet.

20th century jewsnet, you mean.

I agree that it's new that Christ makes a covenant between one man and many men

Cool, so there’s a new covenant. Thanks for continuing to publicly humiliate yourself.

But the old covenant stands

Not according to Christ, who has damned you to hell for eternity.

I asked you what supersedes

The Bible explains.

I gave you the option

You have no power over me. You’re not the arbiter of truth or the moderator of reality. You gave no options. I don’t give a fuck about your opinions. You directly contradict the contents of the Bible. You’re irrelevant.

So, yeah, you don't define and defend

Directly cited and sourced everything I said.

But let's see if we can think of a different motive.

Keeping people from falling for your jewish lies.

dispie strawmen

“Directly quoting dispensationalist beliefs is a strawman!” ~ the mentally ill

I always say that, as long as I'm alive, the US Constitution remains alive in me

You would willingly burn every copy of the Constitution and erase its words from everyone’s mind if given the chance. That’s neither here nor there. Your attempts at redirection aren’t working.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

On what aspects?

Pay attention.

That would mean he makes fact statements that contradict what he believes.

… Did you mean ‘false’?

No grand conspiracy behind the quote.

Pulled it out of thin air, made it up, completely out of context, irrelevant to the discussion, not even close to anything anyone said remotely related to the topic. So yeah, the conspiracy is “You made up bullshit for absolutely no conceivable reason.”

Again

Thanks for admitting you didn’t even try. You’re done here.

The two aren't even comparable or in the same category.

They’re both fallacies. And you purposely misrepresented what I said. Try again with some effort.

Well that's what others will believe

Nah, it’s not.

Case study: this exchange.

Your single data point is not representative of anything other than your individual mental illness.

After how long?

About five seconds.

And people are unique, you know.

Objective data metrics aren’t.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +2 / -2

Mmmm yes, because people are paid to shill for the True Worldview.

He’s shilling against it.

Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity

Yes, which is why he lies about it.

Why would he be paid, why not free?

Because I need at least some semblance of order and culture left in the world.

Wow, much conspiracy. Such evidence.

Great job not even pretending to construct a believable strawman. Get fucked. You didn’t even TRY to reply to what I said.

So you believe that begging the question and circular reasoning are two different fallacies?

So you beat your wife? Not playing your game. Try the fuck again with something someone actually said.

The way you present it

No, that’s not how I present it.

Nobody will ever, organically, get the conclusion "oh behavior”.

People with triple digit IQs naturally make these conclusions. They’re called context clues. If it walks like a duck, fucking shoot it during duck season.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +2 / -1

Good, do it. Attack Venezuela, too. And Russia. Just end it all.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +3 / -1

Don’t repeat proven lies designed to exterminate my people, then.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Funny how the Bible never uses the words "supersede", "supersession"

Funny how repeating the same copied and pasted talking points doesn’t matter when you were already disproven by the Bible itself.

but a theory that tends to exclude one race of humans from Christian salvation begins to use those words in the last couple hundred years.

Ever heard of a retronym, subhuman paid jewish shill? No one needed to say “snail mail” until e-mail was created. No one needed to say “supersessionism” until dispensationalism was created. Before your heresy appeared, Christianity was just Christianity.

Nice softball, though. Give me something actually difficult next time.

Funny how you call me dispensationalist when I reject dispensationalism as usually taught.

Literally worshipping it right here and now. Incapable of hiding it. Your account would be banned if you denied it.

You seem to think that because I believe in one covenant I must believe in dispensationalism.

Yep, you believe in proven and admitted heresy that Christ Himself denounces. Thanks for playing. You’re unfit to run your boards.

by the works of someone other than me.

So you’re a supersessionist, got it. Thanks for admitting it.

namely that people broke it.

Neat, so it’s not in effect anymore because the contract was over and done with and Christ created a new one. Thanks for playing.

The reason the new covenant lasts

Thanks for admitting there is a new covenant and that supersessionism is Christian doctrine.

This is not about one superseding another

Bible says otherwise. Thanks for playing.

because they are the same covenant

Nope, different terms. You’ve never read the Bible.

But the tree itself is not replaced, and that's what you seem to mean by "supersession"

No one gives a shit about your strawmen. None of what I have said is my opinion.

I simply throw Romans 11 backatcha.

Thanks for continuing to use the Bible to disprove your claims.

But since you appear incapable of defining supersession

Zero effort. -15/10; would not be trolled by again.

or of expositing Scripture

Posted it directly. Go suck off jews on another website.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +1 / -2

This somehow proves that SR out of BILLIONS of humans

Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns. That’s the “somehow.”

how far do I have to scroll

First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.

you JUST used that EXACT fallacy

You have no idea what the fallacy even is.

by linking articles that in no way prove SR out of BILLIONS is "paid".

Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

finally

I have literally never not said this in my entire time posting. You’re a worthless sack of shit paid shill who cannot read English and behaves like a Redditor to boot.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +4 / -3

never think

never act like a human

just behave like a nigger and become incapable of comprehending causality

you won’t have any problems if you don’t associate behavior with causality

I dindu nuffin! Muh fee fees hurt!

Yep, that’s par for the course with your posts.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +2 / -2

I'm a little closer to finding your "replacement" theology in the Bible after looking all over for it.

Yes, you’ve never read the Bible. You’ve admitted that dozens of times.

Now of the things which we have spoken this is the sum: We have such an high priest, who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens; A minister of the sanctuary, and of the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, and not man. For every high priest is ordained to offer gifts and sacrifices: wherefore it is of necessity that this man have somewhat also to offer. For if he were on earth, he should not be a priest, seeing that there are priests that offer gifts according to the law: Who serve unto the example and shadow of heavenly things, as Moses was admonished of God when he was about to make the tabernacle: for, See, saith he, that thou make all things according to the pattern shewed to thee in the mount. But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises. For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second. For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people: And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest. For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more. In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.

Supersessionism is the foundation of Christianity. It is itself Christianity. Nothing exists outside of it and never has. Your subhuman dispensationalist heresy—funded by zionists at the start of the 20th century—spits in the face of millennia of written proof of Christian doctrine.

Eat shit, you fucking kike heretic.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +3 / -1

Quote?

Don’t be fucking glib. Pretending you don’t know what’s happening is a humiliation.

Logical conclusion.

Literally a fallacy. Don’t do it again.

He rebutted evolution, he says there's evidence Exodus happened, and he argued with…

Irrelevant. His “theology” directly contradicts the Bible.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +4 / -1

So how did you determine

They publicly admit it.

So weak and small an amount.

They pay tens of thousands of shills.

If that were true

Fallacy.

He is pro Christian

Never read any of his posts, confirmed.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +4 / -1

Who is giving out the checks?

Israel.

What currency?

Whichever; they own all of them.

How much money?

50¢ per post, per the leaked documents.

For what?

White genocide and the eradication of Christendom.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +3 / -2

[nothing]

Thanks for admitting that all studies on the topic show women are killing their babies and the system is covering it up because men would go ballistic if they knew.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +3 / -1

All you do is ignore the topic and focus on [the topic]

Great job. 10/10. Way to blow yourself out.

We are speaking common sense. You can't find sources for that.

  1. Can, yeah. That’s the entire point of common sense. It manifests itself in testable reality. That’s why people believe it. It’s why they behave in accordance with it. It’s the definition of the phrase.
  2. Thanks for admitting you lied from the very beginning and that whites can, in fact, fight back and win.

You keep avoiding my accusations.

“You rape children. Wait wait wait wait wait, why aren’t you replying to this? I said words. Therefore the words are real and you have to take them seriously merely because I said them! You don’t get to ignore my obvious personal attack and demand I reply to the topic of discussion! You have to engage with my deflection from the fact that my worldview is a proven hoax!”

Neat, don’t care. Reply to the topic or continue to be mocked.

Also, I'm white.

Clearly not. White peoples don’t behave this way.

Also, I'm here for conversation

Clearly not, otherwise you’d prove what you say instead of continuing to repeat lies only jews say.

not to prove things to people with closed minds.

I’m here to mock people like that by proving things to you.

I didn't start attacking you

Drown in your lies.

This is your MO. You are paid to be like this, or you don't for someone or something. No person acts like you. You're very strange but predictable.

The jew cries out in pain as it literally reads from a script only sophists believe.

And, I was never banned from here. Only from The Donald and GAW. That's why I changed accounts

Translation: “I was banned completely, otherwise I’d keep my old account around for the other boards that actually matter, instead of caring about the paid shilling boards at all.”

Why not just go back to Reddit where your behavior is worshipped by everyone, you filthy sophist?

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +5 / -1

Your scripted paid shilling propaganda is several decades out of date. No one gives a fuck what you have to say, and we’ll never believe you.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +3 / -3

The most amazing thing about all this is

  1. You’re physically incapable of disproving anything I have said.
  2. You only replied because you’re shitting your pants in fear of whites becoming aware of our capabilities.
  3. You can’t reply to the topic, so you have to attack me personally as though you’re accomplishing anything.

News flash, subhuman jew! No one cares about me! My words are still true, no matter what you lie about me!

Find another website to spam. You were banned for a reason.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +2 / -3

that doesn’t work

NOOOOOOOO U RONG CUZ I SAY SOOOOOOOOOO

IT NO WORK I RIGHT CUZ I SAY I RIGHT I WIN NOW

NO I DONT HAVE TO PROVE ANYTHING I SAY

NO I DONT HAVE TO DISPROVE ANYTHING YOU SAY

I AM GOD HIMSELF

YOU PROVIDE EXTERNAL CITATIONS AND SOURCES FOR EVERYTHING YOU SAY, THEREFORE YOU ARE PAID TO LIE

Thanks for admitting you’re a paid shill sockpuppet account and that everything I said in this entire conversation is true.

No one is doing anything, nor will they. Least of all in response to paid jewish shilling like yours. You have zero evidence for any of your claims and refuse to even pretend to provide it.

Funny how a “brand new user” knows what “used to happen” here, isn’t it.

You just can’t help but out yourselves.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +2 / -2

thing that happened before vaccines is from vaccines!

U DUM AND RONG CUZ U HURT MY FEE FEEEEEEEEEEEE

Thanks for admitting that all studies on the topic show women are killing their babies and the system is covering it up because men would go ballistic if they knew.

-5
TallestSkil -5 points ago +1 / -6

Cool; hijacked account confirmed. Thanks for admitting that SIDS is postpartum depressed mothers killing their children.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +1 / -2

NO U

Thanks for admitting you’re a paid shill sockpuppet account and that everything I said in this entire conversation is true.

No one is doing anything, nor will they. Least of all in response to paid jewish shilling like yours. You have zero evidence for any of your claims and refuse to even pretend to provide it.

-3
TallestSkil -3 points ago +1 / -4

No one cares. Fuck off, coward.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›