Given your insistence I must be a Jew because I don't accept your flawed model of the WTC complex destruction, I think I can walk away knowing your mind will never change. Read the book, I've posted it. I see you're done trying to argue about survivors inside WTC1 because it is totally annihilates your suggestion. 2. Not true, they coincide with with initiation of destruction, not before. Snake tongue. 3. If what you think ionizing radiation is "X-rays, basiaclly," you have no place to lecture me about electromagnetics. LOL! I never said that. 4. Your ignorance is laughable. Tell your master they need a better shill than you!

1. They were in the building preceding, during, and after
2. Your source correctly indicates that these are surface waves (Rayleigh waves), not waves that travel through the earth (Primary and Secondary seismic waves), as well as characterizing that it was "the interaction between the ground and the building foundation", ie how hard the building was pressing down onto the earth lessened and the ground sprang up. There are no other CD or underground nuclear blasts whose seismic signature was Rayleigh waves only.
3. I am not confusing anything, I am addressing both. Either way there is an issue with evidence consistency.
4. Pure assertion about "dial-a-nukes". Show me the wavebands that are absorbed by metal and which do not affect human tissue. Steel's best absorption spectrum at 1040nm is ultraviolet and will most certainly burn and irradiate you.

1. The elevators and stairs are both in the central core. How did they not hear such an event? They say the noise came from above.
2. This is a claim. I would love to see the seismographic data from the source regarding your claim of an energy pulse pre collapse. Thank you!
3. If this is ionizing radiation creating dust clouds, how does it not relate to people being burned? If it is thermal, how does it not relate to people being burned? How were there no radiation burns, especially considering "the nukes emitted radiation" that "heated [the] metal burned its paint off"?

This suggestion ignores survivors inside WTC1 (Miracle of Stairwell B), ignores the lack of flash and blast (sound), and ignores the unburned people in the dust clouds.

Your "inside information" means nothing if it is incommensurate with the documentable evidence.

Great point: it is all about optics. Who and how many see something is how they play the game, the cards are almost always on the table.

I'm shocked the lying goons would add that update so promptly. Journalistic integrity is a joke as evidenced by the unquestioning publishing of this propaganda piece in the first place.

I appreciate your write up. While interesting, your suggestion that there is no right or wrong ways of living is why we are subjected to brutal violence so very frequently. Perhaps there is truth to what you are saying on some level of existence; for the human experience there are very much actions which result in suffering of those who have initiated no suffering, and those actions which do not.

That is not an argument or an assessment, simply an assertion. Have you read the book which is available for free at the link above?

I'm not surprised. I almost feel like the "shill pool" is shallower regarding the 9/11 DEW information; perhaps because there are fewer human being evil and low enough to knowingly discredit true information of such a nature. There are millions who genuinely and with good reason do not believe alternative theories that include bombs, nukes, thermite, etc because indeed there is no good evidence about such. They are too naive and incredulous to even consider something else, so they will readily shill against such narratives with no fear of leakage (pre-planned conventional CD narrative). Perhaps it is because of a fear that too much resistance will lead to more eyes, averting a Streisand effect situation.

I imagine that the vaccine skeptic disinformation artists / narrative weavers have been being activated in stages for quite some number of years now. Covid is their "second act" to 9/11, in my opinion. Their "South Tower," or destruction of emotional and empathic bonds between friends and neighbors.

In my perspective, the more relevant decoding of Jachin (aka Strength) and Boaz (aka Beauty) in relation to 9/11 is of the masculine aspect of consciousness (reason) and the feminine aspect of consciousness (emotion), with Building 7 (aka Salomon Brother's building, allusion to Solomon) representing the Wisdom pillar, the unified aspect of consciousness (wisdom / right living).

I am not sure what the point of your metaphor / explanation is and how it may relate to my post. Would you please explain? Thank you!

I remember when your 9/11 directed energy weapon thread was stickied for weeks on Reddit. I reckoned then that you must be alright (along with your other contributions to the discourse) and I wondered how long you had left there. I am glad that this thriving alternative exists, and I plan to make this my online place of interest as opposed to r/conspiracy as it has been for some number of years. Thanks!

Fantastic find and I agree, the lamppost was the obvious subject of the directed energy weapon demonstration / test.

"What happened on 9/11?" is the first essential question that must be answered if we ever wish to resolve the unending insanity that is the "post-9/11" paradigm. If we do not carefully look, our assumptions (planes, fires, bombs, etc...) will influence our assessment of evidence, and if something brand new happened, we will see what we want, a sort of Rorschach test of perception.

This book, written by Phd. of Materials Engineering Science Dr. Judy Wood, is the most thorough and overwhelmingly verifiable assessment does as yet in the public domain. If you want to know, this is the place to start.

Where Did the Towers Go? by Dr. Judy Wood