Given your insistence I must be a Jew because I don't accept your flawed model of the WTC complex destruction, I think I can walk away knowing your mind will never change. Read the book, I've posted it. I see you're done trying to argue about survivors inside WTC1 because it is totally annihilates your suggestion.
2. Not true, they coincide with with initiation of destruction, not before. Snake tongue.
3. If what you think ionizing radiation is "X-rays, basiaclly," you have no place to lecture me about electromagnetics. LOL! I never said that.
4. Your ignorance is laughable. Tell your master they need a better shill than you!
I simplified discussion of ionizing radiation because I'm dealing with a person somewhat ignorant of physics. Whether radiation can ionize depends on the energy of the radiation. X-rays can knock electrons off but are relative weak in effect. Gamma radiation is more energetic and it can do a lot more. Strong E/M forces can vibrate electrons in metal and cause heating. Bombs can emit any or all of these types but the balance depends on the design.
As for what I know, I was deeply embedded in engineering projects related to the aftermath of 9/11 that required clearances. I have more information than I can talk about and am handicapped by that when I discuss things with people like you. So your arguments carry little weight with me.
What you just wrote amplifies your role, and I believe the real shill here is you. After 9/11 I spend five years dealing with the multitude of paid deflectors and the mere idiots who believed them. Now run along sonny, and spread your manure in the barn where it belongs. Shalom.
Given your insistence I must be a Jew because I don't accept your flawed model of the WTC complex destruction, I think I can walk away knowing your mind will never change. Read the book, I've posted it. I see you're done trying to argue about survivors inside WTC1 because it is totally annihilates your suggestion. 2. Not true, they coincide with with initiation of destruction, not before. Snake tongue. 3. If what you think ionizing radiation is "X-rays, basiaclly," you have no place to lecture me about electromagnetics. LOL! I never said that. 4. Your ignorance is laughable. Tell your master they need a better shill than you!
I simplified discussion of ionizing radiation because I'm dealing with a person somewhat ignorant of physics. Whether radiation can ionize depends on the energy of the radiation. X-rays can knock electrons off but are relative weak in effect. Gamma radiation is more energetic and it can do a lot more. Strong E/M forces can vibrate electrons in metal and cause heating. Bombs can emit any or all of these types but the balance depends on the design.
As for what I know, I was deeply embedded in engineering projects related to the aftermath of 9/11 that required clearances. I have more information than I can talk about and am handicapped by that when I discuss things with people like you. So your arguments carry little weight with me.
What you just wrote amplifies your role, and I believe the real shill here is you. After 9/11 I spend five years dealing with the multitude of paid deflectors and the mere idiots who believed them. Now run along sonny, and spread your manure in the barn where it belongs. Shalom.