Wait, you mod-removed your own post? Or is the auto-filter being really aggressive? This happened to the other post to which I replied earlier, too. I didn’t think it warranted removal (unless it was only because it was a top level comment that wasn’t a vote).
They haven’t revolted over anything in over a century. Why would they?
I don't think we should ban anyone unless what their posting isn't conspiratorial.
It isn’t, though. It’s just a mathematically proven, visibly obvious, physically impossible lie. The only conspiracy regards why it is being posted at all, and then the answer is obvious–well poisoning.
Except that information is still wrong, but whatever.
Oh well. Doesn’t matter. No one will do a single thing to stop this.
Enjoy your ban/.
Wrong. Commit suicide.
Go the fuck away, you subhuman communist piece of shit. You’re not fooling anyone.
That reminds me… I still have it bookmarked, how about that… there’s a shortwave radio website where you can listen in to just about everything, and there’s a U.S. military channel for coded information on there. The most important troop movements and activities are announced with messages beginning “SKYKING SKYKING, DO NOT ANSWER.” Four repeats of SKYKING SKYKING means “US actively at war” with one, two, and three being various levels of importance up to that. We hit 3 on a few messages during the early stages of the Syria bullshit when it looked like the US would overtly intervene, but never 4.
That was another blue ball, back in the day.
Who are you and what did I prove you wrong about, kike.
Isn’t one always in the air?
Yep, after going on another spamming spree beyond its “apology” tour.
artificial coloring
Ah, so irrelevant to the discussion.
You can't be objective if you can't think abstractly.
Okay. Abstract ≠ subjective.
you’re an alt
Hilarious.
Imagine being so brain damaged that you actually think we’ll believe that. Fuck off, shill. You already got banned for mass spam. Nothing on Reddit is to the “left” of Stalin.
How do you define words?
Objectively.
If I change the definition of "woman"
But you can’t do that, see. Words continue to have definitions—because they are representations of the objective—even if no one believes in them. Even if no one knows them. The word ‘computer’ means ‘one who computes’ even when it’s 1850 and the transistor isn’t even a mote in anyone’s eye.
does it not fuck up our entire society?
But it doesn’t change the word.
Did you put any thought to what you just typed?
Did you?
Are you controlled opposition?
Oh yes, the guy who says to ignore everything the media says and to stop fucking paying your taxes and stop voting and stop obeying unconstitutional laws and actually fucking kill these traitors is definitely controlled opposition.
I don't like I don’t like controlled opposition. It’s coarse and rough and irritating… and it gets everywhere.
Not a fan of silicates, myself.
All words in the world are defined by other words. When you change the definition of any single word, it has a knock on effect that subtly changes the definition of all words in existence.
That’s literally not how anything, anywhere, works.
your own demise
Cool, I have land. I’ll be fine. I’m not nonwhite, either. I can provide for myself.
I support righting the wrongs of the last 80 years and lowering the population to where it ought to be. Why not, after all?
No, flat earth is forum spam. FWOC presents lateral thinking discussion about the language we use in order to spur discussion and thought about why we use those words in that way, and who told us to do so.
That’s not really an argument that any sane person can entertain, sorry.