To me, it only changes if I understand why the door is being opened. These doors do not contain Schrödinger's car. both doors start out at 1/3 and drop to 1/2. Unless the host is attempting to sway me. In short, it depends on if the second choice is real, or a red haring. Which is not explicitly stated. (See direct calculations section)
The logic of the Pigeon switching also seems false. As The thinking of the pigeon is to continue choosing after failing, as it is not going to choose the same door twice, if it knows it needs to make a new choice.
In addition, it feels like I am being told to accept an absurdity, as a new base logic. And after learning of this on the front page of reddit, I do not trust this to be a truthful logic. It seems they are skewing the base logic by, concealing a fundamental rule that changes the results.
I assumed this was an informative video. But it is an unscripted pod cast.
Subsequently, not a lot of the information in the video is well described or defined, and goes against other videos that are 'less spiritual' , featured on their bitchute channel, that reference Tissue salt in meats for curing aliments.
I assume by by 'tissue salts' you are referencing the other video that I posted. Though I have not watched the video, and skimming it proves light on actual information, the only videos I have watched on that channel that have referenced tissue salts, talk on receiving them by consuming meats. Mostly lamb. So I am uncertain how this is a contradiction.
Edit/note: The other video I posted seems to be a podcast, and not a very good one at that. :/
It's simple really allow me to summarize and elaborate on the basic premise and overall tone of this thread:
Dog go "Woof! Woof!". Boss go "Woof! Woof!"? It get cold outside? So dark at night. It colder at night. Dog smarter than me? Yet sun still bright? Boss and dog smarter than me?!! Conclusion: Boss and dog working together to make cold and dark? Blot out sun!
And there is your conspiracy fren. Dog and boss working together to make cold and dark at night.
"The News Benders" is new to me.
You wrote the title to this link. You crafted a summary based on your assumptions. You don't know what Tartaria is, or understand how theories work. That page is a theory on "the millennium of Christ", not Tartaria, or your assumptions about it.
I've only learned about this the last few days,
Two days you say?
This is the second time it's changed. First, it was a worldwide missing time / civilization. Then the flat earther took it. Now it's this. The way this theory just becomes anything is insane.
???
That page doesn't mention Tartaria once. Nor is it related to any of the theories you are mentioning. You are the one doing this.
Well that doesn't seem related at all. That's the name of a guy who went on a killing spree, a month shy of a decade ago. How is this related, if at all?
Question! Are they currently blocking the port?
https://twitter.com/johnkonrad/status/1776786983097966862
Never mind. It has apparently been cleared to go, and is out to sea at this point:
https://www.vesselfinder.com/?imo=9461893
Other related post:
https://conspiracies.win/p/17siNusKOY/key-bridge-collision---why-was-t/c/
https://conspiracies.win/p/17siO1g9YN/a-perfect-description-that-match/c/
I am only making assumptions of the captain's decisions, based on his current actions.
In taking the above action you will be validating that you are a human being, and not working for a third party. Please click the down arrow, located here to do so.
It's really simple. Just hit the down vote arrow. and notify me once you have.
Humor me; Hit the down vote button on this random comment:
https://conspiracies.win/p/140w2NrqUS/x/c/4ZA2HGCx8ev
Then let me know once you have by replying to it.
Random comment.
O.K. I'll play along, as clearly you are here to "increase engagement", and are not a real person.
Blagh blagh blagh. Random person?!!! Blagh blagh blah. LORA LoGaN!!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lara_Logan
- Me: currently clutching pearls audibly
Feel free to make your claim openly. As I have no idea who you are referring to.
"secondly and most importantly, how does AIPAC have courage to offer bribes?"
So that's the 'second', and 'most important point' made, and I'm not even certain who is making it.
"Cenk Uyghur is allegedly a CIA asset who loves CIA and hates conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones Whitney Webb. However now he is sounding like a legit political activist, almost like a conspiracy theorist."
Hints at who is currently in control of the C.I.A.
Question: Who is currently in charge of the C.I.A?
Because Credible Sources are not citing gremlins.
Not certain what your point is. You gave us 2 examples of sabotage, and 2 ships at sea.
Where as we are currently discussing, 2 examples of potential cyber attacks shortly before a bridge transit, in 2 weeks time.
There has been a lot of loose talk about cyber attacks being a credible cause of the last outage.
Though this article does not say for certain. As either could prevent them from continuing to transit under the bridge for differing reasons. As a ship's captain would not go to sea with mechanical issues. Alternately, he would await clearance and further assistance were it a cyber attack.
No matter who the masters are, grains are bad for the brain, dropping IQ, making people more subservient. So, fairly in line actually.