by pkvi
3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

Correct. Don't do business with "Crypto Companies". They are unneeded and their only goal is to manipulate the market for profits.

by pkvi
3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was a frame up to regulate crypto. Only their laundering was to transparent.

by pkvi
4
Questionable 4 points ago +4 / -0

Crypto is designed to be held in private wallets. It's literally the point. If you have funds on any exchange, you are doing it wrong.

Not your keys, not your coins.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

The army known for winter warfare doesn't have winter gear?

Does that sound truthful to you, or like propaganda?

And you must be really well off to scoff at Natural gas prices in Germany.

https://www.globalpetrolprices.com/Germany/natural_gas_prices/

But I digress. Are you aware that you are currently acting as a front man for political theater? And that you are not actually providing any theories, on conspiracies, and are merely talking against such?

With that in mind. Please feel free to give us your beast theory on Russia's actions. And do so give us your best, and not just claim, "Putin is evil and therefor a bad man in control of an evil empire."

In fact, if you are so inclined, make a thread on the topic. And for God's sake, do it right.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think I'll do any of that.

Now do the following:

  1. Seethe

  2. Dilate

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Amazing, so now they both do and don't exist. And you have flown into a rage, and started making accusations of lying. That's not actually a normal response. In fact, there is something very wrong with you.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

You really don't understand what is is you said do you? If the buses were empty, than they were faking the attendance of their presidential breakfast. There are no photos, of said event. Just buses, buses you claim were empty.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually. Which would be stranger? If the buses had military personal on it, or if they were empty?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

You've got to be fuck'n kidding me right now.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Names have meaning. You either chose yours, or it was generated in batch. Your propensity to illicit doubt, brings this in Question.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're just making shit up in your head

Yes, that is what an estimate is. Or they could have used six buses, to delivers six people. Or, 30 people on each bus, from six different bases for a total of 180.

Do you think she was at the breakfast all by herself?

That's all that's in that photos. Where I have a photo of six buses.

What is wrong with you?

Well, I'm not you. But, I'm counting that in the plus column.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

That doesn't answer the question

It answer the Question you asked directly.

How many were there and how do you know?

I gave you a maximum number from the number of buses present.

How do you know that any military personnel were in those buses?

They were military buses, or prison buses. And the second one of those makes no sense.

4
Questionable 4 points ago +4 / -0

"I suck dick... Real well" -TallestSkill

Oh my God, no. Can we both do that now?

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

6 Buses, can fit 432 passengers.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

And you chose it. Or you didn't. Either way, it is who you are now.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Close. That is a picture of one person. Now find me those six buses.

That would be a maximum of 72 X 6 for a possible total of 432 passengers.

Where the White House Dinning room seats 14?

Or is it the White House State Dining Room? That can fit 140?

Again, not seeing those buses.

4
Questionable 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sure are lot of you in here right now. Telling me, my motivations.

4
Questionable 4 points ago +4 / -0

That is my online handle. Yours is "Smoke and Mirrors". Again, did you not name yourself that?

3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

I didn't even mention that. You are replying to a comment, on your behavior.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›