Fake war coverage and war propaganda, but maybe hard to call it a fake war, even if scripted.

I'm usually never a fan of anything but the cold truth, but if some of this propaganda raises the morale of the UA people, then I think it's worth it.

I have friends there and I saw how the ghost of Kyiv gives them hope. While I often say hope is evil, in situations of being powerless, hope maybe be the only light. These types of stories provide optimism, not false hope.

If they need to believe that Zelensky is riding around on a horse like braveheart, I'm willing to photoshop it.

Pray for the people of ukraine. They are not politicians, they are not nazis, they are people like any other that wish to live, eat good food, find love and have a laugh.

For too long on this planet have poor people been pawns of the banks and politics. 99.999% of people want peace.

What would you want to have if you were stranded on a desert island?

I bet gold doesn't make the first 1000 items.

The things you'd want to have are the only things of real value.

Unless a currency is pegged to something necessary for survival, its just an arbitrarily agreed upon token for the sake of convenience.

I don't have a copy, but be prepared for "People of color don't have the privilege to not identify with race."

What do they mean chip shortage? Are we out of silicon wafers? Like there isn't a singular thing called a 'chip'

Thanks for elaborating on your thoughts.

No, pointing out that neither party is good is way better than saying 'democrats are fascists.'

You don't want to promote an XY problem. We want to inspire people to start down paths with actually have a chance at improving things.

Axo, you've been around long enough to see that when one party is in power they push the agenda in one direction as far as they can, until the other party takes over for and they push the agenda on the other front.

They use this reactionary swing of overcorrection to push agendas which scale over the decades well beyond either party's majority position.

This is one of the dumbest things I've seen you post.

What do you mean? The US helped fund it.

Why are you all giving that site traffic?

If you're going to promote your own articles, at least write good ones.

Yes, what I described is my opinion on what us really happening, opposed to the 'dead internet theory.'

Could be, i was too lazy to verify.

There's definitely a lot of bots online, but I think it's more of the 'standard practice of online marketing.'

When it comes to spreading propaganda, and trying to push a consensus, I sadly believe that fewer fake accounts are needed to push herd mentality than one might think.

No worries, this is one of the most commonly overlooked things in the conspiracy realm.

The Smith-mundt Act never actually forbade propaganda being used on the american people. It only forbade showing propaganda intended for a foreign audience to a domestic audience.

So as long as americans were the intended audience for the propaganda it was never illegal.

Propaganda should never be condoned, even when directed at 'your enemy.'

"If the average person understood how the banking system worked, there would be a revolution by the morning" - Henry Ford (IIRC)

People need to actually understand that some people on this earth have given themselves the power to create value (fiat currency) from literally nothing. They then charge us interest on this thing that only they can create.

It's mathematically impossible, in the central banking system, for anything other than the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer to happen. The only way for one person to pay off debt, is to put someone else further into debt.

Imagine the worlds only shoemaker selling you a pair of shoes, but only taking shoes as payment...

You either steal your neighbors shoes to payoff the shoemaker, or else he'll seize your house.

It's pretty much just fanfiction for what has painfully obvious and always known: shit gets worse over time until it collapses. The 'dead internet theory' is way more complex and exciting than the mundane truth of this reality.

When the internet was new, all content was original or at least a first occurrence on the net. Since 99.999% of people will never produce anything original, every new person online is just copying something, giving us worse and worse content as we makes copies of copies of copies...

And that's before the internet was even monetized. Once profits start motivating people online this amplifies infinitely. Now, people and companies with no actual desire to host content start creating websites seeking easy profits. And in come the low effort content creation tools and hosting, to allow everyone to quickly publish as much as possible, trying to strike gold.

And while the profit seeking continues in the background, the social media sites come along and turn the internet into a big popularity contest. Now people are doing something even more toxic than just looking for profits, they're hoping to be cool, hoping for personal validation from the masses online. The copy of a copy effect still in full swing.

Add to this the monetization of social media. We now have real people acting like fake people, fake people acting like real people, and fake people acting like fake people trying to trick real people to act like fake people, etc.

I could go on but I'm sure you already get the idea.

I'm not denying that the alphabet groups and corporations heavily manipulate and censor the internet, but in regards to this 'dead internet theory", we'd be stuck with this shitty internet without any help from them.

The only hope there is for the internet is for some brave souls to actually create some original content, or even better create a new medium. With the creation of original forms of content we can reset the chain of making copies of copies, if only for a little while.

This isn't visual proof, but research how Crispr works.

If viruses aren't real whatsoever, we'd have to come up with another explanation of how crispr works. It's tangible evidence that something exists and we know how to utilize it to alter DNA.

There's a better version of this or a similar map somewhere. It's a map of all of the entrances to the underground as told in native myths and folklore, compared to locations of US military bases.

I believe I came across it reading about Mt. Shasta.

Not trying to swing any dicks around, you called me a misguided fan, or an agent.

Your sources don't say what you think they do.

I'm aware of all of this, and none of this contradicts what I've said.

If you're going to call anyone who did psychedelic drugs in the 60 an agent then sure they're all agents. No one denies that all of the psychedelics stemmed from MKUltra research. Things aren't so black and white though.

The narrative of Ken Kesey getting all the kids too busy with LSD to protest the war simply isn't true, and is counter to what Ken Kesey actually said and did. Tim Leary fits that bill though; turn on, tune in, drop out.

Youre either a misguided fan or an entry level spook in training. Which is it?

I'm just someone who looks at things in much finer detail than you do currently. I've been studying MKUltra, counterculture and 'conspiracies' since the 90s.

Agree or disagree with me I don't really care. I only responded to you originally to try to inspire you to study more sources in finer detail. The original 'tavistock British mind control' website that all this info is based on had a lot of misinfo, assumptions, and guilt by tangential associations.

Very familiar with everything you mention.

Look at the timelines and origins of hippie culture in finer detail.

My only point is that Ken Kesey and the merry pranksters were not controlled assets. We all know that in 1960 kesey volunteered to be a lab rat trying various drugs in what we now know as MKultra. Maybe they knew he stole drugs, maybe they didnt, but it does not appear that kesey or the original pranksters were controlled. Quite the opposite.

Much of the hippie psyop was in response to what the pranksters were doing pre-1965, the acid tests and graduation being a culmination of their efforts.

If kesey was a controlled asset he wouldn't have had to flee to Mexico. He would have had the same immunities that Morrison, Manson, the dead, etc.

Unless it's changed in the last year, you can remove the whole box. There's instructions around online.

The Merry Pranksters were not really MK-Ultra/CIA, but the grateful dead most definitely ended up that way. You could argue that Ken Kesey was 'allowed' to steal the LSD and other drugs from the lab, but they definitely weren't 'in on it.'

The Merry Pranksters scared the shit out of the establishment, and the alphabet boys had to work overtime to co-opt the movement they inspired, which led to what people now know as hippies.

The acid test graduation was in '66 and the last semi-official acid test was in 67. The grateful dead got their start as the warlocks playing the acid tests, but weren't really doing a whole lot until after the pranksters more or less disbanded.

Kesey and most of the pranksters did not get along with other known cia assets like Timothy Leary down at millbrook. The pranksters also never received any of the special treatment that others like Manson received.

I admit that I'm a huge kesey fan, but if you read his works, listen to him, and read what others have said about him you'll see why there's no way he was working for/with any alphabets or those at he bohemian grove.

Kesey was one of the greatest americans to ever make a name for himself. A champion of free thinking, free speech, personal responsibility, anti-"government" etc.

Dick Scientist?