TL;DR: We take a close look at the disinformation published on the Lincoln assassination more than a decade ago by the highest-level disinfo operation, “Miles Mathis”, which is still extant today. We can now carefully dissect it and examine what was said and what was not said, metaphorically penetrating and deflating Their most sophisticated disinformation program.

The first issue to be addressed is this: why should we consider Mathis the “highest-level” disinfo program? IOW, what should we use as the metric? The clear answer, from my perspective, is the level of truthful disclosure used to get the target audience to swallow the lies and follow the misdirections. I cannot even think of a comparison to Mathis on this score. (I did run across a cheap knockoff once that was just… beyond bad.)

You see, none of this has to do with the size of the audience or the prominence of the program in the public sphere. There were boatloads of people that listened to the Tic Tac UFO nonsense, and scads that cannot stop talking about the Flat Earth. None of those people will ever engage with the Mathis material, and none were ever intended to.

I will have to be brutally honest here: those people will never make a difference in the information war. Only a few recognize they’re on a battlefield, but even those few don’t have the sides correctly identified. All those people are bedazzled by the spectacles, or far too busy signaling their virtue, or consumed with how “right” their conclusions are. They are no threat and never will be.

There is a tiny minority, though, that seeks the truth at all costs, particularly as a precursor to any action. As Fox Mulder told us, “The truth is out there,” and this minority might just find it. After finding it, they might just tell other people, and eventually some of those people might be in a position and of a mind to do something about it. Mathis was sent forth to show that tiny minority some small part of the truth, then lead them on a fascinating and compelling journey away from it.

Mathis has a worldwide readership that I would guess to be in the low tens of thousands, counting anyone familiar with any of his work. These readers are high-level conspiracy theorists to have gotten that far. They evidently were judged to merit construction of this last ditch for them to fall into, worth the effort and—vitally—worth the necessary revelations. Of the few I have seen make it that far and fall into that ditch, almost none climbed their way back out. It’s an effective op.

What about the very words you’re reading right now? Is this another disinfo ditch? Well, out of 8 billion people in the world, there are probably 8 of them reading these words. This is all really a helluva lot of effort to derail one out of a billion, isn’t it? If “They” are that far ahead and working down to that level of detail, I mean… you should be asking yourself what you’re even doing here. I know I do, constantly.

So here we are at that final level, prepared to closely examine the subtle evidence revealing the cutting-edge practice of limited hangout disinformation sold as “conspiracy theory”. We begin with the paper where some years ago I personally learned the shocking truth:

Lincoln's Assassination was also a manufactured event (2/19/2014 36-page PDF)

“Mathis” is certainly a team of researchers and writers, not some dude in Taos, New Mexico, frittering away his spare time in front of a computer. In addition to some other clues and evidence, there is no way a single person could generate his volume of output. I am well aware of exactly how difficult and time-consuming that particular type of research and writing is. Ask me how I know.

The primary observation about high-level disinfo we can draw from this paper (and similarly from other work by “Miles Mathis”) is that there is not some master disinfo plan based on MKULTRA experimentation and crafted by quantum AI under the control of IQ 900 demons who are supervising the Simulation wherein…. All that is utter nonsense and you should be ashamed to be so mentally undisciplined as to consider such things. It’s dealing yourself a stack of wild cards and marveling at your skilled play.

So let’s deconstruct Mathis’s writing. To be sure, he does more than enough to satisfy the basic thesis—that the event was a hoax—coming at it from many different angles with facts and reasoning anyone could (and should) validate. When I wanted to provide someone with evidence the assassination was faked, I have linked that paper innumerable times—with the proper caveats.

Another major part of the paper discusses John Wilkes Booth, and it provides us with a critical revelation—not about Booth, per se, but about Mathis. You’ll find four Booths and even a Wilkins-Booth on the Salem witch trials list. Mathis never mentions that. Is it cunning misdirection? I feel strongly that it is not. He (the team, that is) just did not know at that time. You see, the crucial paper was more than a year and a half in the future:

The Salem Witch Trials were not what we have been told (10/19/2015 17-page PDF)

The “hangout” part of the “limited hangout” was giving away that the trials were faked. We were all supposed to read the paper and then walk away, smug and superior in our new knowledge. And that was supposed to be the end of it.

Clearly, the “MM” team never put two and two together themselves. Thus, they never expected nor anticipated anyone else doing it either. But someone finally did and here we are. Even with this tiny bit of analysis, can you really make yourself believe it was all planned? I am sure there are a few who can. Not me, though.

For a very long time in his work, and including much material in the Lincoln paper, Mathis pushed us towards “Intelligence” operations. This is a big part of the misdirection. You see, there’s nothing concrete about “Intelligence”, just this nebulous collections of organizations up to various nefarious hijinks. You see, for all the shit the CIA may be up to in the world, could you name a single individual in that huge bureaucracy who you would jerk out of his cube at Langley and drag to a courtroom? See what I mean about nebulous “Intelligence” and how it’s not going to get anyone anywhere?

Let me paint a picture to give you the basic illustration of what I imagine has gone on with “Miles”. It looks like a rep for whoever is really pushing the pieces around the board drops into the MM writing room one day and says, “Don’t you guys think it looks like Booth was some kind of Intelligence operative and that the assassination was staged as a big Intel psyop? Okay bye!”

That would have been when they were writing the paper in 2013, before it was published in 2014. Then maybe he drops by again in late 2015 and says, “You know, now that a lot of conspiracy theorists have figured out the Jews are behind a lot of stuff, and it’s now popular and costs nothing extra to blame them in conspiracy theory circles, don’t you guys think it was the Jews here too? BTW, have you seen this book we had written for us?”:

Addendum January 2, 2016: John Wilkes Booth may have been Jewish. It is not my research that discovered that, it is in the new book on Lincoln by Sarna and Shapell—who are Jewish themselves—and in the testimony of Booth's sister Asia and brother Edwin.

Then maybe mid-2016, he drops by once more with another helpful suggestion: “Hey, like Carlin said, it’s a Big Club. Not just that, seems like all these people are related to each other, doesn’t it?”:

Addendum, August 27, 2016: I just found an entire layer I missed the first time. It required a very close and extended study of the genealogy charts in the mid-1800s, which I later ended up doing as part of the research for many later papers, including my paper on Lizzie Borden, my paper on F. Scott Fitzgerald, and so on. Only by cross-referencing these many genealogy searches was I able to discover that all these families are closely related.

So from then on, MM’s papers were filled with dizzying webworks of genealogy. Frankly, the vast majority of it was pretty loose with very, very few links to documentation. You really had to take his word for it all. It got progressively more forced, making the web bigger and bigger, like claiming “Linton” was a variant of “Clinton”. Even in this very early Lincoln paper, you’d get lost in it. You were supposed to. As mentioned in a previous post, among other things They are working to defeat your efficiency.

We now finally arrive at the Salem Witches. Even then, in the Lincoln paper, the team was not hiding what I must imagine “They” now wish had remained hidden. There are bits here and there in the long, long paper, none of them crucial to the case for the hoax, and they could have easily left these out. First let me give you an example of the impressive cloud of association, meant ultimately to obscure:

That is to say—as that research relates to this paper—we find the Todds were related to the Surratts. They were also related to the Booths, Parkers and Rathbones. So we find more evidence this was all an inside job.

Let me blow the cloud away and show you that which was obscured. You know how I always say the Salem Witches operate from just outside the spotlight, and that the Parkers are the most prominent I have yet found? Well, get this, from the hand of Miles Mathis himself (or so to speak):

Now, what about that drunken policeman John Frederick Parker, who was allegedly next door at a pub while Abe was getting himself assasinated? He was also later the personal guard of Mary Todd Lincoln at the White House, indicating some relationship were aren't being told. Hold on to your hat, because this is the closest relationship of all. Mary Todd Lincoln's mother was Anne Elizabeth Parker. She had a brother Archibald Parker, who is listed as having no children. John could have been his son.

So there you have it, a high-level disinfo operation making my case for me over a decade ago. And now stop to ask yourself: Do you really think all this could be the carefully scripted work of DARPA’s Grok disInfoBot v911.3.2.2? Or maybe that super-intelligent aliens wrote it all into the Simulation because of some reason I can’t even think of an example of? Or that maybe it’s Satan way of testing your… whatever?

I think it’s just what it appears to be, and I’ve shown it to you just as I found it. Do not think “They” can’t be out-thunk. “They” have just been at it longer—for centuries, as we have seen—but look how fast we’ve been catching up. No wonder “They” seem desperate lately.

Final note: Sorry for how long all this Lincoln material turned out. Believe it or not, there is even more that should be documented about the Lincoln assassination and the Salem Witches that has not yet been written up. The evidence was always out there but no one recognized it for that it was, not even Miles Mathis. We’ll move on to some other Salem Witch hijinks, which I think you will find as surprising as I did.

In any case, I hope you find this useful. Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: We survey the landscape of conspiracy that has built up over a century and a half regarding this notable historical event. The bonus features yet another Parker.

Advisory: Aside from the bonus, there are no new revelations here. I assume everyone reading this is aware that it was a hoax and that the Salem Witches were behind it, just as they were behind so many other historical events. It all seems so familiar to me now, but I can imagine that if this was the first time someone encountered these claims, they might strike as quite unbelievable. In fact, if you can’t believe those claims might possibly be true, bail out now because you’re just going to get madder as we go along and present evidence to that effect.

This post is actually about the importance of efficiency in research. Sounds boring, but ask yourself this: Which do you think will run out first, Their capacity to generate bullshit and nonsense, or your capacity to find your way through it while avoiding throwing out the baby with the bathwater? It is vital to decide what you can ignore or discard as fast as possible.

There is a jungle of deceptions and irrelevancies that has grown up over the centuries, and They are busy planting more trees. You need a chainsaw to have any hope to get through it all and—just maybe—get to the truth. If you’ve carefully trimmed a beautiful topiary with nail clippers and you’re proudly showing it off to everyone who will come look, well… you’re getting what you wanted.

I’ll make a serious point that many will find offensive: if you’re a truth-seeker, you have got to get over trying to be the smartest person in the room. You seldom will be, so just forget about it. You see, we’re about to take a look at a lot of smart people saying a lot of smart things about Honest Abe, and most of it can be thrown out. The key issue is context.

Lincoln—as prominent as he is in history and even currently—was on the fringes of the Salem Witches and was always under their influence. All his actions and all events involving him must be evaluated in that light. For normies, a Presidential assassination is a big deal and faking one is out of the question (that is, until recently because They are getting really desperate to smear a certain someone in any way available).

However, for those familiar with the Salem Witches, such historical manipulations are commonplace. See how context changes everything? Again, if you’re new to this, the “receipts” were brought in a prequel post:

Was Abraham Lincoln just some rando born in a log cabin? You won’t think so after hearing who he’s connected to, like the Salem Witches and even more Parkers (conspiracies.win 7/23/2025)

To coin a new term, this is a “meta-deep-dive” into the historiography (or so to speak) of the 1865 Assassination of Abraham Lincoln. First, should we say “alleged” assassination? The issue here is that for virtually anyone that knows about it, it is not alleged. You could not point to a single person literally alleging that it happened.

That is, no one prefaces any statement regarding it with, “I claim that President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated, and….” It just happened and everyone knows it. Yet it did not. As big as the English language is, we don’t really have an adjective or noun for this particular state of affairs, perhaps aside from “psychosis”.

The second item to notice concerns the base level of “common knowledge”. Lincoln was shot by a moody loner with a gun, obviously. All subsequent such events get anchored to that “knowledge”. Every time we are told a moody loner with a gun does what moody loners do, we all “know” what happened.

I was recently watching the classic “Ring of Power: Empire of the City” conspiracy documentary. You have to admit it goes pretty deep, does it not? However, they described the assassination as when “a gunman with European connections shot him down in cold blood”. A big miss, particularly considering the next item.

The third item to notice is that the mainstream actually admits that the assassination was the result of a conspiracy. You can read up on it right on that wiki page—it was quite elaborate. A number of people were (purportedly) hanged for it. But my point is that very, very few people realize this. I myself never knew there was a larger conspiracy until I read the paper by Miles Mathis a number of years ago. The world and my view of it have come a long way since then.

I saw it suggested several times that the recent assassination attempts involving Crookes and Routh should be presumed to be conspiracies and investigated on that basis. I think I heard the Lincoln conspiracy mentioned once in response. Of course, everyone was shouted down as “conspiracy theorists”.

Actually, that conspiracy too is being written out of history and I’ll tell you how. Do you remember the film Lincoln from 2012? Produced and directed by Steven Spielberg, if that indicates anything to you. In the 2016 Presidential debates, I recall Hillary cited the film as if it was actual history. No one I was watching with was similarly scandalized. I never actually saw the film, but do want to know how wiki summarizes the part of the plot where the assassination takes place?

On April 14, Lincoln meets members of his cabinet to discuss future measures to enfranchise blacks, before leaving for Ford's Theatre. That night, while Lincoln's son Tad is watching a play at Grover's Theatre, the manager stops the play to announce that the President has been shot. The next morning, at the Petersen House, Lincoln dies with a peaceful expression across his face….

A heart-rending narrative of American bullshit. There was no conspiracy because Spielberg and the screenwriters did not deign to give us one. The film isn’t historical—it is how history is written, understand?

Here we begin the exercise in efficiency. Knowing what you know now about Lincoln, if you had the opportunity to try to inform a fellow truth-seeker about what was “really going on” with the assassination, how much of the wiki page on it would be important to your case? Not very much at all, right? Yet it distills God knows much work of historians on the event. Virtually worthless.

The same applies to a lesser extent to what I might call “suppressed mainstream scholarship”. It’s drawn from all the same sources using all the same methods as conventional scholarship, but it somehow never gets discussed because it clashes with the mainstream narrative.

Contrary to that narrative, Lincoln was a tyrannical jerk. A site that has a lot of such research is run by Lew Rockwell, former Chief of Staff for Ron Paul, and you might like to begin with this search on his site. I particularly recommend the work of Thomas DiLorenzo. You may wish to look up his video presentations on YouTube about Lincoln and other subjects.

Even all that material must be reconsidered with the knowledge that Lincoln was a lifelong pawn embedded in a larger game. It’s very hard to say what Lincoln “did” or “thought”, because you wonder what forces were manipulating him behind the scenes. Crucially, you would only be able to discern those forces if you knew they existed, right?

So we have seen that the mainstream authorizes us to believe certain conspiracies, and that these authorizations may also be revoked. At the level of “conspiratorial” conspiracies (again, there are no terms for this), there are a range of theories more in keeping with the connotation of “not discussed in the mainstream to this day”. A good selection of them is here:

LINCOLN ASSASSINATION THEORIES: A SIMPLE CONSPIRACY OR A GRAND CONSPIRACY? (Roger J. Norton)

What to say about them? It’s not so much that they’re wrong, it’s that they’re not right. They may be made of all true and important facts, yet none ever get at the vital truths of the event. Well, okay, they tried their best, right? Similar to Norton is the legendary Dave McGowan. While his major works are mentioned quite frequently, I’ve never once heard anyone mention his magisterial 12-part series on:

WHY EVERYTHING YOU THINK YOU KNOW ABOUT THE LINCOLN ASSASSINATION IS WRONG (Center for an Informed America)

It’s about as good as you’ll get from any conspiracy researcher and he has a well-deserved reputation. Dave, though, never really “cracked the code”. I suppose it just never occurred to him it was all a hoax. As much research as he’d done—even on the Moon Landing hoax—was it still outside his Overton Window that the Lincoln assassination was also faked? I found one single comment on the final installment saying this:

All these comments and to some extent McGowan’s writings suggest that Lincoln died from injuries suffered on April 14, 1865. Did he?

No, Kent, he did not. Anyway, skim through Dave’s writeup and ask yourself—knowing what you know now—how much of it you would feel vital to pass along at the next conspiracy cocktail party. Again, I’m trying to make a point about efficiency in research.

But past efficiency there is a huge problem: off-target conspiracy theory opens a perfect vector for disinformation. We don’t see it much with Lincoln since the event is so old, but all the high-profile JFK assassination research is such disinformation. It’s all true and it’s all tantalizing and it will get you exactly nowhere and it has worked perfectly since 1963. That’s why the CIA wrote it.

Bonus: I stumbled into another one. As I mentioned, I never watched Lincoln and I was browsing through the very long cast list to see who was in it. Fifth from the bottom—so far down I suspect his name was never spoken in the movie itself—was “Asa-Luke Twocrow as Lieutenant Colonel Ely S. Parker”. You gotta be kiddin me. After a bit of research, I have three things to say about this guy.

First, yes, he’s definitely one of “those” Parkers. You’ll see he was all tied up with a guy named Lewis H. Morgan. If you’re thinking, “Haha, as in JP?”, yes. They actually admit that right on Lewis’ page.

Second, you’ll notice that he’s Native American, or at least he ain’t white. That recalls something Mark Passio mentioned about the Satanists he had been involved with. He said they were of all races, all ethnicities, rich, poor, young, old, all types of occupations. All the Parkers I’ve dug up so far have been white, but we can see there’s no prohibition on intermarriage or perhaps adoption.

Third, you know how I always say these Salem Witches operate from just outside the spotlight? Turns out Ely was Ulysses S. Grant’s right-hand man in the Civil War (i.e. War of Northern Aggression). He even “wrote much of Grant's correspondence”.

This phenomenon, of being just outside the center and unnoticed, frequently reminds me of another film. In Forrest Gump, Tom Hanks (you will recall from the last post Abe’s mother was born Nancy Hanks) shows up in the background of all kinds of famous historical events.

Well, have you ever taken a close look at the iconic lithograph of when Lee Surrenders to Grant at Appomattox? Just like he was fifth from the bottom of the cast list, take a look at who is fifth from the right in that picture. Seriously, I don’t think I’m going too far to say that all of mainstream history needs to be reconsidered.

Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: “They” have been anything but honest with us about just who “Honest Abe” really was. Surprised or not surprised? Far from being a poor boy who wanted to work hard and save the Union, Lincoln was born into the Small Club You Ain’t In and has surprising connections to all kinds people. “They” always prefer to use family members as their stooges because they are surrounded from birth by people they know and trust. In the bonus, research on a toy shows we just cannot get away from “Them”.

Advisory: Sorry this is so long but perhaps it’s some indication of how much history has not been written down in history books.

The first question might be: why would you even care about this dude that got smoked a century and a half ago? Competing for first question: why would I care? Or, how did I come to be writing about this guy? As always, I stumbled into all this.

I was writing a post about a famous event that few know was a grand historical hoax, focusing on the disinformation obscuring important truths even in the limited hangout exposing it as a hoax:

Lincoln's Assassination was also a manufactured event (Miles Mathis 2/19/2014 36-page PDF)

Mathis is, of course, all about deep genealogy and esoteric matters, stuff that might require you to have a library card. In contrast, almost all of the stuff I’m about to point out to you is right in Wikipedia. My interpretation—which you are free to reject—is that the “Miles Mathis” writing team, rather than limiting that part of their hangout, actually did not themselves possess the fuller picture and did not realize the importance of what they were handing over. That’s a danger of compartmentalization.

We should begin with what They most love to hand us because it’s what we most love to hear: a “rags-to-riches” story:

Abraham Lincoln's Boyhood; Raised in the Poorest of Circumstances. (THE DIGITAL RESEARCH LIBRARY OF ILLINOIS HISTORY JOURNAL 3/26/2021)

No boy ever began life under less promising auspices than young Abraham Lincoln. The family was very poor!

Be sure to take a look at the third photo, captioned, “Twenty-one-year-old Abraham Lincoln moved to Illinois with his family in March 1830. Digital image from an 1865 b&w film negative.” I should correct myself and say “drawing”, because it very obviously is. I also seriously doubt anyone in 1865 took a photo of that pen-and-ink drawing.

As another rule of narrative-building, when it may be tough to cover up a “riches-to-more-riches” story, they first sell us a “riches-to-rags” story. From Abe’s wiki:

Lincoln's father bought multiple farms in Kentucky but could not get clear property titles to any, losing hundreds of acres in legal disputes. In 1816, the family moved to Indiana, where land titles were more reliable.

Cool story about land titles, bro. Anyway, back at the log cabin here’s mom blowing sunshine at this young loser doomed to grinding lifelong poverty:

Once [his mother] said to him: "Abraham, learn all you can, and grow up to be of some account. You've got just as good Virginian blood in you as George Washington had." Abraham never forgot this.

And this is what They would like you to forget: Abe really was descended from the Harrison family of Virginia. It includes a Founding Father, three Presidents, and Elvis (who was another big project). Nor do I believe this to be some tangential connection, since we are told:

Another York County line begins with Richard Harrison (1600–1664) from Essex, England.

The Salem Witches were primarily from Essex, England and created Essex County, Massachusetts as some sort of replica of it. A “new” England indeed. Further, I consider that the more important part of Abe’s blood for our purposes was not Virginian but Massachusite. The Lincoln family rooted itself all the way back in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Yes, they have their own wiki page just like every other family without promising auspices.

The progenitor, Samuel Lincoln, arrived in 1637. The families I’ve been researching arrived during the Puritan Great Migration, particularly in the 1635-40 time frame. They sometimes say Samuel was himself a Puritan, pointing out that succeeding generations all had Biblical names. I am working under the thesis that all these families were generational Satanists, so perhaps we need not be too precise as to public religious identifications.

Samuel settled in Hingham, Massachusetts. Where is that, you ask? Well, if you stood on the shore of Hingham Bay and looked due north over the water, about 20 miles away would be Salem. Whaddaya know. But maybe Samuel was just one of “your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free”, huh? If so, then this would be mere happenstance:

Samuel's mother also belonged to a family long associated with the American government: the Gilmans of Exeter, New Hampshire. Samuel's mother Bridget Gilman was the daughter of Edward Gilman of Hingham, Norfolk, England, whose son Edward Gilman Jr. emigrated to Hingham, Massachusetts, later to Ipswich, Massachusetts, and finally to Exeter, where he and his family became prominent businessmen, elected officials and, later, ardent Revolutionary War patriots. Nicholas Gilman, a signer of the U.S. Constitution, was a member of this family.

Okay, so your “out”, at this point, is that perhaps all this spooky Elite shit wore off through the several generations between Samuel and Abraham, right? Nope, it’s gets worse! Abe’s mother was Nancy Lincoln. She was born Nancy Hanks. Yes, “that” Hanks! They admit right on her page that she’s related to Tom Hanks. No one would contest his inclusion on the Mt. Rushmore of Hollyweird Creeps, am I right?

In the same “Notable relatives” section, you’ll find a surprise: Camille Olivia Hanks, who is the wife of Bill Cosby. It’s too long to go into but the whole Cosby affair was another psyop, and now you see it didn’t come purely out of left field. Did you ever take a look at his primary accuser, Andrea Constand? Google up some pics and I think you’ll notice what I did. Also, look up information on the case and you’ll see them carefully steer around any specific mention of customary male-female sexual congress. IOW, the old PIV. Now you know why.

You’ll also find George Clooney there. He’s the most obvious Intelligence asset in Hollywood today, isn’t he? Also, take a look at the wiki for his wife, Amal Clooney. Her backstory screams that she’s another Intelligence asset.

Now, I won’t argue the point but I just wanted to mention a suspicion I’ve long harbored. Take a good look at Amal’s picture next to George’s. Does it strike you that she is a younger female version of George himself? IOW, a gender-flipped clone-y? He would finally be able to make love to himself. Too far? Too far by me or by him?

So that was Abe’s mom, but did you know he had a stepmom? She was born—get this—Sarah Bush. Coinkydink? I don’t think so. Let’s put two and two together and see what we get. Her father:

Christopher Bush, a settler of Dutch ancestry, was a financially well-off slave patrol captain. Described as "a stirring, industrious man," he owned more than two thousand acres of Kentucky land.

And my mom always said slave-patrolling didn’t pay well. Dutch, though, huh? Here’s who we find on the page for Dutch Americans:

George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush, 41st and 43rd Presidents, respectively. They count members of the Schuyler family and the related Beekman family among their ancestors.

I don’t think they would ever admit that these Bushes are the same as the other Bushes, but I’m marking it down as “provisionally true”. For confirmation, we’ll have to wait for an official denial. Let me also note this coincidence, though: that page also lists Theodore Roosevelt. He became President when William McKinley was shot. Know who was on-scene at that assassination? Robert Todd Lincoln. Moving on….

Can you guess the name of where Abe moved to when he first went out on his own? It’s now called Lincoln's New Salem. C’mon, no one could make this up! It writes itself.

We’re finally getting down to it. Abe’s wife was Mary Todd Lincoln. Her mother was born Elizabeth Ann Parker. We have found this to be the most prominent name of all the Salem Witches, have we not?

You will still need your list of people of the Salem witch trials, because we next find out Mary’s great-grandfather was Andrew Porter, another Hero of the Revolution. His first wife was another woman named Eliza Parker. I would also highlight from his page that with his second wife, he had a daughter:

Elizabeth Rittenhouse Porter (1769–1850), who married Robert Porter Parker (1760–1800) and was the grandmother of Mary Todd Lincoln.

Makes me wonder if Kyle was also not just some rando. In any case, we can see how They like to “keep it in the family”.

To round out the final act (<- get it?) of Lincoln’s life, the assassination, here is what we have: Mary Todd (a Parker) sitting next to Abe, Robert Todd (a Parker) who was supposed to have been there, policeman John Frederick Parker who abandoned his post outside the door, and shooter John Wilkes Booth. The other couple in the box, Henry Rathbone and his fiancée Clara Harris were actually step-siblings. His mother and her step-mother was Pauline Penney. The witness to Booth entering the theater box was Navy Surgeon Dr. George Brainerd Todd. Nobody even asks whether he was related to Mary, but c’mon. That’s how low the bar on research really is. Abe was succeeded by Andrew Johnson.

Bonus: Although in the age of screens it’s sure to soon become extinct, a popular toy for a century has been Lincoln Logs. Fun as they may be, it occurred to me that they were created to cement this bullshit “Honest Abe born in a log cabin” narrative. They really are that devious, aren’t They? To be honest, I predicted they would have been sold by Parker Brothers. Not so.

It turns out they were created by John Lloyd Wright, second son of Frank Lloyd Wright. I would think that if you asked anyone to name an architect, his would be the first one out of their mouths (if any, that is). Now Jeez, Frank couldn’t be in on all this, could he?

Get this: the very first thing about him, in oh-so-characteristic fashion for these shadowy Elites, is that there is confusion over exactly what his name was. That’s how shadowy they are. In 1987, a biographer suggested his name may have actually been "Franklin Lincoln Wright". Ohhh, Lincoln, huh? Beyond that, we must recall that the main witness at the Salem Witch Trials was Bethshua Folger, maternal aunt of Benjamin Franklin. Mere coincidence? Let’s keep looking.

Frank’s father, William Wright, was a minister that supposedly could not hold down a job or some such thing, and as a result the family moved literally all over the map: Wisconsin, Iowa, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts. In fact, we are told William was originally from the Bay State, and in 1874 had a pastorate in Weymouth, Massachusetts. Know where that is? Right next door to Hingham, where Samuel Lincoln settled so long ago in time and in this post. Huh.

Anyway, Frank’s first gig is as an intern. He’s constantly short of money because of his expensive tastes, although we’re not told how he got expensive tastes in the first place. To make up the shortfall, he accepts independent commissions to design at least nine houses. They are eventually built and known by the names of the purchasers. Some of them still stand today and one of them is the Robert P. Parker House. I wonder if his friends called him “Robbie”?

Anyway, the Lincoln Logs thing wasn’t so crazy after all, was it? Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: A roundup of revelations related to the event that led to the US in WWI. Please stay tuned for the bonus, where I’ll tell you something you’ve never heard the (real) Trump assassination attempt.

Somewhere along the line I realized there was something odd about World War I (1914-1918): nobody ever talked about it. I could probably name 50 pop culture works based on WW2, but only All Quiet on the Western Front (1929) that takes place in the prequel. Actually, there was also a movie on Netflix about the “Christmas truce” (12/24-26/1914), but They don’t want anyone to know that human beings are allergic to war and love peace much better, so I’m surprised it was made in the first place.

Then there’s the whole deal about how it all started. I mean, how odd is it that there are lots of people who could tell you it was precipitated by the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, but yet have no clue whatsoever how that could have possibly led to the US fighting in a giant war on another continent. What the hell did Franz Ferdinand do to Americans? Or for Americans? The whole thing is compounded when you find out it was a laughable hoax (Miles Mathis 11/20/2021 11-page PDF).

I think you will come to recognize the same rule I have: when the effect of a psychological operation has been achieved, They let it die. If left alive in the public imagination, the only thing that’s going to happen is that someone will come along and stir up inconvenient truths. Haha, that’s what we’re going to do right here with the Lusitania!

Another point: it’s Conspiracy 101 to recite that the Gulf of Tonkin incident was the hoax that sparked the Vietnam War. Bonus points for name-checking Rear Admiral George Stephen Morrison, father of Jim Morrison of The Doors. But what about the incident that sparked the US into World War I?

You see, the Vietnam War was a regional conflict with a lot of brown people killing brown people way out in the jungle. Not to be racist about this, but World War I, by comparison, was white Christians in Europe murdering each other on a mechanized industrial scale. You can compare the stats on deaths and casualties, both military and civilians, and find that there is no comparison. If America is so racist, WWI is the one we should all care about, right? How weird is it that there’s so little attention to the far larger conflict? There is also the fact that it was just the setup to the somehow far more bloody World War 2.

All that said, let’s give it some of the attention it deserves, beginning at the beginning of the part that finally ropes in the Americans, the Sinking of the RMS Lusitania on May 7, 1915….

I always resist doing this but since—as I have just finished so laboriously saying—this part of history is so unfamiliar to most, I have to “give you the answer” before we examine the subtle evidence. I called it a “false flag” but it should be more properly called a “provocation”. There’s just so much lying involved that “false flag” seems more fitting.

In any case, they loaded up the Lusitania with literally tons of contraband munitions and thousands of innocent people that just wanted to get across the ocean. The German embassy took out advertisements to warn people not to sail on it, but the US State Dept quashed almost all of them. Near Ireland, a German U-boat put a torpedo into the ship, and that set off some of those munitions causing a huge secondary explosion. Whereas big ships hit by a single torpedo took hours to sink or did not sink at all, the Lusitania sank very quickly causing a huge loss of life. That included 128 Americans and that was enough. Hey there, basically isolationist and strongly of Germanic ancestry America, welcome to WWI.

First, you might be surprised to find that Wikipedia admits to a lot of that scenario, although in a less-than-direct way. The thing is, since a major motion picture like Titanic has not been made about Lusitania, probably about 98% of the US population has no idea any of this took place. For a longer version of events (but lacking the deep conspiracy we’ll get into later), please see:

The Lusitania: The Ship That Helped Launch Millions of Deaths (revisionist.net)

Next we go to the most modern and advanced of disinformation by our old familiar friend:

The Sinking of the Lusitania was Faked (Miles Mathis 3/2/2021 16-page PDF)

I had actually stopped reading Mathis for a year and a half by the time this was published, so I didn’t know it existed until yesterday. Certainly, there are truths in the paper and you should examine it for those truths, but here are the bullshit angles he’s pushing: (1) everything is fake, (2) everything was done by British aristocrats, (3) British aristocrats are secretly Jews, and (4) by Jews he means the Phoenician Navy. We don’t have time to fully address those points, but if you’re inclined to accept them, I don’t think you need to bother reading any further. What I’ll be telling you are the things I would claim such disinfo is to keep you from discovering.

By the way, as discussed in several previous posts, I maintain that the sinking of the Titanic and all subsequent events related to it were an utter hoax. None of it ever happened and there’s no wreck at the bottom of the ocean. This is to say I have no reservation in principle that such things can be successfully faked. Not here, though.

You see, if you can read up on all this and think all the info was planted to fool the handful of people that are aware of it, well, I don’t know what I could say to you. For example, while Mathis gets you all caught up in numerology, you would have to imagine all this background was manufactured:

The Lusitania Was "45,000 Tons Of Live Bait": How The War Party Triggers War Fever (David Stockman)

I mean, “They” just never put in that kind of effort into their bullshit backstories because they know for a fact no one is looking. One novel item I would submit into the body of “Lusitania conspiracy” (and of which Mathis has nothing to say) is that the whole thing was a setup from the jump. From that last article:

In 1913, Churchill called in the head of Cunard and said Lusitania would have to be refitted for a war he predicted would break out in September 1914.

Good guess, Winnie. But even long before that, from the wiki for the Cunard Line we find:

In 1902, White Star joined the American-owned International Mercantile Marine Co. In response, the British Government provided Cunard with substantial loans and a subsidy to build two superliners needed to retain Britain's competitive position.

White Star would christen the Titanic in a decade. There really is a boatload to say about all things Titanic, and if you want to open up that kettle of fish, you’d have to start at my latest post on it and deep-dive your way backwards through the links:

Let’s put the spotlight on James Cameron: the Titanic hoax, the Manson false flag, the Salem Witch Trials, and a secret son? (conspiracies.win 4/9/2025)

What I’m pointing towards is that we’re dealing with a tight little group moving all these pieces around on the chessboard. It’s as close to “They” are you’re going to get, and they have operated for centuries in a covert underworld. I’d link you to the “conspiracy alternate history book” for the full context of what I’m writing but none such has ever been written. Really, it’s what we’re painstakingly doing now and why these posts are so long. Anyway, way down the line Their chess moves end up as unrelated “historical events”.

If you’ve read previous posts, you know I always say these Salem Witch chess-piece-movers work just outside the spotlight, right? Well, guess what: I spotted one just outside the spotlight. The wiki on the sinking says this:

At about 11:52 on 7 May, the ship received another warning from the Admiralty, probably as a result of a request by Alfred Booth, who was concerned about Lusitania….

Does he sound like a mover? Does to me. That’s the first mention of him but his name isn’t hot-linked, which is quite anomalous considering he does indeed have a wiki page: Alfred Allen Booth. Yep, we’re back to bolding because we just found names on the list of people of the Salem witch trials.

Want more connections? You got it. Alfred’s mom was Lydia Allen Butler. One of his daughters was Mary Blake Dwight. His maternal grandfather was Benjamin Franklin Butler. Ben Franklin’s aunt, Bethshua Folger, testified at the trials.

Now, do I really think that Alfred Booth was a relative of the Booths involved in the Salem Witch Trials and other historical fabrications, and who are generational Satanists, and who did all this nefarious shit for years culminating in the sinking of the Lusitania and the deaths of 1200 people in May 1915, and which led further to America’s entry into WWI and many more deaths?

Booth was created a baronet in 1916 by Prime Minister H. H. Asquith for supporting Britain's war effort and services to industry.

Yes, yes I do.

I’m sure by now that the name John Wilkes Booth has come to mind. There’s a case to made that he was of the same Booth family so it’s no surprise that Lincoln's Assassination was also a manufactured event (Miles Mathis 2/19/2014 36-page PDF). In fact there’s much more to be said about the Booths which will have to wait, including that the Booths are related to—get this—the Gores of melted polar ice cap fame.

Bonus: What about the Trump assassination, widely considered—even by some normies—to be fake? People actually seem to take pride in believing that, as if they have seen through the curtain. You may end up with as low an opinion as I do of that theory and of those who subscribe to it after reading this.

Remember Alfred Booth’s maternal grandfather, Benjamin Franklin Butler? I haven’t done the full genealogical work, but I feel certain he’s related fairly closely to this guy: General Richard Butler, a hero of the Revolutionary War. In fact, he’s famous enough to have a town named after him, although I suspect you never heard of it until recently: Butler, Pennsylvania. Ring a bell? What a coincidence, huh? There’s more.

If you’re a regular reader of my posts, you know I go on and on about the Parker family, and how they’re the most prominent of these generational Satanists I’ve ever unearthed, and yada yada yada, even back to the Salem Witch Trials, right?

It just so happens that one of Benjamin Franklin Butler’s great-grandmothers was Deborah Parker. General Richard Butler’s mother was Eleanor Parker. BTW, guess who predicted there would be an attempt on Trump’s life two days before it happened? Craig Hamilton-Parker:

Psychic who envisioned Trump assassination attempt gives his US election prediction (Metro 7/21/2024)

And to wrap it all around to the subject at hand, from the revisionist.net article linked at the top:

Sir Gilbert Parker, the member of the British propaganda bureau in charge of information and propaganda aimed at the USA, used the occasion to rush the infamously dishonest “Bryce Report of German Atrocities” into print within five days after the sinking, with the sole aim of bringing the USA into the war on Britain’s side.

C’mon now, you really cannot make this shit up, can you? You kind of want to throw up when you accept that no, no one made it up.

Thanks, as always, for reading.

TL;DR: We’ll compare someone everyone is talking about, Peter Thiel, with someone no one is talking about, Sean Parker. This is basically a counter-intelligence analysis, featuring he of whom you’re not really supposed to be aware.

Advisory: If you are already satisfied that you know what the dealio is with all things Thiel, you will find nothing of value here. Reading further will only make you upset so, you know, that’ll be on you if it happens.

Peter Thiel and Palantir are the talk of the conspiracy town, fear-mongered and condemned in all corners of the conspir-o-sphere. Frankly, that alone should be enough to tell you that there’s no there there.

What do I have to say about Thiel and Palantir? Pretty much nothing. That’s exactly what I would have said before the Mighty Wurlitzer cranked up a few months ago to play us a tune, first about Thiel and now about Palantir. I had barely heard of Thiel before then, and I have almost no idea what Palantir does. Now they’re mentioned everywhere and I find it dismaying that no one finds this suspicious. But let me amplify on all this.

As to Thiel, in a minute I’ll link to a podcast that includes some alarming(!) remarks by him about the End Times. Or something like that, because I wasn’t listening closely. You see, if you want to hear some half-formed claptrap comments about the End Times or anything else, you can find about 200/day on r/conspiracy. The only reason you’re hearing Thiel’s comments is that they’re being pushed in your face while you’re being instructed on how alarming(!) they are.

Palantir is some kind of tech company, something to do with surveillance I think. You know who else had tech? The KGB, and the Cheka before them. Think of all the damage they did with their tech: filing cabinets, typewriters and bakelite phones. If only someone had sounded that alarm(!), huh?

The tech, in and of itself, is never the problem. I would guess that the most awake tovarishchi of the USSR would tell you that it was lack of awareness of the threat that was the problem. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn said as much in one of his most famous quotes.

So “They” will push any manner of alarming(!) narrative at you, hoping you’ll buy into at least one or maybe just waste all your time carefully deciding which to pick. It’s as pointless as discussing the KGB’s typewriters. An important observation is that “Corona” (one of the most prominent brands of typewriter, children) means “crown”. Obviously referring to the British Royal family, which takes us to Vlad the Impaler, and…. Okay, see what I mean?

The object, plainly (to me, anyway), is to blackwash all things Trump. There are “nefarious doings” afoot. They don’t care what you think those doings are. You’re free to make them up and that’s exactly what people do. But okay, I get it, up to this point has been a lot of hand-waving, so let’s get some sauces and hot-links going because that seems more persuasive.

Do you remember when we first started hearing the music out of the Wurlitzer about Thiel? It was after Trump named JD Vance as his running mate. The basic tune targeted conspiracy bros and went something like, “Know how all these Silicon Valley tech gurus are sus and evil, bro? Well, did you know that JD Vance used to work for Peter Thiel? That’s the blood boy guy from ‘Silicon Valley’, bro!”

That’s about all they could say. Weird, yes, but mostly because it’s unfamiliar. A lot of people who have received blood transfusions admit they understand what Thiel is talking about. Blood doping has been around a long, long time. If you want to get freaked out, read up on the Lance Armstrong doping case, where you’ll be upset to find out:

More upsetting to many were reports that he forced others to dope, even to be on the team.

There’s nothing to be gained—from an agitprop perspective—by promoting any of that, so why would either the mainstream or online shills tell us about it? That’s not what they’re paid for. The blood stuff was all an aside anyway because the point is JD Vance’s guilt-by-association with Peter Thiel. On that wiki page, you’ll find that Vance is mentioned in the text a total of… one time:

Two of said senatorial candidates (Blake Masters (who lost his race) and later U.S. Vice President JD Vance) were also tech investors who had previously worked for Thiel.

That single mention is, as you can see, quite literally parenthetical. But let’s take a look at someone mentioned (non-parenthetically) five times in the text, whose name just never seems to come up in any of this Thiel talk: Sean Parker. We discussed him before in this post:

How generational Satanists took control of what goes in your ears (bonuses: a demonically-possessed novelty podcasting light and a connection to Sandy Hoax) (conspiracies.win 10/16/2024)

The focus there was his impact on society through Napster and Spotify. The focus here is on his other big project, Facebook, and that’s exactly where he intersects with Thiel. Facebook is another source of enormous societal impact, isn’t it? We could go on and on about how socially corrosive it has been, all the data collection and psychological distortion, the experimentation and outright manipulation, the banging of high school gfs/bfs behind the back of wifey/hubby, etc, could we not? But they say nothing about any of that in relation to Thiel. FB is still an important weapon in their arsenal and They won’t badmouth it.

We need to begin with something boring: money. Namely, how much money did Parker walk away with from Napster? Well, Napster was always privately-held so there was no disclosure, and no one has ever casually mentioned a figure. From 2001 and into 2002, the company was in the endgame. Just two weeks before the curtain came down, Bertelsmann offered $85M but a judge forced them to liquidate instead. Did Parker and Shawn Fanning split something like that amount? Whatever it was, it must have been some goodly ducats, right?

The reason I bring this up is to argue that the involvement of Peter Thiel was never for anything more than to occult (haha) Parker’s central role. You see, all Thiel did was give them half a million bucks way back in 2004. Technically, his investment was only a convertible note—bridge financing, a sort of short-term loan—and he had no part in running the company. He got a board seat a few months later but you’ll see that was probably for his “Rolodex”, as Silicon Valley types say.

The thing is, Parker was president of the company. Do you really think he could not float it $500k? Seriously? He’d prefer to sell off 10% of the company? None of us are SV tycoons (I don’t think) but that sounds like a load of bullshit to me. Aren’t we supposed to think billionaires—which Parker would soon become—are all greedy a-holes? Maybe not Parker, huh, just giving away the store?

Now let me juxtapose some things for you to judge. We are being told to think Thiel is central to the “Dark Enlightenment” project, which now includes Vance and Bannon and Trump himself, but is said to stretch back to Fascist Italy. Know when that wiki page stretches back to? A month ago. Isaac Weishaupt has swallowed all this hook, line, sinker, fishing pole, and boat. He congratulates himself for raising the alarm(!), and dismisses all the h8rs for questioning whether he’s really quite got it right on this one.

Alternatively, we can believe that Thiel is the Antichrist, or maybe his forerunner, or perhaps just thinks the AC is a cool dude, and also that Thiel is trying to bring on Armageddon or something. As I mentioned, I was not listening closely but this line is being flogged by James Corbett:

Episode 481 – Antichrist or Armageddon? (Corbett Report 7/4/2025)

I don’t want to plant any ideas, but James becomes, with each passing episode, audibly more frantic for anyone to buy into his “research”. For some time now, I’ve recognized the trend where “They” are becoming more willing to burn their assets because there’s no tomorrow if They don’t come out on top. That podcast has become my new hate-listen, but I do it for COINTEL.

Let’s look again at how evil genius Thiel figures into Facebook, that most diabolical of Big Tech projects. Surely it is part of the Dark Enlightenment/Armageddon/Choose Your Own Adventure (although no one mentions it). We get something of a unique highlight from an article written by the man himself, Sean Parker:

The 100 Most Influential People: Reid Hoffman (Time 4/16/2015)

Back in 2004, when Mark Zuckerberg and I were starting Facebook, Reid Hoffman was the first person we called to fund the company…. He set us up with Peter Thiel and suggested that Peter join the Facebook board; Reid was too busy launching LinkedIn, but he agreed to give us our first funding anyway.

That’s right, Thiel was involved essentially tangentially. In fact, the wording makes it seem that Reid and not Thiel gave FB the money. Maybe there’s been some smearing of history.

Okay, so Facebook was Zuck and Parker, but Zuck is The Man, isn’t he? Everybody knows Facebook = Zuckerberg. Normies know that, FFS! Well, on Sean’s page we find this comment from a guy who would know something about it:

According to Peter Thiel, Parker was the first to see potential in the company to be "really big", and that "if Mark ever had any second thoughts, Sean was the one who cut that off".

Do we see now who was behind the wheel of this social and psychological rape van?

Let me wind up by giving you a list of things we’ve talked about: Peter Thiel, Palantir, KGB, Dark Enlightenment, Antichrist, Armageddon, Napster, Trump, Vance, Bannon, Facebook, blood boys. You can hate and fear any of them, or all of them together in combination. Make up whatever you like about them. Write a social media post, record a podcast, put a video up on YouTube. Many others have and no one will stop you.

Think about that for a minute, or maybe two. See what I did there? Is the Mighty Wurlitzer playing loud enough to drown out everything you should be aware of?

Thanks as always for reading these long posts!

This mainstream article exposes the schism. First note: the mainstream is not clever enough to paper over it.

CIA says Iran’s nuclear program ‘severely damaged’ by U.S. strikes President Donald Trump dismissed an earlier Defense Intelligence Agency assessment as inconclusive and premature. (NBC News 6/25/2025)

CIA Director John Ratcliffe said Wednesday credible intelligence indicated that Iran’s nuclear program was “severely damaged” in recent U.S. airstrikes and that several key sites were “destroyed.”

A Defense Intelligence Agency initial assessment leaked Tuesday found that the U.S. bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites may have set back the country's nuclear program by only several months, a more limited impact than President Donald Trump stated after the strikes.

To properly analyze this, we have to put a black box around it and look at the effect it's having outside of that box.

DIA wants to maintain Israel's pretext for striking Iran in the first place, which ignited a war that was, in fact, ended by the US bombing itself.

As a separate issue, do I think that bombing actually took place? No, I do not, not at all. A complete fiction. Nor is it hard to figure out, and I conclude all these military/intelligence types know it well. I stipulate that people who should know better yet announce otherwise are lying.

This is, of course, something to be aware of as to a general understanding of the world and how it works, but the black box goes around that too. What actually took place is unimportant for the vast majority of the population, but only what they believe took place.

Back outside the box, Trump, Gabbard, Hegseth, and the CIA are saying Iran's nuclear program is done into the foreseeable future and the whole thing is over. No more military action by anyone is warranted. This brings a crisis: anyone who maintains otherwise must declare or imply that these others are incompetent or lying.

The DIA has already broken cover to do so. I concluded long ago that General Michael Flynn, late of the DIA, was a Deep State plant. A few others have finally started to get that. I thought he was an anomaly that just happened to be at the DIA, but now I conclude it is just another nest.

The next significant move is for Bibi to make. Maybe he'll say something like, "Hey you lying American dumdums, back my play as I continue this war." Sounds ridiculous, but (((they))) are usually willing to say anything as long as they can say more later.

I hate to point out information at odds with a Trump "truth" and every jackhole with a keyboard at r/conspiracy, but several hours after the purported attack, we should take a look at what the Iranians themselves are saying about this outrageous act of war that will surely lead to a regional conflagration.

The state-owned propaganda outlet aimed at the West, PressTV has exactly one article:

Iran's atomic body condemns American assault on nuclear sites, vows legal action (PressTV 6/22/2025)

In a strongly worded statement early Saturday morning, the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) condemned the aggression on the country’s nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, which have been claimed by the United States.

Slow down, Iran! What's next, a strongly-worded Letter to the Editor of the New York Times? They also apparently had to learn about it from Trump's tweet rather than things blowing up in Iran. They also failed to mention one of the obliterated sites.

Okay, what about the fiery Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, responsible for a big part of the problem with Iran to begin with? Two of their most important officers were killed (or were they?) in the first Israeli strike.

The IRGC is in charge of all the missiles currently raining down on Israel, and they're surely going to let us know about the Islamic fire and Jihadi fury that is soon to be raining down upon the Great Satan. Death to America! Here's comes the voice of vengeance in their semi-official press outlet, Tasnim News Agency.

As of this writing, there is not a single story on the "US attack". For the record, the top story is:

Iran Won’t Forgo Nuclear Rights: President (Tasnim News 6/21/2025)

I guess we'll just have to stay tuned for how they're going to smoke all the Amreekan infidels. They could not be bothered to comment on it yet.

TL;DR: In the same vein as Dave’s classic expose on Laurel Canyon, Devo does not seem to be just a bunch of musically talented weirdoes whose funky songs and robotic style earned them fame and fortune. Connections we find along their way help shine a light on the Spooky Underworld and bring the subliminal up over the threshold.

To begin, I’m a fan of Devo. I’ve actually had my suspicions about them for some years now, but resisted looking into the issue for fear of what I would find. After this research I found nothing you could really call nefarious.

That made me realize that an “evil new wave band” was as silly an idea as an “evil zookeeper” from Austin Powers. Not that Devo isn’t tied up in the Big Spiderweb--as we are soon to see-- but that not everything in the giant evil plan is itself evil. For all of us critical thinkers, that would be the “fallacy of division”, so I should have known that anyway. Then again, there is this:

The name Devo comes from the concept of "de-evolution" and the band's related idea that instead of continuing to evolve, mankind had begun to regress, as evidenced by the dysfunction and herd mentality of American society. In the late 1960s, this idea was developed as a joke by Kent State University art students Gerald Casale and Bob Lewis….

I always assumed that, yes, it was a joke that was then spun up as a marketing gimmick. But when you’re looking at their early years they sure seem to spend more time and attention on it than they would have if it was just some goof. I tend to now view that “They” introduced it to say, “We’re telling you to your faces that we’re reducing you to animals, and look how novel and edgy and entertaining you find it all. A herd you are indeed.” Am I taking that thought too far?

To begin with the “not just a new wave band” material, somewhere along the line I learned that Gerald Casale had been a student at the university during the Kent State Massacre on May 4, 1970.

I always assumed he just happened to be enrolled there at the time it took place. One time, I had been on campus at a university during a huge demonstration, but I had no idea it even took place until I read about it in the school paper the next day. I was in the library the whole time because I had shit to do. But here, Gerald was far closer to the situation:

Being involved with Freshman orientation at the KSU Honors College, he personally knew two of the victims, Jeffrey Miller and Allison Krause, and was near Krause when she was shot. Casale described that day in multiple interviews as being "the day I stopped being a hippie". Together with Bob Lewis, Casale used the shooting as a catalyst to develop the concept of De-evolution, forming the band Devo in 1973.

Welp, there it is: the whole deal came out of the Kent State event. And that brings up the big conundrum and puts it right in our faces:

The Kent State Massacre Never Happened (Miles Mathis 8/2/2017 (23-page PDF)

We have to square that circle, don’t we? The fake-itude of the massacre is not going to go. When you really look at all the famous pics, you can’t avoid seeing how phony they are. I’ve made this point before: no one notices because they are not really looking. So Gerald Casale is not just some rando college student, and now we have to take a closer look.

Well, TBH, what actually made me take a closer look was something I heard offhand in a podcast about Monsanto. I looked it up to confirm that I had heard correctly:

Monsanto Paying $80 Million Penalty for Accounting Violations (SEC 9/19/2023)

The SEC’s investigation found no personal misconduct by Monsanto CEO Hugh Grant and former CFO Carl Casale….

Okay, I looked and there’s almost no genealogical information available on either of these Casales, so we can’t prove or disprove they’re related. That’s par for the course, and I’m still surprised when I can actually make the hard genealogical connections. But really, that shared, nearly unique name makes you suspicious, doesn’t it? Let’s move on and see if there’s more. (There is.)

Devo gained some fame in 1976 when their short film The Truth About De-Evolution… won a prize at the Ann Arbor Film Festival. This attracted the attention of David Bowie, who began work to get the band a recording contract with Warner Music Group. In 1977, Devo were asked by Neil Young to participate in the making of his film Human Highway.

I trust that in these circles, we really don’t have to do more than mention the name David Bowie to associate him with the occult and his fake death. The guy is sus and we find him right here. Neil Young is not widely considered to be sus, but guess where he’s quoted praising Charles Manson? Dave McGowan’s Weird Scenes: Inside the Canyon:

“He had this kind of music that nobody else was doing. I thought he really had something crazy, something great. He was like a living poet.”

The Manson murders were another landmark hoax. As I’ve remarked before, sometimes this stuff seems to write itself. In any case, you can believe that Devo got their “big break” by attracting the attention of these two “music industry icons”, or that “this is what they were handed” using the influence of two “guys that were in on it”. You decide.

And you’ll need to do a lot more deciding because this is where we venture into the tall weeds. To be specific, these Salem Witches always manipulate events from just outside the spotlight. They stand there plain as day yet no one ever notices them. So what happens when we start looking around Devo? We saw his name earlier but I bet it got by you, so here’s a quote from Devo’s wiki:

The name Devo comes from the concept of "de-evolution" and the band's related idea that instead of continuing to evolve, mankind had begun to regress, as evidenced by the dysfunction and herd mentality of American society. In the late 1960s, this idea was developed as a joke by Kent State University art students Gerald Casale and Bob Lewis, who created a number of satirical art pieces in a devolution vein.

The joke is on us, I believe. So both the concept and later the band come from Robert Curtis Lewis. He just so happens to share a last name with Mercy Lewis, who “played a crucial role during the Salem witch trials in 1692, when 20 people were executed for witchcraft, including her former master, George Burroughs.” Imagine the coincidence. But maybe it is, though, huh? Is there anything unusual about ordinary composer and musician Bob?

In the 1980s, while working as a consultant in Damascus, Syria, he was Middle East Correspondent for Rolling Stock magazine….

Oh, uh, whaddaya know. Nothing spooky about that, just covering music for Rolling Stone in the Middle East, right? Wait, no, that was Rolling Stock:

Rolling Stock was a newspaper of ideas and a chronicler of the 1980s published in Boulder, Colorado…. The paper had a regional motif, but featured correspondents covering the world, including Woody Haut on Labor….

Listen, if that doesn’t scream “Intelligence front” to you, then I don’t even know how you came to be reading this. Boulder is a suburb of Denver and that place is super spooky, a main hub for Them. If you’re unfamiliar, a fun writeup is Exposing the Dark World: There’s something very strange about “Evergreen” (conspiracies.win 2/20/2024). But did you catch the rather uncommon name of the first listed writer, Woody Haut? Ring a bell?

He shares the surname of 1st Lt. Walter G. Haut, public information officer at the 509th Bomb Group and close personal friend of base commander Col. William H. Blanchard at the time of the Roswell Incident. That was one of “Their” capstone false flags, paying massive dividends up to this very day. Haut was absolutely crucial as the man who wrote the fateful press release on the orders of Col. Blanchard. Lots more about the whole hoax in this key post:

Broomstick Crash at Roswell: A shocking number of people involved in the “Incident” have the same last name as people involved in the Salem Witch Trials (conspiracies.win 12/6/2024)

There’s no genealogy, but I wouldn’t expect any since “Woody Haut” is more or less a fake person. If I had to guess at his existence as an actual person, then based on ages he’s Walter’s nephew. The rest is just Intelligence legend.

Take a look at this page: Woody Haut's Blog: About me. Do you think that’s the actual photo of an actual writer looking to promote their work? We’re also never told about the odd transition from international/regional labor commentator to noir fiction author. I’d complain that it’s all insulting but no one is paying close enough attention to be insulted, which is how they get away with it.

Now for this last part, if you want to try to sort out what names are real and who got what fake name from where, go ahead but I don’t think that’s important. I just want to bring the pieces into close juxtaposition. It centers around the fairly uncommon name “Woody”.

To begin, back in about 1992 or 1993, the fiction writers of the Roswell event realized that they had left a plot hole in the narrative. It’s a bit complex to understand the problem, but they sought to patch it over with more “newly discovered” narrative. That came in the 1994 book by disinfo peddlers Kevin Randle and Donald Schmitt, The Truth About the UFO Crash at Roswell (includes downloadable versions). The pertinent invention is on page 3:

South of Roswell, William Woody was watching the night sky with his father when he spotted a white light with red streaks in it. It glowed brilliantly and, unlike (he many meteors he had seen in the past, took a long time to fall. It was brighter than any of those other meteors, and according to Woody, the wrong color.’

The father is never given a name and William Woody has no existence outside the pages of the book, because narratives don’t need infinite detail. So let’s get this straight: On July 4th, William Woody happens to see a UFO. Four days later, Walter Haut writes a false/true press release about the crash of presumably that very same UFO. Decades later, we come across Woody Haut who turns out to be a spooky, ephemeral character. Coincidence?

My final offering on this is to address the question of the original source of the name “Woody”. It’s a rare surname, but is found slightly less rarely as the short form of “Woodrow” (Harrelson) or sometimes “Heywood” (Allen). I can only attest that I have not come across any Woodys or Woodrows or Heywoods in my extensive research on these people.

All that I can offer is that in the list of people of the Salem witch trials, we find “Elizabeth Woodwell, age 33 and living in Salem” and Anne Wood Price Bradstreet. FWIW.

Final final note: If you think it’s possible all this was stitched together out of whole cloth, just googling up combinations of names and making something out of nothing, I would contend that’s extremely difficult. You just get stuff like the obituary of Roswell Woodrow "Woody" Hamlett. Try to find something beyond that he was born on Halloween. Rest in peace, Woody.

Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: It was a hoax, yes, but there are a lot of hoaxes. What will be illuminating is our examination of the context surrounding it, which is never discussed in DB Cooper research circles. Of course you know that’s the hallmark of how these “enduring mysteries” endure.

Fair warning: This is super long but I’m trying to take a 50-year-old baffling cold case and stomp it into a mudhole in the ground so it never gets back up. I’ll try to be brief but it will still take a bit.

To begin, let me say that I was never interested in D. B. Cooper or anything else in the “true crime” genre. If you choose to punch out now for that reason, go ahead, but I think even Cooper-ologists will miss out on aspects not discussed elsewhere.

Coming into contact with the case is unavoidable, as I’m sure you will agree, and now every conspiracy/true crime podcast out there has to do an episode on it as if it’s required by state law. I think the reason They ran the hoax in the first place had something to do with tightening the police state’s noose on peasants flying through the air. However, I think history has proven it to be more impactful due to the time wasted by people doing research on DB Cooper that has not and will not ever get them anywhere. Really, the mind boggles at the sheer number of conspiracist-hours down the toilet.

So somewhere along the line I heard about the recovered ransom money, and we’ll pause here to discuss the crucial role of “anomalous” evidence. Scientists know that not only must they account for all evidence, they should pay special attention to evidence that doesn’t fit in with accepted theory. When properly investigated, it can truly point the way towards new science. But since scientists don’t get funding for, “This thing didn’t work out like I thought,” pretty much zero of them do it nowadays.

Well, that money was anomalous. You see, there was just no plausible explanation I could come up with—no matter how I stretched my imagination—as to precisely how the money could have come to be where it was. I’m not talking about proof for any particular thesis, I’m talking about dreaming up a thesis at all. Turns out it’s hard to get the hard details (surprise) but what I was trying to make sense of was this situation:

$5,800 of airplane hijacker D. B. Cooper’s ransom money is found near the Columbia River on February 10, 1980. (History Link 8/6/2024)

So I let it go, which brings up an even more important point than anomalous evidence. At the time, my “Overton Window” (so to speak) for how the world could possibly work did not include as an available thesis, “Ohhhhhh, this whole fucking thing was fake, wasn’t it?” It’s a limitation of consciousness, really, and you should always strive to be aware of what you’re subconsciously ruling out as impossible.

In any case, I lived and learned about the shenanigans of the Spook Elites. As I was researching fake UFO incidents, I happened to encounter one of those innumerable Norjak podcast episodes. That’s when I came to realize that the DB Cooper incident had taken place in the same area I have come to think of as the Puget Sound Stronghold. There is a lot more material on it, but what I wrote up so far is here:

The Puget Sound Flap: Or, How the boring Kenneth Arnold UFO sighting blows up in your face in terms of Salem Witches (conspiracies.win 5/1/2025)

BTW, who downvotes such content? Could there be enemy infowarriors among us? Perhaps. Anyway, this DB Cooper materials adds to the pile we’re building on Puget Sound.

Since I mentioned the infowar, I might mention that I have never once heard it suggested from any researcher, given all the work they have done collectively on the case, that it has occurred to any of them it might have been faked. So, witting shills or the promotion of dimwit “experts”, you can see how the information war is really waged.

I will credit one of those podcasts for casually mentioning that at one point, there were only six other people on the plane besides DB. You see, they’re all too busy talking about cigarette butts and clip-on ties and parachutes and so forth, all the shit that I’m now telling you will get you nowhere. It took dozens of documentaries and podcasts before the fact that only a very tiny group was involved stuck in my consciousness.

At last, with the idea in mind that it may all have been phony, I tried to think up various scenarios as to how it took place. Another piece of anomalous evidence—never discussed, surprise—was DB’s very strange choice of outfit. A plain dark suit and tie for jumping out of an airplane into the forest at night?

It was late November in the Pacific northwest coming into night, and gear pretty much as rugged as you like would not have seemed out of place. In fact, while others were worried about getting drenched while walking to the plane, it was noted by a witness that DB appeared to have no such worries. Anomalous, right?

My explanation is that DB was not worried about walking to the plane because DB was not going to walk to the plane. At least, not the DB making a show of himself in the departure lounge. Plot twist! It turns out that a fringe theory on the case is that DB Cooper was the co-pilot, First Officer Robert “Bob” Rataczak:

Could The DB Cooper highjacking have been an elaborate simulation for an old fashion Ransom? Could he have just been the co-Pilot in sunglasses? Shouldn’t we consider this? (r/dbcooper 5/23/2017)

The idea is not fleshed out there, but what’s important to note is the comments: the OP gets absolutely hammered for even bringing it up. Remember we were talking about the infowar? I think the whole subreddit exists just to “keep the mystery alive”. For comparison, the thesis came up again on our old familiar stomping grounds—as heavily controlled and infiltrated as they are--and got a very warm reception:

No one ever jumped out of the plane! Meet Dan Cooper! It was an inside job! (r/conspiracy 6/2/2025)

You may even see my tiny contribution there, that it was a form of a stage magic trick. Let me here expand on my suggestion: DB did not disappear from the plane, he was never on it. Everyone incorrectly believes he was where he never actually was. This short video demonstrates the principle:

Vanishing a Quarter Into Thin Air (Scam Nation 10/22/2018 YouTube 5:40)

That video was originally from the “Scam School” podcast, which proposed to teach you fairly simple tricks you could use at the bar or at parties. I watched the entire run, hundreds of episodes I think, and never learned one single trick. You see, I ended up studying the principles those tricks were based on, and how our perceptions are manipulated, and how easily our “knowledge” comes to be incorrect. Highly recommended on that basis.

The “vanishing DB into thin air” effect goes basically like this: DB Cooper walks into the airport, buys a ticket, and makes sure he is seen at the departure lounge. As everyone is getting their shit together and boarding, DB just dips out. Who would notice such a thing? No one. There’s the trick: you know “for a fact” that everyone who buys a ticket gets aboard the plane (barring some mundane problem). But can we find any record of anyone testifying they saw him climb into the plane? Nope. No one even asks the question, you see.

Back to DB’s anomalous choice of outfit. As necessary, the co-pilot takes the flair off his uniform and suddenly he’s DB. Would people recognize him? Of course not. Could you describe the pilot and co-pilot of any jet you’ve been on? Also, you’ll find in the original witness statements that the “DB on the ground” was about 5’9” and the “DB in the air” was about 6’1”. Another anomaly never discussed.

At the end of the big caper, the flight crew walks off the plane with the money in their carry-ons. Who would check? The cash dropped away into the night, didn’t it? Years later, the money on the riverbank was planted to—again—“keep the mystery alive”. Dumb, but it has worked perfectly.

Perhaps that’s already enough to convince you of the fakery, but if you need that extra push over the cliff, then once again we find the Salem Witches at work. You’ll need your list of people of the Salem witch trials.

First things first: is a relative of Dan/DB Cooper on there? Well, we have every reason to believe he would and could and did give a fake name. He even said it was “Dan” but it got munged to “DB”. So what a coinkydink it is to find Elizabeth Cooper, born November 12, 1676 in Salem, Massachusetts. Yes, it seems there were Coopers in the tiny town of Salem at the time of the fake trials.

Were any Coopers—or anyone whose name doesn’t appear in the list—directly involved? It becomes hard to say because we know people (eg Robert Moulton III) have been left off the wiki list. Also, women’s maiden names are not frequently noted. I could do all the very tedious research, but I’m going more with, “Try to make yourself believe this is all mere happenstance.”

Moving on, the flight's pilot was Captain William Scott. You may be interested to know that one of the last group of witches of Salem to be fake hanged by the neck until not dead was Margaret Scott.

As far as my description of the magic trick, one person that would have definitely noted that DB Cooper did not board the plane would have been the gate agent, making little pen marks on his manifest or whatever they did in 1971. His name is rarely mentioned and hard to find (surprise) but it was Hal Williams. Perhaps we should hold a seance and ask Abigail Williams, “among the first of the children to falsely accuse their neighbors of witchcraft in 1692”, what she knows about all this. But whoa, I guess that would be witchcraft.

BTW, as far as the members of the crew who identified as female, good luck finding out if their last names were their maiden names or if they were married or what their mother’s maiden names were or anything else about them. So who knows. Tina Mucklow, the one that sat next to DB, apparently joined a nunnery later in life. Guilt? Again, who knows.

You’d think the FBI would have to be in on it. They seem to be in on a lot, and I think they were in on this too. Take a look at this Big List of FBI agents Associated with Norjak (Martin Andrade 9/22/2016). The second to last was Larry Carr, and I refer you to the supposedly witchery-afflicted “Ann Carr-Putnam Sr., age 31 and living in Salem Village/Danvers”.

As for the agents who handled the case for the first two decades, Charlie Farrell and Ron Nichols, there is a deeper connection and I’ll have to refer you to a longer writeup to find out what that’s all about. If you concur, though, that gives us three hits out of six FBI agents:

Dr. Joseph P. Farrell: a disinformation agent with unlikely connections to the Montauk Project, DB Cooper, and the Salem Witch Trials (conspiracies.win 5/29/2025)

Maybe we’ll call this the bonus: The final connection I located is the most unexpected and most mysterious, and therefore the most interesting. There was an enormous manhunt for DB, of course, taking tremendous resources and led by the Clark County Sheriff. Do you know what his name was? Try finding it, because it has very nearly been stricken from the record. It was tangentially mentioned in this old article about the retirement of his undersheriff:

Career of doing what ‘needed to be done’ comes to a close: After 47 years of EMS, fire district service, Tom McDowell's retirement well earned (The Columbian 7/27/2018)

Why the hell is Eugene Cotton so low-profile? Disturbing, isn’t it? Sort of indicates he was in on it too, right? Anyway, remember that cash that was found on the riverbank in Washington? Just some local yokel wandering the woods, right? Nope:

Mena man to sell D.B. Cooper cash (Arkansas Times 1/26/2006)

Mena? Hmm, where have I heard that tiny ville (pop ~5k) half a continent away mentioned before? Anyway, did you read the article about that lucky hick? You should have. The very last paragraph says:

Interestingly, there is another Arkansas connection to the D.B. Cooper episode. The county sheriff who led the manhunt in Washington state retired to Montgomery County years ago and his widow still lives in Norman.

Where is the absolutely miniscule (pop ~500) Norman? About 37 miles along Highway 8, leaving east out of Mena. It’s the next stop so you can’t miss it. Small world.

Final note: His surname is Cotton, which is not common at all, but my guess about the Shadowy Sheriff is that he somehow bears a relation to the guy I take as the Special-Agent-in-Charge of the whole Salem Witch Psyop, Cotton Mather. Hey, even if that was just a weird coincidence it would still be worth knowing.

Thanks for reading this very long one!

TL;DR: We expose another of the numerous disinfo agents running around these days. The first part is a dry examination we can do concerning any suspected agent. The second part is the moist, juicy center containing his strange connections to other famous (fake) events, which you are free to convince yourself are mere coincidence.

Where to begin with Dr. Farrell? We’ll begin at the end with what he does now. Even if you’re somewhat familiar with him, I wish to bring everything into sharp focus (which you will note is the opposite of what disinfo agents do). At his site Giza Death Star, we are told:

Giza Community is a community of speculation, commentary, and opinion centered around current events, history, humanities, and the sciences, and the written works and commentary of Dr. Joseph P. Farrell.

Now, that alone is very interesting not for what’s there, but for what’s not there but should be. I get it—that’s a hard thing to notice but I’ll get back to it. In the meantime, Take a look at his bibliography in Giza Death Star: About Joseph P. Farrell. His leadoff book was The Giza Death Star, published 1/1/2002. Amazon tells us:

This is physicist Joseph Farrellis' amazing book on the secrets of the Great Pyramid of Giza. Among the topics discussed in detail….

“Detail”? They spelled his name wrong and Farrell has evidently never caught that in 23 years. Also, Is Farrell a physicist? Not according to anything else you’ll see, but further down the page under “About the author” they confirm it with:

Joseph P. Farrell is a physicist and researcher who lives in Oklahoma.

Again, he has apparently never corrected or clarified any of this in 23 years. They also left out the first half of his career but, again, we’ll get to that.

Farrell has this drawn out, authoritative, professorial style. However, unlike almost every other teacher you had growing up, he’s not an asshole. He’s a smart, cool dude you could smoke a bowl with. That’s the impression you’re supposed to get. But he’s not here to smoke, nor am I. Let’s go back to his bibliography and I’ll tell you what’s going on.

Farrell is here to sit next to you in the slot-car Jeep and point out the sights as he takes you on a ride through “Occult Paranormal Nazi Secret Breakaway UFO Breakthrough Physics Tech Bankers Park”. It’s an amusement park, and if you look up the etymology of “amuse” you will not be amused. At the end of the day, he’ll send you home with a belly full of ice cream and a head full of air, and somehow with the smug sense that you know more than the normies.

To pause for a moment and compare my work to his, I can’t see that he’s driving towards any sort of synthesis or conclusion. That’s because rides at the amusement park just go in a big circle. For myself, as diverse as the topics I write about may seem, I am definitely driving towards a conclusion. But it’s like building a pyramid, one that includes the capstone this time. You have to start at the bottom and go brick by brick. It’s laborious, but we’ll only get there by trying.

Note that I’m not the only one saying he’s a disinfo agent, although there appears to be literally only one other. Some website called “All Religions Are One” has this to say about him:

Joseph Patrick Farrell is a disinfo agent of the Coast to Coast scene, used to spread disinfo about UFO's (expanding on the Die Glocke mythology like Nick Cook), pyramids, NASA, the JFK ritual, Operation Paperclip, Atlantis, Nikola Tesla, extraterrestrials,...

That’s not quite the summary I would give but I wanted to show you how far anyone else has gotten. I’m not vouching for the site, either. See that ellipsis? That’s not mine, it’s theirs, although there’s no reference to where they copied the text from. Maybe they just don’t know what ellipses are for. That and the fact that I would disagree with about 95% of their other content are why I would not vouch for them.

I will, however, give them credit for stating his full middle name, which I only found one other place. Frankly, it may not even be correct but at least they tried. That brings up the next point, a hallmark of disinfo agents: Dr. Farrell is virtually a ghost.

All that is available are various “about the author” type bios such as on Giza Death Star, Audible, and Amazon. Scrape it all together and you could put it on a laminated 3x5 note card, like for a CIA agent going out on his first mission: “This is who you’re supposed to be. Keep it in your pocket.”

You may have been asking why I didn’t go straight to Wikipedia. I did, and you can see for yourself there is no article for Joseph P. Farrell. This is where the plot thickens. You see, there was a page on Farrell, but they sent it down the Memory Hole over a decade ago.

You have to look closely at the bottom of that wiki “error” page, but there remains a link to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph P. Farrell. Their basic case is, “This guy is full of it.” Okay, I think so too, and typically you would write some fancy form of that on his page. Has wiki ever been reluctant to blackwash and badmouth someone on their own page? Of course not, that’s half the reason Wikipedia exists. But that’s not what wiki did here. They annihilated it from existence.

Almost. You can find an archived version of the page here from just a few weeks before Dr. Joseph P. Farrell was stricken with the ancient practice of damnatio memoriae. The point is, there is a 0.000% chance anyone would ever stumble across that page. Also, do you see where he was educated in physics? Me neither. But okay, Joseph, the pyramids are giant laser beams.

So why did they do it? Beats me, really. All I can do is guess. But I love to guess! It’s like looking for a small thermal exhaust port just below the main port. In this case, I think the two-meter port is two decades of his life’s work—perhaps we could say vocation—that it appears we are supposed to forget existed. I promised we’d talk about what was missing and this is it.

You can stitch together this timeline: He publishes a book in 1982, gets a doctorate from Oxford in 1987, publishes two more books in 1989 and 1990, then publishes a four-volume set in 1997. All of this work concerns some kind of arcane and tedious Christian historical something-or-other that I can’t believe very many people in the entire world are interested in. But some folks really like this kind of lore, apparently including Farrell.

At least he did. There’s a five year break after he spent those two decades on this, uh, electrifying research. Maybe he needed it. But refer back to all those bios: he makes no mention of this two decades of his life and work. He mentions the doctorate from Oxford because that’s supposed to impress us, but has nothing to say about the rest.

Indeed, how and why does one transition from patristics to Demigod of Deep Conspiracy? In precisely what way does the one integrate with the other? Alternatively, if he eventually came to see patristics as boring and pointless and even wrong, wouldn’t it be worth telling us that patristics is boring and pointless and even wrong?

What’s ironic here is that Farrell has been on The Higherside Chats numerous times as one of Greg Carlwood’s favorite guests. Carlwood had a negative experience growing up Christian and eventually left the church. He misses no opportunity whatsoever to slam Christianity, overtly or subtly, because real experiences shape real people. But not Farrell, huh?

So beginning in 2002, for no reason he ever bothers to explain, Farrell takes off at an (ahem) unbelievable pace: 27 book in 23 years, according to his Giza Death Star bibliography. Actually, it’s 28 because he left the latest one out. He’s clearly too busy writing books to make sure his website is up to date. Somehow, though, he never seems in a hurry in his interviews. He also freely invites people to email him. Who the hell has time for that?

None of the books have links to where they are available for purchase. And why would they? He casually mentioned on his most recent THC appearance that he’s rich. I suppose he doesn’t need the money from all these books. But then why does he write them? Doctor’s orders? Hates golf? Watched all of Netflix? If you can convince yourself this is all the behavior and history of a real person, there’s no more I can say.

Or is there? On to the fun stuff….

When I was stumbling about trying to find any genealogical information on the spooky Dr. Farrell, I found this arcane tidbit which would at first seem unlikely to yield anything important: Person Page - 64434: John Cockburn Thomson

That’s from a site called The Peerage, which is an unofficial but terribly elaborate effort to track all the bloodline aristocratic dickheads in Britain and Europe. I think we all realize how crucial bloodlines are to those people. Patristics may not be electrifying, but I found this one line to be so:

John Edward Joseph Farrell was the son of John Arthur Farrell and Hon. Lucretia Pauline Mary Preston. He married Harriet Nichols.

Farther down the page you can see John Arthur has another son named Arthur William Patrick Joseph Farrell, so we get the full name too. I may need to elaborate on why it caught my eye.

I hope you would agree that the Montauk Project would fit in well as an attraction at Dr. Farrell’s amusement park. We first learned about it in the book, The Montauk Project: Experiments in Time, written in 1992 by—you remember it now, don’t you?—Preston Nichols.

The Montauk Project wiki page contains a link for Preston which leads to… the book. That leads to another point. I scraped around and around for info on Preston and came up empty. Preston has no existence outside of the Montauk Project. He’s an even ghostlier ghost than Joe. Just a guess, but I think “Preston Nichols” is a fake name dreamt up for a fake project, and They got it climbing up the old family tree. Or maybe sheer coincidence, right? And here you thought the Stranger Things association to Montauk was strange.

Well, yet stranger and even more coincidental is Farrell’s connection to DB Cooper. Tell me you would have guessed at something like that before reading the title of this post. For a case that has been so thoroughly studied and discussed, you wouldn’t think this information would be hard to find, but I had terrible trouble digging up this:

Big List of FBI agents Associated with Norjak (Martin Andrade 9/22/2016)

Norjak Case Agents (All Norjak Case Agents are Seattle-based.):

2. Larry Carr, 2007-2009

5. Ron Nichols, 1977- 1990(?) Norjak case agent when money was found in 1980

6. Charlie Farrell, 1971-1977, original Norjak case agent

Three hits out of six. I’ll write it up one of these days but yes, the DB Cooper hijacking was faked. The point is, you can see Farrell and Nichols had control of the case for the first two decades.

You may be wondering why I bolded “Carr” above. Any guess? It’s another name from the list of people of the Salem Witch Trials. You’ll have to wait for the whole analysis and links but, yes indeed, there were Coopers living in Salem at the time of the SWTs, and several other names from the list show up as key players in the phony hijacking.

As a final note, one of the handful of genealogical crumbs we were handed about Farrell was that he was born in the innocuous and boring Sioux Falls, South Dakota. I feel I need to suggest it’s not so innocuous:

In 1981, to take advantage of recently relaxed state usury laws, Citibank relocated its primary credit card center from New York City to Sioux Falls.

Thanks, Sioux Falls, way to go. More intriguing to me is that its founding involved an Army officer who was also tangled up in some weird and sus military action involving Mormons, of all people. Who can bother unraveling it. Anyway, he was named James Allen. Please consult the list. SWT FTW!

Bonus: I came across this academic takedown of Farrell, in which the author devoted to him a whole chapter in a big-ass fancy book published by Cambridge University. See how much of this summary you can read without SYH:

16 - Occulture in the academy? The case of Joseph P. Farrell

I suppose my point is that I keep finding out just how different a world most of the world lives in, a place where research like that makes sense, has value, and counts as insight.

The huge controversy as I write concerns Trump pulling funding from Harvard University. If he does so for Harvard and for every other bullshit university—for any reason he cares to state—then I’m in support of it. I think perhaps that’s actually the idea behind what he’s doing.

Thanks as always for reading!

TL;DR: We’ll give the usual treatment to Kenneth Arnold, the Maury Island incident, and a couple of closely associated personalities, Raymond A. Palmer and Samuel Eaton Thompson. The bonus will be where the very strange associations of Arnold’s birthplace lead us (spoiler: to the phony Space Shuttle Challenger disaster!).

It must firstly be remarked that all we will discuss takes place in the area of Puget Sound. I have written before that “They” seem to operate out of various historical strongholds scattered around America, and Puget Sound appears to be one of them. Boeing is a ginormous defense contractor, but do you really think that cloudy and rainy Seattle is a great place to build airplanes rather than, say, the dry and clear Southwest? And when it was all popping off in Silicon Valley, why does Microsoft very controversially relocate to Redmond? Perhaps now you have your answers.

It must secondly be remarked that for some reason, the Kenneth Arnold UFO sighting has, in my lifetime, always been low-profile, like it’s on the way to being written out of history. Virtually every UFO enthusiast begins their discussion with the Roswell incident. That wiki page tells us it was not always that way:

With no phone or radio, Brazel was initially unaware of the ongoing flying disc craze. Amid the first summer of the Cold War, press nationwide covered Kenneth Arnold's account of what became known as flying saucers….

(Quick note: see how “They” hand down our culture to us, which we always believe developed naturally? The concept and term “flying saucer” originated here.)

Why is the Arnold case being dropped from the narrative? I do not know, but perhaps it is this: Roswell does not follow on naturally from Kenneth Arnold. That is, the craft he saw were semi-circular, with one of the them being bat-winged. These shapes have never been associated with Roswell, so you have to ask yourself who the hell is writing these scripts? Would it not have been more convincing to suggest one of the Washington craft crashed in New Mexico?

My answer, FWIW, is that there are too many splinters sticking up from the Arnold incident. In that way “They” have of doing it, these splinters need to be sanded down to create a nice smooth brain surface for their narrative to slide over.

Let’s begin here: You know how I just remarked that few realize the Kenneth Arnold sighting took place right before Roswell? Fewer still realize that the Maury Island incident took place only three days before the Arnold incident, and in the same place! Maury Island is in Puget Sound and Mt. Rainier is just south. Again, nothing about the Maury Island UFO matches the Kenneth Arnold UFOs. And again, who TF is writing this?

But let’s fast-forward/rewind to Kenneth Arnold. You may have known that he was a businessman who happened to be a pilot who flew himself around a lot on said business. Makes it more reasonable to believe he spent a lot of time in the air, right? Okay, sure, but he also instantly turned into a UFO investigator. What are the chances? I think you may begin to agree that the chances are 100%.

I won’t get into all the nonsense concerning either the Arnold sighting or the Maury Island incident themselves. Believe anything you wish about them. Here’s one surprise, though:

Arnold then decided to contact Lieutenant Frank Brown of Military Intelligence, Fourth Air Force, Hamilton Field, California.

Yep, that’s a name from the list of people of the Salem witch trials. Another surprise: the visit from Brown and the other Intel guy was where we were handed down the popular-to-this-day concept of “Men in black”. Yet one more surprise: read that wiki page to find that the guy that handed it to us was Gray Barker, Surprise not surprise on all this, though, right?

At this point, if you’ve been looking at the wikis for both the Arnold and Maury Island incidents, you will have seen the name Raymond A. Palmer. That dude has a helluva long wiki page, does he not? As I would consider the many things mentioned there “tainted”, there are two I would highlight: the very prominent publisher of the personal computing era Ziff Davis, and that Palmer was key to promoting “The Shaver Mystery” and Richard Sharpe Shaver. As a very young conspiracy theorist, I recall being intrigued by the Shaver material. I could not then have even begun to imagine how different my worldview would eventually become.

Can I connect Ray Palmer to the Salem Witch Trials? Well, I don’t know how hard I have to work at such things these days, but I can tell you that off Salem Harbor you will find Palmer Cove. Good luck finding out exactly who it was named after and their genealogy. If you do, please let me know. If you want a little more, I can tell you a bit about Katharine (Unknown) Palmer (abt. 1624 - aft. 1663):

On multiple occasions, Katherine Palmer was accused of witchcraft in Wethersfield [Connecticut, just over 100 miles from Salem]…. Demos states that in 1659 and 1660 members of the same family charged that Goody Palmer (Katherine) had caused the illnesses and deaths of three family members…. Henry and Katherine Palmer disappear from the Wethersfield records after 1663….

We finally come to another alien encounter investigated by Arnold, that of Samuel Eaton Thompson, which took place in 1950 while driving to his home in Centralia, Washington.

First, is Thompson from one of these Salem Witch families? Not a surprise but there’s no genealogy. I can, however, refer you to Lady Gwen Thompson. She’s prominent in Wicca, including something to do with something called the “Wiccan Rede”. Believe that crap if you wish, but I see it simply as Them on the one hand telling you witches are fake, and on the other selling you fake witchery.

The Lady’s wiki discredits the lineage idea, but this more detailed article give us some profitable knowledge:

Were there really any witches involved in the Salem witchcraft trials? (New England Folklore 7/5/2019)

They did find that Thompson had ancestors in Salem during the trials and that members of her family had later studied esoteric topics like Spiritualism. It seems likely that Thompson had inherited some occult lore from her grandmother but it was probably not older than the 19th century.

I conclude that the Thompsons are one of “those” families and were at Salem. Just like many of Their other initiatives I have yet to write up, I’ve already collected a bunch of data concerning “Spiritualism”. That one statement also seems consistent with the idea that this bullshit was invented in the 1800’s, just like I thought.

By the way, neither the wiki nor that article even notes what leaps out to me in red flashing lights: the name of her grandmother was Adriana Porter. Since our subject is fake UFOs, did I ever mention that Stanton Friedman’s first wife, to whom he was married when he “broke” Roswell, was Susie Virginia Porter?

Perhaps more damning is the peculiar name Eaton. Bloodlines being paramount to these Elites, they typically use their mother’s maiden name as their middle name. Probably no surprise at this point, but there were Eatons back at the beginning:

PASSENGER PROFILE: The Eaton Family (The Mayflower Society)

I fired a torpedo through that boat as being something other than just an ordinary boatload of buckle-shoed religious fundies seeking freedom in this post. Enough said.

Now, here’s some trivia I bet you didn’t know, let alone cared about: Samuel Eaton Thompson’s tiny hometown of Centralia is twinned with the other tiny town of Chehalis, Washington. Do you know where Kenneth Arnold took off from on his fateful journey? The Chehalis–Centralia Airport. What are the chances!? 100%, right?

Bonus: Did you think this post got weird? It gets weirder. You’ll have to decide if it means anything, but I know for sure I couldn’t possible make it up.

You see, Kenneth Arnold grew up in a town named Scobey, Montana, named after a cattleman named Major Charles Richardson Anderson Scobey, about whom I can find no information.

That name is strange, isn’t it? If it’s pronounced as I believe, then the only person with even a similar name I’m aware of is Dick Scobee. I will assume everyone is aware of one of the oddest conspiracy theories out there, that he was one of the astro-nots who was not actually on board the Space Shuttle Challenger when it exploded into a zillion pieces. No, that’s not the weird part.

Kenneth Arnold was flying to Yakima, Washington. If you were driving from there to Seattle, you would unavoidably pass through the microscopic town of Cle Elum, Washington, population about 2000. Guess who was born there? Dick Scobee.

There’s more. As a young child, Dick moved to Auburn, Washington, a suburb of Seattle. Depending on exactly where he lived in Auburn, had 8-year-old Dick gone as few as three miles northwest to the shores of Puget Sound and looked out over the waters on a certain day in June, he would have witnessed the Maury Island incident.

Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: We’ll take a look at two “alien encounters” from just before 1900, exposing them as phony. Afterward, I’ll suggest what we might learn from these events in the larger context.

Advisory: I’m saving the analysis for the second part of this post because I always caution readers to beware disinfo agents pushing everyone towards certain conclusions. The necessity in this instance is this: okay, maybe these incidents were “not as advertised”, but why? How does it all fit into the Big Plan? The Big(ger) Plan is what we should always be after, so if you’re looking for ideas on that, I’ll give you mine. Otherwise, just skip it if you wish your views to stay “unpolluted”. (Also, TBH, there’s not that much evidence to go over so I thought I’d pad this out.)

My previous posts have covered Roswell, Edward J. Ruppelt, and J. Allen Hynek, starting in 1947 and going forward a bit. Here, we go back in time a good chunk. Not to “UFOs in the Bible”, because the longer story you get on those is another disinfo program. That’s actually quite a long story as to what’s going on, so I will have to ask you to set aside those “ancient UFOs” for the time being.

We go first to the much shorter but far more well-known Aurora, Texas, UFO incident of 1897. If you’re like me, you’ve probably heard a hundred shows covering this famous incident. Hey, you don’t know UFOs if you don’t know about Aurora! You likely could say many things about it: lightning storm, windmill, wreckage down a well, ayylmao in the graveyard. But (and I’m serious about this) test your knowledge right now: can you think of who owned the farm on which the UFO crashed?

Jeopardy Theme Song

I take these pains to clearly demonstrate how “They” hide the truth from us. It’s not primary or even important that secrets be classified or in secluded archives or you get booted off Twitter for mentioning them. The truth is hard to hide so They arrange to make it forgotten, first by making it unmemorable or seemingly unimportant. That’s easily enough accomplished: make all the stupid bullshit which may be true but will lead you nowhere seem exciting and titillating and what you want to tell your family and friends about that they don’t want to hear.

This is the answer to the question: Judge J.S. Proctor.

Is that what you’re going to text your bestie right now? Of course not. Hopefully, though, some of you may be like me and have already said, “Oh, okay, that’s enough for me. This whole Aurora thing is some bullshit.”

Let me amplify just a bit: You’ll find the Proctors prominent on the list of people of the Salem witch trials, our landmark hoaxed event. W.W. “Mac” Brazel found UFO wreckage on his ranch at Roswell, and guess who his closest neighbors were? The Proctors. Ever hear of Dodge cars? Capt. John Dodge was living in Salem at the time of the trials, and his wife was born Sarah Proctor. John Proctor sailed to America in 1635 with a man named Thomas Parker. Search on “luigi mangione parker” and I suspect you’ll find more than you suspected. I think you get my drift that finding a Proctor placed just outside the spotlight is damning enough.

Frankly, there’s not more to be said about Aurora, but you can believe what you heard before if you like. If you subscribe to my case, though, see how the crux of this was public yet no one knows it? Think how much interesting detail you’ve heard about Aurora, and now you know why they dreamed it up over the years.

Now, this other encounter is one you’ve probably never heard of before. I personally had not until I ran into it doing all this UFO research. It does not even have a Wiki page so far as I know. That’s strange and I’ll analyze that strangeness later, but an article describing it is:

Local retiree traces reported UFO landing in 1896 Lodi (Lodi News 3/20/2015)

Lodi, in fact, was the site of one of the first documented claims of attempted alien abductions in the 1890s. Col. H.G. Shaw, a Civil War veteran and journalist, wrote of his first-hand experience in The Evening Mail on Nov. 27, 1896. It’s been one of the most widespread accounts of aliens and UFOs.

That last sentence is typical of what is called “journalism” today, where you just make shit up. Oddly, the claim they hedge on is whether it was the first, even though the wiki page on “Alien abduction” lists It as such. As usual, I just stumbled in to all this listening to this back catalog podcast:

Episode 51: Aliens (Theories of the Third Kind 6/4/2020, ff 4 minutes if you’re super-impatient)

Now, can we connect this to The Salem Witch Bullshit of 1692? I think so. Let me refer you first to this bullshit: The Paisley Witches of 1697:

On 17 August 1696, 11-year-old Christian Shaw, the daughter of a local landowner, John Shaw of Bargarran, saw one of her family's servants, Catherine Campbell, steal a drink of milk…. The following day, 22 August, Shaw became violently ill with fits, similar to the symptoms reported a few years earlier in the American Salem witch trials of 1693.

Much nonsense ensues, but again the key is public yet unseen: the name Shaw. Not common at all, is it? Now may I refer you to this person?

Elizabeth Booth was born in 1674 and was one of the accused as well as one of the accusers in the Salem Witch Trials…. When she was eighteen, she began accusing people (ten people on record) of practicing witchcraft, including John Proctor, Elizabeth Proctor, Sarah Proctor, William Proctor, Benjamin Proctor, Woody Proctor….

There are the Proctors, yes, but what’s the connection to the Shaws, you’re asking? Glad you asked! I refer you to the “Life after the trial” section:

Two years after the witchcraft trials, Booth married Israel Shaw on December 26, 1695. She was twenty two years old and the two were married in Salem, Essex co., MA.

Well, well, so there were Shaws in Salem at the time of those trials, close enough to the events to soon marry one of the main participants, and fake Shaw witches were in Jolly Old England right after. Well fucking well.

Bonus (which comes early, before all the analysis you may want to skip): I found something interesting and invite you to ask yourself if it’s merely coincidental. It concerns the fictional franchise of The Uncanny X-Men, and their fictional SHAW FAMILY TREE:

The “Shaw” name has always been synonymous with power. Unfortunately for the Shaws, power corrupts. This article will show how generations of the Shaw’s have “tainted” themselves with their thirst for power from as far back as the Salem witch trials…. In 1692, English born Reverend Hiram Shaw was appointed minister of the town of Salem.

BTW, the fictional story arc in which these Shaws first appear is “Hellfire Club”. Turns out that connects directly to all these same families we’ve been discussing. Funny, right? Okay, on to the analysis….

So how do these two small incidents fit into the Big Picture? When conspiracy theorists talk about Project Blue Beam (as loosely defined), they always say it goes as far back as President Ronald Reagan’s comments at the UN. Welp, it goes much farther back than that:

John Dewey Speech 1917 (Hour of the Time 12/15/1999 <- the original site went offline in 2025 so get these things while you can)

Some one remarked that the best way to unite all the nations on this globe would be an attack from some other planet. In the face of such an alien enemy, people would respond with a sense of their unity of interest and purpose.

Exactly what Ronnie Ray-Gun said, isn’t it? So the concept has been around a long, long time, and I don’t think it’s too much to imagine it was around at the time of these late 19th Century “alien encounters”. Let’s just assume for the sake of argument that “They” make and execute these very big, very long-term plans. Conspiracy theorists take this as an article of faith, but that’s exactly what I want to question.

Okay, so we get this Blue Beam Bullshit in 1896 and 1897, and it’s pretty lame IMHO. As far as promotion, I’d wager no one has even heard of the Lodi incident. Why did they even bother with it? Far worse, They didn’t pick up the thread of this program for fifty more years! WTF?

Further, after all that time, neither Roswell nor the Kenneth Arnold incident (also fake but which I have yet to write up) is a “continuation” of either of these incidents or even matches each other.

Also, what kind of beta test was this? They began with “Close Encounters of the Third Kind”, at the sixth and final level of the “Close encounters” scale. If you recall, the movie itself introduced the scale to the public and worked its way up for dramatic effect. J. Allen Hynek came up with that scale, which wraps us back around.

The point is this: suppose this was all a screenplay about “a coming alien invasion of Earth”, and the treatment you were handed included these four incidents as the first installment of the franchise. You would tell the screenwriter to GTFO and that he’d never eat lunch in Hollywood again. The treatment would go in the trash as utterly unsalvageable.

I say all that to point out two things, each related to the other in a way you’ll have to determine for yourself. One is that if you carry the notion that “They” are SuperGeniuses carefully and cleverly scripting events to shape the world, you should probably seriously reconsider that. The other is that the vast majority of the population actually buys into this dumb bullshit without question, and you should probably seriously take that into consideration in your Estimate of the Situation.

Thanks for reading! More UFO incident analysis on the way!

TL;DR: A false dialectic was handed to us concerning the modern UFO phenomenon. On the one hand, Martians were coming for our women (or at least our b-holes). On the other J. Allen Hynek was the scientific authority telling us there was “nothing to see here” in the skies above us, and to “move along”. We’ll look at some associations that suggest he wasn’t just some dude that happened to end up doing that.

In the last post, we looked at one half of the false dialectic. On the other side was J. Allen Hynek (1910-1986), who simply oozed scientific credibility. He was much higher profile and there is much less to say about him, which I think you will see fits the profile. In short, it looks like he was identified early, plucked out, and put in that position.

Hynek became a living meme: the bespectacled scientist with a Van Dyke and a pipe telling us it was “swamp gas”. Yes, he was quite literally the “swamp gas” guy, if you didn’t know:

Hynek recalled in his 1972 book: "Swamp gas became a household word and a standard humorous synonym for UFOs. UFOs, swamp gas, and I were lampooned in the press and were the subjects of many a delightful cartoon (of which I have quite a collection)."

He played his part well, calling bullshit on everything in the sky and on the ground:

Once back at the office, Hynek requested privacy for a phone call; "He was on the phone for quite a while, which I found very enlightening. He came out and I said, 'Well, Dr. Hynek. What do you think?' He said, 'It's swamp gas.' He tells me one minute he has no idea what it is. And then he makes one phone call to Washington and comes out and gives a statement that it's swamp gas. Very strange."

Hmmm, right? Anyway, Hynek was the scientific adviser to all three big government “UFO investigation” programs: USAF Projects Sign, Grudge, and Blue Book. The last two were officially run by Edward J. Ruppelt as discussed in the last post. They were the two opposing polarities, but Hynek was wrangled by Ruppelt, and Ruppelt in turn worked for General Earle Cabell. All the setup you need. Now the question is, was Hynek’s name just pulled out of a hat? I don’t think so. “They” don’t work like that.

First up in Hynek’s strange associations—and the reason I think They had Their eyes on him early—was that his doctoral advisor at the University of Chicago was William Wilson Morgan. It’s not that Morgan himself has any red flags on him, but it’s that—as part of Conspiracy 101—you’ve probably heard of the fundamental slam on Freemasonry known as the “Morgan Affair”: some guy was writing a book to expose the Masons so they kidnapped and murdered him. Well, (1) that guy was named William Morgan, and (2) that affair was a huge psyop that gets real shady real quick, which I exposed here:

Did you know William Morgan and Joseph Smith were Eskimo brothers? Now I think the whole “Freemasons murdered a guy!” thing was just another psyop (conspiracies.win 11/17/2024)

Point (3) is that I feel certain that the Morgan of said Affair was of the same family as “JP”, so I get real twitchy when I come across anyone named Morgan.

You can read that Hynek was also associated with Harvard, the Smithsonian, and Johns Hopkins. It’s too much detail to get in to and there’s nothing specific about his work at any of these places, but I consider all those institutions to be bastions “They” founded and run to this day. Ever wonder why it was JHU that was telling us how everyone was dropping dead from The Coof? Now you know.

One quick association I can’t resist: Do you know where we got the term “little green men”? It was in fashion for all the early decades of UFOs, and came from the Kelly–Hopkinsville encounter of 1955. I would contend that Hopkinsville and Johns Hopkins are no coincidence at all. See why I’m suspicious Hynek spent time there?

Now, I doubt there are many “science conspiracy” fans out there, but if so we’ll talk a bit about Hynek and George Gamow. He and Hynek wrote a paper about the formation of the Solar System in 1945. If you research Electric Universe theory (which is itself a disinfo program but at the expense of many revolutionary revelations), you’ll find that the conventional ideas about the origin of the Solar System are dead wrong. If you get my drift on this, I have to wonder if Hynek was specifically chosen to help with a paper full of dead wrong ideas.

Speaking of promoting dead wrong ideas, Gamow was primary in promoting the Big Bang. That idea came originally from Georges Lemaitre. Conspiracists love to tell you that Lemaitre was a Jesuit. The ones who have gone in headfirst say that “le maitre” means “the master” in French, and that this is all one big “high Masonic” joke (h/t Alan Watt). Do a little research by clicking the link to find that although Georges attended schools run the Jesuits, he specifically declined to become one. I would contend it’s enough here to know that the Big Bang is wrong, that Gamow promoted it, and that Hynek worked a bit with him. Something more than nothing, but not much.

But do you know which association I simply cannot pass off as coincidence? After Blue Book was shut down, Hynek went to work at the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, a joint project between Harvard and the Smithsonian (both of them so so sus, as mentioned). The director of SAO was astronomer Fred Lawrence Whipple. Profile pic looks like a friendly old guy, right?

Maybe he was, but the name “Whipple” is not common at all, and even more not common is that it appears on the list of people involved in the (fake) Salem witch trials. Okay, maybe the Joseph Whipple in that list was just some easily alarmed and superstitious dirt farmer and the names are mere coincidence, but let’s take a look at another random Joseph Whipple from a little after and not too far from Salem, Joseph Whipple III (1725-1761):

The son of Deputy Governor Joseph Whipple Jr. who was a very wealthy merchant…. He must have had very good political connections because he became Deputy Governor aged 25….

The Governor at the time was William Greene, Sr., and Green is another name you’ll find on that witch trial list. Imagine that.

Our final topic, worthy of some discussion, is the strange shift in controlled narrative that takes place at the end of 1952. It’s a big switcheroo, and we can highlight it with what Ruppelt and Hynek said and did. I can’t tell you I have an explanation, but I would not accept something along the lines of, “They orchestrated it to make it look like They orchestrated it.” Too much even for me! Let’s start with the fact that Ruppelt had to work to keep Hynek—a serious scientist, after all--on the hook that there was something worthy of investigation:

Hynek wrote "In my contacts with [Ruppelt] I found him to be honest and seriously puzzled about the whole phenomenon".

Hynek investigated and called shenanigans on all of it. Maybe we could say it’s an application of the principle, “There’s no one better to tell a lie than someone who believes it.” But by 1952 or so, Hynek and a few others involved apparently started to believe something real was going on. Hey, They can’t have people looking into real things, can They? On the recommendation of the CIA (of course), the Robertson Panel convened in January 1953 to formally say it’s all stuff and nonsense. It worked:

[Hynek] would write that the Robertson Panel had "made the subject of UFOs scientifically unrespectable, and for nearly 20 years not enough attention was paid to the subject to acquire the kind of data needed even to decide the nature of the UFO phenomenon."

Blue Book was reduced to a staff of three and Ruppelt soon left. He later joined in the calling of bullshit:

In new chapters that were notably conservative in tone, and frequently attributed by reviewers to author disillusionment or disenchantment, Ruppelt declared UFOs a "space age myth". Content of this nature was of a noticeably different tone to famous quotes from the original "Report" that had, for example, referred critically to a 1949 change of attitude in the Project whereby "everything was being evaluated on the premise UFO's couldn't exist. No matter what you see or hear, don't believe it".

Oh, he couldn’t figure that out when he had a staff and scientists and the US military? No? Ed died within months, a tool til the end. Now, this last thing I hate to say, but perhaps Hynek was a fool til the end. In 1973, he founded the Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS). Know what the problem was there? The board included Ufologist Jerome Clark. You get that? Another name from the witch trials.

Bonus: Remember that boring Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory that Hynek worked at with Whipple?

It is likely that SAO's early history as a solar observatory was part of the inspiration behind the Smithsonian's "sunburst" logo….

They mean this logo. Have you ever compared it to the IHS emblem of the Jesuits? Maybe those Jesuit-haters aren’t 100% wrong.

Thanks for reading! See you for the next installment where we start in on some of the all-time classic UFO encounters!

TL;DR: This is a tiny incident from which we can learn a lot, including: (1) How many Ukrainians are being slaughtered in the war, (2) Donald Trump is a closet truther, (3) History is changed right under our noses, and (4) The world almost everyone lives in is far from the real one.

I’ve tried to keep track of the number of Ukrainian servicemen killed in the war since the beginning. It’s quite shocking. The last estimate I heard was from Col. Douglas Macgregor a couple of weeks ago: 1.2 million dead. That tracks with the mounting numbers I’ve followed all along.

The Ukrainian government lies their asses off about it—when they mention it at all. What may be surprising at first is that the Russian government lies about it as well. Not like the Ukrainians, of course, and for entirely different reasons. Ukraine doesn’t want everyone to know how badly they’re losing. Russia knows they have to live next door to this country into the future, a country full of fellow Slavs, and they don’t need the resentment that would come if the truth were widely known about the bloodbath they were forced into conducting.

The going rate is about 5,000 Ukrainian dead per week. Guess who said that publicly? Donald Trump. I have long thought he was a closet truther—on this and many other issues—and that he knows far more than he ever says. Before you go to verify that he said it, there is a lot more to the story and that’s what we’re here to discuss.

First, is that number accurate? As I said, you’ll have great difficulty finding a source for it. Just a couple of weeks ago, Ukrainian Armed Forces Commander-in-Chief Alexander Syrsky said he needed 30k new recruits every month. God knows where it is in my notes, but right after that I read an article commenting that even that number was all Ukraine would admit to publicly because their casualty rate was 50k per month.

In conventional war, about 1 out of 3 casualties dies and the other two are only wounded. Due to a number of reasons, such as the lethality of Russia’s weaponry and extreme difficulty evacuating wounded from the battlefield, Ukraine has experienced a 1 in 2 KIA ratio. Even that figure was as of a couple of years ago and it’s only gotten worse since then. You can consider that a minimum. So 50k per month… 1 out of 2… and 5000 a week seems about right.

We need to put that in perspective, though. During the Vietnam War, the US population was about 200M. Over the course of a long war, there were about 60k KIA. Here we are half a century later and many people still remember well how terrible that war was.

Ukraine is—or was at the start of the war—about 1/5 the population that the US was in 1970, so we can magnify that KIA number by a factor of 5 to 25k a week. Thus, Ukraine has about two “Vietnam Wars” a month. I find it staggering. I wish everyone realized this.

While most people, including—alarmingly—almost all European leaders, want only war and more war, one of the few people trying to end this incredible horror is Trump. He doesn’t say it outright, which isn’t surprising if you read the first part of that last sentence again. When I saw that he was trying to get out the word about the appalling level of slaughter taking place, I took that to be consistent with the goal of alerting the public and generating popular sentiment for ending it. He said it today quite publicly in one his “Truths”.

Or did he?

I happened to notice his “Truth” when it was mentioned in a video on the Military Summary Channel on YouTube. I was quite surprised, and later went to save the link to his original post. I found that within only hours, an attempt seems to have been made to wipe it from popular media.

For example, when I searched for it, the first link that came up included this search snippet:

5 hours ago ... "Not necessary, and very bad timing. Vladimir, STOP! 5,000 soldiers a week are dying. Let's get the Peace Deal DONE!" he said in a post on Truth ...

Yep, that’s the text I saw. The link is to this BBC article:

Trump says he is 'not happy' with deadly Russian strikes on Kyiv (BBC 4/24/2025)

That alarming number of 5000 a week and the surrounding text is not in the article. Stranger, archived versions on the Wayback Machine are to a related but different article titled, “Zelensky cuts short South Africa visit after Russian attack on Kyiv”. Don’t ask me what the Beeb is doing, but I’m just saying that what your idea of an “article” is and what it means to “archive” probably needs some updating to match their “flexibility”.

This article preserves the original wording (for now) but it too will probably undergo some “flexibility”:

Trump says he's "not happy" with Russian strikes on Kyiv, tells Putin: "Vladimir, STOP!" (CBS News 4/24/2025)

"I am not happy with the Russian strikes on KYIV. Not necessary, and very bad timing," Mr. Trump wrote on his social media site Truth Social. "Vladimir, STOP! 5000 soldiers a week are dying. Lets get the Peace Deal DONE!"

The “Mr. Trump wrote” text is a hotlink to the original Truth. Go ahead and check it: that 5000 figure isn’t there.

A couple of things: One is that the Wayback does not have an archived version of that CBS story as of this writing. I wanted to see what it said originally, because it turns out that is the wrong hyperlink. The correct one with that wording is here. A mere clerical error on the part of CBS? Who knew they were so slipshod.

Everyone may make of this what they wish, but in this late age I find the historical record is even more plastic than I thought.

TL;DR: Ruppelt and J. Allen Hynek (to be covered later) were put in place as the spokespeople for two opposite positions: “flying saucers are real” and “you did not see what you thought you saw”. Who knows what’s going on in the sky, but if either of these two positions was correct, “They” would never have needed to set up these characters to sell us. When do “They” ever sell us the truth?

<high-pitched annoying class valedictorian voice>:

Merriam-Webster defines “dialectic” as “discussion and reasoning by dialogue as a method of intellectual investigation”.

Sounds good, bro, but the problem is that we are under constant psychological warfare, and one of the main techniques is that while everyone is busily engaging in spirited and informed dialectic with one another, we have covertly been handed a “false dialectic”. As I like to say it, you may choose freely among all the available conclusions, because all of them are wrong.

That’s what we’ve had concerning the UFO phenomenon for nearly eight decades. You are free to believe flying saucers from Mars have little green men in them, or you can believe it’s drunk hillbillies who do not recognize the Planet Venus when they see it. We have since been handed some variations and elaboration on those. So it’s not little green men, it’s time-traveling humans sent to warn us away from nuking ourselves. Does that really make a difference, fundamentally?

Well fundamentally, neither of those choices is correct, and that’s what serves to keep us away from the truth. What we’ll see is that “They” set up the false dialectic of this manufactured polarity using two spokesholes. Ruppelt, our case in point, coined the term “Unidentified Flying Object” to add some sort of scientific legitimacy to saucers. We just got through seeing the exact same thing with this “UAP” BS injected into popular culture, did we not?

So, do I know what’s going on with all this? I do not. What I do know is what anyone needs to know before they could possibly imagine they know what’s going on with all this: the entire “phenomenon” is absolutely riven with characters who are more sus than they could possibly imagine. You’ll have to take my word for it, but Ruppelt and Hynek are just the beginning of what I sometimes feel I may never get to the end of. But let’s take that first step….

I wrote briefly about Edward J. Ruppelt (1923-1960), Captain USAF, in my last post:

The (False) Dawn of the Flying Saucer Age was launched out of the US Army Air Forces in 1947, fake investigated by the US Air Force until 1969, and run by “Them” all along (conspiracies.win 4/7/2025)

The preeminent point about Ruppelt is that all along he was working for the head of Air Force Intelligence, General Charles P. Cabell. You can link outward from that post to even more about Cabell and his family. They have been at it for literally centuries. I cannot understate how damning this single association is.

Going from a bloodline to a technical line, I mentioned in the post that there were “problems in his timeline”. We’ll take a look at that now to demonstrate that he was an asset who was in on this psyop from the jump. His wiki tells us:

After the war, Ruppelt was released into the Army reserves. He attended Iowa State College, where in 1951 he earned a Bachelor of Science degree in aeronautical engineering. Shortly after finishing his education, Ruppelt was called back to active military duty after the Korean War began. He was assigned to the Air Technical Intelligence Center headquartered at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.

Sounds fine on its own but—as mentioned in that last post—you very often must look around what you’re told to get at the truth. Think it through for yourself: WW2 ended in 1945, Ed is discharged and goes to college, and he gets recalled to active service in 1951. Well then, how did this take place just two paragraphs before?

Ruppelt was the director of Project Grudge in 1949….

I think someone is fibbing about where he was and what he was up to. And up to what might he have been? In that last post, I complained bitterly about how the USAF suddenly somehow started collecting reports on the flying saucers they had just said were bullshit after Roswell:

During 1947 the Air Force collected 147 flying saucer reports at its Technical Intelligence Division of the Air Materiel Command at Wright Field in Dayton, Ohio….

Did you notice where Ed was reassigned when he was recalled to service? Exact same place! Everyone is free to disagree, but it just to me seems simpler to conclude that Ed was at Wright-Patt all along, and that he was the one collecting those reports in the second half of 1947.

So it is not historically acknowledged that Ruppelt was there at the beginning, nor is it acknowledged that he was there right after the beginning, with Project Sign. However—surprise!—it was from Ruppelt that we learned about Sign:

Project Sign was first asserted in the 1956 book The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects by retired Air Force Captain Edward J. Ruppelt who later directed Project Blue Book. In this he also claimed that Sign had produced an "Estimate of the Situation" which endorsed an interplanetary explanation for UFOs, but General Hoyt Vandenberg, Chief of Staff of the Air Force, shut down Project Sign for lack of proof. No copy of this document or any other corroboration of Ruppelt's claim has been produced, and Popular Mechanics called the report "probably more mythological than real".

To properly deconstruct and understand this, you have to take a step back and realize that Vandenberg, Cabell, and Ruppelt were all in on it together and, really, that’s about all the was necessary. As you can see, that group could arrange to feed you any narrative they pleased. As we’ll see in the next post, Ruppelt was Hynek’s handler so you can count that as a fourth, if you like. Did not take much to boot the whole thing up, did it?

Ruppelt goes on to direct Project Grudge and Project Blue Book, both created by Cabell. Again, see how small the group is? He leaves Blue Book fairly quickly and do you know what I think the real problem was? Too much legitimate evidence was being uncovered:

Ruppelt started the trend, largely followed by later Blue Book investigations, of not giving serious consideration to numerous reports of UFO landings and/or interaction with purported UFO occupants.

At this point, “They” wanted to shut down any investigation that might lead to… well, we’re still trying to figure out what it leads to, what lies beyond the hurricane of hoaxes and liars which I will cover in future posts. Remember, this was all designed to be a false dialectic, not a real dialectic. More on this in the Hynek writeup.

To finish, Ruppelt dropped dead from what we are told was a heart attack at the age of 37. Just seems sus, don’t it?

Bonus: Let me mention Ed’s association with prominent Ufologist Donald Keyhoe and prominent Ufological organization, the National Investigations Committee On Aerial Phenomena (NICAP). Much more to say about both of those, but the fun factoid I’ll leave you with is that NICAP was founded by inventor T. Townsend Brown. Sure, I get that it’s relatively common, but Brown is a name from the Salem Witch Trials. What are the chances?

TL;DR: We find little-known, very curious and highly unlikely connections between the items mentioned in the title. You’re free to believe it’s all mere coincidence, but you should probably wait to decide that until the end.

Disclaimer: I always hate to begin by “giving the answer”, but once again I consider it necessary to properly interpret the significance of the references we’ll see. Probably all the material will be unfamiliar. If you’ve heard about these things before, it was certainly because you were going to be handed some disinfo right after.

James Cameron, A+++ Hollywood royalty, is no Illuminatus. Rather, he’s an asset, out on the periphery of those who really do arrange history, and who you’ve never heard of. Well, you may have heard of them, but you definitely had no idea “who they really were”.

Let me begin by raising your suspicions about James with what I would say is the highest-profile hoax he’s been involved in selling us: the purported sinking of the Titanic. It really was an iconic psyop, a “conspiracy theory” touchstone. All the conspiracy theories are wrong, of course, but we hit closest to the mark with this landmark paper:

The Titanic: the Fraud that Keeps on Giving (Miles Mathis 10/2/2018 39-page PDF)

Let me say two things right away: First, if you cannot set aside whatever objections you have and tentatively accept the thesis that the boat never sank and is not on the bottom of the ocean, turn back now. The sea of your psyche will only grow more turbulent from here.

Second, the author of the paper—as I have disclaimed many times—is a disinfo agent. He surfaces (haha) plenty of evidence that you can validate for yourself to support the basic thesis. Remember what I said about only being familiar with these topics in the context of disinformation? Well, we got an example right away.

Begin by realizing that Cameron made a whole big giant blockbuster movie about the sinking, didn’t he? You can look up the numbers, but the production budget was (for the time) an eye-popping amount. There was also an equally large marketing budget. Can you see in a new light why “They” would bankroll such things? If the project makes money, great. If it loses money, well, everybody knows the boat sank. They just saw it sink, didn’t they?

Perhaps at this point you’re cutting Jim some slack. You may be thinking that you could make a movie about landing on the Moon without anyone ever having landed on the Moon, right? (Hello, Stanley Kubrick!) But the thing is, Cameron supposedly personally landed on the site of the wreck. Multiple times, actually:

James Cameron has visited Titanic wreckage 33 times. Here’s what he said about the Titan (Deseret News 6/3/2023)

You like that? I’ll top it:

James Cameron was underwater in a Titanic submersible when 9/11 happened (DailyO 6/22/2023)

I’m going to say that if, at this point, you aren’t certain that Cameron is an asset, turn back now. From here, it’s a rocket trip to Bizarro World which will make no sense at all as evidence if you’re still thinking he’s nothing more than some dude that likes to make movies. Our rocket now sets course for the fake Charlie Manson murders, but to get there we’ll have to go through the fake Salem Witch Trials of 1692. See what I mean? Don’t worry, we’ll break all this down.

Just like in conventional Intelligence work (which I suppose is just another form of what we’re discussing), an asset like James Cameron will have a handler. I’ve seen such situations before, and I went to look at his wives, particularly his first. My first instinct was correct: it was Sharon Williams.

A lot of history has been orchestrated by a small group of families, and they are not the ones you think (which is how disinfo works). A lot of my research has centered on them, and one of their hallmark events was the fake Salem Witch Trials (10/19/2015 17-page PDF same disclaimer about Mathis). If you look at the list of people of the Salem witch trials, you’ll find the name Williams. Sure, the name is not uncommon, but you have to admit it’s already strange. We are not done with that list, either.

Try to find any information on this Sharon Williams. Good luck, she’s a ghost. You can’t know anything about her, but you should be able to know that would fit the profile. Also, history isn’t typically hidden, per se, it’s just that the “red strings” that connect events get snipped, making us lose all sense of what happened. Here’s wiki at work with two sentences that bridge a section break:

After the excitement of seeing Star Wars in 1977, Cameron quit his job as a truck driver to enter the film industry. [section break] Cameron's directing career began in 1978. After borrowing money from a consortium of dentists….

“Hey, I’m tired of being a truck driver, so why don’t you give me twenty grand so I can quit and become a rich Hollywood movie director? It’s a slam dunk!” Is that what you think happened? Me neither. We can fill in a bit of detail here:

Staying married to Cameron: A modern Henry VIII? Staying married to the “scariest man in Hollywood” is no easy feat… (Gulf News 7/22/2019)

They were married for 12 years and she supported his film-making ambitions, working two jobs, as he gained an apprenticeship at the lowbudget New World Studio. They split when he started making The Terminator, an idea that came to him in a dream, and he got together with his second wife, Terminator producer Gale Anne Hurd.

Does that fit the profile of a handler, setting someone up in their career until a handoff? You might have to widen your sense of “handler” as something more than a CIA hack in a cheap suit dropping off microfilm. And we’re just going to skip over “New World”.

Speaking of the film that launched the James Cameron we know, we find some curious information in this article:

James Cameron’s First Wife Inspired Terminator’s Sarah Connor (The Terminator Fans 6/20/2022)

Most Terminator Fans will know that The Terminator was inspired by a nightmarish fever dream James Cameron had whilst filming Piranha II: The Spawning – but the real life inspiration for his feminist icon Sarah Connor… is far more grounded in reality; as the waitress turned mother of the future was actually inspired by James Cameron’s first wife, Sharon Williams.

Now, stop and think about the plot of that movie. It’s not really about robots and guns and chases, is it? The soul of it is a very special mother, literally the mother of the savior of humanity. Although there’s no virgin birth this time, it’s still pretty unique: the father is a soldier sent back in time by his future son. Further, it’s not simply that the mother gives birth to the son, she must guard him against a (spoiler: nearly) indestructible assassin and train him to lead a rebellion to prevent the very extermination of humanity. Go, motherhood!

Except Sharon Williams was not a mother. Childless young wives and infertility were not “things” back in the 70’s when they were first married, but Sharon and James had no children. Or so we are to believe. You may think differently in a bit.

There are no photos of Sharon anywhere I can find, but in that same article there is a drawing of her that Cameron made in 1973. That was only four years after the fake Manson murders, which may seem like a pretty random thing to observe.

But look at the drawing: Sharon Williams is reclining on a couch draped with an American flag. You know who else evidently reclined on a couch draped with an American flag? Sharon Tate. You can see it in crime scene pictures included in this analysis:

The Tate Murders were a False Flag (Miles Mathis 6/29/2014 (95-page PDF)

Yes, Mathis again, but again an event that was positively faked. One of the fake victims was Abigail “Gibby” Folger, daughter of Peter Folger and heiress to the Folger Coffee fortune. Well guess what: go back to that witch trial list and make sure you can find “Bethshua/Bethsheba Folger-Pope”. Gibby is a direct descendant of a man from the 1600’s also named Peter Folger, and Bethshua was his daughter. Also, Bethshua was the maternal aunt of Ben Franklin. See how this stuff keeps going?

Of all the things in here you might have a hard time believing, one of them is that we are only now getting to what brought me here today: another bullshit article from the BBC with more bullshit about the story that will not sink:

Titanic scan reveals ground-breaking details of ship's final hours (BBC 4/8/2025)

Yes, more nonsense, but there’s something quite bizarre I need you to notice in it concerning “Parks Stephenson, a Titanic analyst”: they repeat his name three additional times, but each time they use the full “Parks Stephenson”. I have never seen anything like it before and would challenge anyone to produce a similar example. It’s baffling! Some kind of magic(k)? Who cares, there it is.

Let me get my thesis right out before you fall asleep: I submit that “Parks Stephenson” is a fake name and he’s actually the son of James and Sharon. Tall claim, but hear me out.

First up, his bio is bullshit. He supposedly went to the US Naval Academy and is both a submariner and naval flight officer. Could not decide, or just that good? They also say that in the same four years he earned a Masters in Political Science from Auburn University. You can look up other articles and interviews which mention his other incredible accomplishments. I do not find them credible. One example would be this article:

From the Titanic to Baton Rouge, Parks Stephenson looks from the past to the future (The Advocate 11/10/2022) (<-- “The Advocate” was also the name of a famous gay newspaper back in the “gays rights” days and thus almost certainly run by Operation Mockingbird—funny!)

We find out he was an aerospace engineer and was fascinated with the Titanic since childhood. Cool story, bro. There’s a picture of him and James Cameron together and the ages seem right, but also look at the one up top of “Parks” as an older man. Now look up some pics of James Cameron with a salt-and-pepper beard. You decide.

But why would I think “Parks Stephenson” is a fake name? First, what kind of name is “Parks”? A dumb one you’ve never heard before, yes, but there’s something I haven’t written up yet so I’ll be brief: There was a famous actor from the 70’s through the 90’s named Parker Stevenson. His real name was Richard Stevenson Parker Jr. Look at that Salem list again.

Stevenson was by far best known for his role in a very popular TV series called The Hardy Boys/Nancy Drew Mysteries. It turns out that the fictional setting of the show and the youth novels on which it was based is a thinly disguised Salem, Massachusetts. Whaddaya know. Nancy Drew was eventually played by an actress whose real name is Janet Louise Johnson.

If anyone could possibly think I could stitch this all together instead of it just being there for me to find, I thank you for your estimation of my skills. For everyone, though, thanks for reading!

TL;DR: Right after the end of World War 2, the psyop of the phony modern UFO phenomenon was launched, along with the USAF and the CIA who (surprise!) investigated it. We’ll organize the programs and the people to see what a tight little group it really was. The main characters were associated with the same people who organized the fake Salem Witch Trials and so many other things. The bonus connects us directly to the good old Trials.

When observing how history is hidden from us, it’s not usually the case that it is literally hidden and must be uncovered by some investigative reporter, or waterboarder, or archaeologist. Rather, it is only that the key pieces are scattered, making it very difficult to realize there’s even a puzzle. When gathered and arranged In their proper context, the characterization and conclusions become more or less obvious.

That is the case we have here. Wiki has a page closely related to what we’re discussing: Investigation of UFO reports by the United States government

Take a look at it and note what strikes you as suspicious. What red flags do you see? Actually, don’t waste your time unless you really want to. There’s nothing in it that I would notice and I’ve become much improved at noticing things. As one vital point I’ve come to notice, we’re almost always way too busy arguing about the trees to ever notice the forest.

What is virtually impossible to notice in that very long wiki page is that there was a sequence of three key programs, Projects Sign, Grudge, and Blue Book, that got underway instantaneously after Roswell. The third and final iteration was up and running less than five years later. Remember, this is after the government called bullshit on the whole thing within days of Roswell. Does this really seem like the USG we all know and love? C’mon. And it’s not just that. For example, try swallowing this factoid from the wiki:

During 1947 the Air Force collected 147 flying saucer reports at its Technical Intelligence Division of the Air Materiel Command at Wright Field in Dayton, Ohio, and an order was given on December 30, 1947 to begin a project to study the phenomenon.

If there had been no order, why was anyone collecting anything? Almost 150 reports in the six months left over in the year after Roswell? How did “experiencers” know who to call? More to the point, how did whoever answered the phone at the local AFB know who to report it to? This all reeks, and the first mention of the CIA reeks even more:

During the later half of 1952, the Central Intelligence Agency's (CIA) Office of Scientific Investigation (OSI) conducted a study of UFOs in response to orders from the National Security Council (NSC).

Well, they just got roped into it after the USAF was fully established in its own investigations, right? Not according to the CIA:

CIA's Role in the Study of UFOs,1947-90 (Center for the Study of Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency, 1997, 19-page PDF)

While Agency concern over UFOs was substantial until the early 1950s….

That is actually the big pull quote on the first page. You sometimes get the sense that a lot of the lies we’re handed aren’t carefully designed, but more improvisational. Whatever works at the time, you know?

Similarly, there is really not much to notice—in and of itself—in any of the individual pages for Project Sign (1948), Project Grudge (1949), or Project Blue Book (1952-1969). You’ll find vital puzzle pieces there, but you already have to have a pretty good idea of what the puzzle looks like before you’ll recognize them.

At this point, we need to back up to Roswell, on which so so so so so much “UFO research and analysis” depends. Everyone is free to decide, but I feel I established firmly for myself that it was entirely fake and completely phony in this writeup:

Broomstick Crash at Roswell: A shocking number of people involved in the “Incident” have the same last name as people involved in the Salem Witch Trials (conspiracies.win 12/6/2024)

So this literally and figuratively legendary hoax is purportedly the reason the Air Force went off guns a-blazin’ to check out these flying discs. Okay. But of course, it wasn’t “the Air Force”, it was a handful of powerful people in the Air Force and the CIA. I’ve blown them all up before, partially in preparation for this very analysis:

Meet General Hoyt Vandenberg: the creation of the national security state, the modern UFO phenomenon, and Salem witches (conspiracies.win 1/14/2025)

(General Charles P. Cabell) A “Cabell” runs through the JFK assassination to UFOs to Thomas Jefferson to the Mueller investigation to the Mayflower and beyond (conspiracies.win 11/26/2024)

General William H. Blanchard: phony nukes, phony witches, and the (false) Dawn of the Flying Saucer Age (conspiracies.win 12/4/2024)

Now, this information may have been scattered through those long write-ups, but now is the time to pull it together with our red string:

• Vandenberg was the Director of what would very quickly become the CIA until May 1, 1947, a couple of months before Roswell. He was also the Chief of Staff of the USAF—the guy that ran the joint—from 1948 to 1953.

• Cabell became the director of Air Force Intelligence in May 1948. He ordered the creation of Project Grudge in 1949. In 1952, he ordered it dissolved and Project Blue Book created in its place.

• In 1953, while still a serving Air Force officer, Cabell became the Deputy Director of the CIA. He held that position until 1962 when he was fired by JFK along with his boss, Allen Dulles.

• Blanchard, after having supposedly historically screwing the pooch, was pushed up the ladder and eventually became Vice Chair of the USAF. He was prominent for many years in the Strategic Air Command, and I would speculate his role was keeping the orchestrated Cold War on track.

Another name to add to the list is Captain Edward J. Ruppelt. He straddles the line between the men above and the coming wave of phony Ufologists, of which there is much more to talk about. Ruppelt was the Director of Project Grudge and then Blue Book until leaving the Air Force to spearhead said invention of researchers trying to find out the truth for us (if you care to believe that).

There are contradictions in Ruppelt’s timeline. Take a look for kicks, but I’ll wait to write it up along with the other Ufologists. He was the first to tell us about the existence of Project Sign in his 1956 book, also informing us that Vandenberg shut it down “for lack of proof”. Sure he did. I think we see the forest through the trees, don’t we? He also “died suddenly” at 37, from which I would personally conclude he wasn’t just some dude, if you get my drift.

BONUS: I didn’t realize it until recently, but Allen Dulles’s brother was John Foster Dulles, of airport fame. Well yes, I knew that was his brother, but I was not aware that his weird middle name “Foster” was their mother’s maiden name and reflected their bloodline. The supposed Roswell UFO supposedly crashed on the Foster Ranch. The Fosters are also prominent at the fake Salem Witch Trials. And if you didn’t see it before, I personally thought this was a gem concerning these Fosters:

Four Presidential assassinations (real, fake, attempted, and by) are tied together by the Fosters, Salem Witches, and the name “Rose” (conspiracies.win 1/21/2025)

Coincidence? I think not.

ONCE AGAIN REMOTE CONTROL, THIS TIME A FULL THROTTLE DIVE. The jet came in so fast it looks like a missile or meteor. That is why whoever got this video is questioning what it is. It is astounding a learjet held together this well at an obvious supersonic speed. All the jets will go supersonic in a dive but under normal circumstances their avionics systems prevent it. Remote control changes that....

Jim's site with the full analysis is at http://jimstonereloaded.com/. Daily updates will make it scroll off the page, so that day's specific page is at http://www.voterig.com/.ue0.html. Finally, since he's one of the most censored guys out there, a Wayback Machine snapshot is here.

The crater photo isn't good, so--astoundingly from the MSM and federal government--here is a local ABC affiliate's story that includes crystal-clear NTSB video:

New video gives closest look yet at site of plane crash in Northeast Philadelphia (6ABC 2/2/2025)

The false dialectic on this one goes like this: For the normies, it's, "just a sequence of events thing that happened nothing to see here we're experts trust me bro". For the conspiracy theorists, it's, "it was a missile and they're hiding it who was on board". All bogus and will lead nowhere.

So what is really going on? IMHO these were clearly messages to Trump, along the lines of, "We may not have stopped you taking the Presidency, but we still have moves and you better slow your roll."

The proof is that he's said almost nothing about either of these huge incidents, Nor has the media pressed him very hard even though everything else is 100% his fault. The message was to him, not to the public, and more attention does not serve Them.

For anyone reading who has doubts about this analysis, let that serve as additional proof. Imagine Trump trying to explain this Silent War to everyone, including your mom who still watches "The View" and your dad who has CNN on all day long. The truth may be true, but there are times when it's counterproductive to try to spread it.

TL;DR: In the assassination “events” of Lincoln, JFK, Reagan, and Clinton, there is someone named Foster very close to it, others with names that go back to the phony Salem Witch Trials, and a beyond odd recurrence of the name “Rose” in various contexts.

Advisory: As brief as I will try to make it, this will be another long post. I thought it best to keep this bizarre confluence together for maximum impact of the weirdness. Also, big chunks of this will be things you’ve never heard of before which I will summarize and link as best I can. Thus, we aren’t here to argue the particulars of any aspect because there is simply no room.

Make of all this what you will, but my best thesis is that the same generational Satanist families that have been here since before the Mayflower have stood just outside the spotlight as They arranged various forms of Presidential assassinations. “Rose” must be some crazy occult bullshit They throw in. It goes back at least as far as the “Wars of the Roses” and is perhaps some reference to the Rosicrucians, although all that remains for another day. It comes up way too often to be mere happenstance, as you’ll see. Although it’s all strange, it seems best to go in chronological order….

Lincoln's Assassination was also a manufactured event (Miles Mathis 2/19/2014 36-page PDF)

I’m not going to give you the usual caveat about Mathis as a disinfo agent because I’ll be giving you practical examples. That’s a pretty long and detailed paper about the event, but you’ll find no trace of what I’m presenting here. This is a prime example of high-level disinformation. At the cost of presenting you with some juicy truths, you will never be able to proceed from what you are handed to any important, deep Truth. Typically, you’re guided down a fascinating path and—at the end—metaphorically pushed off a cliff into a canyon of bullshit conclusions.

For those now thinking that this writer is doing just that by drawing from the CIA’s deep, dark pool of enticing and intriguing small-T truths to expend, I always like to explain how I got here. I was preparing a post about Project Blue Book, which was created by Charles Cabell. His wiki page mentions John Foster Dulles. I thought, “Foster? His brother was real close to the JFK assassination. I wonder if….?” And here we are.

Have you ever heard of LaFayette Sabine Foster (1806-1880)? Neither had I before today, when I went searching for anyone named Foster related to the Lincoln “assassination”. An important form of disinformation is something like an induced amnesia, where it is arranged that we are not reminded of those things from history that would lead us to the truth. Here it is admitted he was forgotten, and I’m just saying it was on purpose:

The forgotten man who almost became President after Lincoln (National Constitution Center 4/15/2024)

According to the rules of presidential succession in 1865, only Vice President Johnson, and not Seward or Grant, was in line to replace Lincoln if he died. If Johnson had died, an acting President would be appointed until a special election could be held to elect a new President (and not a Vice President). The acting President would have been the president pro tempore of the Senate, Lafayette Sabine Foster of Connecticut.

Did you catch the double-whammy about Andrew Johnson? He did in fact assume the Presidency. About Foster, though, I must also note that he was born in Franklin, Connecticut. (You won’t find the name “Franklin” in the list, but Bethshua/Bethsheba Folger-Pope, the maternal aunt of Benjamin Franklin, is very important in include. You have no idea how many Franklins I’ve found.) Foster attended Brown University, and his predecessor as President pro tempore of the United States Senate was Daniel Clark.

To close out Lincoln, you will also note that there were at least four people named Foster involved at the Salem Witch Trials, one of them being Rose Foster. Additionally, there were at least four people named Booth, which may ring a bell. Even more additionally, there were at least seven people named Wilkins. You may not want to score that a hit until you hear that one of them was named Elizabeth Wilkins-Booth. I mean, c’mon.

Even though he wasn’t involved in the assassination, I feel compelled to cram in one of Lincoln’s generals in the War of Northern Aggression: John Watson Foster (1836-1917). His wife was Mary Parke McFerson. Am I reaching by thinking that “Parke”, which is neither a feminine nor a masculine given name, is actually “Parker”? Well, let me add that as President of the Daughters of the American Revolution (an event in which these Salem Witches were up to their nipples), Mary was preceded and succeeded by Letitia Green Stevenson. Also, she was born in Salem, Indiana.

Mary was also the grandmother of the aforementioned John Foster Dulles (1888-1959). You may fondly recall Mary’s other grandson and his brother, Allen Dulles (1893-1969), for advancing classic American values with projects like the overthrow of Iran in 1953 and Guatemala in 1954, MKUltra, and the Bay of Pigs. (Let me also just sneak in here that their father was Allen Macy Dulles. No Macys were at the SWTs, but the sister coven of Salem was Nantucket, where Thomas Macy was a founder. Yes, the department store Macys.)

In deep appreciation of Allen’s efforts, and following his promise to “splinter the C.I.A. in a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds”, JFK fired Allen as CIA Director in 1961. Note that at the same time, JFK also fired Allen’s deputy, Charles Cabell, with whom this particular trip beyond the looking glass all began. Almost exactly two years later, JFK died suddenly.

John Fitzgerald Kennedy’s mother was Rose Kennedy. Getting weird, isn’t it?

We come now to the attempt on the life of Ronald Reagan. Wait, did it just now occur to you who was involved in that? Don’t worry, I didn’t make the connection either until today:

Jodie Foster is another “star” manufactured by the Illuminati, prototype of the MK-MOUSEKETEER (conspiracies.win 2/18/2024)

Really, you can see the proof of my last statement in that post: there’s no trace of any of this larger context. I only got as far as the negative, “There’s no way she was just some rando innocent bystander”. But I live and learn and now I’m showing you more of the picture as I discover it myself.

How about the “Rose”? You’re going to love this one. In my post, I finger the culprit as George Walker Bush. His wife was Barbara Bush, and recall that she was born Barbara Pierce. Now, you won’t find a Pierce on your list, but you will find a Peter Tufts Sr. (abt. 1617 - 1700). His wife was Mary Pierce. Oh, and Barbara’s Chief of Staff as First Lady of the United States was Susan Porter Rose. Susan was succeeded in that same office by Margaret Ann Williams. Real weird, right?

Maggie was thus in service to First Lady Hillary Clinton, and so we finally come to the assassination of Bill Clinton. Excuse me! I mean by Bill Clinton. Okay, fine, all I can say is that their place of residence, the White House, was the last place anyone saw Vincent Walker Foster Jr. alive. Note that Walker was the middle name of both 41 and 43, so we have a delightful bracket of murder going.

The water gets a bit deep here, but there are deep points about disinfo to be made. I had always simply thought—and I suspect you did too—that because Vince had been Hillary’s law partner, that was why he went to Washington with them as deputy White House counsel. That’s the popular understanding, isn’t it? Well it’s true, but it’s not the whole truth. Creating an incorrect or incomplete popular understanding is its own form of disinformation. You see, they had indeed been long-time law partners, but far more important was that:

Vincent was a childhood friend of Bill Clinton, then known as Billy Blythe. Clinton, a year and a half younger than Foster, resided in an adjoining property to Foster's with his grandparents while his mother was often away studying nursing.

It seems incredibly suspicious that Bill did not seem to have any interest whatsoever in the mysterious death of his close life-long friend. Should we also coin the new term “generational handler”? Hang on to that for a sec, because the going gets really rocky if you want to get to the truth:

The Monica Lewinsky Scandal was Faked (Miles Mathis 3/5/2016 25-page PDF)

There, Mathis concludes that the man we are told was born William Jefferson Blythe III is a sort of constructed Intel legend, and is actually the son of a military intelligence officer named Col. William Jackson Blythe Sr. (<- who obviously did have a son). Then, in a later paper about Seth Rich, Mathis (or, technically, a guest writer published by MM) reveals that the “real big secret” about Clinton is that he’s a member of the British Aristocracy.

Well, that was some bullshit and exactly where he tried to run his readers into the ditch. That’s how disinfo works and you always have to stay on your toes. On a little known social media site that Mathis frequented—and that I did also until I figured out it was full of people gullible enough to hang on his every word—a reader calls him out (gently) and Mathis and his acolytes get into an argument. You can read both the accurate story of Bill and the argument at: https://cuttingthroughthefogcom.wordpress.com/2018/11/09/current-events-discussion-thread/comment-page-16/#comment-28577

To round this out and finish it off, I hope you did not forget that Vince and Hillary worked together for many years at the Rose Law Firm. Super weird, right?

Bonus: Maybe you thought the link between Lincoln and “rose” was weak, so allow me to bolster that with a discussion of “Presidential” roses. You can mentally create the Venn diagram between the lists given in these two documents:

Roses Named For Famous People

List of United States presidential assassination attempts and plots

You have to subtract out the obvious BS psyops. My all-time favorite is the attempt on the life of the Jimmy Carter by Raymond Lee Harvey and Osvaldo Espinoza Ortiz. Priceless! Anyway, the overlap is surprising, and I think it provides something of a guide to interpreting history.

On my scorecard, only Coolidge and Eisenhower got roses without someone actually trying to kill them. As for Wilson and FDR, both had some fairly murky circumstances regarding the latter parts of their Presidencies, so this may be an “occult” confirmation that not all was as we were told with them, you see?

Each President got one rose, but there are four named after Lincoln. Hmm. One of those is the Souvenir du Président Lincoln:

Bred by the famous French rose breeders, Moreau-Robert, and named to honor our president upon his death in 1865....

I mean, that’s some pretty quick work, isn’t it? It seems particularly suspect when we read up on:

The Hidden Lincoln in French Opinion (American Studies Journal, Number 60, 2016):

Abraham Lincoln has never been very popular in France. No statue of Lincoln graces Paris, Lincoln Street is a small street near the Champs-Elysées, much smaller than Washington Street in the same neighborhood, both named in 1879…. Many great Americans have been hailed and celebrated in France, some for their links with France, others for their own greatness.

Fourteen years for a small street but he got that rose right away, didn’t he?

Double-bonus: This article on Presidential Plants features a photo of a species of Texas bluebonnet named after Lady Bird Johnson. To refresh your history, her husband Lyndon Baines Johnson became President after JFK lost his mind.

The fact that men named Johnson became President as a result of assassination is always included in any version of that conspiracy favorite, the Lincoln–Kennedy coincidences urban legend. You may now perhaps be of the view that not all those coincidences were coincidental. (Miles Mathis focuses on the evidence for the Johnsons being crypto-Jews, if you were wondering.)

Hope it was worth reading to the end of this very long one. In any case, thanks very much!

TL;DR: Hoyt Vandenberg was a key player in the America that came out of WW2, one that featured National Security Uber Alles and whose skies were filled with flying objects that the hyper-military somehow had to leave at “unidentified”. His background traces to fake witches, of course.

Foreword: this post doesn’t contain a lot of super-startling revelations, just a lot of regular-startling revelations. The point is more foundational. As it has turned out that we are rewriting the common and even conspiratorial understanding of history, we can’t just do that with sensational posts calling out jews and jesuits. I deeply apologize for the length, but I doubt anyone anywhere is ever going to light up Hoyt, so we have to cram it all in here….

The huge power structures built up during WW2 were going to be dismantled since Americans had been, up to that point, allergic to standing armies. Since it takes a lot of time and effort to engineer wars, They instead decided to fear-monger deadly danger lurking around every corner and underneath your bed. Also in the skies above! Were those saucers filled with little green men bent on our destruction? Reds? Chinks? Nazis? All bent on our destruction or interested in our b-holes?

The solution to that problem-reaction came in the form of the National Security Act of 1947. Among other blessings, it created the Central Intelligence Agency, of which you may have heard. The Vandenbergs were central to it. On that wiki page, you’ll find a photo of Hoyt standing behind Truman as he signs an amendment to it in 1949, and another photo of the last page of the original act signed by Arthur Vandenberg, President of the Senate and Hoyt’s father. We’ll get to him, too.

That particular year may seem familiar because of a certain purported crash, and we find the star of our show at the nexus of this aspect, too. Saucers are suddenly coming out of the woodwork and everyone is looking to the Air Force (also created by the NSA of 47) for answers. And guess who’s running it?

The National Security Act was quite controversial, as you can read in the wiki. Near the end of all the wrestling, they organized some “show hearings”, of which a couple of names caught my eye:

Major witnesses of the bill who spoke in support were… Director of Central Intelligence Hoyt S. Vandenberg, … and president of General Electric Co. Charles E. Wilson.

Out of the list of heavy-hitters in the full quote, all are high-ranking politicians or military except the guy from GE. I have yet to write it up, but GE was stolen out from under Thomas Edison very quickly by “Them”. (If you want to do the research before I get there, look for a guy named Charles Coffin and realize he’s a descendant of one of the founders of Nantucket, the sister group of the Salem crew.)

And did you catch the mistake in Hoyt’s mention in the quote? I said that the NSA of 47 created the CIA, so Hoyt was not Director of an agency that did not exist, right? It turns out no, and triple brownie points if you caught this but knew it was not a mistake.

You see, the position of Director of Central Intelligence actually predates the existence of the agency created thereafter. Hoyt was not just in on the ground floor of the CIA, he was already lurking in the basement. That’s deep in at least two metaphorical senses.

Hoyt left that office on May 1, 1947. There’s no proving it, but I suspect that from that position, he had made what arrangements he needed to for the kickoff of the modern UFO phenomenon: Roswell, Kenneth Arnold, and Maury Island. I’m not saying the CIA or the OSS or whoever ran those gags, but he was situated there for any military/intelligence angle.

The whole UFO thing goes much deeper, as we have seen, are seeing, and will continue to see. I still have to write up Kenneth Arnold and Maury Island (where it leads to DB Cooper and the Space Shuttle Challenger, of all things), but we stomped all over Roswell here:

Broomstick Crash at Roswell: A shocking number of people involved in the “Incident” have the same last name as people involved in the Salem Witch Trials (conspiracies.win 12/6/2024)

NSA47 established the Air Force as a separate branch of the military, as mentioned, and if you read up on the controversy over that act, a lot of the opposition came from the military itself. As I see it, “They” needed to establish a separate base of power from which to operate. If you consult the conspiracy canon for polls about which branch of the military is most willing to shoot American citizens, the USAF always comes out on top. Now you know why.

On April 30, 1948, Hoyt takes over as Chief of Staff of that newly-created USAF. That was just in time for him to control the famous Air Force psyops of Project Sign, Project Grudge, and Project Blue Book. Blowing those up must wait for another post, but let me show you how they disguise his true role. From the wiki for Project Sign:

The project was established in 1948 by Air Force General Nathan Farragut Twining, head of the Air Technical Service Command, and was initially named Project SAUCER…. [two paragraphs later] Project Sign was first asserted in the 1956 book The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects by retired Air Force Captain Edward J. Ruppelt who later directed Project Blue Book. In this he also claimed that Sign had produced an "Estimate of the Situation" which endorsed an interplanetary explanation for UFOs, but General Hoyt Vandenberg, Chief of Staff of the Air Force, shut down Project Sign for lack of proof.

Hoyt called bullshit on UFOs, right? Four things they make hard to notice. One: Twining was Hoyt’s deputy (maybe they just never talked). Two: Hoyt was still running the Air Force when Blue Book started, so he green-lighted a third UFO project. Three: Ruppelt was retired when he wrote the book, but not when he took over Blue Book. Four: Ruppelt therefore worked for Vandenberg running Blue Book.

For all the foregoing, four-star General Hoyt Vandenberg (1899-1954) is never talked about these days. Having served his purpose, that is just how They like it. Some may find the name Vandenberg Space Force Base familiar as the home of all West Coast space launches. Conspiracy theorists like to talk about how suspicious they are of the creation of the United States Space Force in 2019, but I’d say they missed the action by over 70 years. It goes deeper, of course.

We’ve gone way long on the nuts and bolts of Hoyt’s life, things you might bring up in polite company, so I’ll try to be brief with the genealogical and “Salem Witches” material….

Both his parents were Dutch and there are some very heavy-hitting Dutch families in America. One example with links to others is the Livingston family. Personally, I don’t think he’s connected this way, but you never know and I include it for completeness.

Another tenuous lead is that his mother’s maiden name was Kane. The NYT-published “journalist” Leslie Kean spells her last name differently but pronounces it as “Kane”. It turns out that she is lurking just under the surface of this latest wave of UFO (pardon, UAP) bullshit, from AATIP to David Grusch. John Podesta wrote the foreword to one of her books. And yes, I checked it out and will write it up later, but her ancestry traces back to the Salem Witches. Suspicious enough for you?

Hoyt was born in American-as-apple-pie Milwaukee, but he was raised in Lowell, Massachusetts, which is right next door to—you got it—Essex County and Salem. Also, Milwaukee is just a half-hour north of Kenosha, and we just saw four days ago how suspicious Kenosha is in this post:

The link between Rittenhouse in Kenosha, Paddock in Vegas, and Witches in Salem is never discussed, extraordinarily unlikely, and highly illuminating (conspiracies.win 1/10/2025)

Can we really leave it as American-as-apple-pie or do we have to start asking “what part of Milwaukee?” No matter, because we hit overdrive with Hoyt’s father, the aforementioned Arthur Hendrick Vandenberg Sr. (1884-1951).

We’re handed a bunch of lies and suspicious circumstances concerning Hoyt’s family and early years. His mother died in 1917, which would be right when Hoyt was launching into a fabulous career. Elite sacrifice? You decide.

Wiki tells us regarding Arthur that, “As a widower with three small children, Vandenberg was ineligible for active military service during World War I.” Hoyt’s brother, Arthur Jr., would have been ten, which I suppose is small. As to his other sibling, no information whatsoever is available from Hoyt’s Geni page. I mean, they don’t even include Arty Jr. What’s going on?

It gets odder with Hoyt’s “teenage years”, which we are told were in Lowell. If you read Arty Sr.’s page, there is no mention he ever lived anywhere other than Grand Rapids, Michigan, aside from time spent in Washington as a senator. That’s all the way across a Great Lake from Milwaukee. But more importantly, how does Hoyt end up in Lowell? Is it too much to speculate that as a teen he was “given over” to some other group? Sounds outlandish but the water gets deeper.

The little I can find out about Hoyt’s “teenage years” is this: while Arty Sr. skates out of military service (lucky!), he’s a war-monger and his son attends a Hitlerjugend camp on steroids. These “Plattsburg Camps” have generally been written out of the narrative. The “good guys” don’t do such things, do they? But since they love all things war, Hoyt’s involvement is acknowledged in this Department of Defense bio (4-page PDF). You can read about all this insanity here. It’s not mentioned on Hoyt’s wiki page, and you’ll be surprised the mainstream admits to it at all.

Hoyt’s camp was on Plum Island. That’s Plum Island, New York, to be specific, because there’s another Plum Island in Massachusetts. Yes, that’s the suspicious one you’re familiar with, but moreover it’s 14 miles north of Salem, separated from the mainland by the Parker River. (I bolded that so you can start checking your list of people of the Salem witch trials.) Is the name coincidence? You decide,

Virtually all of Arty Sr.’s working career (i.e. not as a US Senator) was spent “as a newspaper editor and publisher at the Grand Rapids Herald. It was owned by William Alden Smith.” Smith chaired the Senate committee on the Titanic, and you can begin to learn about all the fakery of that “hoax of the century” where:

We expose the latest news on the (fake) sinking of the Titan submersible, and find a bonus reference that leads immediately to a monstrous killer, the founding of the British Empire, and pedophilia (surprise!) (conspiracies.win 9/27/2024)

I didn’t even bother checking the genealogy, but in addition to the SWT connection, John and Priscilla Alden were two famous passengers aboard the Mayflower in 1620. Surprise again! But maybe not, because we lit up some of their shipmates in this post:

A “Cabell” runs through the JFK assassination to UFOs to Thomas Jefferson to the Mueller investigation to the Mayflower and beyond (conspiracies.win 11/26/2024)

Finally, I wonder if anyone remembers my claim that “They” had eventually set up various strongholds outside of Salem, like Denver and Kenosha? I’m adding Alden, Michigan to that list of “Spooky Places”. Want to know why?

Alden was first settled as early a 1868 by storekeeper F. J. Lewis in Helena Township…. The growing community was located along the mouth of Spencer Creek along Torch Lake, which was named after John Spencer. Spencer Creek was renamed Alden after railroad official William Alden Smith, who would later become a state politician.

Bonus: Hoyt had a son, which you might have guessed from his name alone: Major General (ret) Hoyt S. Vandenberg Jr.. There’s a whole section in his wiki titled, “Meeting Charles Lindbergh”, as if it was the most interesting thing he’d ever done. Personally, I think They included it to flog another old hoax to us once again:

Lucky Lindy? (Miles Mathis 2/23/2016 34-page PDF and yes, Mathis, disinfo caveat etc etc.)

Not-a-bonus: Wiki admits that Arty Sr. was a Mason. Do you really think the “hE’s A mAsOn!” type of research is at all important at this level?

Can’t believe you made it all the way! Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: Paddock Lake is just to the west of Kenosha, and is named after a relative of Stephen Paddock. Going back further, his ancestors intermarried with prominent families from the Salem Witch Trials. If you think this is merely wild coincidence, stop reading now.

WARNING: It will take a good bit to explain that this is no coincidence at all. This is an extra-long post, but includes three bonuses.

I have to do something I resist doing, which is to give you the answer up front. Some will bolt up from their chair at the defense table to object that this is “leading the witness!” or some such. In this case, the evidence is faint and unfamiliar. I have to show you the top of the puzzle box then explain to you where these strange little pieces of colored cardboard fit into the picture.

Further complicating the situation is the sheer weight of the bullshit narratives that have been purposely fed into the conspir-o-sphere regarding both the Kenosha and Vegas events. Whatever you now believe happened, you’re going to have to set it aside temporarily or we’ll get nowhere with this material. When you finish reading, don’t worry because you’re free to pick it back up as if none of this exists. And no, we’re not here to argue the particulars of any aspect of any of these events.

To make sense of it all, though, the big picture (for us, for now) begins four centuries ago. These Dark Occultists came over in a big wave, embedded in the Puritan Great Migration of 1620-1640. They set up shop in Nantucket and Salem, Massachusetts. Now you know why the Witch Trials were in Salem. They stayed there until about the 1800’s, when some moved out to set up additional strongholds. It turns out that Kenosha was among them, and Denver was another as we have seen in previous posts. All along, though, They have used family members to conduct their various historical shenanigans.

So what happened at these events? Vegas and the Salem Witch Trials are easy: nothing. I mean, if the odd corpse of an inconvenient person was thrown into the mix, who would know the difference? If you objected, well, there would just be the additional odd corpse of an “unfortunate victim”. Kenosha is more complex. To start us off, here’s what I wrote up over three years ago:

There was a conspiracy to murder Kyle Rittenhouse that night, and Joshua Ziminski was involved. If you don’t agree, at least tell me which Joshua Ziminski was not involved. (r/conspiracy_commons 11/21/2021)

Let’s see, 2.6K views of a long, complex post on a highly controversial topic yielding 8 upvotes. Can you say “shadowbanned”? Do They typically bother shadowbanning a load of off-target bullshit? The vital upshot from that night was this: it was a broken play.

The point of the op was to shut down the “Rooftop Korean” phenomenon, which came to prominence during the Rodney King riots. They would smoke one of these 2A types and then run the false dialectic something like this: “white supremacists freely try to murder black trans jews in the streets but thank goddess do not succeed” versus “any fuckwit who tries to defend himself will get killed and no one will get punished and you probably deserved it”. In essence, choose freely and you will be wrong in every case.

Kyle—young, pale, doughy, nerdy Kyle—was selected that night as the easy mark. Turns out he was cool under extreme pressure and good with an AR, so the plan got fucked. They tried to recover, though, and it all ended up in court. It sounds like I’m arguing the particulars of the Rittenhouse case, but this is all just context for the peek behind the curtain.

Go back and look at that Reddit post. Are you going to try to tell me his defense counsel, or any law enforcement personnel, or the judicial system, or anyone in the local press could not figure that out like I did? Forget it. What that means is that all those levers were controlled at least to such extent as to keep all the metric ton of bullshit between the lines. In short, Kyle was an arbitrary choice, but Kenosha was crucial. It is revealed as one of “Their” strongholds.

BTW, I didn’t figure it out in that order if you were thinking I was some sort of Sherlock. No, I was looking up something about the Rittenhouse incident and it dawned on me I didn’t really know where Kenosha was (see, not a Sherlock). I opened up Google Maps and—as a habit I recommend to other researchers—instead of using the search I tried to scroll and zoom and enhance my way there. When I did that, I noticed Paddock Lake, Wisconsin right next door to Kenosha. Well, here we fucking go.

I won’t even get into it, but Kenosha was the home of American Motors Corporation. I touched on it briefly in my “Flint water crisis” post, but They run both Flint and General Motors to this day. And Dodge. See the theme? AMC ended up being run by George W. Romney, the father of Mitt. The Romneys came up in my “Billy the Kid” post. Shit, it gets tiresome even linking to my own work, but I think you get the point.

Wiki tells us that the lake was named after Dr. Francis Paddock (1814-1889). I mentioned that “They” began moving out of their fastnesses in the northeast in the 1800’s and here we have an example. But maybe I’m getting overexcited and this is just some dude named Paddock, right?

He and his family settled between two lakes now known as Paddock and Hooker Lakes in the town of Salem in Kenosha County, Wisconsin (now the village of Salem Lakes, Wisconsin).

(By the by, we are also told that Salem Lakes was “formerly the town of Salem and the village of Silver Lake”. I stopped writing about the subject because it got too detailed and esoteric, but my work on the Black Dahlia eventually led to the reservoir in Los Angeles featured in the movie Under the Silver Lake. We aren’t done and this shit actually gets disturbing after a while.)

Buckle up for (or skip) this next genealogical nitty-gritty. The Geni record for Dr. Francis is: Francis Paddock. That’s a total brick wall. I include it so that you will note it’s a total brick wall, but the interesting fact is that this was “Last Updated: September 24, 2023". Isn’t that weird? This supposed rando died a century and a half ago. What more is there to say about him in 2023? I want you to notice the same brick wall in Doc’s Wikitree record: Francis Paddock (1814 - 1889). “Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]”. Well, that’s the end of that. Except it isn’t. Wiki itself tells us:

The eldest member of the group, David Paddock, Francis's grandfather, was a Revolutionary War veteran and died shortly after the trip. He was called 'Blind David' because he was blinded from powder burn injuries he sustained during the war.

A plain fact the genealogical sites somehow do not know about? My point here is that history is easily erased. But we use what we find, when and where we find it, and discover that “Blind David” was undoubtedly this man: Pvt. David Paddock (1753-1847).

Keep driving back in time through the “Son of” link, and you’ll arrive at man known as “Robert Paddock of the Plymouth Colony”. One item you might note while there is that his first wife was born Mary Ball. That is exactly the same name as the wife of George Washington. I have never followed up as to whether they were related, but we should start a pool.

Now let’s go back to the Before Times of 2017, when we all became acquainted with the bullshit narratives about Stephen Craig Paddock (1953-2017) (<-- haha, he didn’t actually die in 2017!). Again, keep driving up through the “Son of” link. (Funny, but on the way you’ll see he has an ancestor named George Washington Paddock (1819-1901). Also, Mary Ball Washington’s father’s first wife was born Elizabeth Romney, so my speculation isn’t totally off the wall, is it? Anywho….) You’ll once again end up at Robert Paddock of the Plymouth Colony. Seems bizarre that it’s this easy when it’s pointed out to you, doesn’t it?

Okay, okay, so how about those witches, huh? Well, if you wander around the Paddock (also infrequently listed as “Paddack”, so be aware) genealogy, you’ll find this prime example: Stephen Paddack (1729-1814). (See what I said about the alternate spelling? It got dropped way back when, though.)

Get out your handy list of people of the Salem witch trials. Stephen’s son Ichabod married Priscilla Clark. Priscilla was the daughter of Deborah Brown (who was born a Bunker, which I’ll tell you about in a sec). His mother’s second husband was Susannah Folger. (Bethshua Folger, a primary witness at the trials, and was the aunt of Benjamin Franklin, which I’ll tell you about in a sec.) Some female Paddock’s husband or son or whatever could have personally been at the fake trials for all I know, but I think you’re getting the picture.

Stephen just happened to be more Nantucket-based, actually. So if you get out your handy list of Nantucket settlers, you may find it interesting that Stephen’s sister was Elizabeth Swain, his niece was Elizabeth Coleman, and his wife was Eunice Coffin. Feel free to wander around these genealogies, which are like a sink drain with a hair clog of Elite bloodlines.

Bonus (speaking of witches): In Macbeth, who are Greymalkin and Paddock?

In Macbeth, Greymalkin and Paddock are the familiars of the witches, serving as their demonic assistants.

Whoa, on the nose, huh? Now, I’m not just going to leave you with, “Oh look, mention of someone named pAdDoCk!!!” Of course not, my frens. There is more.

We are told that Macbeth was written by Shakespeare, of course, but who knows who really put quill to parchment, so to speak. Yet I can definitely tell you that next to the Library of Congress, kitty-corner from the Supreme Court, and a block from the grounds of the United Stated Capitol sits the Folger Shakespeare Library. Getting the sense that a lot has been going on under our noses all these centuries?

Double-bonus: Remember in this post I mentioned the Black Dahlia and Silver Lake? That reservoir is just south of the Franklin Hills neighborhood. The murder itself is suspected to have taken place at a certain famous house on Franklin Avenue, at the end of which, as the entrance to Franklin Hills, sits the Shakespeare Bridge.

Third bonus: Did you notice the list of Nantucket settlers included the name Robert Pike? Yep, he’s a direct ancestor of Albert Pike. I’ll light up that fat jackass in a future post.

If you ain’t spooked, I don’t think you can be spooked. You are also now free to return to exactly what you previously believed concerning Rittenhouse in Kenosha, Paddock in Vegas, and Witches in Salem.

In any case, thanks for reading!

TL;DR: LAPD Chief William Parker, of the family of generational Satanists and the larger collection of families of Spook Elites, appears to have been involved in faking the deaths of Marilyn Monroe, Robert F. Kennedy, and himself.

Because there is so much material to cover, we have to be brief and to the point. That is, the focus is on Chief Parker, expanding on his involvement in these famous cases. If you have trouble believing that the deaths of Marilyn and RFK were faked, you better just hit eject now because we do not have space to discuss it and we aren’t here to argue it. Alternatively, even if this is the first you’ve heard of the claim about the fake deaths but you allow that it may be possible, then I’ll bootstrap you and you can read on to add all this Parker stuff to the cases.

There are two vital “meta-points” to this post, both involving disinformation. One concerns that highest-level disinformation agent out there, Miles Mathis (although “MM” may actually be a writing team). In none of his work—which is incredibly extensive—does he ever mention Chief Parker, and certainly not as a bloodline Satanist. So if, while reading this post, you find it of probative value in your search for the truth, you have a practical example of high-level disinfo at work.

The other meta-point concerns the standard-issue disinformation comprising a goodly fraction of “conspiracy theory”. That is, you’ll see some examples here, but there are innumerable other “conspiracies” regarding these two and their deaths, everything from JFK and RFK tag-teaming Marilyn, to aliens, to Israel, to the mob, etc, etc. The same holds for the whole of the conspir-o-sphere.

Nowhere do any “conspiracy theorists” (excluding Mathis, and we have just discussed that he is high-level) suggest the deaths were faked. Pick any or all of the juicy conspiracies you’re handed because they’re all wrong. See how that works? We’ll draw from their work because they have to give you some truths—here regarding Chief Parker—as bait for their lies. We’ll see how that works too.

To begin, the big premises of this post are the fake deaths. Parker’s they don’t even want to talk about: he dropped dead at an awards ceremony and that’s that. Miles Mathis wrote a paper documenting Marilyn’s (again, never mentioning any Parker):

Marilyn Monroe's Death was faked (8/18/2015 12-page PDF)

As to RFK, he claimed it briefly and tangentially in his paper on Charlie Manson but never documented it:

The Tate Murders were a False Flag (6/29/2014 95-page PDF)

[Abigail Folger] had worked on Robert Kennedy's campaign in 1968, and, as you will remember, he was also killed in very mysterious circumstances. His death was filmed, the wounds and gunshots never matched, the photos were faked, the “murderer” was a patsy, and we saw no body.

Since we’re talking the finer points of disinfo, it’s worth noting that Mathis made no such claim in his lengthy landmark paper over six years earlier:

The Hidden Kings: Camelot ruled from the cave of Merlin (December 2007 86-page PDF)

BTW, that paper was his big entrée into conspiracy, where he claims the JFK assassination was faked. It was not, but we aren’t here to debate that either. Do note, though, that in the Tate paper he never remarks, “Hey, I thought it was legit before, but it turns out the RFK assassination was faked.” That’s because you aren’t witnessing an increase in knowledge and the evolution of a consciousness. We were all being fed truth mixed with bullshit all along. Do you see?

Now, as far as documenting the fake assassination of RFK, the only person in the world ever to have done that appears to be… yours truly. Hard to believe but there we have it. If you’re interested in the details, you can find comments trying to expose this under my same username in these two social media posts:

Why was JFK killed and by who? Obviously wasn’t the patsy Oswald? Also, why was Bobby killed? (r/conspiracy 6/25/2022)

Deleted Reddit Thread Outlines Interesting Details on 1968 RFK Assassination (conspiracies.win 8/25/2024)

I link you to that information in its “native” context so you can also observe the gullibility and disinfo being spread around social media channels on a daily basis. It does not make for optimism.

Now, if this is your first contact with what a scumbag Chief Parker was, or as a refresher on some small part of the huge context in which he sits:

Ever feel like “To protect and serve” was a big joke? It is! We discuss that and other occultism at the LAPD, featuring Chief William H. Parker, a generational Satanist. (conspiracies.win 10/2/2024)

As to the next two links, I had thought that someone once said something like, “There is no one better to promote a lie than someone who actually believes it.” I can find no source, so who knows or cares, but here we have people who I believe have swallowed the disinfo and are trying their best to make sense of it and trying their best to pass it on:

THE MURDER OF MARILYN MONROE

When he arrived, Sergeant Clemmons was supposed to secure the crime scene, and have Marilyn's body transported to the county morgue for an autopsy. Instead, he allowed her body to be picked up by 2 morticians. Sergeant Clemmons' boss was the notoriously corrupt LAPD Chief of Police named Captain William Parker…. As chief, Parker was supposed to ensure that Marilyn's remains were removed to the county morgue for an autopsy.

The Death of Marilyn Monroe (9/20/2020)

Sergeant Clemmons’s superior officer (Chief Parker) insisted that the case be investigated as a suicide. Clemmons was told to keep quiet. When he refused he was dropped from the force.

For such a big conspiracy to work would require many officials in the corridors of power to be working together to play down the drama and hope that the public would get bored. Some of the officials often named, all friends of the Kennedys, include Police Chief William Parker, Captain James Hamilton, Coroner Theodore Curphey, Chief Daryl Gates, John Van Kamp, and Ira Reiner.

(NB: Much more to say about Gates and Hamilton at a future date.)

God bless these people, but see how it all implicitly excludes the possibility of her death being faked? I beg you to please resist the impulse to become a crusader. That will do little except obscure your view and corrupt your search for the truth, assuming that’s what you’re after.

Now allow me to frame the next set of links which—at long last—form the heart of this post. They’re desperately trying to sell you some dumb crazy bullshit about Marilyn and Bobby and JFK—anything you’ll swallow—but they give up info about the central role of Chief Parker in these “events”.

Also note the “historiography” of disinformation. The first one is not contemporaneous but almost a quarter-century after the fact. That’s because they were making it up at that time, you see? Also, it continues to this very day. That’s sure and disturbing proof that “They” are still actively polluting our timeline and distorting our reality. Here we go:

THE MAN WHO KEPT MARILYN'S SECRETS (Vanity Fair, May 1991)

"I do know that Bobby Kennedy was in town that day. He was staying at the Beverly Hilton Hotel. This was all told to me by the police chief, [William] Parker. He was very adamant that Kennedy was seen at the hotel the night of Marilyn's death."

According to L.A. Police Chief William Parker, Kennedy was seen at the Beverly Hilton Hotel on Saturday night, so he did not return to San Francisco immediately after he left Marilyn's house that afternoon.

Bombshell: Sixty Years After Her Death, New Evidence Suggests Marilyn Monroe Was Murdered and LAPD Covered Up Murder (Covert Action Magazine 8/4/2022( (<-- a high-level disnfo outlet IMHO)

Robert Kennedy was particularly close to LAPD chief William Parker, whom he considered the best police chief in the nation….

A week later, Captain James Hamilton told Clemmons to sign a report he had prepared about Marilyn’s death. Clemmons refused, but later learned that his signature was forged under the orders of Chief Parker.

Just after Marilyn’s death, Parker, who had ambitions of replacing J. Edgar Hoover as FBI chief, was the one to confiscate her phone records.

Hollywood icon [Shirley MacLaine] reveals she saw filthy bedroom encounter between Kennedys and Marilyn Monroe on JFK's birthday: Monroe had sex with Bobby Kennedy 30 minutes before she sang 'Happy Birthday' to his brother JFK (Daily Mail 11/2/2024)

Shirley MacLaine had an open marriage with producer and alleged spy Steve Parker for 28 years - who she described as the love of her life.

If I haven’t made my case by now, I never will. But let me throw in this bonus from a week after that last article….

Bonus: Marilyn Monroe has been 'haunting' a famous Hollywood hotel since she died tragically at age 36 (Daily Mail 11/9/2024)

Okay, beyond MFMs, we get ghosts. Jesus H. Christ. But did you notice the byline? Heidi Parker.

You cannot make this shit up.

TL;DR: Evidence strongly points towards Trey Parker being a member of one of a number of families of generational Satanists who have been running psyops and influencing history from just outside the spotlight for many centuries.

This is another example of how associations can be right in front of our faces, yet we never see them. I’ve known Trey Parker’s name for over 25 years, and I daresay I’ve written more than anyone in the world (at least publicly) on the Parker family of Satanists, yet it only now occurred to me that he may be one of them.

You have already concluded by this instant that he is one of them, of course, or I wouldn’t have written this and you wouldn’t be reading it. However, reflect honestly for a moment and understand that—even for readers of these posts—it never occurred to you either. The important lesson is to try to cut some slack for your normie friends and family who don’t already see what you already see.

I suppose we should start with the subconscious assumption we’ve had all along (and that normies have about everything): to the extent that we thought about it at all, Trey Parker and Matt Stone were just a couple of rando drunken college buddy creative bros that put together a low-brow, vulgar cartoon that caught the zeitgeist just right and became a runaway success. If there was anything more to the story, someone would have told us, right?

No, of course not. That’s not how the world works at all. It’s rare that you ever get more to the story, but that’s what I’m here to offer to you. It begins right at the top of his wiki page, where we find out his name is really Randolph Severn Parker III. The "Trey" comes from him being the third in a row of that fancy name. Being the third of a fancy name—especially here, where we’re on the trail of people obsessed with bloodlines—doesn’t suggest any kind of random bro, does it?

And we’re off to the races except that we come to a screeching halt. There are no genealogical records that I can locate on Trey. Sus, to be sure, but I think by the end of this you won’t feel you’ll need it for confirmation. First—and with a link containing much more context—we should recall that another Parker was previously all over our TV screens on a weekly basis:

Jameson Parker, star of the hit 80’s crime drama “Simon & Simon”, was truly the unseen Parker (plus further confirmation on Sean and Robbie and a note about psychopaths) (conspiracies.win 12/2/2024)

I guess my title stands, given that Jameson was in front of the cameras while Trey works behind the scenes. But still, as a cultural force, I think few would disagree that Simon & Simon was entirely innocuous, while South Park has upped (downed?) the level of cultural degradation a notch or two. Not objectionable to Satanists of any stripe, do you think?

While you’re at that link, you can find discussion of a telling uniformity of hair color of certain Parkers, a distinctive medium-dark reddish-brown. How about Trey? There’s a profile pic on his wiki page, but this pic might be a better one by which to judge. Actually, I’ve started to notice something about eye color too, and we’ll come back to that in the bonus. As for judging similarity, you might think about yourself as compared to your first cousins who might even share your surname. And here I’ve found a bunch of Parkers with similar hair, which doesn’t seem like it would be at all easy to find or manufacture.

On the same note of “not easy to manufacture”, Trey and the Parkers sit in a much larger context, a bit of which is discussed here:

It’s a (very) Small World 3x3: 3 Elite Families working together in 3 locations (and no one ever noticed) (conspiracies.win 3/31/2024)

Reading that, fans of South Park might already have thought, “Hey, Trey Parker is actually from Colorado!” Indeed. And not just from Colorado, but from near Denver, which that post takes as one of the three locations. Specifically, Trey was born and grew up just to the southwest of Denver, in what I am sure is lovely Conifer, Colorado. He attended school just 15 minutes north up the mountain highway and graduated from Evergreen High School (Colorado) in 1988. Hmmm, “evergreen”… that word sounds strangely familiar….

Exposing the Dark World: There’s something very strange about “Evergreen” (conspiracies.win 2/20/2024)

Speaking of high school, Trey’s partner (handler?), Matt Stone, was raised in the nearby Denver suburb of Littleton, Colorado. Ring a bell? Had the town’s most notorious event been called the “Littleton High IRL FPS in Honor of Hitler’s Birthday”, we might recognize Matt’s alma mater, but it has the far-less-market-savvy handle of the “Columbine High School massacre”. Boring name.

I note that Matt Stone “is of Irish-American heritage from his father's side and Jewish heritage from his mother's side. The South Park characters Gerald and Sheila Broflovski were named after them.” If anyone out there thinks they’re always going to find a Jew behind everything, I’ve pointed him out to you. However, I think others will recognize that if we’re always just looking for Joos, we’re going to miss quite a lot. And that’s the point.

Another key collab by Trey and Matt is the 2011 musical, The Book of Mormon. I suppose you could accept that their motivation was to take down organized religion a notch by exposing their silliness and control, or perhaps it was that Trey was once dumped by a Mormon girl and wanted some payback on her entire faith or some such thing. Sure, believe whatever you like, but be aware that there is a far deeper connection between the Parkers and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints:

Billy the Kid was the cousin of two Mormon OGs that overthrew Joseph Smith and the LDS, which should tell you one was fake and the other controlled from way back (plus the Parkers appear!) (conspiracies.win 11/12/2024)

Finally, speaking of artistic inspiration, we should talk about Trey’s directorial debut in a work that predates South Park: 1993’s Cannibal! The Musical. I mean, it’s just that Satanists are consistently rumored to practice cannibalism, so… weird.

But you know, it’s not just the subject matter and that Trey was trying to get attention as an outrageous edgelord. The musical is based on a true story. Gross. Also, you can read that the title was originally Alfred Packer: The Musical. “Packer”? Um, that’s really, really close to “Parker”, isn’t it? Maybe someone decided this musical “based on a true story about a guy almost named Parker” was a little too based on a true story and changed the name. Anyway, makes you wonder, doesn’t it?

Bonus: I know that few out there are aware but there’s this thing called pornography. It’s been around forever, but it hit ultra-overdrive in the late 1970’s with the introduction of what we used to call “videocassette recorders”, kids. Welp, that was exactly when porn actress Kay Parker was also introduced to us. Take a look at her hair and eye color. (Yes, that’s similar to her hair color as a younger woman, but don’t go looking up any pictures of that.)

Double-bonus: There was a villain in The Vampire Diaries called Kai Parker. He was not named after the pornographic actress we just talked about, if that’s what you were thinking. Turns out that “Kai” is short for Malachai.

Not to get nerdy but I have to get nerdy: the name “Malachai” is a vowelization of the Hebrew word root “m-l-k”. You will find many variations on that vowelization, from “Moloch” to “Milchcom”. The word root means something like “king”, which is a generic title.

Now, you may choose to take my take my word in place of a very long case, but I have only ever found that word historically to refer to the entity typically called Satan. I can’t even begin to describe the hurricane of misunderstanding and disinformation surrounding all this, but the point is that here we have it attached to a Parker. Mere happenstance, perhaps.